Jump to content

Most military officers voted against the former PM Yingluck


webfact

Recommended Posts

Most military officers voted against the former prime minister
The Nation

30252607-01_big.jpg

BANGKOK: -- National Legislative Assembly members who voted to impeach former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra yesterday made the decision freely themselves after recognising she had made mistakes in the rice-pledging scheme, according to observers.

The party hosted by NLA chief Pornpet Vichitcholcha at the Army Club on Thursday night had no impact on their decision as most had already made up their mind, the observers said.

The NLA voted 190 to 18 to impeach Yingluck in her former position as prime minister.

Although she no longer holds the position, the NLA wanted the legal consequence to prohibit her from politics.

The majority who voted against Yingluck are mostly military officers who were installed by the junta.

Also seen as an enemy of Yingluck are a group of 40 former senators, while the 18 votes in her favour mostly came from people in the business sector.

The military-installed lawmakers mostly regard Yingluck's handling of the rice-pledging scheme as a big mistake as she refused to end the project after the acknowledgement of corruption.

Yingluck delivered her opening and closing speeches at the impeachment proceedings but she did not answer any questions from NLA members. Some members gave her no credit for this.

In her speeches, Yingluck also did not answer any questions or clear up suspicions over the rice project.

She mostly attacked what she said was the National Anti-Corruption Commission's political motive in impeaching her, a NLA member said.

The NACC's decision to charge her former commerce minister Boonsong Teriyapirom and former deputy commerce minister Poom Saraphol for allegedly creating illegal government-to-government rice-sale deals confirmed Yingluck's mishandling of the scheme, the NLA member said.

The NLA yesterday failed to impeach former Parliament president Somsak Kiartsuranon and his ex-deputy Nikom Wairatpanij in relation to an amendment of the 2007 Constitution.

As a consequence, the 38 former senators who sponsored the amendment bill also escaped impeachment.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Most-military-officers-voted-against-the-former-pr-30252607.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-01-24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No NCPO intervention in Yingluck's impeachment, army spokesman says

BANGKOK, 24 January 2015 (NNT) - Spokesperson of the Royal Thai Army and the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) Col. Winthai Suvaree has said the NCPO did not intervene in Friday’s vote by the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) to impeach former Prime Minister Yngluck Shinawatra.


Col. Winthai confirmed the NCPO was still in charge of maintaining peace and order in the country. There had not yet been any movements by the ex-premier’s supporters after the vote, only comments from those who did not agree with the impeachment, the spokesman said.

Col. Winthai added that the NCPO wanted the public to understand that martial law was still necessary and avoid stirring up conflicts. He also asked people to trust their government and help move on the country into the second phase of the national reform roadmap.

nntlogo.jpg
-- NNT 2015-01-24 footer_n.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not about Red or Yellow - this is about right or wrong, and the rule of law.

What rule of law - the armies ?

And how can a person not in political office be impeached?

The generals yellow colours are there for all to see.

Democracy won't be seen in this country for a long time. The military are giving up nothing.

It is quite simple really. If you break a law and the law changes in the time before you are caught you are still guilty of committing that crime and of violating that law. The same rule of law applies here.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not about Red or Yellow - this is about right or wrong, and the rule of law.

What rule of law - the armies ?

And how can a person not in political office be impeached?

The generals yellow colours are there for all to see.

Democracy won't be seen in this country for a long time. The military are giving up nothing.

It is quite simple really. If you break a law and the law changes in the time before you are caught you are still guilty of committing that crime and of violating that law. The same rule of law applies here.
Please explain how you can be impeached under a constitution that does not exist anymore from a position she no longer holds ?

Oh sorry you can if you bends the laws - install a military council and tell them how to vote - and impose martial law on a country for nearly 9 months. Then of course you can do whatever you want.

Bending what laws. These laws were in effect when she was PM! She violated these laws when they were in effect so she should be prosecuted for that. If you work at a company and break the law and then you quit and the law changes to you are still guilty of violation of that law because it was a law when you vomit the crime.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not about Red or Yellow - this is about right or wrong, and the rule of law.
What rule of law - the armies ?

And how can a person not in political office be impeached?

The generals yellow colours are there for all to see.

Democracy won't be seen in this country for a long time. The military are giving up nothing.

It is quite simple really. If you break a law and the law changes in the time before you are caught you are still guilty of committing that crime and of violating that law. The same rule of law applies here.
Please explain how you can be impeached under a constitution that does not exist anymore from a position she no longer holds ?

Oh sorry you can if you bends the laws - install a military council and tell them how to vote - and impose martial law on a country for nearly 9 months. Then of course you can do whatever you want.

Bending what laws. These laws were in effect when she was PM! She violated these laws when they were in effect so she should be prosecuted for that. If you work at a company and break the law and then you quit and the law changes to you are still guilty of violation of that law because it was a law when you commit the crime.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not about Red or Yellow - this is about right or wrong, and the rule of law.

What rule of law - the armies ?

And how can a person not in political office be impeached?

The generals yellow colours are there for all to see.

Democracy won't be seen in this country for a long time. The military are giving up nothing.

Your comments make me feel you have not been in Thailand long

This is Thailand my friend

and Like the old saying

when in Rome, you need to do what the Roman's do

I think you'll find a lot of your Romans voted for Yingluk.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

"The party hosted by NLA chief Pornpet Vichitcholcha at the Army Club on Thursday night had no impact on their decision as most had already made up their mind, the observers said."

Naive, so naive.

Yingluck was never more than a puppet and she probably has already been discarded by the Thaksinator as a future person of influence, so her banning for 5 years is an irrelevancy. The real issue is getting criminal indictments against her and every other sorry son-of-a-britch involved in this foul scheme. There is no issue of national security involved here, so the government must force the Commerce Ministry to open its books to public scrutiny.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The majority who voted against Yingluck are mostly military officers who were installed by the junta." Hmmmmm could they have voted any other way. blink.png This whole impeachment rubbish is farcical. It would be funny if it wasn't so ridiculous. Yawn...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

I see on the other thread the yellow dem junta cheerleaders are salivating and drooling over every headline about Yinglucks inevitable impeachment by a military regime which has taken the the country via force and placed it's stooges in key positions to do the bidding of the puppet master.

It's nothing more than a kangaroo court and the head of this kangaroo court has truly shown his yellow colours by his open bias to the Shinawatra family.

It's not only a sad day for democracy it's a sad day to see the minority yellow supporters on here actually believing she got a fair go.

You guys and the junta deserve each other .

Absolutely shameful decision and should be condemned and not recognised worldwide !

Your totally wrong - it's a great day for democracy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But of course. Not for a moment would they be considering their careers and future incomes - their decision was doubtlessly purely altruistic.

Of course, none of them would have jeopardized their careers by hanging their hats on a political pariah. And I like the gal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not about Red or Yellow - this is about right or wrong, and the rule of law.

What rule of law - the armies ?

And how can a person not in political office be impeached?

The generals yellow colours are there for all to see.

Democracy won't be seen in this country for a long time. The military are giving up nothing.

It is quite simple really. If you break a law and the law changes in the time before you are caught you are still guilty of committing that crime and of violating that law. The same rule of law applies here.

Please explain how you can be impeached under a constitution that does not exist anymore from a position she no longer holds ?

Oh sorry you can if you bends the laws - install a military council and tell them how to vote - and impose martial law on a country for nearly 9 months. Then of course you can do whatever you want.

You are following the Shin argument. Look for some way to discredit the process as actually we have no defense because she was negligent.

Impeachment is a Western word with a specific meaning. I'm not sure if that's the right word for translating the Thai word or the the meanings are exactly the same.

Here, whatever the word, it seems that an action for punishment can be instigated even after the accused has left office. If the vote is for impeachment then a 5 year ban can be imposed. This is what happened to Yingluck.

This is Thailand, under Thai law, which seems to have more experts, academics, judges, lawyers and politicians who all agree to disagree on what the laws actually are or were meant to be. Now we have the barrack room lawyer TVF posters interpreting them however they want to to support their arguments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...