More septic tank rubbish

On 12/6/2025 at 11:57 AM, cjinchiangrai said:

The vaccines saved many millions of lives. You story does not provide any evidence that the vaccine was responsible for this guys death.

There is no evidence to proof the vaccines worked. There is a lot of evidence by now that does show problems with these specific vaccines. 

 

Imagine being that gullible that you still believe this was real, as real as 9/11 was. No wonder 95% of people works for life being fked time after time.

8 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

It's safe to say it effectively culled a substantial part of the population, and still is.

You say that like it’s a bad thing.

1 hour ago, ChaiyaTH said:

There is no evidence to proof the vaccines worked.

Let's go back to fundamentals here Sir.

 

What are vaccines actually for? Particularly the mRNA jab; if it can be termed a vaxx for discussion purposes.

 

They are developed and manufactured to prevent, or lessen, the effects of a disease. What disease? Well, in this case it was covid-19. How did the white-coats know what it was? Well, it was a relative of SARs-cov-2. Now here, it does get very interesting. Why? Because SARS-cov-2 don't actually exist.

Of course it does; says the virologist. It is a variant of SARs-cov-1.

And where, and when, may I ask, was SARs-cov-1 isolated, and found to exist?

Sorry, I have to go now; says the virologist. I've got to find a new variant.

 

The facts of the matter is, that no virus has ever been found in nature. The one that all this is built on - the SARs-cov-2, is not real. It originated in a petri-dish and they, the virologists/immunologists/epidemiologists/computer coders, got it confused with an actual computer virus. It was/is all make believe nonsense. The virus is only found in a computer.

 

So; to return to the jab. Was it produced to ward off, something or other, that has never been shown to exist? Let alone cause anybody any harm. My take was that it was. Why! That's a topic for another time.

 

Nature has all the answers.

22 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Let's go back to fundamentals here Sir.

 

What are vaccines actually for? Particularly the mRNA jab; if it can be termed a vaxx for discussion purposes.

 

They are developed and manufactured to prevent, or lessen, the effects of a disease. What disease? Well, in this case it was covid-19. How did the white-coats know what it was? Well, it was a relative of SARs-cov-2. Now here, it does get very interesting. Why? Because SARS-cov-2 don't actually exist.

Of course it does; says the virologist. It is a variant of SARs-cov-1.

And where, and when, may I ask, was SARs-cov-1 isolated, and found to exist?

Sorry, I have to go now; says the virologist. I've got to find a new variant.

 

The facts of the matter is, that no virus has ever been found in nature. The one that all this is built on - the SARs-cov-2, is not real. It originated in a petri-dish and they, the virologists/immunologists/epidemiologists/computer coders, got it confused with an actual computer virus. It was/is all make believe nonsense. The virus is only found in a computer.

 

So; to return to the jab. Was it produced to ward off, something or other, that has never been shown to exist? Let alone cause anybody any harm. My take was that it was. Why! That's a topic for another time.

 

Nature has all the answers.

Tell us how you failed high school biology again.

On 12/6/2025 at 3:28 PM, johng said:

this should really go in another separate thread but i'll 

post here as its kind of related to this poor guys experience.

 

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/breaking-study-pfizer-mrna-found-in-over-88-of-human-placentas-sperm-and-blood-and-in-50-of-unvaccinated-pregnant-women/

BREAKING STUDY: Pfizer mRNA Found in Over 88% of Human Placentas, Sperm, and Blood — and in 50% of Unvaccinated Pregnant Women

This study no longer exists. If you click on the link in @johng's post and then on the link to the article, it cannot be found.

 

It was deleted  from the website where it was originally published after it was apparently found to contain a fundamental flaw. As pointed out by one peer reviewer, the authors had mistakenly matched to the human genome, not to Pfizer vaccine mRNA.

 

The fact that it was deleted rather than retracted is significant because retraction requires a formal process, whereas deletion leaves no trace - no DOI, no retraction notice, no explanation.

 

The flaw is so fundamental (primers match human genome) that it’s not a “mistake” that can be corrected - the entire study is invalid. A retraction notice would be embarrassing and quotable. Deletion allows the journal and authors to pretend it never happened.

4 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Tell us how you failed high school biology again.

I sense a hidden thought there Sir.

 

Where is there a paper, showing that a virus has been isolated? I'll save you the bother. There ain't one.

 

The whole virus thing is nonsense. Held together by the $$$.

 

A barefoot walk in the forest would do you good Sir. Look at the trees. Ask yerself why they are shedding their leaves. The squirrel runs along the branch. Ask yerself why. The ants are only too willing to drop onto yer hat and start investigating your ears. Ask yerself why. A tree fell a couple of years back. Nature has almost devoured it and sent it back where it came from. Ask yerself why

 

Nature knows all.

Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

Where is there a paper, showing that a virus has been isolated? I'll save you the bother. There ain't one.

 

I posted a video clip from Youtube where the scientist injected an egg with a virus.

 

You can claim that it's "fake" I suppose, but neither can you prove that it's a fake experiment.

 

3 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

The whole virus thing is nonsense. Held together by the $$$.

 

No, theory doesn't hold up because many vaccines are paid for by govts.

Utter nonsense from you once again. 

 

15 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

I posted a video clip from Youtube where the scientist injected an egg with a virus.

 

You can claim that it's "fake" I suppose, but neither can you prove that it's a fake experiment.

 

Can't inject something into an egg, or anything else for that matter,  that don't exist Frogs Sir.

 

If I drop an egg on the floor and it cracks, spilling the contents all about, I can't in all reasonableness say a virus caused me to drop the egg. It was simply my carelessness.

 

18 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

No, theory doesn't hold up because many vaccines are paid for by govts.

Utter nonsense from you once again. 

 

The flu is a natural body occurrence Frogs Sir. 

 

There is no such thing as a flu vaccine. Can't you see it's all nonsense?

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

The flu is a natural body occurrence Frogs Sir. 

 

There is no such thing as a flu vaccine. Can't you see it's all nonsense?

More tosh, so the rest of the world is wrong, but the quack here, Dr.Mump is right.............😒

33 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

This study no longer exists. If you click on the link in @johng's post and then on the link to the article, it cannot be found.

 

It was deleted  from the website where it was originally published after it was apparently found to contain a fundamental flaw. As pointed out by one peer reviewer, the authors had mistakenly matched to the human genome, not to Pfizer vaccine mRNA.

 

The fact that it was deleted rather than retracted is significant because retraction requires a formal process, whereas deletion leaves no trace - no DOI, no retraction notice, no explanation.

 

The flaw is so fundamental (primers match human genome) that it’s not a “mistake” that can be corrected - the entire study is invalid. A retraction notice would be embarrassing and quotable. Deletion allows the journal and authors to pretend it never happened.

Try this one Sir.

 

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/breaking-study-pfizer-mrna-found-in-over-88-of-human-placentas-sperm-and-blood-and-in-50-of-unvaccinated-pregnant-women/

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Try this one Sir.

 

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/breaking-study-pfizer-mrna-found-in-over-88-of-human-placentas-sperm-and-blood-and-in-50-of-unvaccinated-pregnant-women/

Try this Dr.Mump, from those who actually know what they are talking about, not a wannabe fruitcake doctor on here........😬

 

https://www.cdc.gov/flu-vaccines-work/benefits/index.html

1 minute ago, transam said:

More tosh, so the rest of the world is wrong, but the quack here, Dr.Mump is right.............😒

Thanks for engaging Trans buddy.

 

If the 'rest of the world' are saying that the flu is a disease, and there is a vaccine to prevent it, or lessen the effects of it, then they are Diddy Kies, or Dilly Dops. In other words they are WRONG.

 

Trans Sir. I have told you before; I'm not, or ever have been a doctor. I was, as you know, a practicing physiologist back in the day.

6 minutes ago, transam said:

Try this Dr.Mump, from those who actually know what they are talking about, not a wannabe fruitcake doctor on here........😬

 

https://www.cdc.gov/flu-vaccines-work/benefits/index.html

 

I've not looked at the piece. My take is that no vaccine has ever worked, anywhere at any time.

 

NONE of them are 'safe', 'effective', and it goes without saying; 'necessary'.

2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

 

I've not looked at the piece. My take is that no vaccine has ever worked, anywhere at any time.

 

NONE of them are 'safe', 'effective', and it goes without saying; 'necessary'.

You need a very big larf for that, so the WHOLE WORLD of MEDICINE is wrong because YOU say so, a bloke shacked up in Thailand..............

 

2 minutes ago, transam said:

You need a very big larf for that, so the WHOLE WORLD of MEDICINE is wrong because YOU say so, a bloke shacked up in Thailand..............

 

Not the WHOLE MEDICAL WORLD Trans buddy. Not all are wrong. Just most of them.

 

There are quite a few of us. At least 17. 6 of them post on AN.

 

There is no such thing as disease or viruses. Can't say it any plainer.

 

Nature has all the answers.

 

 

31 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Can't inject something into an egg, or anything else for that matter,  that don't exist Frogs Sir.

 

I wish you wouldn't exist, man.

You're a pain in the butt.

 

So this is a "fake experiment" being funded by a University, which is funded by a government? HA HA ... I guess they have money to throw away? 

 

 

4 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Not the WHOLE MEDICAL WORLD Trans buddy. Not all are wrong. Just most of them.

 

There are quite a few of us. At least 17. 6 of them post on AN.

 

There is no such thing as disease or viruses. Can't say it any plainer.

 

Nature has all the answers.

 

 

It makes me very happy that you post the same nonsense every day, which points out to others that you have a screw loose, I will be here to also point it out, just in case a really sick person takes notice of you and the other nut job, Red..............

10 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

I wish you wouldn't exist, man.

You're a pain in the butt.

 

So this is a "fake experiment" being funded by a University, which is funded by a government? HA HA ... I guess they have money to throw away? 

 

 

Utter nonsense. In fact I would say it's monumental humbug.

 

As I've told you, and others repeatedly, the flu is not a disease. It is different set of symptoms - although similar - for all those undergoing a seasonal, or emergency, body detoxification. 

 

If you, or anyone else, has the flu, there are some good things to do. To speed up the whole thing and lessen the discomfort. And that don't include Big Pharma drugs.

 

Open your mind Sir. Nature shows us the way.

2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Utter nonsense. In fact I would say it's monumental humbug.

 

As I've told you, and others repeatedly, the flu is not a disease. It is different set of symptoms - although similar - for all those undergoing a seasonal, or emergency, body detoxification. 

 

If you, or anyone else, has the flu, there are some good things to do. To speed up the whole thing and lessen the discomfort. And that don't include Big Pharma drugs.

 

Open your mind Sir. Nature shows us the way.

Why didn't nature take care of us from the start, we are now living twice as long and more, so, it wasn't because of nature, now was it................?   🤫

14 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

the flu is not a disease.

 

I don't consider it a "disease".

It is a compromised immune system, though.

And not everyone can fight it off without laying in bed for several days (which is bad for productivity, comapanies don't like people taking sick days) or getting seriously ill in some cases.

 

And one of the main causes, from what I understand, is lack of sunlight.

Which is why the flu is highly prevalant in winter months in cold climates.

 

Since you cannot export the sun from Thailand to Siberia, scientists invented a flu vaccine to try to minimize sickness. Even though it doesn't work as effectively as they would like ... and that's because it's difficult to replicate the sunshine in a lab and also difficult to predict which strains of flu virus (which do exist!) will be prevalent in any given year. 

 

One possible alternative to flu shots might be Vitamin D + Red Light therapy? 

Although I don't know enough about Red Light therapy .... it at least is zapping the body with some rays similar to the sun, although not all the rays on the spectrum.

 

If I ever have to go back to a cold climate, I may experiment with these Red Light lamps during winter months. 

 

Your suggestions to get rid of vaccines are not helpful unless replaced with a proper protocol that is shown to be effective. The flu vaccine is not just for money. It's there because the flu is a real problem. 

 

Seeya.

 

 

10 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Certainly, Mark. I'm sure the other 'conspiracy theorists' of the forum, who are very knowledgeable, could give you good sources, but I would recommend starting with this interview of Tina Peters. It is 17 minutes long, but she sums it up well in the first five minutes:

 

https://zerospike.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/My-Movie-45.m4v

 

that's my "thanks" ...555    the "science" was just too damn confusing to me.... over my head, i guess you could say .    So i didn't put extreme effort into it .  I just started this video and already am enlightened ....... after lunch,  will finish !!

2 hours ago, rumak said:

 

that's my "thanks" ...555    the "science" was just too damn confusing to me.... over my head, i guess you could say .    So i didn't put extreme effort into it .  I just started this video and already am enlightened ....... after lunch,  will finish !!

 

I'm also taking the opportunity to add another resource for those who are interested in learning – or refreshing their memory – about what the Covid jab is and what it does to the human body.

 

Sherri Tenpenny was, to my knowledge, the first doctor to sound the alarm on this. I was fortunate enough to watch her videos early on, and she is the reason why I knew from April 2021 that I should never take this 'vaccine' under any circumstance.

 

At the time, she had listed 20 mechanisms of injury of the Covid shot, which 2 years later had grown to 40 mechanisms.

 

Here she is in 2023 on Mike Adams' show, summarising her research with a couple years of hindsight.

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vjgoaKuLt1nS/

7 hours ago, save the frogs said:

 

So this is a "fake experiment" being funded by a University, which is funded by a government? HA HA ... I guess they have money to throw away? 

 

 

The experiment itself don't seem fake, as the vid shows, white-coats are doing stuff in a lab to eggs.

 

But at the end of the short vid they say they have a virus. They do not. They are telling pokies; as these white coat charlatans usually do.

 

My advice to them. Isolate the virus first. Then grow it in an egg. Then they might have some credibility.

 

Nature reveals its wonders to us all the time.

12 hours ago, trainee wombat said:

More septic tank rubbish

Why not debate Sir?

 

It's possible that your input would be very worthwhile.

 

15 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Certainly, Mark. I'm sure the other 'conspiracy theorists' of the forum, who are very knowledgeable, could give you good sources, but I would recommend starting with this interview of Tina Peters. It is 17 minutes long, but she sums it up well in the first five minutes:

 

https://zerospike.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/My-Movie-45.m4v

this content seems to not be available now .....  i never finished 

4 minutes ago, rumak said:

this content seems to not be available now .....  i never finished 

 

I've just tried it, it's still working on my side.