52 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

That's what it boils down to in most situations…

 

Thanks for sharing, I look forward to reading Stiddle's reply.

 

google Harvoni to see the "explanation"  of how the drug stops "the virus" .

 

If we don't call it a virus, does it matter ?   it is something .   and evidently is "killed"  by stopping the replication .   the replication... of what ?  

 

yes,  we will see the reply .    

1 hour ago, rumak said:

 

google Harvoni to see the "explanation"  of how the drug stops "the virus" .

 

If we don't call it a virus, does it matter ?   it is something .   and evidently is "killed"  by stopping the replication .   the replication... of what ?  

 

yes,  we will see the reply .    

 

I wasn't convinced by the 'viruses don't exist' theory for years, because I couldn't reconcile it with my lived experience.

 

Example:

 

When he was about five, my son caught what is commonly referred to as 'the flu' at school, and as he was very ill, we took him to the hospital, where the 'white coats' (to use a stiddlism) told us he had 'flu+pneumonia' and should spend the night there, so he did. During the night, I started developing 'flu symptoms' myself: chills, aches, no energy etc., so they tested me and told me, to my surprise, that I did not have the flu.
Their explanation was that the 'flu virus' had hopped from my son into my own airways and was attacking me, but hadn't infected me as my 'immune system' was fighting back and that was why I felt so terrible. I spent a whole day feeling like sh*t and in the evening, I felt better and we all merrily went back home. My wife did not have the slightest symptom, although she was with us all along and therefore just as exposed as I was.

 

Under the viral paradigm, this makes total sense: 'flu virus' is going around, kid catches it at school, gives it to people around him, and according to the effectiveness of their immune system, some people will be infected and others won't.

 

Under the 'viruses don't exist' and 'flu symptoms are cleansing mechanisms' paradigm, it didn't make sense to me at all: what were the chances of 'cleansing mechanisms' activating for two people within the same 12-hour time frame?

 

It is only when I started exploring Béchamp's terrain theory that I began to make sense of it: when there is 'something going around' ('flu' or call it whatever you want, let's say 'pathogen'), it will choose to nest in a terrain which is favourable to it: as Rudolf Virchow put it: “Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.”

This would indeed explain why you can have a group of 30 people, among which 15 will 'catch the flu' and 15 will not: the 15 who don't feel any symptoms have a clean terrain which doesn't encourage the pathogen to nest there.

 

So:

 

• Viral paradigm: the body is a fortress to be defended against 'viruses' – foreign elements which will attack any organism indiscriminately;

• Terrain paradigm: the body is an ecosystem which, if it remains clean and balanced, will not attract the 'pathogens' which can only thrive in an ailing environment.

 

It is worth noting that under the terrain paradigm, vaccination has no usefulness whatsoever. The terrain paradigm therefore precludes the existence of an industry generating 80 billion dollars per year.

43 minutes ago, rumak said:

google Harvoni to see the "explanation"  of how the drug stops "the virus" .

 

I did, the mechanism as it is explained does make sense indeed.

1 hour ago, GoodieAfterDark said:

 

Hmmm, so do you think that all those turbo cancers that are killing and causing havoc among the "vaccinated" just came from nowhere? it is the environment, too much sex, too much masturbation, and other "scientific" explanations coming  out daily are responsible for the turbo cancers.

 

'Turbo cancer' is 'not a medical term', Goodie, and therefore there is nothing to worry about. You need to learn to think like a Science™ aficionado.

2 hours ago, GoodieAfterDark said:

 

Hmmm, so do you think that all those turbo cancers that are killing and causing havoc among the "vaccinated" just came from nowhere? it is the environment, too much sex, too much masturbation, and other "scientific" explanations coming  out daily are responsible for the turbo cancers.

No, I think there are some remarkable MRNA based cancer drugs in testing. They might be useful to you at some point.

2 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

2 hours ago, rumak said:

google Harvoni to see the "explanation"  of how the drug stops "the virus" .

 

I did, the mechanism as it is explained does make sense indeed.

 

The hepatitis "virus"  is even broken down into genotypes :

 

A Hepatitis C (HCV) genotype is a distinct genetic strain or type of the Hepatitis C virus, with six main types (1-6) and further subtypes (e.g., 1a, 1b) existing globally, each with different prevalence and historically affecting treatment effectiveness, though modern antivirals can cure most genotypes, making genotype testing crucial for personalized antiviral choice and duration. 

What Genotypes Are

• Genetic Variations: Genotypes are genetic variations, like different "flavors" or strains, that have evolved within the HCV virus.
• Main Types: There are six major genotypes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), with subtypes like 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, etc..
• Geographic Spread: Certain genotypes are more common in specific regions (e.g., Genotype 1 in the US, Genotype 4 in Egypt, Genotype 3 in Asia). 

Hepatitis C (HCV) is still a major global health issue, with around 50 million people chronically infected worldwide

 

If gates and his bs "philanthropes"  had any iota of honesty .....they could wipe out HCV  within a year or two .  The antivirals are extremely effective and simple to take ( a pill a day for 60 days was all it took for Harvoni to work ,  and no side effects what so ever)

 

the test is simple.  the cure is simple .  and the cost is STILL extremely expensive : prices for a 12-week course still averaging around $90,000 to $110,000 without insurance. 

 

how about it Bill ...... surely a Bill.ion  bucks could just about wipe the disease out (it is not airborne, transfers only blood to blood),

 

crickets .................. from those "foundations"

3 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

'Turbo cancer' is 'not a medical term', Goodie, and therefore there is nothing to worry about. You need to learn to think like a Science™ aficionado.

Agree. Warpspeed cancer is better. 

6 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

Under the 'viruses don't exist' and 'flu symptoms are cleansing mechanisms' paradigm, it didn't make sense to me at all: what were the chances of 'cleansing mechanisms' activating for two people within the same 12-hour time frame?

 

In the ten years that Ms. Rumak and I have been together , neither she nor I have had a cold or anything resembling a "flu" .   EXCEPT  about 6 months ago when i stuck my face in an eye machine that hundreds of others had rested their chins on that day .   Two days later i was feeling weird, sinus and throat issues .  Not intense symptoms , but cause for concern.  One day of feeling like this, then second day back to normal .  Ms. rumak followed with symptoms just as mine were gone .   She has the "terrain"  of a buffalo on steroids .   The Poster Girl for natural immunity ,  having grown up walking in rice paddies behind a buffalo plow .   She remembers being sick...once .    So........ anyway,  i'd say our "terrain"  is doing pretty well, though mine has strengthened a lot in the last 2 or 3 years .  Alterations to diet have all but eliminated the seasonal allergies i used to have. 

Us both getting ill with the same symptoms  (as happens to children and their mothers constantly) is anacdotal enough for me to say ... call it a virus or call it a pathogen or call it fairy dust .... but something is transmittable between those in prolonged vicinity of each other.   However, a person's "terrain"... or what i might simply call "state of inner health"  ,  does dramatically determine how well they avoid or recover from a health issue.

2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I admit it. I had to look at a medical book to get myself up to speed on Hepatitis. And what do yer know, it was all about viruses.

 

"Because I don't subscribe to the 'virus theory', I look for other things."

 

Rumak :   I do not subscribe to being blind to any and all possiblities when I begin to research .   And try not to be completely locked in to one BIAS which will not enable me to form a personal decision on what road to take.

 

I don't know if all the "cleansing"  and do this and do that advice was directed solely at me ( i doubt it) .... but did find it a bit condescending .

 

Since there is absolutely no place in your beliefs that something that is referred to as a virus can exist.... well, what can i say.  (though referencing of all places the WHO  got a laugh out of me) .

 

The drug I took after many years of  first coming back from near death, to improving with a protocol that i put together ..... but not eliminating what i was convinced was a "virus" ...  was HARVONI .   Before that came along, many well-known stars and notables died from it or needed a liver transplant (David Crosby being one) .   Also ,Pamela Anderson contracted Hepatitis C in the late 1990s, reportedly from sharing a tattoo needle with ex-husband Tommy Lee, announcing her diagnosis in 2002. After living with the virus for years, she was cured in late 2015 using modern antiviral drugs like Sovaldi,

 

for reference to those interested :

 

Harvoni (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) is a combination direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medication that kills the hepatitis C virus (HCV) by blocking two specific proteins the virus needs to replicate and spread throughout the body. 

The two components work in distinct ways:

• Ledipasvir interferes with the NS5A protein, which the virus requires for replication and assembly of new viral particles.
• Sofosbuvir (which is converted to its active form in the body) inhibits a viral enzyme called NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. By incorporating itself into the virus's genetic material (RNA), it acts as a chain terminator, stopping the production of new viral RNA. 

By disrupting these two essential processes, Harvoni effectively halts the virus's ability to multiply. Over a course of treatment (typically 8 to 24 weeks), this action greatly reduces and eventually eliminates the virus from the body, achieving a "cure" in over 95% of patients. A patient is considered cured if the virus remains undetectable in the blood 12 weeks after treatment completion, a condition known as a sustained virological response (SVR). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

This is determined by blood tests that detect 'anti-bodies'* that correspond to one of the different hepatitis viruses. Although, since Kary Mullis; death, the PCR, as a diagnostic tool, is becoming more commonplace.

 

trying to educate oneself in a day , on a subject that is relatively unknown to someone searching  ........ is really not advised .   You are making the common mistake of searching and picking and searching and picking .... with a blindfold .    

the excerpt above is a good example .   A general blood test will find "anti-bodies "  for HCV when directed to do so (if present) .

If found,  the next test is for viral load .   This is a more specialized test and is extremely important to find the quantity in ones blood .  This is what determines the stage and seriousness of the infection.

 

*after the anti-viral drug is successful.... the viral load reading will report "undetectable"  .    However ,  any future blood test will still record HCV anti-bodies.     

5 minutes ago, rumak said:

 

"Because I don't subscribe to the 'virus theory', I look for other things."

 

Rumak :   I do not subscribe to being blind to any and all possiblities when I begin to research .   And try not to be completely locked in to one BIAS which will not enable me to form a personal decision on what road to take.

 

I don't know if all the "cleansing"  and do this and do that advice was directed solely at me ( i doubt it) .... but did find it a bit condescending .

 

Since there is absolutely no place in your beliefs that something that is referred to as a virus can exist.... well, what can i say.  (though referencing of all places the WHO  got a laugh out of me) .

 

The drug I took after many years of  first coming back from near death, to improving with a protocol that i put together ..... but not eliminating what i was convinced was a "virus" ...  was HARVONI .   Before that came along, many well-known stars and notables died from it or needed a liver transplant (David Crosby being one) .   Also ,Pamela Anderson contracted Hepatitis C in the late 1990s, reportedly from sharing a tattoo needle with ex-husband Tommy Lee, announcing her diagnosis in 2002. After living with the virus for years, she was cured in late 2015 using modern antiviral drugs like Sovaldi,

 

for reference to those interested :

 

Harvoni (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) is a combination direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medication that kills the hepatitis C virus (HCV) by blocking two specific proteins the virus needs to replicate and spread throughout the body. 

The two components work in distinct ways:

• Ledipasvir interferes with the NS5A protein, which the virus requires for replication and assembly of new viral particles.
• Sofosbuvir (which is converted to its active form in the body) inhibits a viral enzyme called NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. By incorporating itself into the virus's genetic material (RNA), it acts as a chain terminator, stopping the production of new viral RNA. 

By disrupting these two essential processes, Harvoni effectively halts the virus's ability to multiply. Over a course of treatment (typically 8 to 24 weeks), this action greatly reduces and eventually eliminates the virus from the body, achieving a "cure" in over 95% of patients. A patient is considered cured if the virus remains undetectable in the blood 12 weeks after treatment completion, a condition known as a sustained virological response (SVR). 

 

From my early days of being interested in physiology, I have been a stickler for the facts. Is it true? Or! Is it conveniently made up, and camouflaged to be the truth. Because my aims, in those early times.1970/80s, was to progress in sport. To achieve that, one has to ask questions. One is constantly looking for a better way. Eating more nutritious food. Understanding body rhythms. Examining the science behind training programmes. I have changed my mind considerably in the last few decades. So, I can, and do, alter my opinions, if the evidence is compelling.

 

I first came interested in viruses during the AIDS era. What was being promoted as science simply didn't make sense to me. As a physiologist, I knew that the body adapted to stimuli. That the body would adapt to stress. I couldn't buy into the germ/virus theory that was being promoted. I knew it was all constructed by wealthy people to make more money. And to this day it remains the same.

 

I didn't harp on about 'Harvoni' at all. Not because i doubted you Sir, when you said it virtually brought you back to normality, but - as I dimly referred to drugs ending in ',,,vir.' - it is an anti-viral. And in my book; there is no such thing. 

 

Understanding what is the root cause of a medical problem, is not always easy in a snapshot of time. All illnesses have root causes. Have to excuse me for being a tad vague on this; but we all have a health story. A medical history; sometimes we regret stuff. I know I do. I've come through it unscathed; touch wood. Unlike some friends of yesteryear.

 

It is very easy, and convenient, and profitable, to say that Hepatitis is caused by viruses. And it is on this, where I make my stand. This is where 'facts' and the 'truth' come into play. There has not been a Hepatitis virus actually found. If  I'm wrong, then my position would change.

 

My post on Hepatitis was a general view, that some poor soul could take - if he/she was 'diagnosed' with the complaint - and didn't want to go down the Big Pharma route.

 

Good, that you came through your ordeal Sir. Long may you carry on the great thought-provoking posts.

      

40 minutes ago, rumak said:

 

trying to educate oneself in a day , on a subject that is relatively unknown to someone searching  ........ is really not advised .   You are making the common mistake of searching and picking and searching and picking .... with a blindfold .    

the excerpt above is a good example .   A general blood test will find "anti-bodies "  for HCV when directed to do so (if present) .

If found,  the next test is for viral load .   This is a more specialized test and is extremely important to find the quantity in ones blood .  This is what determines the stage and seriousness of the infection.

 

*after the anti-viral drug is successful.... the viral load reading will report "undetectable"  .    However ,  any future blood test will still record HCV anti-bodies.     

Viruses don't exist Sir. Hepatitis is not a viral infection. No such thing as a viral load. It's all about constructing a story to make money.

6 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

From my early days of being interested in physiology, I have been a stickler for the facts. Is it true? Or! Is it conveniently made up, and camouflaged to be the truth. Because my aims, in those early times.1970/80s, was to progress in sport. To achieve that, one has to ask questions. One is constantly looking for a better way. Eating more nutritious food. Understanding body rhythms. Examining the science behind training programmes. I have changed my mind considerably in the last few decades. So, I can, and do, alter my opinions, if the evidence is compelling.

 

I first came interested in viruses during the AIDS era. What was being promoted as science simply didn't make sense to me. As a physiologist, I knew that the body adapted to stimuli. That the body would adapt to stress. I couldn't buy into the germ/virus theory that was being promoted. I knew it was all constructed by wealthy people to make more money. And to this day it remains the same.

 

I didn't harp on about 'Harvoni' at all. Not because i doubted you Sir, when you said it virtually brought you back to normality, but - as I dimly referred to drugs ending in ',,,vir.' - it is an anti-viral. And in my book; there is no such thing. 

 

Understanding what is the root cause of a medical problem, is not always easy in a snapshot of time. All illnesses have root causes. Have to excuse me for being a tad vague on this; but we all have a health story. A medical history; sometimes we regret stuff. I know I do. I've come through it unscathed; touch wood. Unlike some friends of yesteryear.

 

It is very easy, and convenient, and profitable, to say that Hepatitis is caused by viruses. And it is on this, where I make my stand. This is where 'facts' and the 'truth' come into play. There has not been a Hepatitis virus actually found. If  I'm wrong, then my position would change.

 

My post on Hepatitis was a general view, that some poor soul could take - if he/she was 'diagnosed' with the complaint - and didn't want to go down the Big Pharma route.

 

Good, that you came through your ordeal Sir. Long may you carry on the great thought-provoking posts.

      

An interesting read from actual experts...........😉

 

https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis-b/about/index.html

On 12/7/2025 at 5:40 PM, impulse said:

 

 

Edit:  Do you really think people are healthier today than we've been?  Because the numbers say they aren't. 

 

People are getting older all the time because of medication.

20 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Viruses don't exist Sir. Hepatitis is not a viral infection. No such thing as a viral load. It's all about constructing a story to make money.

 

And..... i respect your freedom to state your facts.   I tried to explain that when testing for viral load I went to an independent lab that knew nothing of me having an issue .    Their findings were that my load was in the many millions. When i later took one after Vit. C and dietary measures,  it had come down significantly .    When i showed up years later , after a course of what "they call"  an anti-viral (Harvoni) ...... again the lab knew nothing to make up an arbitrary number .  Knew nothing of any medications i had taken.  It is just a lab .    My numbers were no longer detectable according to their test. 

And,  my health has returned in spades.    If indeed,  they "make all this stuff up" ....... they are quite the magicians .

I have posted  many, many health opinions on the forum, and 99% are in areas i am personally familiar .   I have been the "test subject"  . 

Some , like statins .... i rely on the doctors i trust who tell of the dangers .  But mostly i stick to what i "know" .   I am very much against many of the practices and protocols of mainstream medical ....   and treat myself accordingly .  

 

Stay well .    Rumak   (i did not give the thumbs down.  everyone can probably guess who they came from ) 

1 minute ago, FritsSikkink said:

People are getting older all the time because of medication.

Seems to much medication and wrong lifestyle in a twist with social media gurus and fake dr's turns the clock back at the moment.

 

And of course a dose of misbelief in government advises.

 

I have to admit public officials recommendations not always best for healthy people, I'm going to give them that.

 

 

45 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Viruses don't exist Sir. Hepatitis is not a viral infection. No such thing as a viral load. It's all about constructing a story to make money.

I had to give you an thumbs down. The stupidity continues and there is nothing more to be said, except just show my despise for someone who continue on daily basis the lies and misinformation 

56 minutes ago, Hummin said:

I had to give you an thumbs down. The stupidity continues and there is nothing more to be said, except just show my despise for someone who continue on daily basis the lies and misinformation 

I don't like the thumbs down Sir. It don't upset me that much. What I don't like about them, is that posters, perhaps like yourself,  simply dismiss something put of hand, instead of discussing. Ie; the debate between myself and Mr Rumak. We don't agree; but are prepared to listen and consider.

 

Viruses have not been found. Not been isolated and purified. Not been sequenced. Not been shown to cause anything. Only available in computers and some virologist's minds.

 

It's hard work trying to get the truth out there. People are so indoctrinated.

46 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I don't like the thumbs down Sir. It don't upset me that much. What I don't like about them, is that posters, perhaps like yourself,  simply dismiss something put of hand, instead of discussing. Ie; the debate between myself and Mr Rumak. We don't agree; but are prepared to listen and consider.

 

Viruses have not been found. Not been isolated and purified. Not been sequenced. Not been shown to cause anything. Only available in computers and some virologist's minds.

 

It's hard work trying to get the truth out there. People are so indoctrinated.

I normally do not gives a thumb down, and when I do, I normally gives a explanation, but this theme have been debated to the end, and if you are serious about what you expressed, you have a complete lack of trust in science. 

 

I have been in a relationship whith someone who studied viruses, and also naturally been in an environment with colleagues and friends of her where the nature of the conversations was updates and trivial talks about things that had been lately researched. 

 

I worked in a industry that heavily depended on science, and hard to deny any industry today would survive without science, so my question to you, why the distrust? Where does it originate from ?

 

I know those who are vegans, smoke dope, been traumatized or born with mental challenges, often falls for alternative truths, but not everyone can be generalized, so where do find yourself in the society? 

 

You just saw the light one day? Like a new religious? 

 

 

On 12/18/2025 at 1:06 PM, rattlesnake said:

 

Are you doing a crash course in conspiracy theory?

 

Yes, Alex Jones is a Deep State asset. But Robert Redfield is not and I recommend listening to what he has to say on the Covid jab.

 

Japan has a serious demographic crisis due to many years of low birth rates. To the point where it has to start opening its borders to mass migration or the country might implode. And they do not want mass migration like the EU. 

 

It also had one of the highest Covid vaccination rates per capita in the world. 

 

Do you think the Japanese govt is so stupid that it would risk administering a dangerous vaccine when they have an existential crisis regarding their demographics? 

 

Here, it states that anti-vaxxers were claiming Japan was investigating millions of Covid 19 deaths and this claim was a hoax from a fake web site. And I believe them when they say it was a hoax based on the reason I mentioned above.

 

Anti-vaxxers you are getting information from are mostly liars. 

 

https://publichealthcollaborative.org/alerts/hoax-news-site-claims-japan-is-investigating-millions-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths/

 

A website that publishes hoax news stories claimed that the government of Japan is investigating millions of deaths supposedly caused by COVID-19 vaccines. The post has been widely shared, including by several high-profile anti-vaccine figures.

2 hours ago, Hummin said:

I have been in a relationship whith someone who studied viruses, and also naturally been in an environment with colleagues and friends of her where the nature of the conversations was updates and trivial talks about things that had been lately researched. 

Very interesting Sir.

 

Did she ever find one?

17 hours ago, GoodieAfterDark said:

Agree. Warpspeed cancer is better. 

 

What, in your opinion, would have happened if Operation Warp Speed hadn't existed?

Trust the science. Easy to understand how they were able to create this terrible "pandemic" in 2020 and destroy the world economy. 

 

 

19 hours ago, save the frogs said:

 

Japan has a serious demographic crisis due to many years of low birth rates. To the point where it has to start opening its borders to mass migration or the country might implode. And they do not want mass migration like the EU. 

 

It also had one of the highest Covid vaccination rates per capita in the world. 

 

Do you think the Japanese govt is so stupid that it would risk administering a dangerous vaccine when they have an existential crisis regarding their demographics? 

 

Here, it states that anti-vaxxers were claiming Japan was investigating millions of Covid 19 deaths and this claim was a hoax from a fake web site. And I believe them when they say it was a hoax based on the reason I mentioned above.

 

Anti-vaxxers you are getting information from are mostly liars. 

 

https://publichealthcollaborative.org/alerts/hoax-news-site-claims-japan-is-investigating-millions-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths/

 

A website that publishes hoax news stories claimed that the government of Japan is investigating millions of deaths supposedly caused by COVID-19 vaccines. The post has been widely shared, including by several high-profile anti-vaccine figures.

 

Why choose an obscure website which nobody has heard about, rather than the credible and widely disseminated information?

 

Regarding Japanese developments, I recommend listening to (and reading) Professor Yasufumi Murakami, Tokyo University of Science, Department of Biological Science and Technology:

 

If you thought the mRNA vaccine saga couldn’t get any wilder, Japan just dropped a bombshell that’s shaking the narrative to its core. A group of 350 Japanese volunteers, led by the United Citizens for Stopping mRNA Vaccines, has unleashed a staggering 21 million vaccination records—yes, you read that right—obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. This isn’t some small-fry dataset; it’s a colossal trove of vaccination dates, lot numbers, and, most chillingly, deaths. And what it reveals? Well, let’s just say it’s not the “safe and effective” mantra we’ve been spoon-fed.

 

By analyzing the 21 million records, Prof Murakami of Tokyo Science University uncovered a disturbing peak in deaths 90–120 days after mRNA vaccination, with higher doses showing earlier death peaks. That’s right—folks who got more jabs died sooner, suggesting a cumulative toxicity that builds with each shot.

 

Murakami estimates that 600,000 to 610,000 Japanese may have died post-vaccination, a figure that aligns eerily with Japan’s excess death statistics. But here’s the kicker—why haven’t these deaths been plastered across headlines? Prof Murakami suggested that they’re happening three to four months later, slipping under the radar of official reports because doctors do not see them as cause of deaths if they are not within a few days after vaccination. The government’s not connecting the dots, folks, and it’s no surprise why. These delayed deaths don’t fit the narrative of “safe and effective.” Instead, they point to a silent crisis that’s been swept under the rug.

 

https://www.aussie17.com/p/japans-shocking-mrna-vaccine-revelations

Just now, rattlesnake said:

 

Why choose an obscure website which nobody has heard about, rather then the credible and widely disseminated information?

 

Regarding Japanese developments, I recommend listening to (and reading) Professor Yasufumi Murakami, Tokyo University of Science, Department of Biological Science and Technology:

 

If you thought the mRNA vaccine saga couldn’t get any wilder, Japan just dropped a bombshell that’s shaking the narrative to its core. A group of 350 Japanese volunteers, led by the United Citizens for Stopping mRNA Vaccines, has unleashed a staggering 21 million vaccination records—yes, you read that right—obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. This isn’t some small-fry dataset; it’s a colossal trove of vaccination dates, lot numbers, and, most chillingly, deaths. And what it reveals? Well, let’s just say it’s not the “safe and effective” mantra we’ve been spoon-fed.

 

By analyzing the 21 million records, Prof Murakami of Tokyo Science University uncovered a disturbing peak in deaths 90–120 days after mRNA vaccination, with higher doses showing earlier death peaks. That’s right—folks who got more jabs died sooner, suggesting a cumulative toxicity that builds with each shot.

 

Murakami estimates that 600,000 to 610,000 Japanese may have died post-vaccination, a figure that aligns eerily with Japan’s excess death statistics. But here’s the kicker—why haven’t these deaths been plastered across headlines? Prof Murakami suggested that they’re happening three to four months later, slipping under the radar of official reports because doctors do not see them as cause of deaths if they are not within a few days after vaccination. The government’s not connecting the dots, folks, and it’s no surprise why. These delayed deaths don’t fit the narrative of “safe and effective.” Instead, they point to a silent crisis that’s been swept under the rug.

 

https://www.aussie17.com/p/japans-shocking-mrna-vaccine-revelations

🤣.........Says the bloke and chums that only use obscure nutters websites........🤣

1 minute ago, transam said:

🤣.........Says the bloke and chums that only use obscure nutters websites........🤣

 

This is a very astute remark, transam, thank you for the sustained quality of your contributions.

2 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

This is a very astute remark, transam, thank you for the sustained quality of your contributions.

My pleasure, your clique at times slips up when posting...... 🤗 

Just now, transam said:

My pleasure, your clique at times slips up when posting...... 🤗 

 

Hence the absolute necessity that you remain by our side at all times, leveraging your invaluable expertise and wit for the greater good.

 

Oh and while you're at it, don't hesitate to give your take on Professor Murakami's statements:

 

 

1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Hence the absolute necessity that you remain by our side at all times, leveraging your invaluable expertise and wit for the greater good.

 

Oh and while you're at it, don't hesitate to give your take on Professor Murakami's statements:

 

 

No thank you, did it take a long time to dig that one up..........😏.......🤫

 

And god, we are all dropping like fly's.........