Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

bang-up job by the FA this. basically set a precedent for any player who wants to boot down the referee's door after a match and threaten him. go ahead, we'll just fine you and ban you the same as if you'd been sent off by the referee during the match. utter berks they are.

Not trying to be thick here....... but berks for being too soft, or too hard ?

What punishment would you advocate in this case ? - genuine question...

  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

If you accuse someone of racist comments and you are proven wrong, then you've made a false accusation.

A lot of people call that lying.

Myself included.

A false accusation is lying is it? What a comedian. So if Ramires believes he heard something and it seems likely he mis-heard, he is lying. 55555555 I don't follow that logic at all.

So Chicog, this is your events of what happened.

Chelsea lost to bad ref decisions.

In the dressing room they decide to make up a racism story.

To make it seem more realistic, Mikel agrees to get angry and burst in the the refs office and threatened to break his legs.

Or.

Ramires mis-heard.

If its just a lie, why didn't Mikel say he heard the ref say it?

Keep clutching at straws.

Chelsea have also confirmed a separate incident, understood to involve Juan Mata, after claims that Clattenburg called him ‘a Spanish t**t’.

Lie.

No - it's true...... he is a "t**t" (Spanish to boot).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...