Jump to content

Falkland Islands are Argentine signs 'regrettable'


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

Falkland Islands are Argentine signs 'regrettable'

Argentina's decision to display signs expressing the country's claim over the Falklands is "regrettable", a diplomatic source has said.

A law passed by the Argentine Congress says public transport must have signs saying "Las Malvinas son Argentinas" (the Falkland Islands are Argentine).

The Argentine MP behind the initiative said it would reflect "our undeniable sovereignty" over the islands.

But the source said the move was a "hostile course of action".

The move was introduced as part of a wider raft of public transport reforms which were passed unanimously on Thursday.

Read More: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30149799

bbclogo.jpg
-- BBC 2014-11-22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh dear, are things so bad in the UK, they need a new bogus war to prevent civil unrest.

The problem is that there are no Brits in Britain left to fight. They are all living expat somewhere else.

Looks like they will have to send all the Argentine expats there to fight instead.coffee1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't the people of the Islands have a referendum or vote on this issue at one point in time?

Yes, in early 2013, but a foregone conclusion would vote to remain a British Overseas Territory.

There have been major oil discoveries that are planned to go into production in 2017, so matters may hot up...

http://world.time.com/2013/03/11/is-the-falkland-islands-referendum-a-farce-or-a-landmark-moment/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't the people of the Islands have a referendum or vote on this issue at one point in time?

Yes & wasn't that a fair & balanced out come--- ask just the British land owners on there .... Do you want things to remain as they are.

Yes mate was the surprised answer, in March 2013 by 99.8% (there still looking to hang the 1 guy that voted no).

Much the same vote was recorded in Gibraltar, a lump of rock that is actually join to Spain by a road, --this is part of England also, because just the people on the rock say so.

.

Something akin to asking the republican party only---who should be the next president.....fair & balanced.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_Warhttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_Warttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_Warquote name="klauskunkel" post="8704844" timestamp="1416623387"]

Just make your own signs:

"Argentina wants to be bitch-slapped, again"

bitch-slapped ? How many brit soldiers died in the last Falkland war ? How many brit ships lost ?

Any enemy can hit back hard.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War

Edited by maximillian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear, are things so bad in the UK, they need a new bogus war to prevent civil unrest.

The Poms are stuffed paying for the Malvinas.

About time the "convicts" and sheep shaggers paid up for stealing Australia and Tasmania form the Aboriginal people.

Are you a native Spanish speaker or do you also refer to Tasmania as Van Diemen's Land?

Edited by Baerboxer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.economist.com/blogs/americasview/2014/02/oil-and-gas-falklands

Everything clear now?

Apart from that, sabre rattling is always a good way of winning votes, Argentina is in a bad way.

The last 'Argentinians' (no such country as Argentina then) on this group of islands accepted happily an offer from the British to be repatriated. They abandoned it.

There are other solutions to this problem than just demanding the UK just surrender this potentially very valuable piece of real estate to then Argies and evacuate the islands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_Warhttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_Warttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_Warquote name="klauskunkel" post="8704844" timestamp="1416623387"]

Just make your own signs:

"Argentina wants to be bitch-slapped, again"

bitch-slapped ? How many brit soldiers died in the last Falkland war ? How many brit ships lost ?

Any enemy can hit back hard.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War

Considerably less than the Argentine's lost.

War is never a good thing. But, the Argies started it, and may well do so again.

Edited by Baerboxer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just make your own signs:

"Argentina wants to be bitch-slapped, again"

Things change, demographics change, lessons get learned as well as taught, wouldn't be so easy these days if it could be done.

The islands are closer to Argentina than England. So the proposition is that the islands belong to England because there are English living there. Putin should claim the same about eastern Ukraine, Russian population so worth the motherland killing for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear, are things so bad in the UK, they need a new bogus war to prevent civil unrest.

The problem is that there are no Brits in Britain left to fight. They are all living expat somewhere else.

Looks like they will have to send all the Argentine expats there to fight instead.coffee1.gif

The irony here is that in the last Falklands War, Maggie Thatcher and the UK Generals sent in the Welsh Guards (and others), overlooking the historical fact that much of southern Argentina was populated long ago by Welsh people seeking new lands to farm sheep. When Goose Green was finally taken and the Argentinian soldiers taken captive, the British soldiers in talking to their captives discovered they'd been shooting at their own (admittedly distant) relations.

I think for many people, and especially Argentinians, the geography somewhat speaks for itself because Port Stanley is just a wee bit closer to Buenos Aires than London. It's hard to believe that the British government gives a rats ____ about a handful of farmers (1516 people apparently) in the Southern Ocean (Maggie herself, for those who were not around at the time, had far more impact on the 20,000 coal miners she threw out of work back home). The mock sincerity about the wishes of the islanders only thinly veils the financial prospect of rich oil and mineral resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear, are things so bad in the UK, they need a new bogus war to prevent civil unrest.

The problem is that there are no Brits in Britain left to fight. They are all living expat somewhere else.

Looks like they will have to send all the Argentine expats there to fight instead.coffee1.gif

The irony here is that in the last Falklands War, Maggie Thatcher and the UK Generals sent in the Welsh Guards (and others), overlooking the historical fact that much of southern Argentina was populated long ago by Welsh people seeking new lands to farm sheep. When Goose Green was finally taken and the Argentinian soldiers taken captive, the British soldiers in talking to their captives discovered they'd been shooting at their own (admittedly distant) relations.

I think for many people, and especially Argentinians, the geography somewhat speaks for itself because Port Stanley is just a wee bit closer to Buenos Aires than London. It's hard to believe that the British government gives a rats ____ about a handful of farmers (1516 people apparently) in the Southern Ocean (Maggie herself, for those who were not around at the time, had far more impact on the 20,000 coal miners she threw out of work back home). The mock sincerity about the wishes of the islanders only thinly veils the financial prospect of rich oil and mineral resources.

The "wee bit closer" has become a problem since 1982, successive UK governments, starting with the government in power in 1982 and the ships returning from the South Atlantic, have allowed the Merchant Navy to be decimated by ship-owners intent only on profit, with their flag of convenience ships and foreign crews, that now there is no way to replicate what was achieved then.

Probably don't need to what with the larger garrison and the longer runway, and the Argentine armed forces are nothing like they were then in size or equipment, but the fact remains that in 1982 the whole operation would have never happened without UK flagged merchant vessels and crews being available at short notice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...