New True Internet - 8mbps
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
20
Did we have the best of it ? Is Britain Lost ?
Your quoted cancer survival rates are based on what? -
58
Illegal Foreign Tour Guides Bypass Thai Law with Bribes
Isn´t it not more the problem of corruptible Thai Officials?.....Being corruptible is obviously reserved for Thais -
41
Economic News to Make the Trump Haters Scream
And exactly the same is happening this time. Companies make big promises, because they know that will land them big favors from Trump for the time being, and probably will exempt them from the tariffs. They also know that Trump will be in office for a maximum of 4 years, put probably will be expelled much earlier, so they will then renege on their promises but in the meantime have cashed in on Trump's favors -
22
The Struggle for Supremacy: Can Trump Halt China’s Global Ascent?
Traitors! We defended you and rebuilt you twice and when the time has come for you to grow a pair and live up to your end you run to China waving white flags? Seriously? This will be a VERY interesting meeting at the white house today with Giorgia Meloni reping for trade agreements for the EU. Brings up flashbacks of Dec. 7th, 1941 where Japan had an envoy sitting in the white house with a peace proposal while Pearl Harbor was attacked. -
43
Harvard University resists
And what has that got to do with denying funds for medical and hi-tech research? -
43
Harvard University resists
"But it’s that lack of a standard definition for affirmative consent that has led some colleges like Harvard not to adopt it. Harvard’s policy forbids what it calls “unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature,” stating that “conduct is unwelcome if a person did not request or invite it and regarded the unrequested or uninvited conduct as undesirable or offensive.” Earlier this week, 28 current and former Harvard law professors said the policy could deny due process process to those who are accused and that its definition of unwanted conduct was too broad and vague. Student activists, meanwhile, said the definition doesn’t go nearly far enough, and urged Harvard to change its definition to one of affirmative consent, saying in a petition that “the absence of a ‘no’ does not mean ‘yes,’ and our university policy should explicitly recognize that.” Mia Karvonides, the university’s Title IX officer, said that Harvard uses a standard that is “consistent with the standard in all federal civil rights laws that apply in an education setting,” and that even its peers in the Ivy League don’t truly use an affirmative consent standard as they don’t require a verbal yes at every turn “The closest any college comes to a defined affirmative-consent approach is Antioch College,” Karvonides said. “Under their policy, consent is given step by step at every point of engagement during an intimate encounter. You must verbally ask and verbally get an answer for every point of engagement. ‘May I kiss you? May I undo your blouse?’ ” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/means-enough-college-campuses They have gone insane. Literally. These people are not rational anymore.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now