Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Starmer Caves To Trump After 48-Hour Cabinet Revolt Over Iran

Featured Replies

Milband and Starmer.jpg

Starmer Caves To Trump After 48-Hour Cabinet Revolt Over Iran

Sir Keir Starmer was forced into a dramatic climbdown over the Iran crisis after an internal Cabinet revolt — led by Ed Miliband — briefly blocked the United States from using key British military bases.

According to insiders, the Prime Minister initially sided with Miliband and other senior ministers in refusing Washington access to facilities including RAF Fairford and the strategic Indian Ocean base at Diego Garcia.

But the standoff lasted less than 48 hours.

Following intense pressure from the White House and a reframing of the mission as “defensive”, Starmer abruptly reversed course. American Northrop B-2 Spirit aircraft are now expected to deploy to Diego Garcia in preparation for possible strikes against Iranian missile infrastructure.

The episode has exposed deep divisions inside Starmer’s Cabinet — and raised fresh questions about Britain’s reliability as a military ally.

Miliband Leads Cabinet Resistance

The drama unfolded during a tense National Security Council meeting on Friday.

Miliband reportedly rallied senior ministers including Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to oppose British involvement in potential US military action against Iran.

The trio argued that supporting pre-emptive strikes would be legally questionable, citing advice from Attorney General Richard Hermer.

One insider described Miliband’s intervention as “petulant, pacifist, legalistic and very political,” claiming the Energy Secretary’s hostility was driven partly by his dislike of Donald Trump.

Defence Secretary John Healey reportedly took the opposite view, arguing Britain should allow allied forces access to its bases if US troops came under Iranian attack.

The clash followed weeks of tense discussions between London and Washington, including a confrontation between Britain’s deputy national security adviser Matt Collins and Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby.

Trump Fury Forces U-Turn

image.png

By Sunday, the White House returned with a revised request — framing the operation as limited and defensive, targeting Iranian missile systems rather than broader strikes.

Starmer relented.

Downing Street insists the Prime Minister never ruled out cooperation entirely, but critics say the reversal shows Britain folded under American pressure.

Trump made his displeasure clear.

Speaking to reporters, the US president said he was “very disappointed” with Starmer, later adding the British leader was “not Winston Churchill” and warning that he “ruins relationships.”

Echoes Of Labour’s Syria Revolt

The episode has drawn comparisons to the dramatic parliamentary rebellion in 2013, when Miliband — then Labour leader — derailed proposed British strikes against Bashar al-Assad’s regime following chemical weapons attacks in Syria.

Critics argue the latest dispute shows similar instincts at the heart of Labour’s foreign policy.

Starmer has defended his handling of the crisis, telling MPs Britain must only act when there is a “clear and thought-through” strategy from Washington and its allies.

But with US bombers now heading to Diego Garcia, the damage may already be done — both inside the Cabinet and across the Atlantic.

SOURCE

 

Typical cowardly style from starmer

Trump should disown that fool and his country until starmer is gone

They are no use to us with that pathetic simp in charge

Sad it used to be a great country

Why would the UK want to follow a demented and dumb leader into yet another war?

The UK and Australia and New Zealand (amongst others) have followed the US into their wars and skirmishes and yet Trump stated a short while ago that, "the Brits stayed away from the front line mainly" or words to that effect, insulting the troops that fought in the Afghanistan war (for 20 years).

Furthermore there seems to have been no planning put into this, nor an exit strategy, which would be typical of someone with less than half a brain like Trump.

AND Trump called those lost in battle, "Suckers and Losers".........so who would expect to lay down their lives for a dumb moron like trump.

What is it with these wiener does furiously wagging their tags and looking up at Trump hopefully for his approval?

The only reason the US is the self-declared world police is because other countries allow them to.

The real pity is that the war on Iran will have no effect. The old regime will regroup and, unless Israel levels the country like Gaza, everything will be the same-old. Except a lot of ordinary people suffering for no reason.

Iran's only card to play is is the Strait. It will be some comeuppance if they manage to hold it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.