Jump to content

Chalerm's 'insight' may be blind loyalty


webfact

Recommended Posts

EDITORIAL
Chalerm's 'insight' may be blind loyalty

The Nation

Former minister's claim that Pheu Thai will return misses vital factors about current situation

BANGKOK: -- There have been two statements that sum up Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha's situation. The first was said by the man himself and the second by someone who knows a thing or two more about politics than him. Chalerm Yoobamrung, resurfacing to deny rumours about his death or grave illness, stated that every time the military asserts its might politically, Thaksin Shinawatra benefits. Love Chalerm or hate him, many will have to agree, to a certain extent at least.

Almost at the same time in Italy, Prayut tried his best to avoid the impression that Chalerm promoted. The interim prime minister, appearing at the Asia-Europe Meeting, suggested that his coup in May was to prevent a bloody crisis more than anything. He did not highlight shortcomings of the government he toppled and was content with portraying the coup as the only way to pre-empt what could be a civil war.

Putting Prayut's and Chalerm's statements together and we have the tightrope that the former is walking on. We can also see the dual-track campaign that could benefit the Shinawatras. If the coup was meant primarily to pre-empt a potential bloodbath, certainly the government that was overthrown was not that bad. On the other hand, if the coup was aimed to uproot the Shinawatras, it fit claims about an undemocratic conspiracy against the former ruling clan. Either way, some sympathy went to those who lost power, and scepticism went to their rivals.

So, Prayut has been besieged with these questions lately. Did he stage the coup to put away the Shinawatras? Or did he stage the coup to prevent the national divide from becoming something worse? Did he mean both or did he just use the potential "civil war" as a pretext to bring down the Shinawatra? Was he actually helping Thaksin as claimed by Chalerm?

According to Chalerm, Thaksin's political party can return whenever an election is held, thanks largely to the military. That's probably true, as the 2006 coup and the 2010 crackdown on the red shirts' protests could attest. But Chalerm was only telling half the story about the current political situation.

In predicting a Shinawatra return, Chalerm did not address the high possibility of a vicious circle of nominees, dubious policies, scandals, court cases, obstruction of justice or refusal to accept judicial verdicts and street protests. Chalerm also failed to see that while the Pheu Thai Party is far from finished, maybe the Shinawatras have been, not least because basically everyone knows that their return would take the country nowhere.

Thailand's problem is a combination of wrongdoing by a lot of people involved. Chalerm was in fact part of a big mess considering his roles in some controversial government agendas. Political reform will be a very delicate process in which a balance has to be restored whereas those causing any imbalance must be put on the sides. This is Prayut's extremely sensitive task, and a man with Chalerm's political expertise should have known the whole picture.

Prayut can be encouraged by recent opinion surveys, in which the Thai public seemed to be more at ease and hopeful than before the coup, although it has to be said that opinion polls in Thailand are never reliable indications of what happens next. Chalerm, meanwhile, foresees a return to the old days, when election results reigned supreme and little else mattered. The political veteran, too, appeared hopeful, although it's debatable what he based his hopes on - democratic principles or loyalty that could have blinded his analysis.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinion/Chalerms-insight-may-be-blind-loyalty-30246268.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2014-10-27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chalerms loyalty lies with Chalerm, no one else , the man is a negative vibe that gives off enormous amounts of static discharge and this is where the rank N File should be included in the nomination process, this person gets nominated because he is elected by the elite Shinawatra brigade , these former politicians should be prevented from entering politics , however to do this unless one has a criminal record ( New Reforms Ha Ha Ha) anybody can nominate , unless there are strict guidelines on nominations the same will develop again and Thailand will have its 20th coup in the making.coffee1.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coup was not to stop corruption, it was to stop violence, you can see that since the coup people have stopped being killed over politics; which leads to the following point:

The problem is that Thaksin and his band have divided the country on purpose for political gain, so trying to stop him and trying to stop the national divide are the same thing.

absolutely 100% correct which make the OP a pile of <deleted> nonesense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chalerm was in fact part of a big mess considering his roles in some controversial government agendas.

Free speech and freedom of the press is one thing I personally adhere. On the other hand I believe statements of Thaksin and Chalerm should not make the headlines in the media anymore for the sake of the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chalerms loyalty lies with Chalerm, no one else , the man is a negative vibe that gives off enormous amounts of static discharge and this is where the rank N File should be included in the nomination process, this person gets nominated because he is elected by the elite Shinawatra brigade , these former politicians should be prevented from entering politics , however to do this unless one has a criminal record ( New Reforms Ha Ha Ha) anybody can nominate , unless there are strict guidelines on nominations the same will develop again and Thailand will have its 20th coup in the making.coffee1.gif

So your guys: Suthep, Abhisit, Korn, Surin, Sondhi, they are all squeaky clean??cheesy.gifcheesy.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chalerms loyalty lies with Chalerm, no one else , the man is a negative vibe that gives off enormous amounts of static discharge and this is where the rank N File should be included in the nomination process, this person gets nominated because he is elected by the elite Shinawatra brigade , these former politicians should be prevented from entering politics , however to do this unless one has a criminal record ( New Reforms Ha Ha Ha) anybody can nominate , unless there are strict guidelines on nominations the same will develop again and Thailand will have its 20th coup in the making.coffee1.gif

So your guys: Suthep, Abhisit, Korn, Surin, Sondhi, they are all squeaky clean??cheesy.gifcheesy.gif

Maybe not, but they are preferable to the organized criminality of the Shinawatra Clan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't even trust one's classics anymore, can we, 'In vino veritas' they said, and wrong, wrong that is this time, as no genuine truth did or will ever come out of this alcoholic's mouth. What a pity that statue of limitation, otherwise this criminal could have gone on forever getting drunk in muslim Malaysia, where he had run away too to avoid a deserved sentence. Do the people remember about this, and other shady activities of this whole family, or do they only keep the one son in mind, who got acquitted after shooting a policeman dead at pointbalnk range and is now a RTP Captain 'shooting instructor'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its Comical. All the conspiracies and talk of corruption...

Facts are, not a lot of corruption has been found since the Military Coup,.

Certainly nothing that the NAACP couldn't have dealt with as most of the "Investigations" were already underway.

The Coup was for control of Power.. Yes, believe it or not, these Coups don't happen to "Save the nation" on average every

7 years, they occur for the benefit of the Elite/Dems & Military. They all benefit by using the disguise of "Reform".

How many reforms can a group lead and still not "Get it right"? Jeesh.

As long as people see if for what it is. This is not about reform. This is about power for the Elite & Military.

So not having the elite and military what have you ?? democracy cheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chalerms loyalty lies with Chalerm, no one else , the man is a negative vibe that gives off enormous amounts of static discharge and this is where the rank N File should be included in the nomination process, this person gets nominated because he is elected by the elite Shinawatra brigade , these former politicians should be prevented from entering politics , however to do this unless one has a criminal record ( New Reforms Ha Ha Ha) anybody can nominate , unless there are strict guidelines on nominations the same will develop again and Thailand will have its 20th coup in the making.coffee1.gif

So your guys: Suthep, Abhisit, Korn, Surin, Sondhi, they are all squeaky clean??cheesy.gifcheesy.gif

What does that have to do with a the post?

Usual attempt to divert from the subject, namely the illustrious Chalerm his comments.

Several members of the Shiniwattra family have been convicted for fraud. How many of those you accuse have been convicted of anything?

Oh, that's right, the courts are only against the Shin crooks.

JOC, Do not mention Korn in any derogatory way you will get lynched---he is one of Thai peoples most loved men. and as bearboxer said in other words stop posting off topic. Your version of Propaganda/opposition is embarrassing to the rest of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...