Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I will probably get it, if it is as good as I think it is.

Canon has finally decided to quit the silly megapixel race. This camera might be the low light super performer that I have always dreamed of. Clean pictures at ISO 5800 +.

Price tag stings a little bit, but the release is in march, so I have loads of time to save up for it.

Edited by ricku
Posted

Having been a Canon/Nikon/Canon then back to Nikon user this is my take:

Good points - improved ISO, AF that is supposed to work, 14fps in jpeg, improved video. Bad - price, size/weight. No AF in video mode. EXPENSIVE! It's evolutionary rather than revolutionary. If the new Nikon has raw video, af video, thunderbolt, built-in wifi it would piss all over this. Or if the Red Scarlet with interchangeable lenses af's we'll all be using them :-)

Will wait for the D4 and then consider.

Second-hand Mk4's could be a good price then ;)

RAZZ

Posted (edited)

Lots of talk about video there Razz. ;) Sounds to me like you are a videographer?

Cool if you are, but none of those things matters for me and other photographers who does not care much about video.

By the way, I think that continuous autofocus is quite unnecessary unless you like "amateurish focus-pumping action" like on consumer camcorders.

Just my opinion.

Edited by ricku
Posted (edited)

Lots of talk about video there Razz. ;) Sounds to me like you are a videographer?

None of those things matters for me and other photographers who does not care much about video.

By the way, I think that continuous autofocus is quite unnecessary unless you like "amateurish focus-pumping action" like on consumer camcorders.

Just my opinion.

Continuous autofocus uneccessary? :blink::lol:

You ever tried photographing sport? ;)

Not really interested in video...but if I'm paying for it I don't want so spend 1000's of $'s, €'s or £'s on rails or follow focus systems to make it usable.

RAZZ

Edited by RAZZELL
Posted (edited)

Continuous autofocus uneccessary? :blink::lol:

You ever tried photographing sport? ;)

Not really interested in video...but if I'm paying for it I don't want so spend 1000's of s, €'s or £'s on rails or follow focus systems to make it work.

RAZZ

Is that a serious comment? I was obviously talking about continuous autofocus when doing videos. biggrin.gif

Edited by ricku
Posted

Continuous autofocus uneccessary? :blink::lol:

You ever tried photographing sport? ;)

Not really interested in video...but if I'm paying for it I don't want so spend 1000's of s, €'s or £'s on rails or follow focus systems to make it work.

RAZZ

Is that a serious comment? I was obviously talking about continuous autofocus when doing videos. biggrin.gif

Oops..Misunderstood ;)

There are good pro-level video cameras that follow focus....not brilliantly but they do work.

RAZZ

Posted

Incredible camera, but as I have said many times before... just what is it you want your camera for? Do you intend to market your photos? If so then it's a great step forward. But, if it's just to show pictures to your family and friends then what's the point.

Posted (edited)

Nikon all the way, dont waste your money on canon!

I am sure that you are very fond of your brand new Nikon Coolpix, but there is no need to bash other camera brands.

It will only make you look like a stupid fanboy and highly unprofessional, which I guess that you are anyway. coffee1.gif

Edited by ricku
Posted

Incredible camera, but as I have said many times before... just what is it you want your camera for? Do you intend to market your photos? If so then it's a great step forward. But, if it's just to show pictures to your family and friends then what's the point.

I have the 1D III and it has paid for itself many times over as a sports event camera. But that's all I use it for. For everything else it is heavy overkill and it stays in the cupboard; and a Panasonic GF1 is more than adequate.

Posted

Incredible camera, but as I have said many times before... just what is it you want your camera for? Do you intend to market your photos? If so then it's a great step forward. But, if it's just to show pictures to your family and friends then what's the point.

I have the 1D III and it has paid for itself many times over as a sports event camera. But that's all I use it for. For everything else it is heavy overkill and it stays in the cupboard; and a Panasonic GF1 is more than adequate.

99% of professional "photojournalists" use Nikon or Canon.

A great many switched brand loyalty due to the well-known focusing issues with the Canon Mk3.

Although there isn't much difference between a Nikon D3s and a Canon Mk4 (apart from video capabilities) I would say Nikon is "just" a little ahead.

RAZZ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 651

      Thailand's Expats Urged to Register with TRD for Tax, Says Expert

    2. 57

      Getting Old: Stoic About It or Endless Whinger?

    3. 13

      Thailand Live Monday 25 November 2024

    4. 3

      Thai-Chinese Collaboration: MOU Signed for Environmentally Friendly Waste-to-Energy Plant

    5. 1

      Marrying a Thai Wife: Overrated or Underrated?

    6. 5

      Tour Boat Capsizes in Cheow Lan Dam in Storm: Search for Missing French Tourist

    7. 0

      Young Male Elephant Found Dead in Natural Canal in Chachoengsao

    8. 13

      Thailand Live Monday 25 November 2024

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...