Another Suicide At The Tiffany Shooting Range

[sriracha john]

John,

All those sofisticated words in one sentence waw man but clearly you dont seem to have any idea of what you are talking.

First of all where did you get the story from about Pedophiles. Nothing or nobody has ever mentioned in any official statement that it handles about this matter. Maybe your mind is dirtier then you might think yourself.

Second It was mentioned that he was fired for showing pictures of a sexual nature to a co worker so he was fired on charges of sexual harrasment.

Third if a person of 63 years old does loose his job (at 63 you dont have that much to say anymore on the modern job market especialy with a report of sexual harrasment following you) plus he gets the name you people throw at him without even knowing what you are talking about and calling him names without even thinking about the consequences well i know people who did commit suiciced for much less than that. (Thai bar grilfriend leaving them after their first night out together)

-fourth I have my idea on how some people in Montessori handled this case but then again i know a bit more about the case and would like to keep those details to myself.

Thats realy all I have to say about this matter.

Sorry if my words were overly sophisticated, I'll try to refrain (stop) from doing it or at least supply other similar words in parenthesis.

I got the notion (idea) about pedophilia when reading that he was fired for showing indecent photos to 12 & 13 year-olds, which is a common ploy (trick) that pedophiles use to entice (encourage) children into indecent acts. The report on PCN didn't say it was a co-worker.

*Granted, reports on PCN are sometimes erroneous (wrong).*

You are right that I don't know him. I based my observations on the press reports, which may or may not be incorrect. The details, as reported, indicate very suspicious behaviors leading to my assessment (decision) that he was likely a pedophile. I don't think his being called one on thaivisa would have much impact on anyone’s employment, however.

Someone committing suicide over a BG leaving him after their first night has some serious mental issues and would likely have done so over some other "crisis" even if he had never made it to Thailand. It's certainly not within the "normal" range of response. It's tragic, but obviously it does happen.

I can appreciate that you may wish to keep certain details to yourself and certainly respect your right to do so.

[Dirk_brijs]

I got the notion (idea) about pedophilia when reading that he was fired for showing indecent photos to 12 & 13 year-olds, which is a common ploy (trick) that pedophiles use to entice (encourage) children into indecent acts. The report on PCN didn't say it was a co-worker.

*Granted, reports on PCN are sometimes erroneous (wrong).*

John,

as you seem to be such a reader you would have read in one of my previous posts that it would have been extremely hard for him to have shown sexual explicit pictures to his 12&13 year old students as Montesosori first of all is a kindergarten type school where the oldest student is about 6 to 7 and secondly the person in question didnt have any students as he mainly performed office duties at the school.

And dont worry about your difficult words I have an online dictionary and I was thought from house out what you dont know you should look up to keep your brain exercised which maybe some people on this board should do as well before starting to accuse people of such grave acts without even taking the effort on checking a minimum on facts.

Edited January 22, 2006 by Dirk_brijs

[gburns57au]

I got the notion (idea) about pedophilia when reading that he was fired for showing indecent photos to 12 & 13 year-olds, which is a common ploy (trick) that pedophiles use to entice (encourage) children into indecent acts. The report on PCN didn't say it was a co-worker.

*Granted, reports on PCN are sometimes erroneous (wrong).*

John,

as you seem to be such a reader you would have read in one of my previous posts that it would have been extremely hard for him to have shown sexual explicit pictures to his 12&13 year old students as Montesosori first of all is a kindergarten type school where the oldest student is about 6 to 7 and secondly the person in question didnt have any students as he mainly performed office duties at the school.

And dont worry about your difficult words I have an online dictionary and I was thought from house out what you dont know you should look up to keep your brain exercised which maybe some people on this board should do as well before starting to accuse people of such grave acts without even taking the effort on checking a minimum on facts.

Dont worry about SJ....he would hang anyone he heard had spat on the street.....he still cant work out that an assumption is not an assessment.....

Edited January 22, 2006 by gburns57au

[Dirk_brijs]

Dont worry about SJ....he would hang anyone he heard had spat on the street.....he still cant work out that an assumption is not an assessment.....

Now that is also a conclusion i do not want to support i am not worried about any individuals just at the press and kind of people in general who jump to those kind of conlusions without wanting to understand they play with human lives as it shows again.

[sriracha john]

I got the notion (idea) about pedophilia when reading that he was fired for showing indecent photos to 12 & 13 year-olds, which is a common ploy (trick) that pedophiles use to entice (encourage) children into indecent acts. The report on PCN didn't say it was a co-worker.

*Granted, reports on PCN are sometimes erroneous (wrong).*

John,

as you seem to be such a reader you would have read in one of my previous posts that it would have been extremely hard for him to have shown sexual explicit pictures to his 12&13 year old students as Montesosori first of all is a kindergarten type school where the oldest student is about 6 to 7 and secondly the person in question didnt have any students as he mainly performed office duties at the school.

And dont worry about your difficult words I have an online dictionary and I was thought from house out what you dont know you should look up to keep your brain exercised which maybe some people on this board should do as well before starting to accuse people of such grave acts without even taking the effort on checking a minimum on facts.

Dont worry about SJ....he would hang anyone he heard had spat on the street.....he still cant work out that an assumption is not an assessment.....

LOL @ gburns....

to quote his own words in a another very recent thread

"not worthy of a response"

[gburns57au]

Dont worry about SJ....he would hang anyone he heard had spat on the street.....he still cant work out that an assumption is not an assessment.....

LOL @ gburns....

to quote his own words in a another very recent thread

"not worthy of a response"

aha but you did......

[husky]

As a parent of one of the students at the Montessori school, I've known Ron since he took on the job as principle there. Although we didn't know each other socially, we had a lot of interaction in the PTA and various other school activities. As far as his job, I would say he was really good. He did a lot of good things for the school, by that I mean programs such as the PTA and organized and ran events well. He also was a good person to run any problems by with my child and seemed to take and interest in all the children at the school.

I also knew the previous principle who I didn't find to be nearly as good in that position.

I heard of the events leading up to the dismissal by another teacher, didn't need to get the full details, but basically thought that it didn't sound all that serious to merit a dismissal. Anyway, again, I didn't get into detail but as far as him being principle the infraction sounded minor. It definitely didn't involve showing inappropriate materials to students as others here seem to have reported. Nothing in my interaction with him ever gave me cause to suspect that he shouldn't be in that position and nothing I've heard to date does either.

I felt from knowing Mr. Ron he would take the firing badly and also knew his money situation wasn't the best.

I'll remember Mr. Ron as a really good principle and friend who I would say brought a lot to the school.

[OldAsiaHand]

If only 10% of the posts on the board were this interesting, restrained, and relevant.

If only.

[thebounder]

If you want to know the truth, here it is. This is from an email sent by a teacher who resigned in protest at what this guy had been caught doing. The most telling part is that he apparently admitted what he had been doing,

"It is very sad that Mr. Ron died. However, if he had been at home in

the USA he would be in police custody for trying to obtain child pornography.

He would therefore be safe from psychological harm that inevitably

comes to a man who has been exposed. He would have access to

psychiatric help if it was deemed correct. Here he has been left uncared for and sadly he is dead.

Anyone who is trying to obtain child pornography is committing a

global crime. He admitted it and expressed that he had psychological problems.

This was stated to parents on the meeting of January 3rd. Now the story

changes and they are claiming he was ‘set up’. Ms. [name]

and Ms. [name] were both present and witnessed Mr. Ron trying to obtain pornography."

[FlyingDutchman]

I guess the old bugger tried to avoid making any victims in the future, so he took the right decision ...

[sriracha john]

POST #1

As a parent of one of the students at the Montessori school, I've known Ron since he took on the job as principle there. Although we didn't know each other socially, we had a lot of interaction in the PTA and various other school activities. As far as his job, I would say he was really good. He did a lot of good things for the school, by that I mean programs such as the PTA and organized and ran events well. He also was a good person to run any problems by with my child and seemed to take and interest in all the children at the school.

I also knew the previous principle who I didn't find to be nearly as good in that position.

I heard of the events leading up to the dismissal by another teacher, didn't need to get the full details, but basically thought that it didn't sound all that serious to merit a dismissal. Anyway, again, I didn't get into detail but as far as him being principle the infraction sounded minor. It definitely didn't involve showing inappropriate materials to students as others here seem to have reported. Nothing in my interaction with him ever gave me cause to suspect that he shouldn't be in that position and nothing I've heard to date does either.

I felt from knowing Mr. Ron he would take the firing badly and also knew his money situation wasn't the best.

I'll remember Mr. Ron as a really good principle and friend who I would say brought a lot to the school.

POST #2

If you want to know the truth, here it is. This is from an email sent by a teacher who resigned in protest at what this guy had been caught doing. The most telling part is that he apparently admitted what he had been doing,

"It is very sad that Mr. Ron died. However, if he had been at home in

the USA he would be in police custody for trying to obtain child pornography.

He would therefore be safe from psychological harm that inevitably

comes to a man who has been exposed. He would have access to

psychiatric help if it was deemed correct. Here he has been left uncared for and sadly he is dead.

Anyone who is trying to obtain child pornography is committing a

global crime. He admitted it and expressed that he had psychological problems.

This was stated to parents on the meeting of January 3rd. Now the story

changes and they are claiming he was ‘set up’. Ms. [name]

and Ms. [name] were both present and witnessed Mr. Ron trying to obtain pornography."

Amazingly, diametrically-opposed stands...

Any additional information from either side?? To tip the scales?

as for credibility, one aspect is TV history and post #2 has many completely legitimate and worthwhile posts while post #1 is literally a first poster. Post #2, actually for a pattaya poster, is surprisingly and refreshingly normal. Certainly, tv history is but a small part of the total picture, but it IS does play a role. And credibility is but one aspect of an even larger picture.

Edited February 5, 2006 by sriracha john