Pheu Thai Party’s spokesman says armed PDRC guards violate section 63 of constitution

BANGKOK, 2 March 2014 (NNT) – Mr. Promphong Nopparit, spokesman of Pheu Thai Party, said that PDRC guards did not respect laws and harmed people and officials like fascists.

He was responding to the news the the guards assaulted Pol. Col. Nopporn Suphapat, Deputy Superintendent of the Appeal and Supreme Court Case Inspection Division, Legal Department, Royal Thai Police and detained Lt. Sunisa Lertpakawat.

Deputy PDRC guards have used violence with weapons several times. It was said that PDRC Secretary General Mr. Suthep Thaugsuban' 50 guards had weapons in possession. This shows that PDRC demonstrations have violated section 63 of the constitution.

Mr. Promphong believed that the number of PDRC supporters would decrease as people rejected the violence and asked people to stop supporting PDRC demonstrations.

-- NNT 2014-03-02

I'm sorry but are terrorist attacks against the protestors against the law?

Are shooting at people and throwing grenades at them against the law?

How about planning to secede and form a 600,000 army? I'm sure there's a law against that, isn't there?

If you idiots are going to quote the 'law' then I suggest you enforce it. And not selectively.

Oh and aren't you supposed to be in jail for breaking the law also?

..... and the red guard were????

Arsonists? Terrorists? Thugs?

I appreciate one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, and, history is written by the winners.

The complete history of this set of encounters is yet to written.

55555

Kettle calling pot black...

Let he without sin cast the first stone...

He who live in glass house should not throw stones...

BANGKOK, 2 March 2014 (NNT) – Mr. Promphong Nopparit, spokesman of Pheu Thai Party, said that PDRC guards did not respect laws and harmed people and officials like fascists.


Oh! Here we go again.....another one throwing his dolls out of the cot....pitiful!!!

Motor bike taxi operators....Jet-Ski operators....just about every other rat bag in Thailand...including 95% of the politicians.....they all violate the constitution!...What's this sleaze guy on about??

I don't have a problem with the guards being armed, as long as they all hold licences, it's the unlicenced that's the problem, who is overall accountable for them, should they shoot an innocent peson in a cross fire? it happens...

Pheu Thai is firmly on the side of enforcing the constitutional right of the protesters not to be protected from bombs, grenades, and gunfire. While this strange man is at it, he may want to look into the UDD's constitutional right to bury the NACC in cement, their constitutional right to secede, and their constitutional right to go after the independent agencies and the Civil Court. And while he's at it, he may want to look up Article 7 and Article 108.

Dear Khun Prompong are you writing this from your cell? Pheu Thai spokesman gets one-year jailterm without suspension

December 12, 2013

The Appeals Court on Thursday sentenced Pheu Thai party spokesman Prompong Nopparit and another Pheu Thai member to one-year imprisonment without suspension after finding them guilty of defaming the former president of the Constitution Court.

It sets a precedent,and not a very good one, as it means that anyone who feels the need to employ 1350 armed guards can now do so, without any fear of the Law stopping or impeding them.. I do believe that's what the PTP spokesman is aluding to

............The Appeals Court on Thursday sentenced Pheu Thai party spokesman Prompong Nopparit and another Pheu Thai member to one-year imprisonment without suspension after finding them guilty of defaming the former president of the Constitution Court....................

Laughable. This low life vermin citing the law.

Nonsense trolling posts and replies have been removed.

Here we have a Convicted Crim ( who should be IN prison ) quoting this garbage, hanging on by the fingernails now........

What is the law when it comes to carrying weapons ? I'm not talking about owning one, I'm talking about carrying one in public?

I'm not trying to pick sides, I'd like to know that if the shoe/gun was on the other foot/hip, what does the actual Law state about the carraige of a weapon in public??

How about invading a hospital, just in case there were gunmen there, causing the patients to be evacuated, does that violate any laws?

What is the law when it comes to carrying weapons ? I'm not talking about owning one, I'm talking about carrying one in public?

I'm not trying to pick sides, I'd like to know that if the shoe/gun was on the other foot/hip, what does the actual Law state about the carraige of a weapon in public??

Like many countries you can carry unloaded weapons on a standard gun license to and from a shooting range etc.. to carry otherwise you would need a carry permit.

Sent from my XT1032 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

It sets a precedent,and not a very good one, as it means that anyone who feels the need to employ 1350 armed guards can now do so, without any fear of the Law stopping or impeding them.. I do believe that's what the PTP spokesman is aluding to

Yawn, The precedent has been set many times previously including the 2010 riots.

What is the law when it comes to carrying weapons ? I'm not talking about owning one, I'm talking about carrying one in public?

I'm not trying to pick sides, I'd like to know that if the shoe/gun was on the other foot/hip, what does the actual Law state about the carraige of a weapon in public??

Pay for the licence and you can carry it anywhere, concealed or otherwise. I know a few Thai women who have handguns in their purses and in their cars.

It sets a precedent,and not a very good one, as it means that anyone who feels the need to employ 1350 armed guards can now do so, without any fear of the Law stopping or impeding them.. I do believe that's what the PTP spokesman is aluding to

"....spokesman is aluding to."

He can allude to whatever he likes, but there is one thing that he is eluding, and that is his jailer. Supercilious cretin.

Mr Prompong Nopparit - Arrogance personified.

What is the law when it comes to carrying weapons ? I'm not talking about owning one, I'm talking about carrying one in public?

I'm not trying to pick sides, I'd like to know that if the shoe/gun was on the other foot/hip, what does the actual Law state about the carraige of a weapon in public??

Like many countries you can carry unloaded weapons on a standard gun license to and from a shooting range etc.. to carry otherwise you would need a carry permit.

Sent from my XT1032 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Thank you, so basically the TV members who are shooting this guy down then (figure of speech) have no issues or concerns about large groups of armed males doing their own thing ?

Sounds more like a Militia if that's the case, and if they don't have any issue, then they'd obviously have no objections to 600,000 armed reds being allowed to do the same as and when they pleased (not that it hasn't happened before) I mean when there's a Red rally, they all place a ring of armed protectors then?

It sets a precedent,and not a very good one, as it means that anyone who feels the need to employ 1350 armed guards can now do so, without any fear of the Law stopping or impeding them.. I do believe that's what the PTP spokesman is aluding to

"....spokesman is aluding to."

He can allude to whatever he likes, but there is one thing that he is eluding, and that is his jailer. Supercilious cretin.

Mr Prompong Nopparit - Arrogance personified.

Thank you for the grammatical correction I'm sure you knew what I was meaning

I couldn't care less about whether he's now a criminal himself, I'm sure he'll be amongst many distinguished "guests" soon enough, maybe once the dust has settled and all the criminals and what not are behind bars, they can sit down and play tiddly winks against each other

Is He right in what he's saying, that the carraige of a weapon in a public place is an offence..simple answer yes or no?

It sets a precedent,and not a very good one, as it means that anyone who feels the need to employ 1350 armed guards can now do so, without any fear of the Law stopping or impeding them.. I do believe that's what the PTP spokesman is aluding to

Yawn, The precedent has been set many times previously including the 2010 riots.

I'm not doubting that but obviously lessons were not learnt then you can't change the past, but you can change the future !!

What is the law when it comes to carrying weapons ? I'm not talking about owning one, I'm talking about carrying one in public?

I'm not trying to pick sides, I'd like to know that if the shoe/gun was on the other foot/hip, what does the actual Law state about the carraige of a weapon in public??

Like many countries you can carry unloaded weapons on a standard gun license to and from a shooting range etc.. to carry otherwise you would need a carry permit.

Sent from my XT1032 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Thank you, so basically the TV members who are shooting this guy down then (figure of speech) have no issues or concerns about large groups of armed males doing their own thing ?

Sounds more like a Militia if that's the case, and if they don't have any issue, then they'd obviously have no objections to 600,000 armed reds being allowed to do the same as and when they pleased (not that it hasn't happened before) I mean when there's a Red rally, they all place a ring of armed protectors then?

I think what some TV members have issue with is the continual bombing and destruction of innocent people because the police have ignored more than 100 grenade attacks and refuse to protect citizens. Just a guess.

(see, didn't even mention killing children at random )

What is the law when it comes to carrying weapons ? I'm not talking about owning one, I'm talking about carrying one in public?

I'm not trying to pick sides, I'd like to know that if the shoe/gun was on the other foot/hip, what does the actual Law state about the carraige of a weapon in public??

Like many countries you can carry unloaded weapons on a standard gun license to and from a shooting range etc.. to carry otherwise you would need a carry permit.

Sent from my XT1032 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Thank you, so basically the TV members who are shooting this guy down then (figure of speech) have no issues or concerns about large groups of armed males doing their own thing ?

Sounds more like a Militia if that's the case, and if they don't have any issue, then they'd obviously have no objections to 600,000 armed reds being allowed to do the same as and when they pleased (not that it hasn't happened before) I mean when there's a Red rally, they all place a ring of armed protectors then?

FH. Large groups of armed Thai males are doing there own thing EVERYDAY. There are over 6 million licensed weapons in Thailand .. I would warrant at least 1 in 5 car owners probably have one in the car.

Sent from my XT1032 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

It sets a precedent,and not a very good one, as it means that anyone who feels the need to employ 1350 armed guards can now do so, without any fear of the Law stopping or impeding them.. I do believe that's what the PTP spokesman is aluding to

Yawn, The precedent has been set many times previously including the 2010 riots.

I'm not doubting that but obviously lessons were not learnt then you can't change the past, but you can change the future !!

Thai's learning lessons? Slim chance.

I'm sorry but are terrorist attacks against the protestors against the law?

Are shooting at people and throwing grenades at them against the law?

How about planning to secede and form a 600,000 army? I'm sure there's a law against that, isn't there?

If you idiots are going to quote the 'law' then I suggest you enforce it. And not selectively.

Oh and aren't you supposed to be in jail for breaking the law also?

That is the classic vapid concept of 2 wrongs can make an idiotic right.

Whoever carries a firearm without the permit to do so, is in violation of the laws. Be it one of the Students (I shudder at the thought that those are the future doctors and engineers) or red or yellow shirts, the ones in violation of the existing laws should be held accountable and also those enlisting and aiding their services.

Cuchulainn, on 02 Mar 2014 - 17:10, said:

............The Appeals Court on Thursday sentenced Pheu Thai party spokesman Prompong Nopparit and another Pheu Thai member to one-year imprisonment without suspension after finding them guilty of defaming the former president of the Constitution Court....................

Laughable. This low life vermin citing the law.

I suggest you read up on why the "low life vermin", as you call him, was found guilty of "defaming" the former president of the constitution court.

Something to do with a dissolution case against the Democrat Party for illegal donations to the party. Of course we couldn't have that sort of thing going on, dissolution cases I mean, not illegal donations, nothing wrong with that as long it is the right party...............

Quote

Satit Pitutecha, a Rayong MP and Democrat executive, said efforts to discredit the courts would continue even if the Democrat Party is dissolved but Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva does not face a political ban.

The party has been charged with abusing its political development fund. The Constitution Court is expected to make a ruling in the case next month.

The Pheu Thai Party alleged that a Democrat MP had met the then secretary of the Constitution Court president to lobby the case.

The Democrat said the release of the video clips depicting the meeting between the MP and the then secretary, who later resigned, was an attempt to discredit the court and step up pressure in the case against the ruling party.

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/home/2010/10/25/politics/Courts-being-deliberately-discredited-Democrat-MPs-30140752.html

More discerning people (obviously no-one in the democrat party, of course) would call the video clips showing the meeting, during which the dem MP discussed the dissolution case with the Constitution Courts Presidents secretary (who later resigned and went to ground in Singapore for a while), EVIDENCE , not an attempt to discredit the court (they had already done that by having the meeting), but hey, that's the amart for you.

Low life vermin., my ass.

I'm sorry but are terrorist attacks against the protestors against the law?

Are shooting at people and throwing grenades at them against the law?

How about planning to secede and form a 600,000 army? I'm sure there's a law against that, isn't there?

If you idiots are going to quote the 'law' then I suggest you enforce it. And not selectively.

Oh and aren't you supposed to be in jail for breaking the law also?

That is the classic vapid concept of 2 wrongs can make an idiotic right.

Whoever carries a firearm without the permit to do so, is in violation of the laws. Be it one of the Students (I shudder at the thought that those are the future doctors and engineers) or red or yellow shirts, the ones in violation of the existing laws should be held accountable and also those enlisting and aiding their services.

2 wrongs don't make a right. True.

However, protestors wouldn't need to be armed to protect themselves if they weren't being shot at and had grenades thrown at them on a daily basis.

Protestors wouldn't need to be armed if the police actually did something to catch the culprits attacking them.

Violation of law? How about the government enforces the law on EVERYONE regardless of political color spectrum, not be hypocrites and only enforce it on their political rivals.

It sets a precedent,and not a very good one, as it means that anyone who feels the need to employ 1350 armed guards can now do so, without any fear of the Law stopping or impeding them.. I do believe that's what the PTP spokesman is aluding to

Indeed!!

Transgressions committed and no punishment? It will happen again.

Regardless of the shirt they are wearing, they should be held accountable and those employing and aiding them.

Then again, that would be within the confines of The Rule of Law... In Thailand ???

Dysfunctional is the best way to describe it.