Jump to content

Claims of substandard Thai rice distorted: ex-deputy minister


webfact

Recommended Posts

RICE-PLEDGING SCHEME
Claims of substandard rice distorted: ex-deputy minister

The Nation

BANGKOK: - FORMER DEPUTY Commerce Minister Yanyong Phuangrach yesterday voiced doubt over results of the government's audit of the rice-pledging scheme, saying they appeared to have been gravely distorted and that granary owners and surveyors should sue the panel in charge of verifying the state stockpiles.

There appeared to be irregularities in the report released on Friday by the committee chaired by ML Panadda Diskul, permanent secretary of the PM's Office, he said, such as the finding that more than 14 million tonnes of rice were of "substandard" quality and only two million tonnes of "standard" quality.

That was unbelievable and did not reflect reality, Yanyong said.

Not all warehouses in the country were checked, only some on a random basis, he said. Samples from bales deep inside the stacks of rice were taken from only one in every seven storage sites.

The other six were only of rice on the perimeter. Each granary may have at least 20,000 sacks of rice, he said.

The timing of the release of the results of the checks on Friday was suspicious, as if there might have been a political motive since the National Legislative Assembly will debate an impeachment motion against former PM Yingluck Shinawatra soon and the Attorney-General's Office was about to decide whether to indict Yingluck, he said.

"The Panadda panel's allegation that substandard quality rice reached 14 million tonnes was manipulative and misleading to make the public believe that the scheme caused a massive loss because the impeachment against Yingluck will commence early next year,'' he said.

The Panadda report also contradicted the results of checks by the Office of Commodity Standards, the Foreign Trade Department and a committee appointed by the Yingluck government to monitor the rice-pledging operation, he said.

These panels regularly checked the quality and quantity of rice in the scheme and never reported such a huge volume of substandard rice, he said. The report could not be used against Yingluck because her government did not have to take responsibility for the damage as contracts signed by the state and granary owners made the owners accountable for any damage from rotting rice and stock losses, he said.

The contracts clearly stated that the owners of the granaries and surveyors who assessed the quality of rice before storage must be held responsible for damage incurred to the rice, he said.

Yingluck also appointed several teams to check stocks such as the Foreign Trade Department team, a committee checking the rice-pledging operation and the special police team appointed by ex-deputy PM Chalerm Yoobamrung.

"She would definitely not get impeached for dereliction of duty that led to grave damage to the state, as accused," he claimed.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Claims-of-substandard-rice-distorted-ex-deputy-min-30250374.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2014-12-22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why you can take anything anyone in this country for their words, one day this minister say that,

the next that minister says something else, no checks and balances, no scoopfuls, no accountability,

and no facts, all is self serving agendas of this or that government bureaucrats, police and army officials..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why you can take anything anyone in this country for their words, one day this minister say that,

the next that minister says something else, no checks and balances, no scoopfuls, no accountability,

and no facts, all is self serving agendas of this or that government bureaucrats, police and army officials..

And it was easy to avoid: hire an international accounting firm to do the checks, and you don't have all these problems a little later (it would cost you some money, but we are talking about hundreds of tons of rice here, so a little extra overhead costs to find "the truth" will be fine.

But I guess finding the real numbers was not in the best interest of the country or the junta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And while the politicians continue their meaningless pissingcontest, the Thai taxpayers are paying 2 billion bath per month in storage costs!!

Get rid of the bloody rice, let whoever is responsible for the mess face the music, and move on!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Sampling" works just fine...a statistically proven quality assurance model....used in many industries....both civilian and government.

But I guess for some in Thailand when sampling discovers low quality products/services which in turns supports legal action then it's considered a bad method to determine quality....then "every" bag of rice needs to be checked which should take forever and draw out the legal process forever or death (whichever comes first).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would the junta de-value the stockpiled rice, so that they can get less money for it??

Because they know they are going to have to offload a lot of low quality rice at a low price....so, they are just preparing the public now so the public won't be shocked when the govt sells rice at far below market price.

In fact, I'm sure once the govt starts selling the low quality rice they will spin the press releases to say they got a higher price than expected for the low quality rice and sold more than expected...give the govt a pat on the back.

Edited by Pib
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yingluck also appointed several teams to check stocks such as the Foreign Trade Department team, a committee checking the rice-pledging operation and the special police team appointed by ex-deputy PM Chalerm Yoobamrung.

"She would definitely not get impeached for dereliction of duty that led to grave damage to the state, as accused," he claimed.

If she assigned Chalerm to check on the rice, that appointment alone is a de facto dereliction of duty. Hic.

There was more rice when Chalerm checked as he was seeing double at the time.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why you can take anything anyone in this country for their words, one day this minister say that,

the next that minister says something else, no checks and balances, no scoopfuls, no accountability,

and no facts, all is self serving agendas of this or that government bureaucrats, police and army officials..

And it was easy to avoid: hire an international accounting firm to do the checks, and you don't have all these problems a little later (it would cost you some money, but we are talking about hundreds of tons of rice here, so a little extra overhead costs to find "the truth" will be fine.

But I guess finding the real numbers was not in the best interest of the country or the junta.

I suppose that you accepted the "real" numbers that the PTP survey did, and found NO irregularities) as the truth then? After all it took them almost a week or 10 days to check EVERY rice storage facility in Thailand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why you can take anything anyone in this country for their words, one day this minister say that,

the next that minister says something else, no checks and balances, no scoopfuls, no accountability,

and no facts, all is self serving agendas of this or that government bureaucrats, police and army officials..

And it was easy to avoid: hire an international accounting firm to do the checks, and you don't have all these problems a little later (it would cost you some money, but we are talking about hundreds of tons of rice here, so a little extra overhead costs to find "the truth" will be fine.

But I guess finding the real numbers was not in the best interest of the country or the junta.

I suppose that you accepted the "real" numbers that the PTP survey did, and found NO irregularities) as the truth then? After all it took them almost a week or 10 days to check EVERY rice storage facility in Thailand.

Seriously wondering what point of my request for "independent verification" would lead you to suppose I would accept everything the PTP has been claiming.

Maybe you can explain, but probably you will not even try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why you can take anything anyone in this country for their words, one day this minister say that,

the next that minister says something else, no checks and balances, no scoopfuls, no accountability,

and no facts, all is self serving agendas of this or that government bureaucrats, police and army officials..

And it was easy to avoid: hire an international accounting firm to do the checks, and you don't have all these problems a little later (it would cost you some money, but we are talking about hundreds of tons of rice here, so a little extra overhead costs to find "the truth" will be fine.

But I guess finding the real numbers was not in the best interest of the country or the junta.

I suppose that you accepted the "real" numbers that the PTP survey did, and found NO irregularities) as the truth then? After all it took them almost a week or 10 days to check EVERY rice storage facility in Thailand.

Seriously wondering what point of my request for "independent verification" would lead you to suppose I would accept everything the PTP has been claiming.

Maybe you can explain, but probably you will not even try.

As far as I know the last independent foreign auditor was shot in 1998 or so, an Australian chap.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samples from bales deep inside the stacks of ricw were taken from 1 in every 7 storage sites because the other 6 of every storage site they only found 1 that actually had rice deep inside the stacks. The rest were made to look like rice was there but had scaffolding or boxes in its place.

And your evidence of this is where ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"... 14 million tonnes of rice were of "substandard" quality and only two million tonnes of "standard" quality." - Panadda.

Putting aside the political and personal disputes people have with Yingluck and her administration, from purely a scientific perspective Yanyong is correct that the report now from Panadda was at least "misleading." The inspections don't back Panadda's allegations.

When you look at the original record of the NCPO audit led by Panadda as reported by The Nation, Panadda's recent statements on rice quality look more like a fanciful storyline lacking a factual basis. If Panadda's alleged two million tons of standard quality was accurate, that rice would have been sold out well before the end of 2014, yet the government is continuing to pay Bt2 billion/mo. for granary storage and Thailand has now become No.1 this year in rice sales. Now that the NLA is considering Yingluck's impeachment, it seems history needs to be rewritten to fit the crime.

'Nationwide rice audit ordered by Junta nearly complete' & 'Improvement on many fronts after two months: NCPO Nationwide rice audit ordered by Junta nearly complete'

Nation July 28, 2014

"Since the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) initiated the inspection early this month, 18 million tonnes of pledged rice in 1,787 granaries around the country have been checked by troops against records for both quantity and quality."

"General Prayuth Chanocha, director of the NCPO, has said the regime was committed to inspecting the quality and quantity of rice stored at government granaries nationwide, as well as bringing charges against anyone found involved in fraud or non-transparent activity."

"Of that, 126 granaries [as of Friday] were found to have irregular rice, and the type of rice in storage was not the same as that listed on the records," he said."

"However, inspections in 14 eastern provinces found few flaws. There were 429.8 tonnes of rice missing or 0.018 per cent of the 2.32 million tonnes in total on the lists, the Second Army Area spokesman said yesterday."

The Commerce Ministry is preparing to resume selling rice from its stocks early next month, gradually in small lots, at the rate of about 500,000 tonnes a month.

'80% of rice is fine'

The Nation July 29, 2014

"Only 10 per cent of rice stockpiles has spoiled and only some sacks were missing, while 80 per cent was in still good condition, the rice inspection committee reported to the Rice Policy Committee meeting yesterday." [Panadda is head of the committee]

"The audit of 18 million tonnes of pledged rice stored in granaries has progressed by 72 per cent to 1,290 out of 1,787 locations nationwide."

Edited by rickirs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...