11 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

He's definitely racist, yes. And paranoid.

It's a game of numbers. If the population of Muslims goes above a certain percentage, it will become a Muslim country.

A lot of people don't like Musk, but I think he's a highly intelligent person. If Musk is sounding the alarm, then people should take note and not sweep every comment under the carpet and label it as racism.

Quote from Musk: If you have a large group of people whose beliefs are antithetical to Western beliefs, at some point they will try to implement their views.

Edited July 24Jul 24 by save the frogs

20 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

My uncle was a Polish Jew (nice guy), my first gf was a Jew (lovely girl).

That was back in Brighton.

I'd even turn their lights on and uncover their dinner table on a Saturday night.

Although having to walk home after a late night date on a Friday night could be a bit of a pain.

Which does absolutely zero to rescue your nonsense claim that I hate Jews.

Let alone your very strange belief that someone is attacking your culture while you post somewhere outside Nakhon Nowhere.

26 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Which does absolutely zero to rescue your nonsense claim that I hate Jews.

Let alone your very strange belief that someone is attacking your culture while you post somewhere outside Nakhon Nowhere.

Everyone knows you hate Jews.

It emanates from every post you make on the issue of Israel and your wish to have them eradicated "from the river to the sea", while labeling them genocidal.

18 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ve already quoted your filthy racist and antisemitic remarks in this thread.

Be assured Jonny, they will not be forgotten.

No you haven't. You keep referring to them but are unable to quote me. Why? Because they don't exist. Classic Higgot gaslighting. 😄

Let me be very clear. I am very fond of Jewish people. I find them intelligent, peaceful and in most cases extremely successful. One of my closest childhood friends was Jewish and I remain in contact with her.

I have great admiration for them and support their right to a Jewish state, free of disgusting violent attacks from neighbours such as October 7. I wish them all the best defending their homeland from the violent neighbours that surround them. I find the Pro-Palestine leftists revolting.

Talking of revolting pro Palestine leftists, you on the other hand, frequently denigrate Israel and are an apologist for attacks upon the Jewish people by the likes of Hamas. You are the classic "from the river to the sea" left wing anti-semite and your attempts to project your hatred of Jews onto me just further highlights your lack of morality.

11 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Everyone knows you hate Jews.

It emanates from every post you make on the issue of Israel and your wish to have them eradicated "from the river to the sea", while labeling them genocidal.

Jonny you’re antisemite credentials are in the bag.

No amount of DARVO on your part is going to change that fact.

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Jonny you’re antisemite credentials are in the bag.

No amount of DARVO on your part is going to change that fact.

Yes, you keep saying that Higgot. 😄

Yet you keep failing to produce the quote when asked. I've asked about 10 times now. 😄

You lies are clear to everyone. Just as your racist, anti-semitic, ethnic erasing, bigoted narrative is.

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

I have no problem with Muslims killing each other and oppressing their women in their own countries.

Lefties, always banging on about women's rights, and gay men's rights, but loving Muslims. It's all rather odd, I guess they can't think for themselves and just obey their ideological masters.

Then you have their god, Karl Marx who thought women and non-whites were property.

A very confusing answer.

Your original post about Bangladesh (is) said you didn't think their religion was violent or primitive, yet when I pointed out their religion was Muslim, you go off on a tangent about Muslims killing each other and ' lefties'.

I reckon you have nothing against Bangladeshis, it's Muslim Arabs you hate.

King Charles taking some heat for putting Islam on a pedestal at Easter.

Neglecting his role as defender of the Faith?

Time to ban all religions?

But this seems stupid because doesn't Ramadan fall around the same time as Easter?

Edited July 24Jul 24 by save the frogs

3 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

King Charles taking some heat for putting Islam on a pedestal at Easter.

Neglecting his role as defender of the Faith?

Time to ban all religions?

But this seems stupid because doesn't Ramadan fall around the same time as Easter?

Let's just say it's becoming very clear why Queen Elizabeth II stayed on the throne until she passed.

Fortunately, William will make an excellent King.

It's just a question of how much damage is done before then.

32 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Let's just say it's becoming very clear why Queen Elizabeth II stayed on the throne until she passed.

Fortunately, William will make an excellent King.

It's just a question of how much damage is done before then.

She stayed in her throne until she died because she took her oath seriously and perhaps because she saw what a Monarch abdicating did to her father.

12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

She stayed in her throne until she died because she took her oath seriously and perhaps because she saw what a Monarch abdicating did to her father.

Many have suggested that she could see that there would be a period with a weak minded, lily livered Liberal tree hugger and she wished to keep that to a minimum.

2 hours ago, save the frogs said:

King Charles taking some heat for putting Islam on a pedestal at Easter.

Neglecting his role as defender of the Faith?

Time to ban all religions?

But this seems stupid because doesn't Ramadan fall around the same time as Easter?

The dates of both Easter and Ramadan vary. I think that it would be coincidental if they coincided?

"Imagine no religion?" Imo quite a positive thought but no chance of it happening.

Still, as long as there are "tolerant religious zealots" - an oxymoron if ever there was one - like the priest in the video our morality and souls are in good hands🤦

6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

The answer is simple Raymond. The truth. I know it's a concept you struggle with.

Someone commented that most of the team were not English. I clarified the comment, I stated the fact that they were English in terms of nationality, but not ethnicity.

I stand by that stated fact. I will continue to speak the truth openly without hesitation and I refuse to be silenced by the Woke mob and their tired old attempts at insults.

The truth endures. Therefore, I repeat, they are not ethnically English. Moreover, none of your lame and overtly racist attempts at ethnic erasure of the English will change that fact.

Continue...

Another redefinition, Jonny. This time, it's the word, 'truth'. You're right. I don't understand your version of it.

Your "clarification" was meaningless. Of course, I don't have access to data about the England players DNA, but statistically it's almost certain that none of the England team - black or white - are 100% ethnically English. You chose to identify only the black players in the team as not being ethnically English and we all know why that is.

You're right again, Jonny. The truth will endure but not your redefined, fabricated version of it.

Your feeble attempts to justify your racism grow even more pathetic.

On 7/16/2026 at 2:52 AM, JonnyF said:

It's weird having a coach refusing the sing the national anthem because he isn't from that nation.

It's a key part of the team. Should be English same as the players.

What next? Foreign goalkeepers? Up to 2 foreign outfield players? Buying players from other nations with a transfer fee and a quick passport swap?

Not for me.

To be fair, it's even weirder that the players have to sing THAT <deleted> national anthem at all.
Not to mention the fact that the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (later rebranded as the 'Windsors') are pretty much Germans (with a bit of Greek (Phil) and Jewish (Jimmy Goldsmith was Diana's real father / Kate's mum also a Jew) thrown into the completely non-English mix.

So, English national anthem, aloong with the Windsors, needs to go..

No one's ever gonna get passionate about a song about god saving a kInG who isn't even English.
The players try but at heart, we and they all know our song is BS - a painful 2 minutes - esp when u consider that some of the other national anthems are straight bangers.

PS. There's zero indication that William won't continue where his dad left off.

QE2 also weirdly over rated by boomers considering she oversaw the transformation of a rich country into a multi culti, financialised, failing state and never did or said anything to intervene. Probably burning in hell along with Phil and the rest of the freaks : )

.

Edited July 24Jul 24 by Tourist2

3 hours ago, save the frogs said:

King Charles taking some heat for putting Islam on a pedestal at Easter.

Neglecting his role as defender of the Faith?

Time to ban all religions?

But this seems stupid because doesn't Ramadan fall around the same time as Easter?

Charles is likely just following orders - his brother was likely hung out to dry in the Epstien affair as punishment for this:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-1986-letter-prince-charles-blames-foreign-jews-for-mid-east-turmoil/

Remember: Less Muzzies in the ME = more space for the greater isreal project

Yookay Poking Order =

Good point about the Royal Family, ethnically English, absolutely not.

Albert, Queen Victoria's husband was German, the Russian czars were cousins, Greeks thrown in.

No wonder they had to change the surname when war broke out.

The UK, consisting of a small island with many ports and very close to Europe, is inevitably going to have citizens containing many strains of European ethnic groups, plus some of further afield.

4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I have great admiration for them and support their right to a Jewish state,

Misguided but true to the script.

Worth getting your head around this:

Edited July 24Jul 24 by Tourist2

12 minutes ago, bannork said:

Good point about the Royal Family, ethnically English, absolutely not.

Also, another point about the monarchy.

May be off topic or maybe not entirely.

How did Lady Diana die?

Was she deliberately killed?

And if so, was at least part of the reason was her involvement with Dodi Fayed?

Muslim immigrants are one thing, but mixing royal bloodlines is another?

Asking AI whether there is such a thing as pure English heritage-

From a genetic and historical standpoint, no, there is no such thing as a "pure" ethnic English heritage.

The concept of a biologically uniform, distinct English race is a modern myth.

What we define as "English" today is the result of thousands of years of continuous migration, displacement, and intermarriage between completely different groups of people.

The Genetic Melting Pot

The modern English genome is a highly complex blend of several distinct ancestral populations.

Comprehensive genetic mapping, such as the landmark Oxford University genetic map of the British Isles, demonstrates that the English population is a historical mixture:Indigenous Britons (Celts): The foundational genetic layer of England comes from the ancient hunter-gatherers and Bronze Age farmers who inhabited the island first.Anglo-Saxons: Germanic tribes (Angles, Saxons, and Jutes) arrived in mass migrations starting in the 5th century.

They did not completely replace the native population but heavily integrated and intermarried with them.

The Norse (Vikings): Scandinavian invasions left a permanent, distinct genetic signature, particularly in the northern and eastern regions of England known as the Danelaw.

Normans: The French-speaking Norman Conquest of 1066 introduced continental European DNA into the ruling classes, which gradually diffused into the wider population.

Why DNA Tests Report "100% English"If you take a commercial DNA test and it shows "100% English," this does not mean you have a pure, ancient bloodline.

Genetic testing companies create reference panels based on modern populations. A "100% English" result simply means your DNA perfectly matches the average genetic makeup of people whose grandparents and great-grandparents lived in England.

It is a snapshot of modern geographical clustering, not an indicator of a single, ancient ethnic source.

The Evolution of "Englishness"The concept of the "English people" began as a political and cultural identity, rather than a biological one. The identity emerged when various Anglo-Saxon kingdoms began unifying against Viking invasions.

Because English heritage is built on centuries of global migration, trade, and integration, sociologists and historians generally agree that Englishness is a cultural, linguistic, and civic identity rather than a strict biological category.

Off topic troll post and replies removed @JonnyF

Meanwhile, back to the football.

Young kids at Barcelona, showing the talent to come.

18 hours ago, bannork said:

Asking AI whether there is such a thing as pure English heritage-

From a genetic and historical standpoint, no, there is no such thing as a "pure" ethnic English heritage.

The concept of a biologically uniform, distinct English race is a modern myth.

What we define as "English" today is the result of thousands of years of continuous migration, displacement, and intermarriage between completely different groups of people.

The Genetic Melting Pot

The modern English genome is a highly complex blend of several distinct ancestral populations.

Comprehensive genetic mapping, such as the landmark Oxford University genetic map of the British Isles, demonstrates that the English population is a historical mixture:Indigenous Britons (Celts): The foundational genetic layer of England comes from the ancient hunter-gatherers and Bronze Age farmers who inhabited the island first.Anglo-Saxons: Germanic tribes (Angles, Saxons, and Jutes) arrived in mass migrations starting in the 5th century.

They did not completely replace the native population but heavily integrated and intermarried with them.

The Norse (Vikings): Scandinavian invasions left a permanent, distinct genetic signature, particularly in the northern and eastern regions of England known as the Danelaw.

Normans: The French-speaking Norman Conquest of 1066 introduced continental European DNA into the ruling classes, which gradually diffused into the wider population.

Why DNA Tests Report "100% English"If you take a commercial DNA test and it shows "100% English," this does not mean you have a pure, ancient bloodline.

Genetic testing companies create reference panels based on modern populations. A "100% English" result simply means your DNA perfectly matches the average genetic makeup of people whose grandparents and great-grandparents lived in England.

It is a snapshot of modern geographical clustering, not an indicator of a single, ancient ethnic source.

The Evolution of "Englishness"The concept of the "English people" began as a political and cultural identity, rather than a biological one. The identity emerged when various Anglo-Saxon kingdoms began unifying against Viking invasions.

Because English heritage is built on centuries of global migration, trade, and integration, sociologists and historians generally agree that Englishness is a cultural, linguistic, and civic identity rather than a strict biological category.

The language gives it away despite what the cack handed statements of some guy sitting in his pajamas on the Verandah of his bungalow in Nakhon Nowhere have to say on the matter.

22 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Let's just say it's becoming very clear why Queen Elizabeth II stayed on the throne until she passed.

Fortunately, William will make an excellent King.

It's just a question of how much damage is done before then.

My vote is for Andrew!

Andrew is definitely part of the manosphere, if not a world cup star.

Edited July 25Jul 25 by BritManToo

36 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The language gives it away despite what the cack handed statements of some guy sitting in his pajamas on the Verandah of his bungalow in Nakhon Nowhere have to say on the matter.

Just calling people racist is over-simplifying a complex issue.

The Charlie Hebdo case ... it was common free speech for France citizens to mock whatever they wanted... until they mocked the wrong people. Now we see clash of cultures, recent immigrants imposing their will through extreme violence in a land that has not been their own very long, acting like they own the joint, as opposed to integrating and respecting local culture and freedoms of expression that the West has developed over the years.

13 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Just calling people racist is over-simplifying a complex issue.

The Charlie Hebdo case ... it was common free speech for France citizens to mock whatever they wanted... until they mocked the wrong people. Now we see clash of cultures, recent immigrants imposing their will through extreme violence in a land that has not been their own very long, acting like they own the joint, as opposed to integrating and respecting local culture and freedoms of expression that the West has developed over the years.

Which part of my post you responded to calls anyone a racist?

46 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Which part of my post you responded to calls anyone a racist?

Not the latest post. Previous posts.

5 hours ago, bannork said:

Meanwhile, back to the football.

Young kids at Barcelona, showing the talent to come.

I'd like to ask JonnyF and indeed anyone who really knows about football, why can't British players dribble like this?

We pass better these days, like the kids here, but it's rare to see such superb dribbling in UK soccer.

Or are things changing with the kids?

2 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Not the latest post. Previous posts.

The only people I have called racists are those that make racists post which I quoted at the time of calling out their racism.

21 minutes ago, bannork said:

I'd like to ask JonnyF and indeed anyone who really knows about football, why can't British players dribble like this?

We pass better these days, like the kids here, but it's rare to see such superb dribbling in UK soccer.

Or are things changing with the kids?

Barcelona buy the best football playing kids from aground the World to train at Barcelona's academy .

Barcelona bring the Worlds best 6 year olds to Barcelona to train and become football players .

In many countries in the EU, it seems groups are forming to counter-act this mass migration.

This is a group in the Netherlands.

Here are some comments from the comments section of this video: