2 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Nah complete no hopers spend all their time trolling on cannabis threads, nothing better to do?

I thought this was a chat forum where anyone can comment, even your imaginary no hopers..........🤫

3 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

You are very wrong, it was only ever legalised for medicinal purposes...

 

Read this, I hope your cannabis affected brain can understand it.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_Thailand

I thought that when we, in the UK, had the big clear  out , all those years ago, out we sent the stupid ones to America and the wrong'uns to Australia   seems they got things the wrong way round with you

4 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Don't confuse me with somebody who cares what you think or preach

Then why did you reply....I know I touched a raw cannabis nerve.

2 hours ago, Olof Karlsson said:

I think it’s better that doctors take car of sick patients than sell cannabis to drugusers. Forbid the <deleted> ,that’s the very best.

I think it's better that people who have no idea about Cannabis should shut up about something they have no idea about!

Plus i think it is illegal for doctors to take the car from patients.lol

1 minute ago, Bday Prang said:

I thought that when we, in the UK, had the big clear  out , all those years ago, out we sent the stupid ones to America and the wrong'uns to Australia   seems they got things the wrong way round with you

Wow, is that the best you can say....555

3 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

I don't understand your "poor white girls with negroes."

So you don't even understand why weed was banned in the first place

Educate yourself

Last night on walking street pattaya 3 tourists smoking a spliff. didnt see a medical professional inside. 

1 minute ago, Aussie999 said:

Wow, is that the best you can say....555

far from it  but my best would get me suspended...again  and you ain't worth it

I expect the rates of migraines, back pain, anxiety, and insomnia to skyrocket as a result 🙂

13 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

A lot less users...a lot less smell

I don't understand your "poor white girls with negroes."

7 minutes ago, Docno said:

I expect the rates of migraines, back pain, anxiety, and insomnia to skyrocket as a result 🙂

No $ht Sherlock

14 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

Wow, is that the best you can say....555

 

I'm sure he can say a lot more, but we aren't allowed to talk about other posters. Let's just say that you appear happy  to wallow in your ignorance. 

 

9 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

If you believe this than there is no hope for you!

19 hours ago, ronnie50 said:

This is nonsense. No one becomes a 'medical professional' (of any kind) by taking a free online course. Ten thousand weed shops? The term money laundering is gaining traction.

Totally agree. Good opportunity to squeeze extra money from this potential Govt. scam where it states in the headline,"must employ certified medical professionals onsite (sic)". 

 

Medical professionals. Kiss my ass! The only medical professionals are dope smokers themselves and now want to earn an income from smoking dope? Gee how do you apply for such a stoned job?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

So you don't even understand why weed was banned in the first place

Educate yourself

Actually I do, but be more specific...which country

18 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

far from it  but my best would get me suspended...again  and you ain't worth it

On, try

2 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

Actually I do, but be more specific...which country

 

Pick a country and then tell us.

Wow stoners get triggered much 😂. Serious question, are a lot of you smokers on this forum relatively new to Thailand and started coming here after legalisation or have you been here years just smoking the crafty zoot undercover up until then?

13 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Actually I believe it had more to do with the Dupont family, and cotton.

 

DuPont's opposition to cannabis (marijuana) wasn't about personal views but tied to protecting their chemical/synthetic industries (like nylon, plastics) from hemp's competition and aligning with powerful forces like Hearst, benefiting from regulations that stifled hemp's industrial uses (paper, textiles, rope) by framing it as a dangerous drug, effectively clearing the field for their petroleum-based products. 

Key Reasons for DuPont's Stance:

Competition with Hemp: DuPont manufactured and profited from synthetic fibers like nylon, which competed directly with hemp (a strong, natural fiber used for rope, textiles, and paper).

Alliance with Hearst Media: DuPont, alongside newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst, backed Harry J. Anslinger's anti-marijuana campaign, which painted cannabis as a dangerous narcotic, leading to restrictive laws.

Economic Advantage: By promoting hemp prohibition through the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, DuPont helped eliminate a viable, plant-based competitor, allowing their synthetic materials to dominate the market. 

How it Played Out:

Hearst's newspapers ran sensationalized stories linking cannabis to crime and violence, fueling public fear.

Anslinger, head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, used these narratives to push for legislation, even misrepresenting medical opinions.

DuPont's involvement ensured that the narrative focused on marijuana's alleged dangers, not hemp's industrial potential, benefiting their petrochemical-derived products. 

In essence, DuPont leveraged anti-cannabis propaganda to remove a natural competitor (hemp) from the industrial market, paving the way for their synthetic materials. 

1 minute ago, goldenbrwn1 said:

Wow stoners get triggered much 😂. Serious question, are a lot of you smokers on this forum relatively new to Thailand and started coming here after legalisation or have you been here years just smoking the crafty zoot undercover up until then?

 

You don't think it's just because you appear to be a brain dead Troll then?

Just now, Aussie999 said:

Actually I believe it had more to do with the Dupont family, and cotton.

 

DuPont's opposition to cannabis (marijuana) wasn't about personal views but tied to protecting their chemical/synthetic industries (like nylon, plastics) from hemp's competition and aligning with powerful forces like Hearst, benefiting from regulations that stifled hemp's industrial uses (paper, textiles, rope) by framing it as a dangerous drug, effectively clearing the field for their petroleum-based products. 

Key Reasons for DuPont's Stance:

Competition with Hemp: DuPont manufactured and profited from synthetic fibers like nylon, which competed directly with hemp (a strong, natural fiber used for rope, textiles, and paper).

Alliance with Hearst Media: DuPont, alongside newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst, backed Harry J. Anslinger's anti-marijuana campaign, which painted cannabis as a dangerous narcotic, leading to restrictive laws.

Economic Advantage: By promoting hemp prohibition through the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, DuPont helped eliminate a viable, plant-based competitor, allowing their synthetic materials to dominate the market. 

How it Played Out:

Hearst's newspapers ran sensationalized stories linking cannabis to crime and violence, fueling public fear.

Anslinger, head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, used these narratives to push for legislation, even misrepresenting medical opinions.

DuPont's involvement ensured that the narrative focused on marijuana's alleged dangers, not hemp's industrial potential, benefiting their petrochemical-derived products. 

In essence, DuPont leveraged anti-cannabis propaganda to remove a natural competitor (hemp) from the industrial market, paving the way for their synthetic materials. 

 

Nice cut and paste. And?

I don't see the point of all of this noise.

Do you have any objection to people using cannabis?

1 minute ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

 

You don't think it's just because you appear to be a brain dead Troll then?

Actually, he asks good questions.

I wonder what the "Budtenders" training entails, and how many hours they must do. 

 

7 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

 

Pick a country and then tell us.

Did you have a problem understanding my question..... cannabis does affect the brain  you just proved it.

1 minute ago, Aussie999 said:

Actually, he asks good questions.

 

You think?

 

What is the relevance of this question?

 

Quote

Serious question, are a lot of you smokers on this forum relatively new to Thailand and started coming here after legalisation or have you been here years just smoking the crafty zoot undercover up until then?

 

1 minute ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

 

Nice cut and paste. And?

I don't see the point of all of this noise.

Do you have any objection to people using cannabis?

Some of it was, but that's irrelevant...

Just now, Aussie999 said:

Did you have a problem understanding my question..... cannabis does affect the brain  you just proved it.

 

How? I haven't utilised any. What affected your brain?

It just seems to me that the thread has attracted a number of mindless Trolls.

1 minute ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

 

You think?

 

What is the relevance of this question?

 

 

It is relevant because you replied to it.

 

Damn, come on mate, too much cannabis has affected your ability to comprehend.

6 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

 

You don't think it's just because you appear to be a brain dead Troll then?

Christ 😂, I take it that’s a yes from you.