World News

Hegseth Uses D-Day Speech to Attack Europe Migration

Report

Hegseth Uses D-Day Speech to Attack Europe Migration

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth used a speech marking the 82nd anniversary of D-Day in Normandy to criticise European migration policies, comparing migrant arrivals on the continent's shores to an "invasion".

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking at commemorations in northern France, Hegseth said Europe now faced new threats to the freedoms secured by Allied forces during the Second World War.
Migration Compared to an 'Invasion'
Referring to migrant arrivals across southern Europe, Hegseth said beaches in Spain, Italy, Greece and Bulgaria were being "stormed" by people arriving by boat.
"Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies," he said. "Boats and men arrive. When will European capitals do something about that invasion?"
Migration remains a major political issue across Europe, where support has grown for parties advocating stricter immigration controls and tighter border security.
Part of Wider Trump Administration Criticism
Hegseth's remarks are the latest criticism of European migration policies from senior members of the Trump administration.
Earlier on Friday, US Vice-President JD Vance linked the killing of British student Henry Nowak to what he called a "mass invasion of migrants" and said the "only response" should be "righteous anger".
The UK government rejected those comments. Downing Street criticised "people trying to interfere in our democracy" and noted that Nowak's family had said they did not want his death used to create further division.
The Crown Prosecution Service has confirmed that Vickrum Digwa, who was convicted over the killing, was born in Britain.
D-Day Legacy and European Security
During his address, Hegseth said some European nations had become too comfortable with freedoms won through sacrifice and conflict.
He argued that the lessons of D-Day remained relevant and that current leaders must continue to defend those freedoms.
"The men who fought and died here restored freedom to Europe," he said. "That freedom must be maintained by this generation of leaders and war fighters or what they fought for was merely temporary."
D-Day, launched on 6 June 1944, was the largest seaborne military operation in history. Tens of thousands of troops from the United Kingdom, United States and Canada landed on five beaches in Normandy as part of the campaign to liberate Western Europe from Nazi occupation.
Migration Remains a Key Political Issue
US President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticised European immigration policies. Speaking at the United Nations last year, he said European countries were "going to hell" because of what he described as uncontrolled migration.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded by saying those comments were "not right", while acknowledging the challenge posed by illegal migration, particularly crossings of the English Channel in small boats.
According to the United Nations, more than one million people crossed the Mediterranean into Europe during the migration crisis of 2015.
Between April 2025 and March 2026, the UK, Greece, Italy, Spain and Cyprus recorded a combined 169,341 sea arrivals, with the UK accounting for about 23% of the total.
Official figures show that 9,142 people crossed the English Channel from France to the UK by small boat between 1 January and 3 June 2026, a decline of 38% compared with the same period a year earlier.
Immigration Central to Trump's Agenda
Immigration enforcement has remained a cornerstone of the Trump administration's domestic agenda.
A National Security Strategy published in December warned that Europe could become "unrecognisable" within two decades if current migration trends continued.
Meanwhile, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have carried out thousands of arrests since January 2025 as part of the administration's broader crackdown on illegal immigration.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 7 June 2026

• USA

• 55 comments
• 381 views

webfact

June 7Jun 7

Ukraine Launches Major Drone Attack on St Petersburg

Russia

Ukraine Launches Major Drone Attack on St Petersburg

Ukraine carried out a large-scale drone attack on the Russian city of St Petersburg and surrounding areas on Saturday, prompting Russian officials to describe it as an “unprecedented” assault as the city hosted the final day of Russia’s flagship economic forum.

Get today's headlines by email

Russian authorities said more than 140 Ukrainian drones were intercepted over the surrounding Leningrad region. Regional governor Aleksandr Drozdenko reported that the attack sparked a fire at an unspecified military facility and led to the evacuation of nearby residents. He added that damage to buildings was limited.
For the first time since the start of the war, St Petersburg Governor Alexander Beglov urged residents to remain indoors while air defence systems responded to the threat.
Kyiv Targets Naval and Military Sites
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said the operation struck military targets deep inside Russia, including naval arsenals and a base in Kronstadt, home to the Russian Navy’s Baltic Fleet.
Writing on social media, Zelensky said Ukrainian drones had travelled around 1,000km (620 miles) to reach the St Petersburg region. He described the attacks as a justified response to continuing Russian strikes on Ukraine and repeated his call for an end to the conflict.
Zelensky also said Ukrainian forces hit an oil depot in Russia’s southern Krasnodar region, roughly 500km (310 miles) away. He referred to the operation as part of Ukraine’s campaign of “long-range sanctions”, a term Kyiv has used for attacks on Russian military and energy infrastructure.
The latest strikes came only days after Ukrainian drones targeted areas on the outskirts of St Petersburg as Russia’s annual economic forum was beginning.
Peace Talks Remain Elusive
The attacks occurred amid renewed disagreement over potential peace negotiations.
On Thursday, Zelensky publicly called for a ceasefire and direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, arguing that it would be wrong to wait for international attention to return to the war.
In a social media post on Saturday, the Ukrainian leader said it was “time to end this war” but accused Putin of wanting to continue the fighting.
Speaking at the economic forum on Friday, Putin rejected the idea of a face-to-face meeting with Zelensky. He maintained that a ceasefire would only allow Ukraine to rebuild its military capabilities and said Russia would end the war only after achieving its objectives.
Moscow continues to demand that Ukraine withdraw from the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions and abandon its ambitions to join NATO. Kyiv has consistently rejected those conditions, arguing that territorial concessions would encourage future Russian aggression.
Drone Campaign Expands in Occupied Areas
Elsewhere, authorities in the Russian-occupied Luhansk region announced restrictions on transport services following a series of Ukrainian drone attacks aimed at Russian supply routes.
The Moscow-backed administration suspended coach services on two motorways, advising residents not to use the roads for security reasons. It also halted commuter train operations and banned organised transportation of groups of children within the region.
The measures came despite Putin’s recent assertion that Russia had established full control over what Moscow calls the “Luhansk People’s Republic”.
In recent weeks, Ukraine has increasingly targeted logistics networks in occupied territory. According to an analyst interviewed by the BBC, more than 200 lorries and over 30 fuel trucks have been struck since the beginning of May.
Ukraine's Expanding Long-Range Capabilities
More than four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion, Ukraine has significantly expanded its domestic defence industry and long-range strike capabilities.
Kyiv now routinely targets sites inside Russia, particularly energy facilities, fuel depots and military infrastructure that it views as supporting Moscow’s war effort. The latest attack on the St Petersburg region underscores Ukraine’s growing ability to strike strategic targets far from the front lines.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 6 June 2026

• Ukraine Conflict

• 0 comments
• 267 views

webfact

June 6Jun 6

DOJ Says Trump Could 'Bulldoze Statue of Liberty'

USA

DOJ Says Trump Could 'Bulldoze Statue of Liberty'

A federal appeals court on Friday examined the Trump administration’s claim that President Donald Trump can proceed with construction of a new White House ballroom without congressional approval, as Justice Department lawyers argued that courts lack the power to stop the project once it is underway.

Get today's headlines by email

During a hearing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Yaakov Roth said judges could not block the project, even as construction advances. He noted that more than 3 million pounds of steel reinforcing bar had already been delivered to the site and said the project was “well on its way.”
Judge Patricia Millett repeatedly challenged that position, asking whether any court could prevent the ballroom from being built. Roth replied that it could not.
Statue of Liberty Hypothetical Draws Attention
The hearing took a dramatic turn when Millett posed a hypothetical scenario involving the destruction of the Statue of Liberty.
She asked whether the administration’s legal argument would also mean that no lawsuit could stop the government from quickly bulldozing the monument if construction moved fast enough. Roth agreed, saying that once an alleged injury becomes impossible for a court to remedy, it is no longer legally redressable.
The exchange prompted audible reactions in the courtroom.
Millett criticized what she described as a “move fast and break things” approach, questioning whether rapid action by the government could effectively prevent legal challenges from succeeding.
Preservation Group's Right to Sue Under Scrutiny
The case was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which argues that it has standing to challenge the ballroom project because of its mission to protect historic sites and because some of its members would be harmed by alterations to the White House complex.
Roth contended that the organization lacks standing because the original East Wing has already been demolished and courts can no longer provide meaningful relief.
The judges appeared divided on the issue. While Millett expressed skepticism toward the administration’s arguments, Judge Neomi Rao raised questions suggesting concerns about whether the preservation group has the legal right to bring the lawsuit.
Millett also questioned the administration’s dismissal of claims by National Trust board member Alison Hoagland, who argues that the project would alter the historic character of the White House grounds.
Authority and Security Concerns Debated
Several judges also questioned whether federal laws cited by the administration provide sufficient authority for the project.
Judge Bradley Garcia noted that one statute appears to authorize maintenance and upkeep of the White House but does not explicitly permit major construction projects involving demolition and replacement of existing structures.
Rao likewise questioned whether the Office of the Executive Residence has the authority to oversee construction work on behalf of the National Park Service.
The Justice Department defended the project by arguing that it serves critical security purposes. Roth said the former East Wing lacked the protections needed to address modern threats, including drone attacks, and that the redevelopment is intended to provide a secure location for the president and senior government officials during emergencies.
Construction Continues During Appeal
The Trump administration is seeking to overturn a March ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, who found that Trump exceeded his authority in pursuing the ballroom project and ordered construction halted.
That order was temporarily suspended by the appeals court in April, allowing work on the project to continue while the legal challenge proceeds.
The appellate panel has not yet issued a decision on whether the lawsuit can move forward or whether construction should ultimately be allowed to continue.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 6 June 2026

• 26 comments
• 364 views

webfact

June 5Jun 5

ICE Ends Reporting of Deaths After Detainee Release

USA

ICE Ends Reporting of Deaths After Detainee Release

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has ended a policy requiring the agency to report and investigate the deaths of former detainees who die within 30 days of their release, reversing a measure introduced during the Biden administration.

Get today's headlines by email

The change was ordered by acting ICE director David Venturella in a recent memo and was first reported by the Washington Post.
Biden-Era Rule Revoked
The policy being withdrawn was introduced in 2021 and required ICE to notify Congress and conduct reviews when former detainees died within a month of leaving custody.
The measure was intended to prevent the agency from avoiding accountability by releasing seriously ill detainees shortly before their deaths. Under the rule, deaths occurring shortly after release remained subject to scrutiny, allowing investigators to assess whether medical care or detention conditions may have contributed.
In his memo, Venturella said ICE would return to its previous practice of reporting only deaths that occur while individuals are in agency custody.
Concerns Over Accountability
Supporters of the 2021 policy argued that it closed a potential loophole in detention oversight.
The rule was adopted after the death of a man who suffered a stroke while being held for two years at the Adelanto detention centre in California. After contracting Covid-19, he was released by ICE and died three days later.
At the time, Deborah Fleischaker, then acting chief of staff at ICE, said the policy change was intended to make clear that detainees should not be released simply to avoid recording deaths in custody.
Cases involving detainees suffering from severe infections or brain injuries who died soon after release also helped shape the policy.
Agency Under Scrutiny
The decision comes as ICE faces increased scrutiny over healthcare and detention conditions.
According to the report, 18 detainees have died during the first five months of this year. The agency has also faced concerns over a number of suicides in detention facilities.
Critics argue that ending post-release reporting could make it harder to assess the full impact of detention policies and medical care provided while individuals are in custody.
ICE Defends Move
An ICE spokesperson defended the policy change, describing it as a return to a more practical approach.
The spokesperson told the Washington Post that the agency remains committed to transparency regarding deaths that occur while detainees are in custody. However, the spokesperson said ICE should not be responsible for monitoring or reviewing deaths that take place weeks after individuals have left detention.
The change marks a significant shift in how the agency tracks and reports deaths connected to its detention system, narrowing oversight to those that occur while a person remains in ICE custody.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 6 June 2026

• 1 comment
• 293 views

webfact

June 5Jun 5

Downing Street Rebukes JD Vance Over Nowak Comments

UK-Politics

Downing Street Rebukes JD Vance Over Nowak Comments

The UK government has criticised remarks by US Vice-President JD Vance following his comments on the murder of Henry Nowak, accusing outside figures of attempting to deepen divisions in British society.

Get today's headlines by email

A spokesman for Downing Street said there were people “trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division” after Vance linked Nowak’s death to immigration in a post on X.
The response came after Vance described the killing of the 18-year-old student as both “tragic” and “enraging”. He argued that Nowak would still be alive if European leaders had resisted what he called a “mass invasion of migrants”, adding that the appropriate reaction was “righteous anger”.
Family's Wishes Highlighted
In its response, Downing Street pointed to the wishes of the Nowak family, saying they had made clear they did not want his death used to create further division.
The spokesman said political leaders should seek to unite people, even in the aftermath of deeply distressing events, adding that this reflected the values of the country.
Vance’s comments followed a statement from the US State Department, which criticised what it described as “ideological conditioning” and “two-tiered policing” in Western countries.
Political Row Intensifies
Earlier in the week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer accused tech entrepreneur Elon Musk of attempting to inflame tensions over the case.
Musk had shared comments on X urging people to circulate footage showing Nowak’s final moments. He alleged that police treated the victim unfairly while showing deference to his attacker.
The controversy has centred on body-camera footage released by police, which showed officers handcuffing Nowak after he was stabbed. Police said the suspect, Vickrum Digwa, had falsely claimed he was the victim of a racist attack.
Protests and Political Debate
The footage prompted violent protests in Southampton on Tuesday. During the unrest, officers were struck by missiles, leaving eleven police officers and one police dog injured. Police arrested two people in connection with the disorder.
Digwa was later sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 21 years. The court heard he used a 21cm blade, which he said he carried as part of his Sikh faith, to fatally stab Nowak as the teenager walked home alone after a night out with friends on 3 December.
The case has also fuelled debate among political parties. The Conservative Party and Reform UK have criticised what they describe as “two-tier policing”, arguing that different groups are treated differently by law enforcement.
Meanwhile, Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, called for restraint. He said attempts to use Nowak’s death for political purposes should be resisted, regardless of whether they came from American political figures or their supporters in Britain.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 6 June 2026

• USA

• 29 comments
• 338 views

webfact

June 5Jun 5

Putin Rejects Zelensky Talks on Ending Ukraine War

Ukraine Conflict

Putin Rejects Zelensky Talks on Ending Ukraine War

Russian President Vladimir Putin has dismissed a proposal from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for direct talks aimed at ending the war, saying there is currently “no point” in a face-to-face meeting between the two leaders.

Get today's headlines by email

Zelensky made the appeal in an open letter published on Thursday, urging direct negotiations and calling for a ceasefire. He argued that it was wrong to wait for the conflict to once again become a major focus of US attention before seeking a resolution.
The Ukrainian leader's message adopted a defiant tone and included criticism of Putin. In response, the Russian president described parts of the letter as rude and questioned whether it was a genuine attempt to arrange talks.
Speaking at Russia’s annual economic forum in St Petersburg on Friday, Putin said he did not believe the proposal was intended to create the conditions for a meeting.
“I don't see any point for now,” he said when asked whether he would accept Zelensky’s offer.
Ukraine Criticises Moscow’s Position
Following Putin’s remarks, Zelensky accused Russia of choosing to continue the conflict rather than seeking peace.
Writing on Telegram, he said Putin did not want to end the war and suggested many countries would be disappointed by the Russian leader’s response.
Putin repeated Moscow’s longstanding position that negotiations should come before any ceasefire agreement. He argued that a temporary halt in fighting would give Ukraine an opportunity to regroup while key Russian demands remained unresolved.
According to Putin, experts should first work on potential agreements before any meeting between the two leaders takes place.
Russia Maintains War Aims
The Russian president also said military operations would continue until Moscow achieved its objectives.
Russia has consistently demanded that Ukraine withdraw from the regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. It has also insisted that Kyiv abandon its ambition to join NATO.
Ukraine has rejected those conditions, maintaining that it will not surrender territory. Kyiv argues that making concessions would encourage future Russian aggression, noting that Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022 after annexing Crimea in 2014.
In his letter, Zelensky also suggested that age was affecting Putin after more than two decades in power and highlighted recent Ukrainian strikes inside Russia, including one targeting St Petersburg on Thursday.
Fighting Continues
The exchange between the two leaders came as hostilities continued on multiple fronts.
US President Donald Trump welcomed the prospect of direct talks, saying it would be positive if Putin and Zelensky met.
Meanwhile, Ukraine said it had struck five vessels carrying what it described as illegal cargo in the Sea of Azov and waters near Russian-occupied territories. Ukraine’s drone commander, Robert Brovdi, said the ships were involved in transporting Ukrainian grain as well as fuel and military supplies.
Azerbaijan’s foreign ministry reported that five people were killed in attacks on two vessels in the Sea of Azov. It did not assign responsibility for the strikes and said the ships were not Azerbaijani.
Ukraine also said one of its drones exploded in the Romanian Black Sea port of Constanta after being diverted by Russian electronic interference.
Elsewhere, Ukrainian officials reported that at least 13 people were killed and 70 injured in Russian attacks over the previous day. Among the fatalities were four people killed when a dairy factory near Kyiv was struck and a 35-year-old woman who died in a drone attack on a petrol station in Kherson.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 6 June 2026

• 4 comments
• 349 views

webfact

June 5Jun 5

AI-Designed Vaccine Enters Human Trials in 'World-First'

Medical

AI-Designed Vaccine Enters Human Trials in 'World-First'

Artificial intelligence has been used to create a new type of vaccine designed to provide protection against entire families of viruses, marking what researchers describe as a major step forward in pandemic preparedness.

Get today's headlines by email

Scientists at the University of Cambridge say the vaccine is the first to have its central antigen component designed entirely by AI before being tested in human volunteers. The approach aims to generate protection not only against existing viruses but also against future variants and emerging pathogens that could trigger new outbreaks.
Targeting Entire Virus Families
Traditional vaccines are typically developed using a specific strain of a virus. However, rapidly mutating viruses can reduce vaccine effectiveness over time, requiring regular updates, as seen with Covid-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines.
The Cambridge team used genetic sequences from a wide range of coronaviruses collected through surveillance programmes monitoring potential disease threats. An AI system analysed the data and designed a “super-antigen” intended to train the immune system to recognise characteristics shared across the coronavirus family.
Researchers believe this could provide protection against known coronaviruses, including Covid-19 variants, as well as animal viruses that may one day spread to humans.
Professor Jonathan Heeney said the goal is to move beyond responding to existing threats and instead prepare for future ones before they emerge.
“This is about making vaccines that protect us, not just from today's viruses, but protect us from what can cause the next outbreak or disease,” he said.
Early Human Trial Results
The first clinical trial involved 39 participants and was primarily designed to assess safety. A larger study involving about 200 people is now under way to provide more information about the vaccine's ability to stimulate immune responses.
Results published in the Journal of Infection described the immune response as “modest”, but researchers say the findings remain encouraging given the early stage of development.
Professor Saul Faust, who conducted some of the trials, said the technology showed significant promise, particularly for tackling rapidly changing viruses.
Beyond Coronavirus Protection
The research team is already applying the same AI-based approach to other diseases. Studies in animals are examining universal influenza vaccines that would not require annual reformulation, as well as vaccines targeting H5N1 bird flu.
Scientists are also investigating vaccines for viral haemorrhagic fevers, including Ebola. One focus is a species involved in the current outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, for which no vaccine has yet been developed.
Experts See Major Potential
Professor Andy Pollard, who was not involved in the research, said the approach had already produced compelling results in animal studies and that the key test would be whether those findings can be replicated in humans.
More broadly, he said AI could transform vaccine development by helping scientists predict immune responses more quickly and accurately.
Professor Marian Knight described the trial as a significant advance in efforts to provide broad and lasting protection against viral diseases.
Meanwhile, Science Minister Lord Vallance said the project demonstrated how AI and scientific research could be combined to develop new medical treatments and potentially accelerate vaccine deployment worldwide.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• 9 comments
• 332 views

webfact

June 5Jun 5

Xi to Visit North Korea for Summit With Kim

Report

Xi to Visit North Korea for Summit With Kim

Chinese President Xi Jinping will travel to North Korea next week for talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, marking his first visit to the country since 2019.

Get today's headlines by email

State media in both countries said Xi will be in Pyongyang from 8 to 9 June at Kim's invitation. The visit comes at a time of shifting regional dynamics and growing attention on North Korea's relationships with both China and Russia.
China Remains North Korea's Key Partner
China is North Korea's largest trading partner and its most important diplomatic backer. The two countries share a 1,400km border and are linked by a mutual defence treaty signed 65 years ago. The agreement remains China's only formal military alliance.
North Korea continues to face extensive international sanctions over its nuclear weapons programme and allegations of human rights abuses, making Beijing a vital economic lifeline for Pyongyang.
Analysts expect Kim to seek stronger economic cooperation during Xi's visit, including expanded cross-border trade and an increase in Chinese tourism. North Korea has invested heavily in new tourism projects, including beach and ski resorts, and is looking to attract more visitors.
Balancing Russia's Growing Influence
The summit follows a period of intensified engagement between Pyongyang and Moscow. North Korea has deepened ties with Russia since supporting its war effort in Ukraine, raising questions about the future balance of influence among the three countries.
While Beijing maintains close relations with both North Korea and Russia, China is viewed as cautious about the strengthening partnership between Kim and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
For Kim, the visit offers an opportunity to demonstrate North Korea's international standing after emerging from years of pandemic-related isolation. He has increasingly showcased the country's military capabilities and infrastructure projects while stressing its independence from both Washington and Seoul.
Focus on Diplomacy and Nuclear Issues
South Korea hopes Xi's visit could help revive diplomatic efforts on the Korean Peninsula. Since late 2024, North Korea has abandoned reunification initiatives with the South, cut communication channels and adopted a more confrontational stance toward Seoul.
South Korean Unification Minister Chung Dong-young said he believes discussions between Xi and Kim could include the possibility of restarting talks between North Korea and the United States.
North Korea's nuclear programme is also expected to feature prominently in the talks. Although China has traditionally supported denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula, Beijing has placed less public emphasis on the issue in recent years.
Following a recent meeting between Xi and US President Donald Trump, the White House said both leaders reaffirmed support for the goal of North Korean denuclearisation. However, China's foreign ministry did not explicitly confirm that account, saying only that its position had remained consistent.
Pyongyang has continued to reject calls to abandon its nuclear ambitions. This week, Kim said the country's capacity to produce weapons-grade nuclear material had more than doubled over the past five years as he visited a newly built nuclear facility, according to state media.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• China

• 1 comment
• 277 views

webfact

June 5Jun 5

UK Asylum System Near Collapse, MPs Warn

UK-Asylum crisis

UK Asylum System Near Collapse, MPs Warn

Britain’s asylum system is struggling under mounting pressure and risks repeating past mistakes, according to a critical report from a cross-party committee of MPs.

Get today's headlines by email

The report, published on Friday by the UK's public accounts committee, said the asylum system was “failing to cope” and described its findings as “disturbing”. MPs warned that government efforts remained focused on short-term solutions rather than a long-term strategy.
Concerns Over Control and Oversight
Committee chairman Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said control of the asylum system had been “all but lost”, blaming a lack of coordination and a reactive approach to managing growing pressures.
He said asylum seekers were being left either waiting indefinitely for decisions or disappearing from official oversight altogether. The report criticised what it called a “directionless bureaucracy” that was shifting problems between different parts of the system rather than resolving them.
One of the committee’s strongest criticisms concerned failed asylum seekers whose claims had been rejected. MPs said it was “shocking and unacceptable” that the Home Office could not account for all of these individuals and therefore could not say with certainty who remained in the country.
The committee recommended a complete overhaul of monitoring arrangements and urged ministers to explain how they would locate those no longer in contact with authorities, tackle illegal employment and penalise employers who break the rules.
Rising Costs and Hotel Contracts
The report examined government data collection, accommodation management and spending on asylum support.
In the 2024–25 financial year, the Home Office spent around £4.9 billion on the asylum system. Of that total, £3.4 billion went towards accommodation and support for asylum seekers.
MPs called for a full review of hotel contracts used to house asylum seekers, saying the government should assess whether current profit levels for contractors are justified.
Government Defends Reforms
A Home Office spokesperson said the findings reinforced the need for reforms that are already being implemented.
Earlier this year, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced changes including plans for people granted asylum to receive temporary protection that would be reviewed every 30 months.
Political opponents offered differing interpretations of the report. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said more than 73,000 migrants had crossed the English Channel since Labour entered government and argued that the system for removing those without a right to remain was breaking down.
Meanwhile, Max Wilkinson, the Liberal Democrats’ home affairs spokesperson, said the government had failed to repair an asylum system that he said had been left dysfunctional by previous Conservative administrations.
Mixed Performance Indicators
Despite the committee’s concerns, some official indicators have shown improvement.
Home Office figures released in February showed asylum applications fell by 4% in 2025, even as arrivals on small boats increased by 13%.
The backlog of unresolved asylum claims dropped to 64,426, its lowest level since 2020. The number of asylum seekers housed in hotels also fell by 19% to 30,657 as more people were moved into longer-term accommodation.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• 21 comments
• 308 views

webfact

June 5Jun 5

Republicans Break With Trump Again to Support Ukraine Aid

Trump

Republicans Break With Trump Again to Support Ukraine Aid

Republicans in the US House of Representatives joined Democrats on Thursday to approve a bill providing military and reconstruction support for Ukraine, marking another public break with President Donald Trump by members of his own party.

Get today's headlines by email

The Ukraine Support Act passed by a vote of 226 to 195 after 18 Republicans crossed party lines to support the measure. The legislation would allocate more than $1 billion in aid for Ukraine and authorize a further $8 billion in financing loans to support the country's defence efforts.
Despite clearing the House, the bill faces long odds of becoming law. It must still be approved by the Senate and signed by Trump, who has not indicated support for the measure.
Republicans Defy Party Leadership
The vote was made possible after Republican supporters joined Democrats in signing a discharge petition, a procedural move that allowed lawmakers to bypass House leadership and force the legislation onto the floor for consideration.
The outcome highlights growing divisions within the Republican Party over foreign policy and the administration's approach to international conflicts.
It follows another rare display of dissent earlier this week, when four House Republicans joined Democrats to pass a largely symbolic resolution aimed at preventing Trump from taking further military action in Iran.
Pressure Builds Over Iran Policy
Although the White House dismissed that resolution as an unconstitutional attempt to limit presidential authority, its passage added to pressure on the administration as the conflict with Iran continues.
The administration has also retreated from plans to establish an “anti-weaponisation” fund after criticism from both Democrats and some Republicans.
Republican lawmakers had warned they could block a key immigration bill if the administration proceeded with plans that would have directed public funds to Trump supporters, creating another source of tension within the president's party.
Zelensky Seeks Direct Talks With Putin
The House vote came as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky renewed efforts to revive peace negotiations with Russia.
In an open letter addressed to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Zelensky called for a face-to-face meeting between the two leaders, arguing that direct engagement offered the best chance of ending the war.
He said it would be a mistake to wait until the conflict once again becomes a primary focus of US attention and urged a full ceasefire during any future negotiations.
Putin rejected the idea of a ceasefire earlier on Thursday.
Trump later said he believed a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders would be beneficial.
Peace Efforts Remain Stalled
Attempts to negotiate an end to the war have made little progress in recent months. Previous rounds of talks held in Geneva, Abu Dhabi and Istanbul have failed to produce a breakthrough.
Zelensky's appeal coincided with Putin's attendance at a major economic forum in Saint Petersburg.
The letter also referenced a Ukrainian drone strike on the outskirts of the city a day earlier. Meanwhile, Russian-installed authorities in Crimea accused Ukraine of attacks that killed four people in Simferopol. Ukraine said it had targeted a fuel depot.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• Ukraine Conflict

• 16 comments
• 343 views

webfact

June 5Jun 5

Kennedy Center Ordered to Remove Trump Name by June 12

USA

Kennedy Center Ordered to Remove Trump Name by June 12

Employees at the Kennedy Center have been instructed to begin removing President Donald Trump’s name from the performing arts venue following a federal court ruling that blocked efforts to rename the institution.

Get today's headlines by email

According to an internal memo sent on Thursday and first obtained by CBS News, the center’s legal team directed staff to immediately revert to the venue’s official title, “The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts,” or simply “Kennedy Center,” in all communications and materials.
The directive requires updates to email signatures, letterhead, official documents and other branding elements. It also sets a June 12 deadline for replacing interior and exterior signs and removing the Trump-associated name from furniture and other physical assets across the facility.
Staff Ordered to Restore Original Name
The memo represents the clearest indication yet that the arts institution is complying with a recent federal court decision that found the renaming effort unlawful.
Last week, District Judge Christopher R. Cooper ruled in favour of Representative Joyce Beatty of Ohio, an ex officio member of the Kennedy Center’s Board of Trustees. Beatty challenged both the decision to rename the institution and a separate plan to close it for two years to undertake major renovations.
Court Ruling Forces Compliance
In his ruling, Cooper said federal law leaves no ambiguity regarding the center’s identity.
“The Kennedy Center’s organic statute makes crystal clear that the Center is to be named for President Kennedy, and it cannot bear any other formal name or public memorial based on the Board’s unilateral say-so,” the judge wrote.
The court determined that the board lacked authority to formally change the institution’s name, which was established by Congress in honour of President John F. Kennedy.
Renovation Plans Remain Uncertain
While the ruling halted the renaming effort, it did not outright prevent the planned closure of the venue for renovation work.
The Kennedy Center is scheduled to begin a $257 million renovation project on July 5. However, the internal memo stated that officials are still evaluating their next steps and will provide further guidance on whether the facility will remain open beyond that date.
Cooper said the board could revisit the closure proposal, provided it does so carefully and in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
“The Court is not persuaded that the closure is categorically unwarranted or impermissible under the U.S. Code,” he wrote, adding that the preliminary injunction does not prevent the board from reconsidering the matter.
Trump Criticises Judge
Trump sharply criticised Cooper following the ruling, saying the judge should “be ashamed of himself” for blocking the administration’s proposal to rename the venue as “The Trump Kennedy Center.”
Since returning to office, Trump has pursued a broader effort to place his name on federal initiatives, buildings and programmes.
Among the changes, Trump’s name has been added to the exterior of the U.S. Institute of Peace building in Washington, while a large banner featuring his image was displayed outside the Justice Department headquarters. Several government initiatives, including TrumpRx, a prescription drug discount programme, and Trump Accounts, an investment scheme for children, also carry his name.
The Hill said it had contacted the Kennedy Center for comment.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• 6 comments
• 358 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Trump’s Giant Arch Faces New Hurdle in Washington

USA

Trump’s Giant Arch Faces New Hurdle in Washington

The federal commission responsible for overseeing development on government land in Washington has delayed a decision on President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot triumphal arch, requesting additional information on the project’s design, safety implications and impact on the surrounding area.

Get today's headlines by email

The National Capital Planning Commission voted on Thursday to seek further details from the Department of the Interior, which submitted plans for the monument. The arch is proposed for a site between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.
The move follows nearly three hours of public testimony, with most speakers expressing opposition to the project, which is among several initiatives Trump is pursuing as part of a broader effort to reshape the capital.
Commission Requests Additional Information
Commission members asked for more justification for the monument’s proposed height and sought further details on issues including aviation safety, lighting, stormwater management, traffic flow and visitor parking.
Will Scharf, the commission chairman and Trump’s White House staff secretary, acknowledged that the proposal requires additional work before it can advance.
He said officials should provide more information about how the structure would appear in relation to other major landmarks in Washington. Scharf nevertheless argued that the nation’s upcoming 250th anniversary celebrations presented an opportunity to add a lasting feature to the city.
Vice Chairman Stuart Levenbach described the location as one of the few places where a large civic monument could potentially be appropriate, while noting that questions remain over whether such a prominent architectural statement belongs there.
Public Opposition Remains Strong
The commission received around 1,700 public comments ahead of the meeting, the majority opposing the project.
Critics cited concerns over the arch’s size, its effect on Washington’s skyline and potential safety issues in a heavily visited area. Some described it as an unnecessary use of public funds, while others characterized it as a personal legacy project for the president.
Representatives from organizations including the National Parks Conservation Association, the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the Society of Architectural Historians spoke against the proposal.
Among them was military veteran Gary Langston, who argued that the project would disrupt the historic sightline linking the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington House, a visual connection intended to symbolize national reunification following the Civil War.
Monument Design and Funding Questions
Current plans call for a granite arch rising 250 feet from its base to a torch-bearing figure resembling Lady Liberty. Two gilded eagles would flank the top of the structure, while previously proposed lion statues at its base have been removed.
The phrases “One Nation Under God” and “Liberty and Justice for All” would appear in gold lettering, and the Pledge of Allegiance would be inscribed on both sides of the monument.
An observation deck would provide panoramic views across the Washington region.
Opponents argue the structure would overwhelm nearby landmarks. The proposed arch would stand more than twice the height of the Lincoln Memorial and nearly half the height of the Washington Monument.
The final cost has not yet been determined. Trump previously suggested private donations could help fund the project, while a White House official said both public and private money are expected to contribute.
Broader Washington Projects Face Scrutiny
The arch is one of several Trump-backed projects drawing criticism and legal challenges.
A coalition of veterans and a historian has filed a lawsuit seeking to halt construction, citing concerns about the impact on historic views.
Speaking in the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump described the proposed monument as a celebration of American military victories.
The administration also announced the completion of work to add a blue coating to the interior of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool ahead of July 4 celebrations marking the nation’s 250th anniversary. That project is facing a separate legal challenge from the The Cultural Landscape Foundation, which argues federal preservation review procedures were not properly followed.
Meanwhile, the White House East Wing has been demolished to make way for a large ballroom, another element of Trump’s effort to remake parts of Washington.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• 10 comments
• 346 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Hezbollah Rejects Renewed Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire

Middle East

Hezbollah Rejects Renewed Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire

Hezbollah has rejected a renewed ceasefire agreement announced by Israel and Lebanon, describing the US-backed proposal as unacceptable and equivalent to surrender.

Get today's headlines by email

In a strongly worded statement, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem said negotiations had been “futile” and “humiliating” for Lebanon. He argued that the arrangement, which would require the group to halt attacks and withdraw fighters from southern Lebanon, served Israeli objectives and had been rejected by many Lebanese.
The agreement was announced on Wednesday following a fourth round of US-mediated talks in Washington. In a joint statement, the United States, Israel and Lebanon said the deal depended on a complete cessation of Hezbollah fire.
Security Zones Planned in Southern Lebanon
Under the proposed arrangement, Hezbollah operatives would be removed from territory between the Israeli border and the Litani River, roughly 30km north of the frontier. The area is currently occupied by Israeli ground forces.
The agreement also calls for the creation of pilot security zones where the Lebanese Armed Forces would exercise exclusive control, excluding all non-state armed groups. However, no maps or detailed plans were released explaining how the zones would operate.
The deal followed a partial ceasefire announced earlier in the week, under which Israel was expected to halt strikes on Beirut while Hezbollah refrained from attacking Israeli territory. Representatives from both countries are due to meet again on 22 June for further discussions aimed at reaching a broader settlement.
Opposition on the Ground
Reaction in Beirut’s southern suburbs, a Hezbollah stronghold, reflected the group’s opposition.
Local shopkeepers interviewed by the BBC questioned the viability of a ceasefire that did not appear to stop ongoing military operations. Some described the arrangement as a surrender rather than a genuine peace agreement and expressed little confidence that it would bring lasting stability.
Analysts suggest Lebanon’s government may have hoped Hezbollah would eventually accept the talks process, while the United States viewed the negotiations as part of wider efforts linked to regional diplomacy involving Iran. However, Hezbollah appears determined to present itself as the principal force resisting Israel.
Fighting Continues Despite Diplomacy
Hostilities continued across Lebanon on Thursday.
Lebanese media reported multiple Israeli strikes in southern regions and the Bekaa Valley. Lebanon’s health ministry said at least eight people were killed and 15 wounded in attacks targeting several towns, including Sohmor, Masaken and Arab Al-Jalil.
Meanwhile, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, reported that one peacekeeper died from injuries sustained when mortar shells struck a position near Marjayoun. The Israeli military blamed Hezbollah for the attack, while the group had not commented on the allegation.
Serbia later identified the peacekeeper as Senior Sergeant Milovan Jovanovic.
Israel also announced the death of Capt Eitan Shmuel Lemberg during operations in southern Lebanon. The military said several aerial threats had been detected in the area, though no additional injuries were reported.
Hezbollah stated that it had targeted Israeli troops and military vehicles near Qantara and Beaufort Castle with rockets and attack drones.
War Shows No Sign of Ending
The conflict intensified after Hezbollah launched rockets into Israel on 2 March following an Israeli strike that killed Iran’s supreme leader. Israel responded with a large-scale air campaign and a ground offensive in southern Lebanon.
A previous US-brokered ceasefire reached on 16 April failed to halt the fighting. Last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered intensified military operations against Hezbollah following continued rocket and drone attacks.
According to Lebanon’s health ministry, at least 3,526 people have been killed in the country since the war began. The United Nations says more than one million people have been displaced.
Israel says 26 soldiers and four civilians have been killed during the conflict.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• Israel

• 9 comments
• 333 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Trump Approval Falls to Record Low in Poll Tracker

Trump

Trump Approval Falls to Record Low in Poll Tracker

President Donald Trump’s net approval rating has dropped to its lowest level on record in a long-running polling tracker, as public concern grows over rising energy costs linked to the conflict with Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

Analysis by The Economist, which tracks presidential job approval using YouGov survey data dating back to 2009, found Trump’s net approval rating had fallen to minus 25 percentage points. According to the tracker, that makes him the most unpopular president recorded in the series.
The decline comes as Americans face higher fuel prices following disruptions tied to the Iran conflict. The Trump administration remains engaged in negotiations with Tehran over a potential nuclear agreement and efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global oil shipments.
Among the issues measured in the polling analysis, Trump received his weakest ratings on inflation and the cost of living. His net approval on prices and inflation stood at minus 43 percentage points.
Economy and Energy Concerns
While the president scored better on issues such as employment, the broader economy, foreign policy, immigration and crime, rising household costs continue to weigh on public sentiment.
According to AAA, the average price of gasoline in the United States exceeded $4 per gallon on Thursday, compared with roughly $3 per gallon a year earlier.
White House officials have argued that higher energy prices are a temporary consequence of efforts aimed at achieving longer-term stability in the Middle East.
Trump has also downplayed concerns about the economic impact on Americans. Speaking to reporters in May, he said his focus during negotiations with Iran was preventing Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Congressional Pushback
The economic effects of the conflict have also prompted criticism from some members of Trump’s own party.
On Wednesday, four Republican lawmakers joined Democrats in supporting a war powers resolution designed to limit the administration’s military actions against Iran.
Trump dismissed the measure in a post on Truth Social, describing the House vote as “meaningless”. He criticised the Republican lawmakers who supported the resolution and argued that Congress was attempting to restrict his authority while negotiations aimed at ending the conflict were still underway.
The vote highlighted growing divisions in Washington over the administration’s handling of the Iran crisis, even as diplomatic efforts continue.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• USA

• 46 comments
• 450 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Lufthansa Probes Boeing 787 Nose Gear Collapse in Frankfurt

Aviation

Lufthansa Probes Boeing 787 Nose Gear Collapse in Frankfurt

Several airline staff were injured after the nose landing gear of a Boeing 787 operated by Lufthansa collapsed unexpectedly while the aircraft was parked at a gate at Frankfurt Airport on Thursday.

Get today's headlines by email

The incident occurred at about 12:45 p.m. local time as the aircraft was preparing for a scheduled flight to Los Angeles, Lufthansa said.
Passengers had not yet boarded the aircraft when the collapse happened. However, crew members and ground personnel were on board at the time.
Staff Injured During Ground Incident
Lufthansa said a number of employees sustained injuries and were receiving medical treatment.
"Several staff members were injured and are currently receiving medical treatment," the airline said in a statement.
The carrier did not provide details on the number or severity of the injuries.
Aircraft Grounded at Frankfurt Airport
Photographs from the scene showed emergency vehicles surrounding the twin-engine widebody aircraft, which was resting partially on its underside after the nose gear gave way.
The aircraft had been scheduled to operate Flight LH450 from Frankfurt to Los Angeles.
A spokesperson for Boeing said the company was aware of the incident and was assisting Lufthansa but declined to comment further.
Investigation Under Way
Lufthansa said it was working with the relevant authorities to determine the cause of the collapse.
"We are currently investigating the exact circumstances with the relevant authorities," the airline said.
No information has yet been released regarding potential mechanical issues or other factors that may have contributed to the incident.
Key Aircraft in Lufthansa Fleet Plans
The Boeing 787 is a relatively recent addition to Lufthansa's fleet. The airline operates the 787-9 variant as part of a broader strategy to modernise operations, improve fuel efficiency and simplify its aircraft portfolio.
The carrier has been gradually introducing the aircraft while phasing out older, less efficient models.
The incident is likely to draw attention as investigators seek to establish why the landing gear failed while the aircraft was stationary at the gate.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 5 June 2026

• 7 comments
• 336 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Trump Erupts After House Delivers Iran War Rebuke

USA

Trump Erupts After House Delivers Iran War Rebuke

US President Donald Trump has criticised lawmakers who backed a House measure aimed at limiting his authority to continue military action against Iran, describing the vote as "unpatriotic" and singling out four Republican members who joined Democrats in support of the resolution.

Get today's headlines by email

The US House of Representatives approved the measure on Wednesday by a 215-208 vote. The resolution seeks to require Trump either to withdraw US forces involved in the conflict or obtain congressional approval for any further military action.
In a post on Truth Social on Thursday, Trump condemned the vote, arguing it came at a critical stage in efforts to end the conflict.
"Yesterday, in a meaningless vote, the House voted, 4 bad Republicans and all of the Dumocrats, to limit my War Powers, right in the middle of my final negotiations to end the War with the Islamic Republic of Iran," he wrote. "Who would do such an unpatriotic thing."
White House Pushback
The White House has dismissed the resolution, arguing that it lacks meaningful effect and represents an unconstitutional attempt to restrict presidential authority.
The measure adopted by the House is a concurrent resolution. If it also passes the Republican-controlled Senate, it would not require the president's signature to take effect. However, its legal standing could face challenges.
Trump continued his criticism in the same social media post, accusing Democrats of opposing him for political reasons and directing particular anger at the Republican lawmakers who broke ranks.
"The Democrats are fueled by Trump Derangement Syndrome. They would rather have our Country fail than give me another, of many, victories," he wrote.
Referring to the four Republicans who supported the resolution, Trump added: "They're GRANDSTANDERS! They should be ashamed of themselves."
Growing Pressure Over the War
The House vote marked the fourth effort by lawmakers to curb Trump's war powers during the conflict. A similar resolution advanced in the Senate in May, although senators have not yet held a final vote on the measure.
While the resolution is widely viewed as largely symbolic, its passage increases political pressure on the administration as concerns over the war grow. Rising petrol prices and increasing public opposition have added to scrutiny of the White House's handling of the conflict.
The vote also highlighted divisions within the Republican Party. It came shortly after a separate dispute in Congress led the administration to abandon plans for a $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund intended to support political allies.
Republican Split Emerges
The four Republicans who voted in favour of the resolution were Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Tom Barrett of Michigan and Warren Davidson of Ohio. They joined all House Democrats in supporting the measure.
Democrat Jared Golden of Maine, who had opposed similar efforts in the past, also voted in favour this time.
Barrett defended his decision, arguing that Congress has a constitutional role in authorising war.
"Congress alone declares war, that's something certainly we need to be protective of," he said.
Asked whether he feared retaliation from Trump, Barrett replied: "I vote my conscience for what I think is right and willing to accept that."

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• Iranian Conflict

• 134 comments
• 531 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Musk Could Become Trillionaire in SpaceX Market Debut

business

Musk Could Become Trillionaire in SpaceX Market Debut

Elon Musk's SpaceX has unveiled a proposed share price ahead of its planned stock market debut, a move that would value the company at about $1.75 trillion and potentially make it the largest initial public offering (IPO) on record.

Get today's headlines by email

In regulatory filings, the company said it intends to offer shares at $135 each. If achieved, the valuation would mark a sharp increase from the roughly $1.25 trillion valuation assigned to the company earlier this year.
The proposed pricing is notable because companies typically reveal their target IPO price only shortly before trading begins. SpaceX disclosed its estimate more than a week ahead of its expected Nasdaq debut on 12 June.
Record Fundraising Ambitions
SpaceX aims to raise $75 billion through the offering, far surpassing the current IPO record set by Saudi Aramco, which raised $25.6 billion in 2019.
If investor demand supports the proposed share price, SpaceX would immediately rank among the world's most valuable companies. Musk, who owns more than 80% of the company, could also see his personal wealth rise to unprecedented levels.
However, the final IPO price will be determined by market demand and could differ from the company's target.
Investors Betting on Future Growth
SpaceX's valuation reflects expectations for future growth rather than current profitability.
According to Samuel Kerr, head of equity capital markets research at Mergermarket, the company is being valued at a higher sales multiple than any member of the so-called "Magnificent Seven" technology giants — including Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla.
Kerr said investors may be willing to accept the premium because of expectations for future earnings and revenue growth.
Losses Persist Despite Rising Revenue
Officially known as Space Exploration Technologies, the company generated $18.6 billion in revenue last year but reported a net loss of $4.9 billion.
During the first quarter of this year, revenue reached $4.7 billion, while net losses totaled $4.3 billion.
Its balance sheet shows assets worth $102 billion, including rockets and infrastructure, alongside debt of $60.5 billion.
Beyond its rocket-launch business, SpaceX is investing heavily in artificial intelligence, social media, data centres and satellite internet services through Starlink, while also maintaining ownership of xAI.
Uncertain Market Reception
Despite the company's scale and growth ambitions, its market debut carries risks. Data from Dealogic indicates that nearly half of companies that have gone public over the past three decades have subsequently traded below their IPO valuation.
Whether investors embrace SpaceX's ambitious pricing will become clearer when trading begins later this month.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• 7 comments
• 327 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Starmer Says Musk Stirring Division Over Nowak Case

UK-Politics

Starmer Says Musk Stirring Division Over Nowak Case

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has accused billionaire businessman and social media owner Elon Musk of attempting to deepen divisions in Britain following the murder of teenager Henry Nowak.

Get today's headlines by email

The comments came after footage emerged showing police officers handcuffing the 18-year-old as he lay fatally injured. In the video, Nowak repeatedly tells officers that he cannot breathe. His killer, Vickrum Digwa, had claimed he was the victim of a racist attack.
The case has sparked public anger, with violent protests breaking out near the scene of the killing in Southampton. Musk, who owns the social media platform X, has posted several messages criticising the police response to the incident.
PM Criticises Musk's Comments
During a visit to York on Thursday, Starmer said Musk had been interfering in British politics and accused him of seeking to inflame tensions.
"Musk, again, has been interfering in our politics in the last few days, trying to whip up division – that is not who we are in Britain," the prime minister said.
He added that Britain was a country of "reasonable, tolerant people" and pointed to the response of Nowak's family, who have urged the public to remain calm following the teenager's death.
Investigations Underway
Starmer said the conduct of the officers involved was being examined by the Independent Office for Police Conduct. He also confirmed that guidance issued by the National Police Chiefs' Council relating to race was being reviewed in light of the case.
Asked whether he supported Conservative calls for a full misconduct investigation into the officers' actions, the prime minister said changes might be necessary and should not be ruled out.
Call for Political Restraint
However, Starmer stressed that political leaders should avoid exploiting the case.
"I think it's right that there may need to be changes and we shouldn't shy away from that," he said.
"But how we conduct ourselves now as politicians is really important."
The prime minister urged politicians of all parties to heed the wishes of Nowak's family, repeating their appeal for calm and warning against using the case to stoke further divisions.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• 14 comments
• 328 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Germany Blames Russia After Losing UN Security Council Seat

Report

Germany Blames Russia After Losing UN Security Council Seat

Germany has accused Russia of helping to undermine its campaign for a seat on the UN Security Council after Berlin failed to secure election to the body for the 2027-28 term.

Get today's headlines by email

Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul described the outcome as a "bitter defeat" after Germany lost out to Portugal and Austria in voting for two seats allocated to the Western European and Others Group.
Ukraine stance cited as a factor
Wadephul said Germany's strong support for Ukraine may have cost it backing among some UN member states, arguing that Russia did not want a pro-Ukraine voice on the council.
He said it was "no secret" that Moscow had sought to build opposition to Germany's candidacy.
"We have always taken a clear stance on certain issues, and these are positions that not all member states share," Wadephul said.
Russia has not responded to the allegation that it lobbied against Germany's bid.
Israel policy may have affected support
The foreign minister also suggested that Germany's longstanding commitment to supporting Israel could have reduced support for its campaign.
Wadephul said Germany's special responsibility toward Israel in the Middle East conflict may have influenced voting by some countries.
He also acknowledged that Germany entered the race relatively late, which may have contributed to the result.
Germany received 104 votes in the election, while Portugal secured 134 and Austria 131.
Setback for Merz government
The UN Security Council consists of five permanent members — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States — and 10 non-permanent members elected for two-year terms.
Alongside Portugal and Austria, Kyrgyzstan, Trinidad and Tobago, and Zimbabwe were elected to serve on the council. The body is the only UN institution empowered to adopt legally binding measures, including sanctions and authorisations for the use of force.
The outcome represents a setback for Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who has pledged to strengthen Germany's international influence.
Merz sought to downplay the significance of the defeat, congratulating Austria and Portugal while reaffirming Germany's commitment to the United Nations.
"This result does not alter the tasks we face at the United Nations. Germany remains a reliable pillar of the multilateral system," he said.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• 2 comments
• 323 views

webfact

June 4Jun 4

Foreign Nationals Among at Least 21 Killed in Delhi B&B Fire

Fire

Foreign Nationals Among at Least 21 Killed in Delhi B&B Fire

At least 21 people have died and dozens more were injured after a fire swept through a multi-storey building in south Delhi, according to police in the Indian capital.

Get today's headlines by email

Several of those killed were foreign nationals, including people from South Asian, African and Central Asian countries who had travelled to India for medical treatment or were accompanying relatives receiving care, local media reported.
The blaze broke out at the Flourish Stay bed-and-breakfast in the Malviya Nagar area. The property is believed to have catered primarily to patients and family members visiting a nearby private hospital.
More than 40 people were rescued and taken to hospital. Authorities have not yet confirmed how many people were inside the building when the fire started, and the cause remains under investigation.
One of Delhi's Deadliest Fires
The incident is among the deadliest fires in the Indian capital in recent years.
Fire officer AK Malik said crews brought the blaze under control quickly before conducting a full search of the building.
"The fire was brought under control quite early on - it was contained very quickly. We have now cleared the building and opened it up for the police," he said.
Delhi minister Ashish Sood said officials were investigating whether the property had the required permissions to operate as a bed-and-breakfast facility. He added that anyone found responsible for violations would face criminal action.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed condolences to the victims' families and announced compensation of 200,000 rupees ($2,088) for the families of those killed and 50,000 rupees for those injured.
Witness Accounts
Videos shared on social media showed flames engulfing the building as crowds gathered outside. Television footage later showed the structure heavily damaged while emergency teams searched for victims.
Witnesses told BBC Hindi that many people were found unconscious inside the building. Some were discovered beneath beds in hotel rooms, while others were found collapsed in washrooms.
Wasim, a local resident who helped during the rescue effort, said he found the bodies of a couple embracing inside a washroom.
Another witness said several unconscious victims were given CPR, with some successfully revived.
A shopkeeper whose business faces the building said he laid quilts on the ground to help cushion people attempting to jump from upper floors. According to witnesses, several people survived after leaping from the building.
Victims Yet to Be Identified
Authorities have not released a complete list of those killed or formally identified the victims.
Local lawmaker Satish Upadhyay said a number of people from Bangladesh and other South Asian countries were staying in the building while seeking medical treatment in Delhi.
By early evening, search and rescue operations were nearing completion, although ambulances remained on standby as crews continued clearing debris.
Safety Concerns
Fires remain a recurring problem across India, where enforcement of building safety regulations is often criticised as inadequate.
Previous investigations into major fires have highlighted issues including poor inspections, faulty electrical systems and buildings operating beyond their approved use. Incidents at factories, hospitals, coaching centres and entertainment venues have repeatedly exposed gaps between safety regulations and their enforcement.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• 0 comments
• 279 views

webfact

June 3Jun 3

US House Approves Resolution Calling for End to Iran War

Iranian Conflict

US House Approves Resolution Calling for End to Iran War

The House of Representatives has approved a resolution aimed at forcing President Donald Trump to end U.S. involvement in the conflict with Iran, delivering a political victory to Democrats and a small group of Republicans who argue the war lacks proper congressional authorization.

Get today's headlines by email

The measure passed on Wednesday by a vote of 215-208. Four Republicans — Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett and Warren Davidson — joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
Bipartisan vote in House
Although the vote does not immediately alter U.S. military policy, it places the House formally on record against a conflict that has lasted for more than three months and has contributed to economic uncertainty worldwide.
Democrats described the outcome as a significant step in challenging the administration’s handling of the war. Representative Jared Huffman said Congress was moving closer to declaring the conflict unlawful without explicit approval from lawmakers.
Senate action still pending
The resolution now heads to the Senate, where lawmakers have been considering similar efforts to limit the administration’s war powers.
Previous attempts by critics of the conflict to advance war powers measures were blocked by Republican allies of the president. Momentum shifted last month when the Senate moved forward with its own proposal after Senator Bill Cassidy changed his position and voted in favor of advancing the measure. A final Senate vote has not yet been scheduled.
In the House, Wednesday’s vote marked the fourth attempt to pass legislation seeking an end to the conflict. Earlier efforts attracted some Republican backing but fell short because of opposition from party leaders.
Most Republicans, led by House Speaker Mike Johnson, have argued that the military action does not constitute a war requiring congressional approval. Party leaders have also maintained that restricting the president’s authority during the conflict could benefit Iran’s government and undermine U.S. security interests.
Economic concerns shape debate
Support for the administration’s position has weakened as public concerns about the conflict have grown.
While Republican voters largely continue to back the war, independent voters have become increasingly skeptical as fighting has continued. The shift comes as lawmakers prepare for November’s midterm elections.
Economic pressures have played a major role in that change. Disruptions to global trade linked to the conflict have contributed to higher prices for fuel and some consumer goods. Democrats have repeatedly argued that the war has undermined Trump’s campaign promises to avoid new overseas conflicts and reduce costs for American families.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said the conflict had increased costs for consumers and called for an immediate end to the military campaign.
Dispute over presidential authority
Several Republicans supporting the resolution have pointed to the 1973 War Powers Act, which allows presidents to conduct military operations without congressional approval for a limited period. Critics argue that the legal window for the current operation expired in early May and that Congress should now decide whether military action continues.
The House measure, introduced by Representative Greg Meeks, directs the president to withdraw U.S. forces from hostilities involving Iran unless Congress issues a declaration of war or specifically authorizes military action.
Because it is a concurrent resolution, the measure requires approval from both chambers of Congress but does not go to the White House for the president’s signature. The administration has dismissed the proposal as unconstitutional and argues that active hostilities ended after Trump ordered a ceasefire on April 7.
The White House has maintained that there are currently no hostilities requiring the withdrawal of U.S. forces and has opposed the resolution on both legal and practical grounds.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• USA

• 19 comments
• 369 views

webfact

June 3Jun 3

Murder Charge Filed in Death of California Trump Supporter

USA

Murder Charge Filed in Death of California Trump Supporter

California prosecutors have filed a murder charge against a man accused of fatally beating a 69-year-old homeowner known locally for displaying American flags and pro-Trump memorabilia outside his residence.

Get today's headlines by email

The charge against Thomas Caleb Butler, 32, was upgraded after the victim, Kerry George Sheron, died from injuries sustained during an assault outside his home in Escondido on 20 May.
Butler, a former Navy information systems technician, had initially been charged with attempted murder and pleaded not guilty during a court appearance on 22 May. Following Sheron’s death on 24 May, the San Diego County District Attorney's Office amended the case to include a murder charge.
Victim Died Four Days After Assault
According to prosecutors, Butler allegedly punched Sheron, causing him to fall, and then struck him several more times while he was on the ground.
Sheron was taken to hospital in critical condition after the attack and died four days later. Family members described him as a strong supporter of Donald Trump and said the assault was “brutal and unprovoked.”
In announcing the upgraded charge, San Diego County District Attorney Summer Stephan said the attack had left Sheron’s family and community grieving and pledged to pursue justice in the case.
Investigation Continues
Authorities have not identified a motive for the assault. However, the Escondido Police Department said investigators are examining whether the incident may have had a political element.
The attack occurred at about 2:14 p.m. local time on 20 May, when officers responded to reports of an assault at Sheron’s home. Police said they found Sheron suffering from severe injuries. A bystander who intervened was also hurt.
Investigators said the suspect had fled before officers arrived. Police later located Butler in the neighborhood after witnesses provided a description.
Potential Life Sentence
Butler remains in custody at the San Diego County Jail without bail. He is scheduled to be arraigned on the murder charge on Friday after a previous court hearing was canceled.
Prosecutors said Butler faces a potential sentence of 28 years to life in prison if convicted.
Military records provided by the Navy show Butler enlisted in December 2011, served as an information systems technician, and was discharged in January 2023.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• 3 comments
• 291 views

webfact

June 3Jun 3

Starmer Accuses Farage of Exploiting Nowak Murder

UK-Politics

Starmer Accuses Farage of Exploiting Nowak Murder

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has accused Nigel Farage of exploiting the murder of Henry Nowak to fuel division, as the case sparked heated exchanges in Parliament.

Get today's headlines by email

The row follows comments by Farage, who urged the public to respond with “pure, cold rage” after police arrested the 18-year-old victim while he was dying. Officers initially detained Nowak after his attacker falsely claimed he had been the target of a racist assault.
During Prime Minister’s Questions, Farage repeated his argument that the case demonstrated “two-tier policing”, claiming anti-racism guidance had encouraged officers to treat ethnic groups differently. Starmer rejected the allegation, saying the appropriate response was “serious work, not rage”.
Murder and Investigation
Vickrum Digwa, 23, was sentenced on Monday to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 21 years for killing Nowak in Southampton in December.
Digwa stabbed the teenager with a large blade that he said he carried because of his Sikh faith. He then falsely told police he had been subjected to a racist attack, leading officers to initially arrest Nowak rather than his attacker.
Body-worn camera footage released this week showed officers handcuffing the teenager as he repeatedly said he could not breathe. The incident is under investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct.
Family Urges Unity
Starmer told MPs that Nowak’s family had specifically asked for the tragedy not to be used to deepen social divisions.
He said his own response had focused on identifying lessons and ensuring justice, while accusing Farage of appealing to public anger despite the wishes of the victim’s relatives. Starmer described attempts to use the case to create “grievance and division” as unforgivable.
Outside court on Monday, Henry’s father, Mark Nowak, said the family wanted his son’s death to lead to positive change. He urged people not to use the case to promote hatred, tension or division, and said they hoped it would help make streets safer.
Political and Policing Response
Kemi Badenoch also criticised Farage, saying she was disappointed by his intervention. In the Commons, she described the case as a warning to institutions across the country and said politicians should work to unite people rather than divide them.
Ed Davey said police forces should implement any recommendations arising from the watchdog’s investigation. He added that politicians should avoid turning the teenager’s death into a political issue.
Donna Jones said Nowak’s family were distressed by violent protests that broke out in Southampton on Tuesday. She said relatives had made clear they did not support demonstrations or the unrest seen on the streets.
Meanwhile, the National Police Chiefs' Council said it would review wording in its Police Anti-Racism Commitment. The document has faced scrutiny because it states police should not necessarily treat everyone “the same” if they are seeking equal policing outcomes across ethnic groups.
Earlier, Policing Minister Sarah Jones said the wording was wrong and could create a misleading impression. However, she stressed that the document was intended as a statement of values and did not form the basis of police training or operational decisions.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• 177 comments
• 563 views

webfact

June 3Jun 3

Ukraine Hits St Petersburg Ahead of Economic Forum

Russia

Ukraine Hits St Petersburg Ahead of Economic Forum

Ukraine launched drone attacks on the outskirts of St Petersburg early on Wednesday, hours before the opening of Russia’s flagship economic forum, an event aimed at showcasing the country to international investors.

Get today's headlines by email

As daybreak approached, large columns of smoke were seen rising over areas near Russia’s second-largest city. Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to address the forum on Friday, while organisers say thousands of participants from more than 130 countries will attend.
Air Defences Activated
Russian officials said air defence systems intercepted 59 drones overnight. Authorities reported that three districts in and around St Petersburg were affected by the attacks, although no fatalities were recorded.
The strikes disrupted daily activity in the region. Mobile internet services were affected, and operations at St Petersburg’s Pulkovo Airport were briefly suspended. Air raid alerts were also reported in parts of neighbouring Latvia and Estonia.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia would respond to the attacks, describing any future action as part of a broader and systematic approach.
Claims of Hits on Military and Energy Sites
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky later confirmed that Ukrainian drones had targeted several locations inside Russia, including an oil terminal and a naval facility in Kronstadt, a town near St Petersburg.
In a social media post, Zelensky said Ukraine’s campaign of long-range strikes was progressing as planned and aimed at bringing peace closer.
Kronstadt serves as the main base of Russia’s Baltic Fleet. Videos circulating online, which could not be independently verified, appeared to show drones flying toward military vessels docked in the area. The footage ended before any impact could be seen.
Robert Brovdi, commander of Ukraine’s unmanned systems forces, said on Telegram that the Russian corvette Boikiy had been hit during the operation.
Forum Draws International Guests
The attacks took place as St Petersburg prepared to host its annual economic forum, often referred to in the past as the “Russian Davos”.
Before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the event regularly attracted senior Western political figures, business leaders and international investors.
This year’s gathering is expected to include a small US delegation for the first time in nearly ten years. The group is being led by Rodney Mims Cook Jr, head of the US Commission of Fine Arts, who has overseen President Donald Trump’s ballroom project at the White House.
Among other attendees expected at the forum are US commentator Candace Owens and actor Steven Seagal, who has publicly expressed support for Putin.
A Ukrainian defence industry figure, Denys Shtilierman of Fire Point, appeared to reference the timing of the strikes in a post on X, sharing footage of drones and smoke near the city.
War Continues on Multiple Fronts
Since the start of Russia’s invasion, Ukraine has significantly expanded its domestic defence industry and increased its ability to conduct long-range drone operations inside Russian territory. Kyiv has frequently targeted energy and oil facilities, arguing they support Russia’s military campaign.
Meanwhile, fighting continues to cause casualties on both sides.
A Moscow-backed official in the Russian-controlled Donetsk region said seven people were killed on Wednesday when a drone struck a passenger bus.
Russia has also continued its attacks across Ukraine. On Monday night, combined missile and drone strikes killed at least 22 people in various parts of the country.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• Ukraine Conflict

• 15 comments
• 322 views

webfact

June 3Jun 3

Republicans Force Trump to Scrap $1.8bn DOJ Fund

USA

Republicans Force Trump to Scrap $1.8bn DOJ Fund

The US Department of Justice has abandoned a controversial $1.8bn (£1.3bn) compensation fund after facing fierce opposition from Republican lawmakers, marking another instance of President Donald Trump encountering resistance from within his own party.

Get today's headlines by email

The so-called "anti-weaponisation" fund was unveiled as part of a settlement linked to a lawsuit Trump withdrew against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The programme was designed to compensate people whom the administration determined had been unfairly targeted by the Biden administration.
Republican Revolt Ends Controversial Fund
The proposal immediately sparked criticism across Washington. Lawmakers from both parties objected to provisions that shielded Trump, his family and his businesses from current IRS audits. Critics also raised concerns that people convicted over the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol could potentially receive compensation, a possibility administration officials declined to rule out.
Pressure Builds in Congress
Republican opposition intensified rapidly after the plan was announced in May. During a private meeting with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, several Republican senators reportedly condemned the programme, arguing it appeared to benefit the president personally.
The backlash soon extended beyond criticism. Republicans began slowing progress on legislation intended to fund US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, signalling that the fund could jeopardise one of Trump's key immigration priorities.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune publicly urged the administration to withdraw the proposal, saying the administration should resolve the matter itself.
At the same time, Democrats vowed to oppose related legislation, while legal challenges were filed seeking to block the programme. A federal judge later ordered the Justice Department to suspend the fund while litigation proceeded.
A Pattern of Republican Resistance
The collapse of the fund reflects a broader trend during Trump's second term, with some Republicans showing a greater willingness to challenge the president when they believe he has overreached.
Recent examples include Republican support for efforts to limit the duration of US military involvement in Iran and votes compelling the Justice Department to release files connected to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Unlike previous controversies, many Republicans were quick to criticise the DOJ fund and few publicly defended it. Some viewed the initiative as a political liability at a time when Trump is dealing with a costly conflict involving Iran, rising fuel prices and weak approval ratings ahead of midterm elections.
A former Trump adviser described the proposal as a needless political mistake that risked harming Republicans electorally.
Fund Cancelled but Dispute Continues
After initially suspending the programme, Blanche confirmed on Tuesday that the administration would not proceed with the fund.
However, questions remain over whether the issue is fully resolved. Blanche declined to commit the decision to writing, prompting some critics to worry that a future administration could attempt to revive the concept.
Democratic and Republican lawmakers have already proposed legislation that would restrict presidents from using taxpayer funds to reward political allies. Republican Senator Thom Tillis argued that formally ending the programme was the only way to bring the controversy to a close.
Democrats, meanwhile, have pledged to continue pursuing legal and legislative action. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the administration's verbal commitment was insufficient and called for permanent legal measures to prevent any similar fund from being created in the future.
Political Fallout Ahead
Although the programme lasted only two weeks, it has become a significant political flashpoint. Democrats are expected to use the controversy in campaign messaging ahead of the upcoming midterm elections, while Republicans continue to seek safeguards against similar initiatives.
The episode underscores the limits of Trump's influence within his party and highlights growing signs that some Republican lawmakers are prepared to oppose the president when they believe his actions could damage the party politically or raise concerns about the use of executive power.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

• 4 comments
• 306 views

webfact

June 3Jun 3