naboo Posted August 27, 2017 Share Posted August 27, 2017 19 minutes ago, oilinki said: Are those some forgotten F1 drivers? If not, they are not any of interest, thou keep them away from this discussion. Topic police, everyone hide! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2017 Share Posted August 27, 2017 1 minute ago, naboo said: Topic police, everyone hide! Die Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted August 28, 2017 Author Share Posted August 28, 2017 Good last few laps.Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted August 28, 2017 Author Share Posted August 28, 2017 Are those some forgotten F1 drivers? If not, they are not any of interest, thou keep them away from this discussion. Apparently it'll be the next boxing spectacular on Fox Sports. :DSent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 2, 2017 Author Share Posted September 2, 2017 F1 rumour mill, Renault bosses visit McLaren.Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 2, 2017 Author Share Posted September 2, 2017 F1 rumour mill, Renault bosses visit McLaren.Sent from my iris 505 using TapatalkDecision coming soon.http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/20541299/mclaren-faces-complicated-decision-2018-engine-supplySent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 Well.. The rain circuits shows who are the really good drivers. I have never been a fan of Hamilton, in fact I have never liked him. But I do admit he is a pretty damn good driver. Well done Hamilton, you showed your heart previously. Continue doing the same and I'll be a fan of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 2 questions.Is the problem in the wet not the tyres, but that the current crop of drivers for the most part can't drive if some someone spits on the track.Why does Brundle assume everyone has watched game of thrones?Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Mosha said: 2 questions. Is the problem in the wet not the tyres, but that the current crop of drivers for the most part can't drive if some someone spits on the track. Why does Brundle assume everyone has watched game of thrones? Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk 1) The cars are going really fast and the tires can't keep up with the water on the track. 2) Brundle is a... can't say it here. Here is the front row of this Truly Italian F1 Grid :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 1) The cars are going really fast and the tires can't keep up with the water on the track. 2) Brundle is a... can't say it here. Here is the front row of this Truly Italian F1 Grid :)So the tyres are not fit for purpose. :DSent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, Mosha said: So the tyres are not fit for purpose. :D That was the answer, which was given before. Then there is also the case of drivers not been able to see what is ahead. Not so much a problem, when everybody are driving similar speeds, but if there is an accident, there is no time to slow time. Yesterday, when Grosjean had the accident, there was hardly visible yellow flags on the side. Given that the drivers go nearly 350km/hour at the main straight, there is absolutely no time to react. The guys get big money for a dream job, but possible not so big that it's worth of dying every time it rains :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 That was the answer, which was given before. Then there is also the case of drivers not been able to see what is ahead. Not so much a problem, when everybody are driving similar speeds, but if there is an accident, there is no time to slow time. Yesterday, when Grosjean had the accident, there was hardly visible yellow flags on the side. Given that the drivers go nearly 350km/hour at the main straight, there is absolutely no time to react. The guys get big money for a dream job, but possible not so big that it's worth of dying every time it rains :) Lewis's car twitched he lifted, Grosjean didn't.Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, Mosha said: Lewis's car twitched he lifted, Grosjean didn't. Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 Well driven Lewis. A deserved win this time. My second boy, Bottas did well as well. He didn't try to challenge team mate to get the first place, instead he kept his distance so that both team members could save their engines, gearboxes etc. for the future races... which is actually pretty sad for the sport. My first boy Kimi, well.. he did his best with some errors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 There has been a lot of talk about grid penalties due engine, gearbox changes etc. What would be a reasonable alternative to make sure that only the highest paid teams would not have the ability to win the races? Each time a team changes it's engine, it's reward of F1 prize money at the end of the season will given to charities? - Engine change (after 5 engines): 5% of the prize money given out - Gearbox change, etc. 2.5% prize money given out The penalty has to be something, which makes each team to think really hard, before they change engines and parts. Something, which hurts each team in the similar way. The best and most funded teams get the most money. This way the penalties would hurt each team more fairly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farmerjo Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 The sport is in a pretty good place. Daniel Riccardo's drive was worth watching the race for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naboo Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 1 hour ago, oilinki said: There has been a lot of talk about grid penalties due engine, gearbox changes etc. What would be a reasonable alternative to make sure that only the highest paid teams would not have the ability to win the races? Each time a team changes it's engine, it's reward of F1 prize money at the end of the season will given to charities? - Engine change (after 5 engines): 5% of the prize money given out - Gearbox change, etc. 2.5% prize money given out The penalty has to be something, which makes each team to think really hard, before they change engines and parts. Something, which hurts each team in the similar way. The best and most funded teams get the most money. This way the penalties would hurt each team more fairly. The problem with that is Ferrari and Mercedes don't care how much it costs, this is their marketing budget, they'll change engines every race if the penalty is financial, whilst the smaller teams that struggle financially, whom this rule is supposed to help, will be hit hardest by financial penalties, even if its lower penalties than the largest teams. F1 funding of teams needs to change. 2017 estimates of direct funding to teams from the sport: Ferrari $180m Mercedes $171m Red Bull $161m McLaren $97m Williams $79m Force India $72m Torro Rosso $59m Renault $52m Sauber $49m Haas $19m Finances are a mess, so financial penalties are out. The sport is a team game, so you can't split the penalties to impact only the team of the driver. I think they should just be allowed the 4 (or is it 5?) engines through the season, no more. If one fails before time is up, they can use another for more races, or try to patch the other up. Who knows, the final race of the season could come down to who's engine lasts longest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 Let's face it. The F1 races are boring. Most of the races are silly boring. The only times the races are interesting is when there are lot's accidents during the race. (Baku 2017). The other time when F1 races are interesting is when top drivers have to start from behind and they are trying to gain places by overtaking slower cars. All the other times, the races are pretty frucking boring 2 hours of watching cars driving behind others. When the most exciting moments are the pit stops, it says a lot about the excitement of the whole races. So, how do we get the races more interesting. How do we get the races more fair, so that money can't buy the end position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 Punishing the teams by the percentage of their earnings, will hit biggest to the teams, which earn the most. That was the idea behind my idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naboo Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 But the big teams don't care about the financial penalties. They want the finances the way they are so that the smaller teams don't compete. Look at Le Mans 24hrs, a total mess with all the manufacturers pulling out because the smaller teams were allowed to compete and started beating them. This is Ferrari's, and to a lesser extent Mercedes', marketing tool. They will pay the fine without blinking, only the smaller teams will suffer from financial penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 Was it Brindle who suggested the richer teams are fined for say too many engines, and given to the poorer teams? Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 4, 2017 Author Share Posted September 4, 2017 Lewis couldn't have picked a better track to take the lead in the championship.Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ignis Posted September 4, 2017 Share Posted September 4, 2017 Is silly the present system, with only 20 cars how can you take a 65 grid drop ? bearing in mind some of the heavy grid drops are from teams running towards the back.... Next year is to be only 3 engine for the year + a possible extra race...... McLaren both retired this race with more problems and they are on engine 7 already.. with many more Races to go.... financial penalties would not work, Ferrari and Mercedes are not the ones often breaking down or the teams that are supplied by these engines... Maybe the Engine suppliers should get the financial penalties ? One wonders but for these silly grid penalties just where Max and Ricardo would have finished ? the grid penalties were not the fault of the drivers, or that matter the fault of Red Bull... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Encid Posted September 4, 2017 Share Posted September 4, 2017 12 hours ago, farmerjo said: The sport is in a pretty good place. Daniel Riccardo's drive was worth watching the race for me. The best driver of the day IMO. But you can't discredit the Mercedes team (and I mean both drivers and the pit crews) and Hamilton's superb driving skills. Singapore should be interesting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 4, 2017 Author Share Posted September 4, 2017 McLaren Honda announcement due soon.Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil B Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 (edited) On 03/09/2017 at 4:53 PM, naboo said: The problem with that is Ferrari and Mercedes don't care how much it costs, this is their marketing budget, they'll change engines every race if the penalty is financial, whilst the smaller teams that struggle financially, whom this rule is supposed to help, will be hit hardest by financial penalties, even if its lower penalties than the largest teams. F1 funding of teams needs to change. 2017 estimates of direct funding to teams from the sport: Ferrari $180m Mercedes $171m Red Bull $161m McLaren $97m Williams $79m Force India $72m Torro Rosso $59m Renault $52m Sauber $49m Haas $19m Finances are a mess, so financial penalties are out. The sport is a team game, so you can't split the penalties to impact only the team of the driver. I think they should just be allowed the 4 (or is it 5?) engines through the season, no more. If one fails before time is up, they can use another for more races, or try to patch the other up. Who knows, the final race of the season could come down to who's engine lasts longest. A levy on sponsorship??? 40, 50 even as high as 60% that is divided equally between teems so the smaller teams would get more funding. force power unit manufactures to supply engine of same spec for up to 5 or 6 teams who want their power units, drivers limited to drive no more than 3 years for any one team. Edited September 12, 2017 by Basil B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve187 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 my mate is in singapore , white lining the track, says he is ahead at the moment but rain is due in the next few days, but knowing him it will be done in Time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace of Pop Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 Just enjoy whilst it lasts. We will have Electric Cars one day.Be like our old Scalectric revisited.[emoji86]Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil B Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 On 04/09/2017 at 9:01 AM, Mosha said: McLaren Honda announcement due soon. Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Yes, they are getting a divorce... Quote McLaren Group executive chairman Shaikh Mohammed bin Essa Al Khalifa said: "Honda is a great company... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/41248320 I do not think you will see him in a Honda Jaz any day soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mosha Posted September 16, 2017 Author Share Posted September 16, 2017 Singapore has agreed to another 4 years, TBH I'd have preferred it to be Sepang.Sent from my iris 505 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now