Jump to content

Protest Grenade Attack: Police Dispute PCAD's Claims


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

The more the truth comes out the more it looks like a cover up by the anti government protesters and their leaders. But it seems to have failed.

In your hardly humble and ever so slightly biased opinion.

Sure. Anyway, over to the other English language newspaper in Thailand then. They report flatly that a 'Democrat Aide' is a suspect in the bombing (murder). But those kinds of articles you don't see in The Nation and affiliated media/forums.

Do a google search for " democrat-aide-sought-over-blast "

The BP article states no such thing. It reports they are seeking the owner of the pickup, no mention is made of him being a suspect.

  • Like 1
Posted

The more the truth comes out the more it looks like a cover up by the anti government protesters and their leaders. But it seems to have failed.

In your hardly humble and ever so slightly biased opinion.

Sure. Anyway, over to the other English language newspaper in Thailand then. They report flatly that a 'Democrat Aide' is a suspect in the bombing (murder). But those kinds of articles you don't see in The Nation and affiliated media/forums.

Do a google search for " democrat-aide-sought-over-blast "

Not unusual to look for the driver of a vehicle that was attacked, nor is it unusual for them to look for the owner of said vehicle.

"Pol Col Khamthon Ouicharoen, an explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) specialist attached to the Patrol and Special Operations Division, said it was unlikely the grenade had been thrown from the pickup said to be owned by an anti-government protester."

So who's right then?

Posted
The more the truth comes out the more it looks like a cover up by the anti government protesters and their leaders. But it seems to have failed.

In your hardly humble and ever so slightly biased opinion.

Sure. Anyway, over to the other English language newspaper in Thailand then. They report flatly that a 'Democrat Aide' is a suspect in the bombing (murder). But those kinds of articles you don't see in The Nation and affiliated media/forums.

Do a google search for " democrat-aide-sought-over-blast "

More dishonesty from you.

His does "sought" equate to "suspect"?

How can anyone take you seriously?

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

  • Like 1
Posted

Front page of the Bangkok Post says it all.

Appears to be Democrat Party aide that is being sought by police. Man in white hat walks up from behind, drops something and quickly goes to hide behind a nearby pole before explosion.

Posted

So just who is PCAD ? did they change the name before or after the explosion ? if before then this man wanted for questioning has nothing to do with the movement, that was the PDRC ... oh here we go again with the peoples front Monty Python sketch again. rolleyes.gif

Posted

Everything about this says set up, in my opinion. PDRC bombing PDRC in order to try to get sympathy, get army to coup and also raise more money, in my opinion.

PDRC leaders changing the route at the last minute to walk past these empty shop houses, a road never walked before.

PDRC guards and protestors go into the building to violate the alleged crime scene before police/army arrive.

PDRC guards do not allow police to enter.

PDRC only allow army to enter.

And now, caught on film, man in white hat (protestors) drops grenade and hides behind pole and then departs the scene after explosion without a care for any injured person or what is happening.

Ah, so now it's a guy in a white hat who walks past that drops the grenade? It wasn't dropped from the truck as previously claimed?

Posted (edited)

".... police officers who arrived to investigate the bomb attack were turned away by the protesters, saying that the police were not neutral. The area was instead cordoned off and maintained by Royal Thai Army soldiers"

This is a telling quote...This reflects the view held by the UDD/RS/PTP that the military is in league with the protesters, and that in fact many of the guards are military types...There is a general conclusion that the military is there primarily to defend the protesters from Police analysis of their activities and investigations...There have been several other instances discussed on Social Media, of soldiers preventing Police investigations of protester use of explosives....The protesters need explosives to create an environment of confrontation and anarchy...They would love to link Red Shirts to these gratuitous explosions...Another sign of military complicity is the use of explosives in the first place...It takes a certain amount of expertise to do that, which again points back to them...It is felt by the UDD/RS/PTP that the military is 'chafing at the bit' to launch a self-serving coup, with self-righteous indignation about needing to contain the violence they are in part perpetrating themselves....This is not opinion, and you may agree or disagree, but it summarizes some of the stuff that is circulating on Social Media amongst those seeking to preserve Electoral Democracy. Protecting it over against the entrenched elite who are attempting to nullify and/or dilute Electoral Democracy in order to restore their pre-Thaksin political hegemony in a way that protects it going forward.

So, we have the military protecting/supporting the anti-Govt protestors, and the Police protecting/supporting the pro-Govt supporters, is that correct?

Edited by Tatsujin
Posted

".... police officers who arrived to investigate the bomb attack were turned away by the protesters, saying that the police were not neutral. The area was instead cordoned off and maintained by Royal Thai Army soldiers"

This is a telling quote...This reflects the view held by the UDD/RS/PTP that the military is in league with the protesters, and that in fact many of the guards are military types...There is a general conclusion that the military is there primarily to defend the protesters from Police analysis of their activities and investigations...There have been several other instances discussed on Social Media, of soldiers preventing Police investigations of protester use of explosives....The protesters need explosives to create an environment of confrontation and anarchy...They would love to link Red Shirts to these gratuitous explosions...Another sign of military complicity is the use of explosives in the first place...It takes a certain amount of expertise to do that, which again points back to them...It is felt by the UDD/RS/PTP that the military is 'chafing at the bit' to launch a self-serving coup, with self-righteous indignation about needing to contain the violence they are in part perpetrating themselves....This is not opinion, and you may agree or disagree, but it summarizes some of the stuff that is circulating on Social Media amongst those seeking to preserve Electoral Democracy. Protecting it over against the entrenched elite who are attempting to nullify and/or dilute Electoral Democracy in order to restore their pre-Thaksin political hegemony in a way that protects it going forward.

Hand grenades are one of the simplest weapons since the wooden club. Any idiot could manage to use one, though that "certain amount of expertise" is possibly beyond your capabilities.

Posted

The more the truth comes out the more it looks like a cover up by the anti government protesters and their leaders. But it seems to have failed.

You mean the "truth" as put forward by the Govt and Police who have proven so trustworthy and honest over the years?

If you put the words "Govt" or "Police" in any statement, I'm going to take what they claim with a VERY large pinch of salt.

so in the same sense, when the dems have been the ruling party, or if the current protests manage to oust PT and suthep gets his council in power, everything that has come or will come from them should be taken with a large pinch of salt because its likely to be false? Or is it just the current party which lies?
Posted (edited)

So just who is PCAD ? did they change the name before or after the explosion ? if before then this man wanted for questioning has nothing to do with the movement, that was the PDRC ... oh here we go again with the peoples front Monty Python sketch again. rolleyes.gif

Kaosod uses the initials PCAD when referring to the PDRC. They translated the Thai name for PDRC and feel that PCAD is more correct translation, so they refuse to use the English name provided by the group.

Sent from my MB886 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

ahh that old Thai/stubborness. Thank you very much for clarifying thumbsup.gif

Edited by englishoak
Posted

This situation is ambiguous. All indicators point to more obfuscation forthcoming from all sides. There are comments from many sources claiming a 'third' party, but I would think there are two 'third parties' because both sides have a militant faction.

The photo ops are sickeningly insincere. Both sides wage tears in front of reporters. The foreign media is trying to explain 'Thainess' in fourteen sentences (and good luck with that).

This scenario would send Sherlock Holmes packing back to merry old England to begin a new career as a hatter, with a kilo of bottled mercury in hand.

Amazing Thailand. It's the people.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...