Just now, still kicking said:

For all you blind people

That's not the shooter. The shooter is in front of the vehicle and a bit to the right, in the path of the vehicle.

From what I've seen, I would saw the officer should not have fired on the vehicle, but no doubt we'll see more. The left needs a crisis for the midterms.

A post with a blind link has been removed:

• Links to outside content should always include relevant commentary. Blind links to outside content with no context or explanation may be removed.

Officer is in front of the vehicle with gun drawn, driver accelerates at him, he fires, she hits him.

Ep. 1225 Whining Walz and Crying Dokoupil, with Halperin, and Truth About UFOs, with Grusch and Luna – Megyn Kelly

59 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You hear the wheels spinning, the car takes off, at that point its a split second deadly weapon.

Detached reflection isnt reality in the face of an upraised knife as the old saying goes.

Not one critic cannot dispute any of the facts or the videos.

It was a righteous shoot as street cops would say. No one is under an obligation to let themselves be killed or maimed by a criminal. This is the result of the Democrats whipping the mob into a frenzy. More people are going to get killed, which I reckon is their goal as it helps them create martyrs, most of whom are scumbags.

Just so I’m clear on the hypocrisy…

Ashli Babbit murdered, but Renee Nicole Good “should have complied.” Did I get all your BS straight?

Murder.

I wholeheartedly agree, but I would add 'raise hell non-violently', as Trump and his henchmen and enablers want nothing more than to declare martial law and cancel the midterms.

Because if he doesn't, he'll get impeached and the GOP will get crucified.

15 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Just so I’m clear on the hypocrisy…

Ashli Babbit murdered, but Renee Nicole Good “should have complied.” Did I get all your BS straight?

No your analogy is wrong as usual. But nice try.

Just now, Yagoda said:

No your analogy is wrong as usual. But nice try.

Oh, glad you cleared that up with your factual and witty retort!👏

Just now, BLMFem said:

Oh, glad you cleared that up with your factual and witty retort!👏

Your welcome. Im sure educated and non prejudiced folks see the difference. If you are still lost, Id be happy to enlighten you.

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Your welcome. Im sure educated and non prejudiced folks see the difference. If you are still lost, Id be happy to enlighten you.

Educated "folks" know the difference between an analogy and a comparison. If you are still lost, Id be happy to enlighten you.

Just now, Yagoda said:

No your analogy is wrong as usual. But nice try.

The left conflates attempting to run down an officer with climbing in a window unarmed.

Just like they conflate Germany killing millions of Jews with the United States deporting criminal illegal aliens.

Interfering with federal officers performing their duties sounds like insurrection, yes?

I was arrested for this in 1977

"A motor vehicle can be considered a deadly weapon if it is used with the intent to threaten, injure, or kill someone. The specific charges and penalties vary by jurisdiction (state or local law) and the specifics of the incident, often resulting in severe felony charges such as assault with a deadly weapon or aggravated assault."

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Interfering with federal officers performing their duties sounds like insurrection, yes?

Only if you're a professional pearl clutcher. Are you?

Not only is it sick, it's against the law.

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The left conflates attempting to run down an officer with climbing in a window unarmed.

Just like they conflate Germany killing millions of Jews with the United States deporting criminal illegal aliens.

Interfering with federal officers performing their duties sounds like insurrection, yes?

Add a car is never a deadly weapon when a Lefty drives it.

2 minutes ago, CharlieH said:

Even more of a demonstration of how it was a clean shoot.

I have a feeling that the Trump admin will do its best not to enable that officer to even be tried. Will they succeed in this ? I am guessing no because there has been so much outrage over this and the videos seem to be showing guilt of the officer.

And, it looks like the deep polarisation in the US society will likely be a long term thing sadly, judging from comments on a variety of platforms, including this forum.

36 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Murder.

Well done. You've posted what's already been posted showing the car hitting the officer which, correct me if I'm wrong, you said never happened.

7 minutes ago, CharlieH said:

If only she got out of the car when told to do so.

4 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Well done. You've posted what's already been posted showing the car hitting the officer which, correct me if I'm wrong, you said never happened.

You have to ask the question of how much the sick rhetoric flowing from the anti-Ice/Trump crowd made thiss shooting possible.

14 hours ago, Celsius said:

The US will have a civil war long before they invade Greenland.

Celsius maybe you should switch to F. Jai Yen Yen. The Minn. ICE action will be over soon when all the Illegals are deported. The unfortunate death of the protestor this week was due to her interfering with ICE operations. Regarding Greenland. The US has shown long-standing and recently intensified interest in Greenland, driven by national security concerns in the Arctic. Historically, the US attempted to purchase Greenland multiple times (e.g., in 1867, 1946 with a $100 million offer, and discussions in 1910 and 1955), viewing it as vital for defense against potential threats over the North Pole. Currently, as of early 2026, President Trump has revived and escalated efforts to acquire Greenland, describing it as an "absolute necessity" for national security and freedom worldwide. The White House has stated that acquiring Greenland is a "national security priority" to counter Russian and Chinese activities in the Arctic, including missile threats, naval movements, new shipping routes due to melting ice, and access to rare earth minerals. Options under discussion include purchase, economic partnerships, or even military action (though diplomacy is emphasized as the first approach, and some officials like Secretary of State Marco Rubio have indicated preference for buying it). The US already operates Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) in northwestern Greenland under a 1951 defense agreement with Denmark, supporting missile warning, space surveillance, and NATO operations. Greenland forms part of the critical GIUK Gap (Greenland-Iceland-UK), a chokepoint for monitoring Russian submarines entering the Atlantic. Denmark and Greenland have firmly rejected any sale or annexation, asserting sovereignty, with European NATO allies rallying in support. Greenlandic leaders and polls show strong opposition to becoming part of the US, though many favor eventual independence from Denmark. Iceland The US also maintains strong interest in Iceland, though without recent claims of acquisition or territorial control. Iceland is a key NATO ally (a founding member) with no standing army, relying on a 1951 bilateral defense agreement for protection. The US previously maintained a major base at Keflavík until 2006 but continues cooperative activities, including NATO air policing, joint exercises, search and rescue, and occasional deployments. Iceland's position in the GIUK Gap makes it essential for monitoring Russian naval and air activity in the North Atlantic. Relations focus on shared goals like Arctic cooperation, countering Russian/Chinese influence, trade, and security. The US was the first to recognize Iceland's independence in 1944 and has provided economic/military support historically. No current territorial ambitions exist, unlike with Greenland; ties are cooperative and alliance-based. In summary, US interest in both stems from Arctic geopolitics, with Greenland seeing aggressive recent pursuit (including potential ownership) due to perceived vulnerabilities against adversaries, while Iceland involves stable alliance partnership. Both are tied to deterring Russia and China in a warming Arctic.

40 minutes ago, CharlieH said:

This and other video clips from the scene are VERY clear about what happened and it is a case of unlawful killing BUT the bald face lies from trump and Noem should make one sick to the stomach about the people in power in the US.

This is what trump said......

Look carefully at this statement by the liar trump:- "and the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE officer, who seems to have shot her in self defense. Based on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now recovering in hospital."

From all of the clips shown from various sources, the ICE officer walks away after the shooting.....he has NOT been run over despite trumps lying version. How on earth can even the "poorly educated" followers of trump live with this because it is a blatant disgusting lie by the disgusting president of the USA.....come on USA wake up to the reality of who/what is in charge and get him out, one way or another. You and the world deserve better.

1 hour ago, CharlieH said:

Another leftist

1 minute ago, xylophone said:

This and other video clips from the scene are VERY clear about what happened and it is a case of unlawful killing BUT the bald face lies from trump and Noem should make one sick to the stomach about the people in power in the US.

This is what trump said......

Look carefully at this statement by the liar trump:- "and the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE officer, who seems to have shot her in self defense. Based on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now recovering in hospital."

From all of the clips shown from various sources, the ICE officer walks away after the shooting.....he has NOT been run over despite trumps lying version. How on earth can even the "poorly educated" followers of trump live with this because it is a blatant disgusting lie by the disgusting president of the USA.....come on USA wake up to the reality of who/what is in charge and get him out, one way or another. You and the world deserve better.

Howl lefty, howl!

More evidence showing the officer' s legs were clear of the car.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c1lzvyjm3vet?post=asset%3Adac59fe7-d9c3-4de4-b645-689f012f735d#post

5 minutes ago, xylophone said:

This and other video clips from the scene are VERY clear about what happened and it is a case of unlawful killing BUT the bald face lies from trump and Noem should make one sick to the stomach about the people in power in the US.

This is what trump said......

Look carefully at this statement by the liar trump:- "and the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE officer, who seems to have shot her in self defense. Based on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now recovering in hospital."

From all of the clips shown from various sources, the ICE officer walks away after the shooting.....he has NOT been run over despite trumps lying version. How on earth can even the "poorly educated" followers of trump live with this because it is a blatant disgusting lie by the disgusting president of the USA.....come on USA wake up to the reality of who/what is in charge and get him out, one way or another. You and the world deserve better.

Being hit by a car is the definition of being run over by a car. Surely your hate for Trump doesn't affect your eyes. Alas emotions often override rationality. The woman hit the officer with her car. There is video evidence. As I've said if she had just got out of the car when directed to do so or even better if she wasn't interfering with ICE operations in the first place she'd be alive.

6 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Being hit by a car is the definition of being run over by a car. Surely your hate for Trump doesn't affect your eyes. Alas emotions often override rationality. The woman hit the officer with her car. There is video evidence. As I've said if she had just got out of the car when directed to do so or even better if she wasn't interfering with ICE operations in the first place she'd be alive.

Look again.......he wasn't hit by the car and as for being run over, he is walking away after firing the shots. How dumb can you be????
I repeat for the one-eyed MAGAs.......From all of the clips shown from various sources, the ICE officer walks away after the shooting.....he has NOT been run over despite trumps lying version.

Come on, try to be truthful for once on here!

Boy, lefties love them some criminal illegal aliens!

That criminal protester is their new dead hero!

2 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Look again.......he wasn't hit by the car and as for being run over, he is walking away after firing the shots. How dumb can you be????

Too funny