Well, I am bending my oath again. The ignorance of your post screams for my attention and it begs for my response.

I see you spelled Benghazi correctly this time. Ben Ghazi was just a little too wrong for me to pass up. All of this does prove one thing. You are, at the very least, teachable. Good on 'ya.

On to "disbelief" versus "jealous". I realized at the time I should compare "disbelief" to the word "jealousy". However since you used the word "jealous", I was concerned you would report my post to the mods as having misquoted you. We couldn't have that, now could we.

Now on to your fraudulent claim that I used the word "dam" in my post. Let me suggest you get your Captain Marvel magnifying glass out and look very closely at your 8 inch monitor and see what the word really is. I do believe you will find the slightest break in the letter "m". When observed properly and with at least one eye open, you will discover the single letter "m" is really two letters, i.e. "r" and "n".

The word is actually...d-a-r-n.

Have a nice posting day. It can't possibly get much worse for you.

"Bending your oath".... breaking your word again. Please try to be honest, your lack of integrity is disappointing.

You claim you "realized" the mistake....then why not simply use "disbelieving"? Ignorance or dishonesty here?

"Fraudulent claim"....as a typo is a mistake, so is misreading. Do away with your silly spin...it doesn't impress anyone.

What are you trying to boast at the reference to my 8" monitor? That your dog kennel is bigger?

I actually laugh at the thought that you think your post has made my day bad! Is that your arrogance or an unrealistic view of the world?

Thanks

BTW...if you think you post has made my day bad......then you have admitted to being a troll. I don't mind. Unlike you and your silly weak comadres who, when you have no retort go running to mummy that "he said I'm a dummy, wah wah wah!" , I will let this one go.

"Bending your oath".... breaking your word again. Please try to be honest, your lack of integrity is disappointing.

Don't be too hard on him. You did the same thing when you said that you would never answer my posts again and continue to do it to this day.

I will let this one go.

Go for it, big guy. You have obviously mistaken me for somebody that gives a sh*t.

I'm disappointed you didn't highlight my Captain Marvel comment. I thought it was a good one.

Oh, d-a-r-n, I have done it again.

"Bending your oath".... breaking your word again. Please try to be honest, your lack of integrity is disappointing.

Don't be too hard on him. You did the same thing when you said that you would never answer my posts again and continue to do it to this day.

Wrong...AGAIN!!!!

I suggest you go back and look at my actual words.....please stop misrepresenting my words by using half truths....it's either dishonest or a sign of poor comprehension.

"Bending your oath".... breaking your word again. Please try to be honest, your lack of integrity is disappointing.

Don't be too hard on him. You did the same thing when you said that you would never answer my posts again and continue to do it to this day.

UG:

Now you can expect a flood of outrage screaming..."Liar. liar. Pants on fire"...from the injured party.

His comment will be followed by...prove it, man up, don't be such a coward and other endearing terms.

Edit in: I see Speedy Gonzales, aka Harcourt, beat me to it.

I will let this one go.

Go for it, big guy. You have obviously mistaken me for somebody that gives a sh*t.

I'm disappointed you didn't highlight my Captain Marvel comment. I thought it was a good one.

Oh, d-a-r-n, I have done it again.

Happy to disappoint you . The comment was too silly to comment on. A sad admission that you thought it was a good one .

Oh well....it looks like you have no oath to keep anymore....it would be silly to try after having broken it so many times.

Cool...I can post knowing that you will reply.

"Bending your oath".... breaking your word again. Please try to be honest, your lack of integrity is disappointing.

Don't be too hard on him. You did the same thing when you said that you would never answer my posts again and continue to do it to this day.

UG:

Now you can expect a flood of outrage screaming..."Liar. liar. Pants on fire"...from the injured party.

His comment will be followed by...prove it, man up, don't be such a coward and other endearing terms.

Edit in: I see Speedy Gonzales, aka Harcourt, beat me to it.

Actually chucky....I have maybe 40 more years before I reach my 2nd childhood, so I do not use expressions like "Liar. liar. Pants on fire".

What on earth would bring forth a charge of cowardice from the exchange with UG????? Silly...again.

Speedy Gonzales?.....you're letting your 2nd childhood show out again.

if you hear "allah akbar" you would know it's a non-muslim clown who doesn't know that it's "allah hu akbar"

You spelled it wrong yourself.

Is there a right and a wrong spelling for transliteration from Arabic to English? Surely it is simply phonetic?

Exactly. Now maybe Naam will realise how silly his comment was.

There are multiple transliterations by linguists for most languages. Thai is a good example. How many variations of "kop khun kha" have all of us seen?

"Bending your oath".... breaking your word again. Please try to be honest, your lack of integrity is disappointing.

Don't be too hard on him. You did the same thing when you said that you would never answer my posts again and continue to do it to this day.

UG:

Now you can expect a flood of outrage screaming..."Liar. liar. Pants on fire"...from the injured party.

His comment will be followed by...prove it, man up, don't be such a coward and other endearing terms.

Edit in: I see Speedy Gonzales, aka Harcourt, beat me to it.

Actually chucky....I have maybe 40 more years before I reach my 2nd childhood, so I do not use expressions like "Liar. liar. Pants on fire".

What on earth would bring forth a charge of cowardice from the exchange with UG????? Silly...again.

Speedy Gonzales?.....you're letting your 2nd childhood show out again.

Nice for you to confirm you are still in your childhood, with your second one some 40 years away.

As many of us suspected, you are a teenager posting in an adult forum.

Now if you would simply confirm your sex, we would know whether you are a teen aged boy or teen aged girl.

I bent my oath since you have been stalking me all the time anyway. This action by you is also reminiscent of teen aged behavior.

The nice thing about an oath is you can change it to suit your own purposes. From this point forward, my oath is only to respond when you post something of particular ignorance. With your history this is liable to be a full time job

if you hear "allah akbar" you would know it's a non-muslim clown who doesn't know that it's "allah hu akbar"

You spelled it wrong yourself.

Is there a right and a wrong spelling for transliteration from Arabic to English? Surely it is simply phonetic?

Exactly. Now maybe Naam will realise how silly his comment was.

There are multiple transliterations by linguists for most languages. Thai is a good example. How many variations of "kop khun kha" have all of us seen?

It's not simply a spelling error if you miss an entire word or syllable.

Nice for you to confirm you are still in your childhood, with your second one some 40 years away.

As many of us suspected, you are a teenager posting in an adult forum.

Now if you would simply confirm your sex, we would know whether you are a teen aged boy or teen aged girl.

I bent my oath since you have been stalking me all the time anyway. This action by you is also reminiscent of teen aged behavior.

The nice thing about an oath is you can change it to suit your own purposes. From this point forward, my oath is only to respond when you post something of particular ignorance. With your history this is liable to be a full time job

????? You're slipping away rapidly chucky....your posts are getting more and more ridiculous.

I can not see any confirmation of me being a teenager, let alone in my childhood. The fact that my 2nd childhood (a symptom of senility) is perhaps 40 years away indicates that I am approaching middle age. Very simple maths.

Don't flatter yourself chucky...I can't imagine anyone wanting to stalk you .

What's the point of an oath if you can change it when it suits? Ridiculous and redundant. And a viewpoint typical of a weak-willed egotist.

Is there a right and a wrong spelling for transliteration from Arabic to English? Surely it is simply phonetic?

Exactly. Now maybe Naam will realise how silly his comment was.

There are multiple transliterations by linguists for most languages. Thai is a good example. How many variations of "kop khun kha" have all of us seen?

It's not simply a spelling error if you miss an entire word or syllable.

The English do it all the time.

Anyway, I may not have spelled it to your or Naam's liking but at least I'm smart enough to duck if I hear some poor, misunderstood Muslim man shout it out.

It's not simply a spelling error if you miss an entire word or syllable.

it is indeed not a matter of spelling. "allah akbar" doesn't make any sense. what i don't understand is that people who claim to have worked/lived for an extended period in an islamic country failed to pick up the important syllable "-u" or "hu" which is the possessive adjective that adds sense. an interesting fact is that this spoken syllable/vowel is not used in script as it is the case with many arabic words.

I stopped believing you when you claimed the Saudi Arabian Air Defense Forces had S-300 SAMs all over the country. When I proved you wrong, you simply stopped making the claim.

you did not prove anything but had the excuse to contact "your source" who was not available because he/she was on leave in California (or somewhere). and i did not mention it again because it wasn't the right thing to do in the first place. "all over the country" seems to be the result of too much cheap booze which might have also caused your judgment about Saudi pilots.

simple questions:

-who brought my home into the discussion "murder or terrorism"? you or me?

-and who, pray tell, appraised my home from the distance (most probably after consulting his ethopian muslim driver)?

There are multiple transliterations by linguists for most languages. Thai is a good example. How many variations of "kop khun kha" have all of us seen?

It is considered petty to point out spelling errors in English on an English language forum, so transliterating phrases in Arabic must be doubly so.

I stopped believing you when you claimed the Saudi Arabian Air Defense Forces had S-300 SAMs all over the country. When I proved you wrong, you simply stopped making the claim.

you did not prove anything but had the excuse to contact "your source" who was not available because he/she was on leave in California (or somewhere). and i did not mention it again because it wasn't the right thing to do in the first place. "all over the country" seems to be the result of too much cheap booze which might have also caused your judgment about Saudi pilots.

simple questions:

-who brought my home into the discussion "murder or terrorism"? you or me?

-and who, pray tell, appraised my home from the distance (most probably after consulting his ethopian muslim driver)?

I provided the information I obtained from very reliable and highly placed sources that previously worked and are still working in Saudi. You chose to ignore the information and did not respond any further. Some might consider your silence a very strong indication that you have no other information or proof to refute my information. It seems I was correct in my assumption. Prove me wrong!

I brought your 25 million Baht home into the discussion after you made this comment in response to a post I made:

"are you having a bad hair day? did the Mrs order you to sleep in the 30m² dog kennel with the three retrievers because you talk without being asked by a grown-up?"

Any other comments?

The statements I made are fact.

Good one Alex!. Eddie Murphy and Richard Prior have nothing on you.

No problem UG, how about you and your other supporters come up with a definition of: Terror, Terrorist and Terrorism?

I made a start by stating that act's of terror (whatever they are) are intended to instigate fear in the general population.

Do you and your compadres agree with that? If not, could you please state an example of your definition of an act of terror.

Looking forward to your or Koheesti and Chuck reply.

(On a side note some US soldiers where just convicted of killing some innocent civilian"s just because they wanted to kill).

And please don't give me this shit of you not knowing because you never read it was real it would mean you either do not follow the news ore only selectively.

Alex

You are a laugh a minute Alex. No wonder your poor coworkers avoid discussions with you.

A couple of days ago someone left a suitcase at a bus station in Jerusalem (or should I spell it Yeroosolayim?) and it blew up, killing at least one civilian and injuring around fifty.

I would define this as a terrorist act.

Others would say it was an act of revenge for the evil IDF attacking Gaza from the air.

Yet others would point to the rockets sent from Gaza to injure/kill Israelis, which triggered the air force response.

Then again the rockets were sent to protest the actions of the Israeli government in allowing more houses to be built in lands not recognised by the world as being rightfully Jewish/Israeli.

And so on.

But to me that suitcase was an act of terror.

As is the bombing and strafing of parts of Libya by outside parties who have no political interest in the country, but merely want to steal the resources (oil and uranium) being developed there.

I provided the information I obtained from very reliable and highly placed sources that previously worked and are still working in Saudi. You chose to ignore the information and did not respond any further. ..........Any other comments?

Just one: So says the man that insists posters provide links to their sources, or else rubbishes the information as unreliable and unsubstatiated.

Double standard as per usual. Or are you allowed to bend that rule when it suits?

This is terrorism as well, in my opinion

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8404953/Libya-Gaddafi-regime-claims-100-civilians-have-been-killed-by-coalition-air-strikes.html

Libya: Gaddafi regime claims 100 civilians have been killed by coalition air strikes

The Libyan government on Thursday night claimed close to 100 civilians had died in air strikes since last Saturday, the first estimate of the number of casualties since the first day of bombing.

It is also most likely bullshit. It is said that Gadaffi used bodies that were killed by his own forces.

This is terrorism as well, in my opinion

http://www.telegraph...ir-strikes.html

Libya: Gaddafi regime claims 100 civilians have been killed by coalition air strikes

The Libyan government on Thursday night claimed close to 100 civilians had died in air strikes since last Saturday, the first estimate of the number of casualties since the first day of bombing.

I don't think you believe that the Coalition is bombing civilians in order to get Gaddafi to do what they want.

I'm sure the people on the other end of the bombs were terrified but that doesn't make the action itself terrorism. Some people are terrified of mice. That doesn't mean that a mouse walking across the floor is a terrorist.

This is terrorism as well, in my opinion

http://www.telegraph...ir-strikes.html

Libya: Gaddafi regime claims 100 civilians have been killed by coalition air strikes

The Libyan government on Thursday night claimed close to 100 civilians had died in air strikes since last Saturday, the first estimate of the number of casualties since the first day of bombing.

I have to say that I'm with UG and koheesti on this.

It is the mad dog Gaddafi claim....take it with a pinch of salt.

This is terrorism as well, in my opinion

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8404953/Libya-Gaddafi-regime-claims-100-civilians-have-been-killed-by-coalition-air-strikes.html

Libya: Gaddafi regime claims 100 civilians have been killed by coalition air strikes

The Libyan government on Thursday night claimed close to 100 civilians had died in air strikes since last Saturday, the first estimate of the number of casualties since the first day of bombing.

Does not seem out of the questions to me.

After all they (the coalition) have fired at least 125 tomahawk missiles ....Then add in the various bombing runs

Some of those have been at buildings in town that are thought to be command centers....So 100 would seem light to me.

Then again 1 is too much

This is terrorism as well, in my opinion

http://www.telegraph...ir-strikes.html

Libya: Gaddafi regime claims 100 civilians have been killed by coalition air strikes

The Libyan government on Thursday night claimed close to 100 civilians had died in air strikes since last Saturday, the first estimate of the number of casualties since the first day of bombing.

Does not seem out of the questions to me.

After all they (the coalition) have fired at least 125 tomahawk missiles ....Then add in the various bombing runs

Some of those have been at buildings in town that are thought to be command centers....So 100 would seem light to me.

Then again 1 is too much

Don't get me wrong.......I agree that it is not out of the question, ...I just think that I can not side with either versions of the propaganda.

I do not entirely agree with "Then again 1 is too much" either.......we have to be realistic.

Don't get me wrong.......I agree that it is not out of the question, ...I just think that I can not side with either versions of the propaganda.

I do not entirely agree with "Then again 1 is too much" either.......we have to be realistic.

Understood in regards to propaganda from both sides

As for being realistic.....I feel I am

I am not one to accept the claim that collateral damages are acceptable.

Perhaps I may be inclined to agree with that kind of thinking when responding to a countries unprovoked attack on

a country I live in. In that case yes that country attacked us without provocation....so all is fair from here on in.

But in the case of this so called no fly zone enforcement..meddling in another countries civil war.....? 1 is too much from a country I call home & supposedly represents me. I am glad to report that the majority here in the USA feel the same in this instance.

Sadly the majority in this land no longer calls the shots.

I was working in Libya (Benghazi) when the Reagan/Thatcher bombing raid happened.

At Jallah Hospital in Benghazi there were 132 civilian bodies by the end of the next day.

I don't know how many military, as they have their own hospitals.

Jallah was the A&E hospital in Benghazi at that time.

The number comes from the doctors and nurses working there - East European and Philippine nationals.

Missiles - don't know whether bombs or rockets, hit the middle of Benghazi that time - at least ten kilometres from any military target.

A couple of nights later there was a knock at my door around midnight. Opened up and our security were with a Libyan military officer. He wanted our workshops on site opened. So I got the keys and went down with him. He pointed to a big front-end loader and said "Bring that."

I couldn't, so I got the Thai driver up and we took it down the road, about twenty clicks south of BG. Then over the sand dunes to the beach. Just before the beach a couple of soldiers stopped us and indicated a bomb they wanted moved. While I said 'Not on your life' the Thai driver moved in and scooped it up. We took it into the dunes, built a sand wall around it and the Libs then blew it up. It was a bomb, not a missile, therefore I assume it was from the attackers.

All these raids seem to be in Tripoli and Misurata at the moment.

What civilians are in damger in Tripoli? Seems they all support Gaddafi there, or stay indoors and keep quiet.

In Misurata it seems the airport and hospital are in loyalist hands, the rebels being contained around the port. So how can the coalition do anything there? Street fighting can't be solved by air strikes.

This is, as was the Reagan/Thatcher thing, solely a way to expend expensive weapons and give the military some new toys to play with, while the politicians try to wring more concessions out of the country's leader with regard to oil and uranium.

It's all about money.

It is also most likely bullshit. It is said that Gadaffi used bodies that were killed by his own forces.

it was said weapons of mass destruction were ready to be deployed within 45 minutes. source: Tony B. Liar (aka Bootlicker)