Jump to content

NLA impeaches Yingluck with 190 votes


webfact

Recommended Posts

Yingluck impeached, Nikhom and Somsak survive

23-1-2558-12-18-34-wpcf_728x406.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The National Legislative Assembly (NLA) today voted to impeach former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra with the votes of 190-18 with 8 abstentions. Former Senate speaker Nikhom Wairatpanich survived with the impeachment voting of 120-95 and four abstentions.

Former House speaker Somsak Kiatsuranon also survived with 115-100 and four abstentions.

The votes to impeach Ms Yingluck exceeded the required 132 votes of the total 220 members of the NLA for valid impeachment.

Ms Yingluck will be banned from politics for five years.

Besides she will also stand trial for criminal charges in the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions, same as her brother former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra faced and sentenced to two years imprisonment on the controversial land purchase on Ratchadapisek road in 2008.

However Thaksin fled the country before the sentence would be handed down.

Ms Yingluck will become the fourth person in the Shinawatra family who were banned from politics by the Supreme Court. The three others are Thaksin, former prime minister Somchai Wongsawat and his wife Mrs Yaowapa Wongsawat.

Ms Yingluck was reportedly monitoring the NLA voting at her home on Soi Yothinpattana, now flocked with armies of local and foreign news journalists attempting to ask for her reactions.

Nikhom, meanwhile, thanked the NLA for the votes and said he survived because he adhered firmly to the principle of “Rules of Law.”

He said he might suspend his political career temporarily.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/yingluck-impeached-nikhom-somsak-survive

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2015-01-23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

180 to 18 , well the NLA is not loaded one way then is it. Shame on them and their anti democratic masters

It was a democratic vote - they weren't told how to vote unlike the red shirts

So obviously you must be an avid supporter of Military Dictatorships.

Democratic vote , was it really ? . I think you'll find that many of the poor in the North and the working classes voted with enthusiasm for Thaksin and then Yingluck,

What we have is a seizure of power by the Judiciary , Military and now politically. You may want your kids to be brought up in a country where freedom of speech and expression are not tolerated , but I don't. ,Support the Junta all you like , but you should a long hard look at yourself for what you are actually supporting

I'll leave the "democracy" aspect to one side and simply say that those that voted for and supported Thaksin and Yingluck ALSO need to take a long hard look at themselves and what they were supporting.

I dare say they do now, Many these people were voting for a position of poverty, so took what they though was the best way out for them . All political parties lie in their Manifesto's it just that we in the West know they lie , and that's why the turnouts are so low.

Rice scheme corruption ? If it hadn't been them it would have been someone else without a doubt.

Forget the bit about democracy and looking at yourself , I had a temporary attack of outrage facepalm.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eight who abstained should be sacked, if they cant or are afraid to make a decision on something this important they shouldn't be in the job.

Ok the decisions have been made on the evidence presented now lets see who does and does not accept them.

A purge and nothing more. You should have voted also....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

180 to 18 , well the NLA is not loaded one way then is it. Shame on them and their anti democratic masters

Is that anything like a 310 to 0 vote by the PTP on the bill to give Thaksin, Abhisit, Suthep and 25,000 + people accused of corruption (and themselves also) a pardon?

Shame on the PTP and its anti democratic master.

PTP is an individual party not a National Assembly can't you see the difference??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

180 to 18 , well the NLA is not loaded one way then is it. Shame on them and their anti democratic masters

Is that anything like a 310 to 0 vote by the PTP on the bill to give Thaksin, Abhisit, Suthep and 25,000 + people accused of corruption (and themselves also) a pardon?

Shame on the PTP and its anti democratic master.

PTP is an individual party not a National Assembly can't you see the difference??

Yes I can. At the time the PTP government was ruling the country and attempting to do just about anything it wanted.

The NLA isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's kind of curious though, how AFP always mentions the rice pledging scheme as funneling money to Thaksin's base among NE farmers. But somehow, they conveniently seem to forget it was YL's government's failure to actually pay those farmers what they were owed that led to a lot of the protests at the time.

It was Thaksin's OTHER supporters and cronies -- not the common people farmers -- who didn't end up having to wait months to get their substantial serving from the gravy train.

While others will conveniently forget it was the street protests, disruption of elections and threats of legal backlash that meant Thai commercial bank withheld the loans.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

180 to 18 , well the NLA is not loaded one way then is it. Shame on them and their anti democratic masters

Is that anything like a 310 to 0 vote by the PTP on the bill to give Thaksin, Abhisit, Suthep and 25,000 + people accused of corruption (and themselves also) a pardon?

Shame on the PTP and its anti democratic master.

PTP is an individual party not a National Assembly can't you see the difference??

Yes I can. At the time the PTP government was ruling the country and attempting to do just about anything it wanted.

The NLA isn't.

If the PTP was "ruling the country" why did the bill follow the proper channels go to the senate and was voted down?

If PTP "ruled the country" surely they would have the power, like the NCPO, to suspend the constitution and force it through.

You still can't see the difference between voting as an individual party and a National Assembly? Unbelievable. clap2.gif

________________

Edited by firestar
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...