World News

Europol Task Force Arrests 280 Over ‘Violence-for-Hire’

Report

Europol Task Force Arrests 280 Over ‘Violence-for-Hire’

European police have arrested 280 people in the first year of a multinational operation targeting a growing criminal trend in which violence is offered as a paid service, according to the European Union’s law enforcement agency, Europol.

Get today's headlines by email

The arrests were made by an international task force set up to tackle networks that recruit individuals—often young people—through social media and messaging platforms to carry out crimes ranging from assaults to killings.
Authorities say the development reflects a shift in organised crime, where violent acts can now be arranged online in a model resembling a gig economy.
Growing ‘violence-as-a-service’ networks
In a statement released on Wednesday, Europol said violence is increasingly being treated as a service that can be arranged remotely.
“Violence is no longer confined to isolated acts or local dynamics,” the agency said. “It is increasingly offered as a service: accessible, scalable and driven by online ecosystems that enable recruitment, coordination and execution across borders.”
According to Europol, criminal groups use online platforms to recruit people willing to commit violent acts on their behalf. Many recruits are minors or young adults who are contacted through encrypted messaging apps or social media.
The agency warned that such networks allow criminal organisers to operate across multiple countries while distancing themselves from the acts carried out on the ground.
International policing effort
The task force was created last year and brings together law enforcement agencies from 11 European countries. Participating nations include Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
Over its first 12 months, investigators identified more than 1,400 individuals suspected of links to violence-for-hire operations.
Authorities said the arrests represent early results of a broader effort to dismantle the networks behind the crimes rather than focusing only on those who carry them out.
Cases linked to attacks and shootings
Among those detained was a Dutch citizen accused of acting as a getaway driver for two minors suspected of carrying out a series of explosions in Germany in July and August 2025.
In another case, Swedish police arrested a minor in January for alleged involvement in a shooting outside a prison in the Dutch city of Alphen aan den Rijn.
Europol said these incidents illustrate how individuals can be recruited from one country to commit violent acts in another, often arranged entirely online.
Suspects added to Europe’s most-wanted list
The agency has also published details of three men on Europe’s most-wanted website who are believed to be linked to violence-as-a-service networks.
Two of the suspects are from Sweden and one is from Germany. Authorities say they are wanted in connection with offences including murder, drug trafficking and money laundering.
Investigators say the cross-border nature of these networks makes international cooperation essential to tracking down those organising and financing the crimes.
Law enforcement officials warn that the model could continue to expand as criminals exploit digital platforms to recruit participants and coordinate attacks across Europe.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 April 2026

• Crime

• 3 comments
• 250 views

webfact

April 29Apr 29

Kim Praises Troops Who Chose Death Over Capture

Ukraine Conflict

Kim Praises Troops Who Chose Death Over Capture

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has praised soldiers who killed themselves with grenades to avoid capture while fighting alongside Russian forces in the war against Ukraine, publicly acknowledging a practice long suspected by intelligence agencies.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking in Pyongyang earlier this week, Kim described the troops who chose to detonate explosives rather than surrender as heroes who acted to protect the honour of their country.
State media outlet Korean Central News Agency reported that the remarks were made during a ceremony unveiling a memorial for North Korean soldiers killed while fighting in support of Russia.
Honouring fallen soldiers
According to the report, Kim said soldiers who “unhesitatingly opted for self-blasting, suicide attack, in order to defend the great honour” deserved recognition for their actions.
He described their behaviour as the highest form of loyalty.
“Their self-sacrifice expecting no compensation, and the devotion expecting no reward… this is the definition of the height of loyalty of our army,” Kim said.
Senior Russian officials attended the ceremony, including Defence Minister Andrey Belousov and parliamentary speaker Vyacheslav Volodin.
The event highlighted growing military cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang as Russia continues its war in Ukraine.
North Korean troops in Kursk
South Korean officials estimate that around 15,000 North Korean troops have been deployed to assist Russian forces attempting to regain territory in the western Russian region of Kursk Oblast.
Seoul says more than 6,000 of those soldiers may already have been killed in combat. Neither Russia nor North Korea has publicly confirmed those figures.
Intelligence agencies and North Korean defectors have previously reported that soldiers sent abroad were instructed to take their own lives if capture appeared likely.
In North Korea’s military culture, surrender is widely portrayed as a betrayal of the state.
Evidence from prisoners and documents
Earlier this year, South Korean broadcaster Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation aired an interview with two North Korean soldiers captured in Ukraine.
One of the prisoners said he regretted not killing himself during the fighting.
“Everyone else blew themselves up. I failed,” he said in the televised programme.
South Korea’s National Intelligence Service said last year that documents recovered from the bodies of North Korean soldiers also suggested such orders had been issued.
In his speech, Kim also praised soldiers who died in combat during attacks.
He said those who fell while advancing in battle, or those who felt frustration at failing to complete their mission, should also be regarded as loyal patriots.
Growing Russia–North Korea ties
Military cooperation between Russia and North Korea has deepened since the start of the Ukraine war.
In June 2024, Kim and Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a defence agreement committing both countries to assist each other in the event of aggression.
Kim described the treaty at the time as the strongest agreement between the two nations.
North Korea has also pledged to send thousands of workers to help rebuild infrastructure in Russia’s Kursk region following fighting there.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 April 2026

• 2 comments
• 161 views

webfact

April 29Apr 29

Russia Scales Back Victory Day Parade Over Security Threat

Russia

Russia Scales Back Victory Day Parade Over Security Threat

Russia will scale back its annual Victory Day military parade in Moscow on 9 May, citing security concerns linked to the ongoing war in Ukraine, the Kremlin has said. Officials said the ceremony on Red Square will still take place but will be held without some traditional elements, including armoured vehicles and cadets from military academies.

Get today's headlines by email

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the decision was taken because of what Moscow described as a “terrorist threat” from Ukraine.
“All measures are being taken to minimise the danger,” he told reporters on Wednesday.
Russia’s defence ministry later confirmed that the parade would not include columns of military equipment or cadets from the Suvorov military schools, Nakhimov naval schools and other cadet corps.
Security concerns cited
Despite the changes, the ceremony marking the Soviet Union’s victory over Nazi Germany in World War Two will still go ahead in Moscow’s Red Square, featuring representatives from different branches of the armed forces and a military fly-past.
The ministry also said television broadcasts would include footage of Russian troops operating in what Moscow calls the “special military operation zone” — the official term used by Russia to describe its invasion of Ukraine.
Changes to a symbolic event
Victory Day celebrations have long been a key state event in Russia, commemorating the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945.
President Vladimir Putin revived the large-scale display of heavy military hardware on Red Square in 2008, presenting the parade as a demonstration of the country’s growing defence capabilities.
Last year’s commemorations were particularly elaborate, marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two in Europe. More than 20 world leaders attended ceremonies in Moscow, which featured modern weaponry including tanks and drones.
While Russia has altered the format of parades in recent years, this will be the first time since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine that armoured vehicles will not appear on Red Square.
Growing fears of attacks
Reports that this year’s parade could be reduced first circulated on Russian social media earlier in April. Several pro-Kremlin military bloggers suggested officials were concerned about the possibility of long-range Ukrainian drone or missile strikes.
One blogger, Ilya Tumanov, told Russian media that a missile warning during the parade would be damaging for the country’s image even if no strike occurred.
Other pro-war commentators also noted that the usual large-scale rehearsals — which typically involve extensive road closures in central Moscow — had not taken place.
Authorities are also expected to tighten security measures around the event. A telecommunications source told BBC Russian that stronger restrictions on mobile communications will be imposed in Moscow on 5, 7 and 9 May.
Mobile internet services in the centre of the city were previously disrupted in March, which officials linked to security measures.
Ukraine intensifies strikes inside Russia
The security concerns follow a rise in Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russian territory, more than four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion.
Kyiv says its operations target military and energy infrastructure used to support Russia’s war effort.
In recent days, Ukrainian officials reported a drone strike on an oil pumping station near the city of Perm, about 1,500km from the Ukrainian border. Local authorities described the site only as an industrial facility.
Another strike earlier in the week hit a major oil refinery in the Black Sea port of Tuapse for the third time this month. Previous attacks there reportedly caused an oil spill into the sea, with residents describing “black rain” that left oily residue across the city.
Ukraine has not responded publicly to Moscow’s accusations of terrorism. However, Mykhailo Podoliak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, recently ruled out the possibility of an attack on the Victory Day parade itself, noting that many civilians attend the event.
War shapes national narrative
Many analysts say the legacy of World War Two — known in Russia as the Great Patriotic War — remains central to the country’s national identity and to the political messaging of the Kremlin.
For the Russian leadership, the annual Victory Day parade is both a commemoration of past sacrifices and a demonstration of military strength.
But this year’s scaled-down event highlights how the ongoing war in Ukraine is reshaping even Russia’s most symbolic national ceremonies.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 April 2026

• 9 comments
• 182 views

webfact

April 29Apr 29

Powell to Stay on Fed Board as Chairmanship Ends

USA

Powell to Stay on Fed Board as Chairmanship Ends

Outgoing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said he will remain on the central bank’s Board of Governors after handing over the chairmanship next month, an unusual move that comes amid legal scrutiny and concerns about the institution’s independence.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking after the Federal Reserve decided to keep interest rates unchanged on Wednesday, Powell told reporters he intends to stay on the board while his successor, Kevin Warsh, assumes the role of chair.
Powell said he expects to maintain a “low profile” as a governor once the transition takes place. His decision means it will be the first time since 1948 that a Fed chair has continued serving on the board after stepping down from the top post.
“I will leave when I think it's appropriate to do so,” Powell said.
Probe and Concerns Over Fed Independence
Powell indicated that his decision is linked to concerns about legal challenges facing the central bank. He referred to a criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice that had targeted him over renovations at the Fed’s headquarters.
Although the investigation has since been dropped, the Justice Department has said it could reopen the case if necessary. Powell said he intends to remain on the board until the matter is fully resolved.
“I’ve said that I will not leave the board until this investigation is well and truly over with transparency and finality,” he said.
Powell also warned that legal actions against the Federal Reserve could threaten its ability to make decisions free from political pressure. He said the series of legal challenges directed at the institution were unprecedented in its history.
According to Powell, the issue is not criticism from elected officials but the use of legal action against the central bank, which he believes could undermine its ability to conduct monetary policy independently.
A Turbulent Final Stretch
Fed chairs typically step down completely once their term ends, but Powell’s departure follows a turbulent period that included political criticism and investigations related to the central bank’s building renovation project. The project also remains under review by an inspector general inquiry.
Throughout his tenure, Powell has tried to present himself as politically neutral, at times wearing purple ties to avoid signalling affiliation with either political party. He has also publicly resisted pressure from Donald Trump to cut interest rates.
Trump, however, originally appointed Powell to lead the Federal Reserve in 2017.
Economic Challenges Ahead
Powell’s departure from the chairmanship comes as the U.S. economy faces several uncertainties. The Federal Reserve is tasked with balancing its dual mandate: maintaining stable inflation near 2% while supporting maximum employment.
Recent global events have complicated that task. Supply disruptions following the pandemic pushed inflation higher, while Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 added further pressure to energy and commodity markets.
More recently, rising oil prices linked to tensions surrounding Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz shipping route have pushed gasoline prices to their highest levels since August 2022.
At the same time, the labour market has shown signs of softening. Hiring has slowed while layoffs remain relatively low, creating what economists describe as a “low hire, low fire” environment as companies adjust to economic uncertainty and the growing influence of artificial intelligence.
Powell’s Possible Role on the Board
Some policymakers have raised concerns about how Warsh might approach monetary policy once he takes over. Senator Elizabeth Warren has suggested that the incoming chair could face pressure to pursue rate cuts.
However, interest rate decisions are made collectively by the Federal Reserve’s policy-setting body, which has 12 voting members. Any changes must be approved by a majority.
By remaining on the board, Powell could still influence those discussions, potentially acting as a counterweight if political pressure intensifies.
Despite that possibility, Powell said he does not intend to become a prominent critic of the institution’s future direction.
Instead, he said he hopes tensions surrounding the Federal Reserve will ease and that policymakers will continue to work toward consensus.
As he closed what may be his final press conference as chair, Powell told reporters he expected to step back from the spotlight.
“Thank you, ladies and gentlemen,” he said. “I won’t see you next time.”

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 April 2026

• 1 comment
• 138 views

webfact

April 29Apr 29

King Charles and Camilla Lay Flowers at 9/11 Memorial

USA

King Charles and Camilla Lay Flowers at 9/11 Memorial

King Charles III and Queen Camilla have laid flowers at the September 11 Memorial in New York during their state visit to the United States, marking a solemn moment of remembrance for the victims of the 2001 attacks.

Get today's headlines by email

The royal couple visited the site for the first time, paying tribute to the nearly 3,000 people who were killed during the attacks on 11 September 2001. Their visit formed part of the third day of a four-day trip to the US.
Tribute at the memorial
Standing beside the reflecting pools at the memorial site in lower Manhattan, the King and Queen placed a bouquet of white roses in honour of those who died. The pools mark the footprint of the former towers of the World Trade Center, destroyed during the September 11 attacks.
A handwritten note left with the flowers read: “We honour the memory for those who so tragically lost their lives on 11th September 2001.
“We stand in enduring solidarity with the American people and in the face of their profound loss. Charles R Camilla.”
During the visit, the King and Queen spoke with families of victims and first responders who took part in rescue operations after the attacks.
Among those present were New York’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani, and former mayor Michael Bloomberg, along with other dignitaries.
The event took place under tight security, with road closures, checkpoints and a strong police presence around the memorial area. Helicopters were also seen circling overhead as the visit took place.
Remarks on the attacks
The importance of the attacks was also highlighted earlier in the visit when the King addressed members of the United States Congress.
In that speech, he described the attacks as a defining moment for the country and spoke about the global reaction that followed.
“This atrocity was a defining moment for America and your pain and shock were felt around the whole world,” he told lawmakers.
He also used the moment to urge continued support for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, noting that member states had rallied behind the United States after the attacks. The King said a similar determination was now needed to support Ukraine.
Cultural visit during US trip
While the memorial visit was sombre, other parts of the New York itinerary are expected to have a lighter tone.
Queen Camilla, who promotes reading through her Queen's Reading Room initiative, is presenting a special gift to the New York Public Library.
The library has displayed the original stuffed toys that inspired the characters in Winnie-the-Pooh since 1987. However, one character — Roo, the baby kangaroo — has been missing from the collection since the 1930s.
To fill the gap, the Queen has brought a replacement Roo toy from the UK, produced by the same company that made the original toys.
The King is also due to visit Harlem later in the day to see a project focused on education and access to healthy food.
The royal couple will conclude the day by attending a reception celebrating creative industries, which organisers say is expected to draw a number of well-known guests.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 April 2026

• 0 comments
• 150 views

webfact

April 29Apr 29

Indian Carries Sister’s Skeleton to Bank to Prove Death

Report

Indian Carries Sister’s Skeleton to Bank to Prove Death

A man in eastern India carried the skeletal remains of his sister to a bank after repeated attempts to withdraw her savings failed, triggering widespread outrage and drawing national attention to bureaucratic hurdles faced by rural families.

Get today's headlines by email

The incident took place earlier this week in Keonjhar district in the eastern state of Odisha. Video footage circulating online showed 52-year-old Jitu Munda arriving at a bank with a sack containing his sister’s remains and placing it outside the building.
Munda later told BBC Hindi he had taken the drastic step out of frustration after bank officials repeatedly asked him for proof that his sister had died.
Local police said Munda had exhumed the remains before bringing them to the bank.
Dispute over bank procedures
The bank involved, Odisha Grameen Bank, denied asking Munda to present the deceased in person. It said staff had only requested documents required by law to release the funds.
The bank is operated by Indian Overseas Bank, which said reports suggesting staff demanded the physical presence of the dead woman were incorrect.
In a statement, the bank said the situation appeared to have arisen from a lack of awareness of official procedures. It also alleged that Munda first arrived at the branch in an intoxicated state and behaved disruptively, later returning with the remains.
Branch manager Sushant Kumar Sethi told BBC Hindi that Munda had earlier claimed his sister was paralysed and unable to visit the bank. According to Sethi, staff had offered to visit her at home, but later learned she had died.
The manager also said other relatives had come forward as legal heirs and were asked to submit the necessary documentation before the funds could be released.
Officials order investigation
The video prompted strong reactions on social media and criticism of local authorities and the bank, with many pointing to the challenges rural families face when dealing with official procedures.
Suresh Pujari said the case was under investigation and that action would be taken against the branch manager over his alleged conduct.
The Keonjhar district administration said it had “deep concern” about the incident and stressed that protecting the dignity and rights of citizens remained a priority.
Sister’s savings and legal hurdles
Munda said the dispute began after the death of his 56-year-old sister, Kalara, earlier this year.
According to him, she had worked as a daily wage labourer and had returned to her maternal home following the deaths of her husband and son.
A few months before she died, Kalara sold her livestock and deposited about 19,300 rupees (around $203) in the bank.
Munda said he visited the branch several times after her death but could not access the funds.
“When the bank manager refused to listen and kept asking for proof, I got frustrated,” he said. “I brought the skeleton to show that she had died.”
In India, when a bank account holder dies without naming a nominee, relatives must submit documents such as a death certificate and proof of legal heirship before the money can be released. Obtaining these documents can take time, particularly in rural areas where access to administrative services is limited.
Case resolved after backlash
Following the public reaction, local authorities intervened and persuaded Munda to return the remains to the burial site.
Officials also assured him that the issue would be addressed and offered him 30,000 rupees in assistance.
By Wednesday, authorities had issued both a death certificate and legal heir documentation. The bank said the funds had since been handed over to the woman’s family members.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 April 2026

• 1 comment
• 157 views

webfact

April 29Apr 29

Comey appears in court over alleged threat to Trump

USA

Comey appears in court over alleged threat to Trump

Former FBI Director James Comey surrendered to authorities on Wednesday to face criminal charges linked to a social media post that prosecutors say threatened the life of US President Donald Trump.

Get today's headlines by email

The case centres on a 2025 Instagram image posted by Comey showing seashells arranged on a beach to spell “86 47”. Prosecutors argue the phrase carries a violent meaning, claiming it could be interpreted as a call to harm Trump, who is the 47th US president.
Comey briefly appeared in federal court in Virginia on Wednesday afternoon but did not enter a plea or make a statement during the hearing.
Court appearance in Virginia
Judge William Fitzpatrick read the charges and advised Comey of his legal rights. According to CBS News, Comey nodded during the proceedings and later smiled at family members as he left the courtroom.
The judge rejected a request by the Justice Department to impose conditions on Comey’s release, determining they were unnecessary.
Charges linked to social media image
Federal prosecutors have accused Comey of knowingly making a threat to kill or harm the president and of transmitting a threat through interstate communications.
Each of the charges carries a potential maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
The investigation stems from a May 2025 Instagram post in which Comey shared a photo of seashells spelling out “86 47” alongside the caption: “Cool shell formation on my beach walk.”


“Cool shell formation,” James Comey wrote in an Instagram post accompanying this image. The post was later deleted, and Comey now faces charges alleging he threatened the life of US President Donald Trump.

The phrase “eighty-six” is sometimes used in slang to mean “get rid of”. Prosecutors say that interpretation could be understood as an encouragement of violence against Trump.
Comey has denied any wrongdoing and says he was unaware the numbers might be interpreted that way.
In a video message released on Tuesday, he said he would contest the charges and maintained his innocence.
“This won’t be the end of it,” Comey said. “But I’m still innocent, I’m still not afraid and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary.”
Political dispute over prosecution
Comey’s lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, said the defence would seek to dismiss the case, arguing it represents selective and vindictive prosecution tied to Comey’s criticism of Trump.
After the original Instagram post drew criticism online, Comey removed the image and published a clarification.
He wrote that he had assumed the arrangement of shells carried a political message but said he had not realised some people associated the numbers with violence. He added that he opposed violence and removed the post once the interpretation was raised.
Trump criticised Comey when asked about the charges on Wednesday, calling him a “crooked man”. The president said the phrase “86” was widely known as a term used by organised crime groups to refer to killing someone.
Asked whether he believed the post represented a threat against him, Trump replied that it “probably” did.
Debate over strength of the case
The prosecution has drawn criticism from some legal analysts and lawmakers who questioned whether the evidence meets the legal threshold for a criminal threat.
Republican Senator Thom Tillis said he hoped investigators had more evidence than the image alone.
“Otherwise, I just think it’s another example where we’re going to regret this because we’re setting a fairly low bar,” he told reporters.
Former federal prosecutor Jimmy Gurulé described the indictment as “an embarrassment to the American criminal justice system”.
Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the case, saying investigators had examined the matter for a year.
He rejected claims that the prosecution was politically motivated and said threatening the president is a criminal offence.
Second case brought against Comey
The charges represent the second time the Justice Department has attempted to prosecute Comey since Trump returned to office.
Comey, who was dismissed by Trump during his first presidential term after launching an FBI investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, has been a frequent critic of the president.
In September, a federal grand jury indicted him on allegations that he lied to Congress and obstructed a congressional investigation.
Comey pleaded not guilty to those charges, but the case was dismissed in November by US District Judge Cameron Currie.
The judge ruled that prosecutor Lindsey Halligan had not been properly authorised to present the indictment to a grand jury, making the case invalid.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 April 2026

• 17 comments
• 229 views

webfact

April 29Apr 29

Two Jewish Men Stabbed in North London

Two Jewish Men Stabbed in North London

Two Jewish men are seriously injured after being stabbed in Golders Green, north London
A man with a knife was seen running down the high street attempting to stab Jewish people, the Jewish security group Shomrim says
A local resident says one man was stabbed outside shops, and another outside a synagogue
Shomrim says it responded immediately and detained a suspect
It says police arrived and Tasered a man who was then arrested


Board of Deputies says it's working with police to ensure 'forceful response'
18:34
The Board of Deputies of British Jews has also issued a statement.
"We are aware of a reported stabbing incident in Golders Green, with two injured," it says on X.
"The police have apprehended a suspect.
"We are liaising with the CST [Community Security Trust], government and police to understand what has happened and ensure a forceful response."


Developing story from the BBC



Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. 29 April 2026


UPDATE



Suspect detained after incident
Shomrim, which operates in the area, said its members detained a male suspect following the attack. The group said the incident involved attempts to stab “Jewish members of the public.”
According to Shomrim, the suspect had been seen running along Golders Green Road armed with a knife.
Political leaders condemn attack
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the incident as an “utterly appalling” antisemitic attack in a post on X, adding that “attacks on our Jewish community are attacks on Britain.”
London Mayor Sadiq Khan also condemned the violence, calling it an “appalling attack on two Jewish Londoners.” He said there would be increased police visibility in the area.
Recent incidents in the area
The stabbing follows a series of incidents in the same neighbourhood, which has a large Jewish population and is home to several synagogues, schools and restaurants.
In recent weeks, an arson attack on several ambulances in the area was condemned by Starmer as a “deeply shocking antisemitic” act. A separate suspected arson incident was also reported earlier this week.
Authorities have not yet released further details about the suspect or the condition of the victims.



Adapted by ASEAN Now. 29 April 2026

• 199 comments
• 521 views

CharlieH

April 29Apr 29

Ukraine Says 33,000 Russian Drones Downed in March

Ukraine Conflict

Ukraine Says 33,000 Russian Drones Downed in March

Ukraine says its air defences shot down more than 33,000 Russian drones in March, the highest monthly total since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, according to the country’s defence minister.

Get today's headlines by email

Officials also said Ukrainian long-range drones struck a Russian oil refinery on the Black Sea coast for the third time this month, triggering evacuations and warnings from Moscow about possible environmental damage.
Record number of drones intercepted
Ukraine’s defence minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, said interceptor systems had destroyed more than 33,000 Russian drones of various types during March. The figure represents a monthly record since the start of the war.
Kyiv has invested heavily in drone technology during the conflict, developing systems that officials say have helped offset Russia’s larger military.
Interceptor drones have become an increasingly important part of Ukraine’s air defence network, which combines electronic warfare, missile systems and mobile drone units designed to target incoming aerial threats.
Ukrainian officials say the country’s experience on the battlefield has also drawn interest from other regions. Middle Eastern and Gulf countries have begun exploring the use of interceptor drones, particularly amid rising tensions linked to the war involving Iran.
Fedorov said Ukraine is expanding production and supply of interceptor drones to counter continuing Russian aerial attacks. The Ukrainian military has also established a new command structure within the air force to strengthen its drone operations.
Growing range of Ukrainian strikes
Ukraine’s defence ministry said the country’s offensive drone capabilities have also expanded significantly since the beginning of Russia’s invasion.
At the start of the conflict in 2022, Ukrainian forces were able to strike targets roughly 630km (400 miles) away, the ministry said.
Officials now say Ukrainian long-range systems can reach targets up to about 1,750km (1,100 miles) behind Russian lines.
That increased range has allowed Ukrainian forces to target oil facilities that generate revenue for Russia’s war effort, as well as factories linked to military production.
Oil refinery hit on Black Sea coast
Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces said its drones struck an oil refinery at the Russian port of Tuapse on the Black Sea in a coordinated operation involving several defence and security agencies.
The strike marked the third attack on the facility in less than two weeks, according to Ukrainian officials.
They said two earlier attacks this month destroyed 24 oil storage tanks and damaged four others, though these claims could not be independently verified.
Video released by Krasnodar regional governor Veniamin Kondratyev showed thick black smoke rising above the refinery. Footage also appeared to show oil products spilling onto a nearby street, damaging several vehicles.
Kondratyev said residents living near the refinery were being evacuated but did not provide details about the number of people affected.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said the attacks could lead to “serious environmental consequences,” according to the Interfax news agency, though he added that authorities reported no immediate major threats.
Drone attacks reported on both sides
Russia’s defence ministry said its air defences intercepted 186 Ukrainian drones overnight across several regions, as well as over the Black Sea, the Sea of Azov and the annexed Crimean peninsula.
In Russia’s Belgorod region, which borders Ukraine, three people were killed and three others injured in a drone attack, according to regional governor Vyacheslav Gladkov.
Ukrainian officials reported that Russian drone strikes also caused casualties inside Ukraine.
Two civilians were killed in the northeastern city of Chuhuiv in the Kharkiv region, regional military administration head Oleh Syniehubov said.
In Kryvyi Rih, the hometown of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a 40-year-old man was killed and five others were injured.
Kyiv’s mayor Vitali Klitschko said two people were wounded in a rare daytime drone strike on the capital.
Another Russian attack on the northern Ukrainian city of Konotop disrupted electricity and water supplies, local authorities said.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 0 comments
• 142 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

Trump Portrait to Feature in Limited-Edition U.S. Passports

USA

Trump Portrait to Feature in Limited-Edition U.S. Passports

The United States plans to issue a limited-edition passport to mark the country’s 250th anniversary, featuring an image and signature of President Donald Trump inside the document.

Get today's headlines by email

A White House official and a source familiar with the plan confirmed that the commemorative passport will display Trump’s portrait on an inner page over a stylised depiction of the Declaration of Independence. Mock-ups of the design were shared on social media by the State Department.
Officials say the passports are part of wider celebrations marking the nation’s semiquincentennial in 2026.
Anniversary passport design
The State Department said it will release only a limited number of the specially designed passports.
State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott announced the initiative on social media, saying the department would “release a limited number” of the commemorative documents.
Images posted alongside the announcement show Trump’s portrait placed above an artistic rendering of the Declaration of Independence on the inside cover.
The design forms part of broader efforts by the administration to mark the 250th anniversary of the United States, commonly referred to as the semiquincentennial.
White House says design reflects patriotism
A White House spokesperson said the passport design would allow Americans to participate in the anniversary celebrations.
“President Trump’s new patriotic passport design provides yet another great way Americans can join in the spectacular celebrations for America’s 250th birthday,” the spokesperson said in a statement.
The spokesperson added that the president was leading a “renewal of national pride and patriotism” during the anniversary year.
Details about how the limited-edition passports will be distributed, or how many will be produced, have not yet been released.
Currency and coin proposals
The passport announcement follows earlier moves by the administration connected to the anniversary.
In March, the Treasury Department said Trump’s signature would appear on future U.S. paper currency. If implemented, it would make him the first sitting president to have their name appear on U.S. banknotes.
The Treasury said the change was also intended to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States.
The decision comes alongside proposals to create two coins bearing Trump’s image: a one-dollar coin and a special 24-karat commemorative gold coin.
Under federal law, living presidents cannot appear on U.S. currency. However, the administration has argued that the restriction applies only to paper notes and not to coins.
Historically, only one sitting president has appeared on a coin. In 1926, a commemorative coin issued during the presidency of Calvin Coolidge included his likeness.
Anniversary initiatives continue
The passport, currency proposals and commemorative coins are among several initiatives tied to the upcoming 250th anniversary celebrations.
Officials say the measures are intended to mark the milestone year and highlight American history and national identity as the country approaches the 2026 anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 155 comments
• 555 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

89-Year-Old Man Held After Five Wounded in Greece Shooting

EU

89-Year-Old Man Held After Five Wounded in Greece Shooting

An 89-year-old man has been arrested in Greece after a series of shootings in Athens left five people injured, police say. Authorities say the suspect first opened fire on Tuesday at a social security office in the Kerameikos district of the Greek capital, wounding an employee in the leg.

Get today's headlines by email

He then travelled about 5km (3.1 miles) to a courthouse in the Ambelokipi area, where four more people were reportedly hurt before the gunman fled the scene.
Police later arrested the man in the port city of Patras, roughly 200km from Athens. Officers say he was carrying a second weapon, a loaded .38 calibre revolver, at the time of his arrest.
Officials say the motive for the attacks remains unclear.
Two locations targeted
The first shooting took place at a social security agency in Kerameikos, where police say the suspect fired a shotgun and injured one employee.
After leaving the building, the man is believed to have travelled across the city to the Ambelokipi district. There, at a courthouse, he allegedly carried out a second shooting that left four people wounded.
Local media reported that the suspect had entered both buildings with a shotgun concealed under his coat.
Greek authorities deployed a large police presence at both sites following the incidents as investigators worked to piece together how the suspect moved between the two locations.
Footage and witness accounts
State broadcaster ERT aired surveillance footage showing a man believed to be the suspect calmly walking away from one of the buildings on foot.
Investigators are examining whether he used a taxi to travel from the first scene to the courthouse.
One eyewitness described the moment shots were fired.
“I saw the whole thing... he was firing at the ground,” the witness told the state news agency AMNA.
The head of the judiciary employees’ union in Athens, Stratis Dounias, said four women working at the small claims court were injured.
“Four women working at the small claims court were slightly injured,” he told a broadcaster.
Authorities say the victims — one man and four women — all suffered injuries that were not considered life-threatening.
Arrest in Patras
Police said the suspect was tracked to Patras, a port city about 200km west of Athens.
He was arrested at a hotel near the city’s bus station.
According to reports from state broadcaster ERT, the suspect’s niece alerted authorities after recognising him as the individual involved in the shootings.
When officers detained him, they discovered he was carrying a second firearm, described as a loaded .38 calibre revolver.
Rare incident of gun violence
Gun violence is relatively uncommon in Greece. Firearm ownership is legal but tightly regulated under national laws governing possession and licensing.
Authorities say investigations into the circumstances of the attacks and the suspect’s possible motives are continuing.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 1 comment
• 166 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

Starmer Avoids Commons Probe Over Mandelson Vetting

UK-Politics

Starmer Avoids Commons Probe Over Mandelson Vetting

The UK prime minister will not face a parliamentary investigation over accusations that he misled MPs about the vetting process used to appoint Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States.

Get today's headlines by email

The House of Commons voted by 335 to 223 against a motion brought by the Conservative Party seeking to refer the matter to the Privileges Committee, which examines potential breaches of parliamentary rules.
The vote followed a strong push by Downing Street to ensure Labour MPs opposed the proposal, although several members of the governing party broke ranks.
Commons vote and Labour divisions
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch tabled the motion after questioning the prime minister’s statements to MPs about whether Mandelson’s appointment had gone through “full due process” and whether officials had faced any pressure during the vetting process.
Under the Ministerial Code, ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament are expected to resign, while inadvertent mistakes should be corrected as soon as possible.
Fourteen Labour MPs voted with the Conservatives in favour of the inquiry, while another cast votes on both sides, which is commonly treated as a formal abstention. The voting record also showed that 53 Labour MPs did not have a vote registered, which can occur when members are absent with permission or engaged in official duties.
Some Labour MPs expressed unease about opposing the motion. South Shields MP Emma Lewell, one of the rebels, told the debate the government’s handling of the issue risked appearing disconnected from public concerns.
She said the approach had fed perceptions that something was being concealed and argued the prime minister should have referred himself to the committee to clear his name.
Other Labour MPs defended the government. Cardiff West MP Alex Barros-Curtis said the Conservatives had failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for launching an inquiry, while Gurinder Singh Josan described the move as premature because the appointment process was already being examined elsewhere in Parliament.
Opposition criticism
Opening the debate, Badenoch argued that the prime minister’s previous comments in the Commons were inaccurate and said the record should be corrected.
She said it was clear that the vetting process had not followed full procedure.
Senior cabinet minister Darren Jones rejected the accusation, saying the prime minister had been responding to claims that Mandelson had been sent to Washington without any vetting at all. Opposition MPs repeatedly interrupted Jones during his defence.
Opposition parties also used the debate to question the government’s credibility. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said the country needed a government focused on addressing cost-of-living pressures and one the public could trust.
Scottish National Party Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said Labour MPs could not escape the controversy surrounding Mandelson’s appointment.
Scrutiny of Mandelson appointment
Mandelson took up the ambassadorial post in Washington in February 2025 but was dismissed in September after Downing Street said new information had emerged about the extent of his links with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The prime minister has since faced repeated questions about the appointment, including why the Foreign Office granted Mandelson security clearance despite concerns raised by vetting officials.
During evidence to the Foreign Affairs Committee, senior civil servant Sir Philip Barton said Downing Street had not consulted him before the decision was made. He told MPs he had been presented with the choice and instructed to proceed with the appointment.
Morgan McSweeney, the prime minister’s former chief of staff, also told MPs he had made “a serious mistake” in recommending Mandelson for the role.
McSweeney said Number 10 had wanted the ambassador in place quickly but insisted that officials were never instructed to bypass the standard vetting steps.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 2 comments
• 140 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

UK Ambassador Says US ‘Special Relationship’ May Be With Israel

USA

UK Ambassador Says US ‘Special Relationship’ May Be With Israel

Leaked comments from the United Kingdom’s ambassador to the United States suggest that Washington’s only true “special relationship” may now be with Israel, remarks that surfaced just as King Charles III began a state visit aimed at reinforcing ties between London and Washington.

Get today's headlines by email

Sir Christian Turner made the comments during a private meeting in February with British sixth-form students visiting the United States. An audio recording of the discussion, first reported by the Financial Times, was published on Tuesday.
Britain’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said the remarks were informal and did not reflect official government policy.
Leaked remarks question historic phrase
In the recording, Sir Christian suggested the long-standing description of the UK–US partnership as a “special relationship” may be outdated.
“‘Special relationship’ is a phrase I try not to utter because it’s quite nostalgic, it’s quite backwards-looking, and it has a lot of baggage,” he told the students.
He added that Israel might now occupy that role in Washington’s foreign policy.
“I think there is probably one country that has a special relationship with the United States, and that is probably Israel,” he said.
His comments emerged at a sensitive moment. King Charles III arrived in Washington on Tuesday for a state visit designed in part to strengthen relations between the two countries.
The visit comes as relations between US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer are strained, particularly over the ongoing war in Iran.
Shared history but changing era
Despite questioning the phrase itself, Sir Christian emphasised the depth of ties between the UK and the US, especially in defence, security and economic cooperation.
In the recording he described the two countries as sharing “a deep history and affinity”, adding that their economies remain closely connected.
“There are things we do together that no two other countries do,” he said.
However, he also suggested the broader geopolitical environment was shifting.
He told the students he did not believe the alliance was facing a “moment of rupture”, but argued that the relationship was entering a new phase.
“We’re certainly at the end of an era, and the era is changing,” he said.
He added that European countries could no longer rely solely on American security guarantees and would need to contribute more.
“My advice to my prime minister is: I can’t just put my hands on my ears and say it’s special, it’s going to be fine,” he said, adding that Britain must demonstrate clearly what it brings to the partnership.
Additional comments draw attention
In the same discussion, Sir Christian also reflected on the political impact of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.
He said it was “extraordinary” that the controversy surrounding the disgraced financier had “not touched anybody” in the United States.
By contrast, he noted the scandal had “brought down” figures in Britain, including Prince Andrew and Sir Christian’s predecessor as ambassador to Washington, Lord Peter Mandelson.
Prince Andrew has repeatedly denied wrongdoing connected to Epstein. Lord Mandelson has previously apologised for maintaining a friendship with Epstein, saying he only learned the full extent of the financier’s actions after his death.
The comments have drawn renewed attention to the issue during the royal visit. King Charles and Queen Camilla are under pressure from some campaigners to meet survivors of Epstein’s abuse during their time in the United States, although they are not expected to do so.
Government distances itself
Sir Christian, a career diplomat, was appointed Britain’s ambassador to Washington in December.
Responding to the reports, the Foreign Office said the remarks were made privately and should not be interpreted as the UK government’s official position.
“These were private, informal comments made to a group of UK sixth-form students visiting the US in early February,” a spokesperson said.
“They are certainly not any reflection of the UK government’s position.”


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 16 comments
• 169 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

King Charles Urges U.S. Congress to Renew U.K. Alliance

USA

King Charles Urges U.S. Congress to Renew U.K. Alliance

King Charles III told U.S. lawmakers that the alliance between Britain and the United States is “more important today than it has ever been” as he addressed Congress during a state visit to Washington.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to a packed chamber in the House of Representatives on Tuesday, the monarch urged both nations to reaffirm their commitment to cooperation and resist pressures to become more inward-looking. He said he felt the “weight of history” while becoming the first British monarch in 35 years to speak before Congress.
The speech came during a week-long visit to the United States with Queen Camilla and amid strains between President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer over issues including the war in Iran.
Renewing a historic partnership
In his nearly 30-minute address, Charles highlighted the long-standing ties between the two countries, describing their relationship as one of reconciliation and enduring partnership.
He noted that the connection between Britain and the United States stretches beyond the 250 years since American independence, saying it reflects more than four centuries of shared history.
“The modern relationship between our two nations and our own peoples spans not merely 250 years, but over four centuries,” he told lawmakers.
Charles also paid tribute to the role of Congress as a cornerstone of American democracy, calling it a “citadel of democracy” created to represent the voices of the American people and defend their freedoms.
He urged both countries to renew their commitment to cooperation as the United States approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence.
Challenges facing the international community
The king said the address came at a time of global uncertainty, citing conflicts in Europe and the Middle East that are affecting communities in both countries.
While acknowledging that the United States and the United Kingdom do not always agree on policy, he said their alliance remains one of the most significant in modern history.
“Our two countries have always found ways to come together,” Charles said, adding that the partnership between them is “truly unique.”
He warned that the alliance must continue to evolve rather than rely solely on past achievements.
“The challenges we face are too great for any one nation to bear alone,” he said.
Security ties and global cooperation
Charles also emphasized the close defense and security links between the two countries. He pointed to their cooperation through NATO and joint military projects, including work on the F-35 fighter jet and a submarine partnership involving the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia.
He said these initiatives help strengthen collective security and resilience for the future.
The king added that the determination shown by the two nations during World War II, the Cold War and the period after the September 11 attacks remains relevant today.
He said the same resolve is needed in support of Ukraine as it seeks what he described as a “just and lasting peace”, a remark that drew bipartisan applause from lawmakers.
Response to recent violence
Charles also referred to the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner over the weekend, where the president and members of Congress were present.
He said acts of violence would not succeed and praised the courage of those who work to protect others.
“Whatever our differences, whatever disagreements we may have, we stand united in our commitment to uphold democracy and protect all our people from harm,” he said.
A rare address to Congress
The speech marked only the second time a British monarch has addressed the U.S. Congress. Queen Elizabeth II delivered the first such address in 1991.
Charles said speaking in the chamber reminded him of his late mother’s appearance there more than three decades ago.
Before the address, the king met congressional leaders including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.
Earlier in the day, President Trump and first lady Melania Trump welcomed Charles and Queen Camilla to the White House during a formal arrival ceremony. Trump praised the longstanding ties between the two countries, describing them as a “special relationship” he hoped would endure.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• UK Monarchy

• 10 comments
• 198 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

FCC orders review of Disney licences after Jimmy Kimmel joke

USA

FCC orders review of Disney licences after Jimmy Kimmel joke

The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has ordered an early review of television broadcast licences held by stations operated by The Walt Disney Company following remarks by late-night host Jimmy Kimmel about Melania Trump.

Get today's headlines by email

The move comes days after US President Donald Trump publicly urged ABC — owned by Disney — to remove Kimmel from the air over a joke made shortly before a shooting incident at a Washington gala attended by the president and first lady.
The FCC said on Tuesday it had already been examining Disney’s ABC stations for possible regulatory breaches, including allegations of unlawful discrimination.
A spokesperson for Disney told the BBC that ABC and its affiliated stations operate within FCC guidelines and serve the public interest.
Joke sparks political backlash
The controversy centres on a comment Kimmel made about Melania Trump during his late-night programme. The comedian said the first lady had the glow of an “expectant widow”.
The remark was made days before a gunman opened fire near a security checkpoint at a gala attended by the Trumps.
President Trump criticised the joke earlier this week, describing it as a “call to violence”. Melania Trump also condemned the comments, saying they contributed to what she called “the political sickness within America”.
Kimmel rejected the accusation, saying his remarks were not intended to encourage violence.
“I’ve been very vocal for many years speaking out against gun violence in particular,” he said.
Shooting at Washington gala
The dispute follows a security incident at the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner held at the Washington Hilton on Saturday night.
Authorities said a suspect, identified as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, fired shots near a security checkpoint outside the venue.
The president and first lady were evacuated unharmed.
Officials said Allen was subdued by security personnel near a staircase leading to a ballroom where more than 2,000 guests — including journalists, government officials and public figures — had gathered.
He has since been charged with attempting to assassinate the president.
Rare regulatory step
Legal experts say the FCC’s decision to bring forward a review of Disney’s broadcast licences is unusual.
Jeffrey Schneider, a professor at the USC Gould School of Law, said early licence reviews have occurred before but typically involve technical failures or fraudulent conduct.
He said the threshold for revoking broadcast licences is high, requiring regulators to demonstrate “intentional and repeated violations” of federal rules.
Schneider said it was unlikely that Disney would ultimately lose its licences, noting the burden of proof lies with the regulator.
Previous tensions
Kimmel has previously faced backlash for political remarks made on his programme.
Last September he was temporarily taken off air after comments about the killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. During a monologue, Kimmel said supporters of Trump — whom he referred to as the “Maga gang” — were attempting to use the killing to gain political advantage.
His show returned to air a week later.
The FCC, established in 1934, regulates radio and television broadcasting in the United States. The agency oversees licensing of frequencies and enforces rules covering sponsorship disclosures, emergency broadcasts and standards related to obscenity and decency.
President Trump has previously suggested that television networks providing him with what he calls “bad publicity” should risk losing their licences, raising questions about how much authority the administration has over broadcasters.
Last year, FCC chairman Brendan Carr notified Disney that regulators were investigating the company’s diversity and inclusion programmes amid concerns they might conflict with federal regulations.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 169 comments
• 578 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

DOJ indicts former FBI Director James Comey for second time

USA

DOJ indicts former FBI Director James Comey for second time

Former James Comey has been indicted for a second time by the US Department of Justice, according to sources cited by CBS News, the BBC’s US partner. year that showed seashells arranged to form the numbers “86 47”.

Get today's headlines by email

The new charges reportedly relate to an image Comey briefly posted on Instagram last Officials in the administration of Donald Trump have argued the message amounted to a threat against the 47th US president.
Comey has denied any such intent, saying he did not initially recognise the possible meaning of the numbers.
Social media post at centre of case
The exact charges in the new indictment have not yet been made public. However, sources said the case focuses on the now-deleted Instagram photo.
After posting the image, Comey later removed it and explained his reasoning in a follow-up message. He said he had assumed the arrangement of seashells was a political statement but had not realised some people associated the phrase “86 47” with violence.
“I didn’t realise some folks associate those numbers with violence,” he wrote at the time, adding that he opposes violence and therefore took the post down.
In American slang, the term “eighty-six” can mean to remove or eject something. Critics of Comey’s post argued the phrase could be interpreted as a call to remove the 47th president.
Trump dismissed Comey’s explanation, saying the meaning was obvious. “A child knows what that meant,” the president said.
Earlier case dismissed by judge
The new indictment follows a previous case brought against Comey in September. In that earlier indictment, federal prosecutors accused him of lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding during testimony in 2020 related to press leaks.
Comey pleaded not guilty when he appeared briefly in court the following month.
However, in November a federal judge dismissed the case. Cameron Currie ruled that the prosecutor who filed the charges had not been properly appointed, rendering the indictment invalid.
The charges had been brought by Lindsey Halligan, a former White House aide who had not previously prosecuted a case. The judge said Halligan had not been authorised to present the case to a grand jury.
Although the court dismissed the indictment, the ruling left open the possibility that prosecutors could bring the case again.
Long-running tensions with Trump
Comey suggested after the ruling that further legal action from the administration was likely.
“I believe Trump will probably come after me again,” he said at the time.
The former FBI chief has had a strained relationship with Trump for years. Trump dismissed Comey during his first term in office while the FBI was investigating Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election.
Since then, Comey has been a frequent critic of the president and has often been targeted by Trump in public statements.
Separately on Tuesday, another court decision involved Comey’s family. A judge ruled that Maurene Comey — the daughter of the former FBI director — may proceed with a lawsuit challenging her dismissal from a federal prosecutor role during the Trump administration.
The Justice Department has not yet commented publicly on the new indictment. The White House referred questions to the department, which is expected to address the matter during a scheduled briefing later on Tuesday.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 54 comments
• 283 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

UAE Quits OPEC Amid Tensions During Iran War

Middle East

UAE Quits OPEC Amid Tensions During Iran War

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) faces a significant setback after the United Arab Emirates announced it will leave the oil producers’ group, highlighting growing tensions among Gulf states during the ongoing conflict involving Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

The decision, confirmed on Tuesday, ends the UAE’s longstanding membership in OPEC and its broader alliance known as OPEC+. Analysts say the move could undermine the group’s ability to maintain unity at a time when the global energy market is already strained.
UAE Energy Minister Suhail Mohamed al-Mazrouei said the withdrawal followed a review of the country’s long-term energy policies and production strategy.
“This is a policy decision,” he told Reuters. “It has been done after a careful look at current and future policies related to the level of production.”
He added that the UAE did not consult other members about the move, including OPEC’s leading producer, Saudi Arabia.
Disruptions in Gulf Energy Routes
The announcement comes during a period of severe disruption in the region’s energy trade.
Oil exporters in the Gulf have faced growing difficulties moving shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman that normally handles roughly one-fifth of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas flows.
Iranian threats and attacks on vessels during the conflict have raised security risks in the area, complicating exports from Gulf producers.
Mazrouei suggested the UAE’s departure from the producer alliance would have limited impact on global markets because of the already strained conditions in the strait.
Political Fallout and US Reaction
The decision may also carry geopolitical implications.
The UAE’s exit from OPEC could be seen as a political win for US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly criticised the organisation for driving up oil prices.
In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly in 2018, Trump accused OPEC of “ripping off the rest of the world” through high energy prices. He has also argued that Gulf states benefit from US military protection while keeping oil prices elevated.
The UAE, a key US partner and regional financial hub, has recently expressed frustration with the response of neighbouring Arab states to Iranian attacks during the conflict.
Gulf Frustration Over Security Response
Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to the UAE president, criticised the reaction from regional organisations during a discussion at the Gulf Influencers Forum.
He said that while countries within the Gulf Cooperation Council provided logistical assistance, their political and military response had been historically weak.
Gargash added that the lack of a stronger stance from the Arab League was expected, but he had anticipated greater support from Gulf allies.
Strategy Shift in Global Energy Market
Mazrouei emphasised that the UAE had been a member of both OPEC and OPEC+ for many years, but argued that global demand for energy will continue to grow.
Operating outside the producer alliance will allow the UAE to pursue its own production strategy and fully utilise its capacity to supply oil.
Officials say the country can increase output of some of the world’s lowest-cost and lowest-carbon barrels, potentially improving supply flexibility in a tight market.
The departure comes at a time when global spare oil production capacity is already at historically low levels, leaving markets vulnerable to further supply disruptions.
UAE leaders argue that leaving the group could ultimately benefit consumers by supporting a more responsive and reliable global energy supply.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 9 comments
• 160 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

False-flag claims spread after White House dinner shooting

USA

False-flag claims spread after White House dinner shooting

Misinformation spread rapidly online after the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, with unfounded claims that the incident had been staged gaining traction across several social media platforms. Within minutes of the first reports of gunfire at Saturday night’s event, posts speculating that the attack was a “false flag” began circulating. By the following day the theory had spread widely, despite authorities and journalists who attended the dinner releasing verified information about what had occurred. Officials say there is no evidence the attack was staged.

Get today's headlines by email

Authorities have identified the suspect as Cole Tomas Allen, 31, from Torrance, California. Investigators say Allen rushed toward the event while armed before being stopped by law enforcement officers.
A senior administration official said Allen’s brother had previously received writings from him expressing anti-Trump views, which had also been shared with other family members before the incident.
Conspiracy claims spread online
Online speculation accelerated through the weekend as posts questioning the authenticity of the incident appeared across multiple platforms.
On Reddit, several widely shared posts suggested or joked that the shooting might have been staged. Comment threads frequently reflected skepticism toward official accounts.
On Instagram, posts proposing that the White House or the president had been involved attracted thousands of interactions. On X, the term “staged” trended alongside “Butler,” referencing a previous assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Pennsylvania that has also been the subject of conspiracy theories.
Trump himself commented on how quickly the speculation had emerged. In an interview with CBS’s “60 Minutes” on Sunday, he remarked that conspiracy theories about major events usually take longer to appear.
“Usually it takes a little bit longer,” he said. “Usually they wait about two or three months to start saying that.”
Experts warn of rising conspiratorial thinking
Researchers who study misinformation say the speed of the response reflects a broader trend in public discourse.
Michael Barkun, a political science professor emeritus at Syracuse University, said the rapid spread of conspiracy theories was not surprising.
He said society had become “saturated with conspiracism,” adding that suspicion toward official explanations had become a common reaction to breaking news events.
Although staged or “false flag” attacks have occasionally occurred in history, experts say they are extremely rare. Nevertheless, the idea has become a recurring theme in online conspiracy culture.
In recent years, some commentators have claimed that events ranging from the Sandy Hook school shooting to the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol were orchestrated as false flags.
Mark Fenster, a scholar at the University of Florida who researches conspiracy theories and government transparency, said such beliefs tend to rise and fall over time.
He noted that the modern media environment allows these claims to circulate faster and more visibly than before.
False images and misleading clips
Alongside speculation about the motive for the shooting, other misleading or fabricated content also circulated widely.
Some posts shared images falsely claiming to show the suspect, while others distributed altered security footage of him running through a checkpoint. One viral post suggesting the attack involved time travel drew more than 1.2 million views.
An apparently AI-generated video featuring a fabricated clip of commentator Tucker Carlson discussing the theory also spread online. A propaganda video linked to pro-Iran accounts referenced the conspiracy claims as well.
Another widely shared clip showed White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaking on the red carpet before the dinner. In the interview she said “shots will be fired,” referring to remarks planned for the president’s speech. Edited versions of the video circulated online suggesting the comment was evidence of foreknowledge.
Political reactions and concerns
Some political figures from both sides criticised the speculation.
A White House spokesman dismissed the claims outright, saying anyone who believed the president had staged an assassination attempt was “a complete moron”.
Others argued that mistrust of institutions and increasingly partisan politics had helped fuel such reactions.
Analysts warn that the spread of conspiracy theories can have broader consequences for democratic systems. Fenster said widespread suspicion of political opponents and government institutions could make cooperation and compromise more difficult.
Even before the dinner concluded, some attendees predicted that conspiracy narratives would emerge. Representative Jamie Raskin told reporters as he left the event that the attack was likely to intensify existing conspiracy theories surrounding earlier assassination attempts on Trump.
Growing visibility of misinformation
Researchers say the episode illustrates how quickly misinformation can develop during breaking news events.
The combination of algorithm-driven social media platforms, political polarization and declining trust in institutions has created an environment in which speculative claims often circulate alongside verified information.
While investigators continue examining the shooting itself, experts say the online response highlights a parallel challenge: the rapid spread of false or misleading narratives in the aftermath of major incidents.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 62 comments
• 190 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

White House to Review Trump Security After Dinner Shooting

USA

White House to Review Trump Security After Dinner Shooting

The White House will review security arrangements for President Donald Trump following a shooting during the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner, after an armed suspect approached a ballroom where more than 2,000 guests had gathered. A senior administration official said a meeting would be held this week to examine the security response to Saturday’s incident at the Washington Hilton, where Trump, cabinet members and senior political figures were attending the event.

Get today's headlines by email

Authorities said the suspect, identified as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, was subdued by officers near the entrance to the ballroom after a brief exchange of gunfire. A federal agent was wounded during the confrontation but was protected by a bullet-proof vest and is expected to recover.
Despite the breach, Trump has defended the actions of the US Secret Service, the agency responsible for protecting the president and other senior officials.
Security procedures under review
In a statement, a senior White House official said Trump believed the Secret Service had “done an excellent job” neutralising the suspect and escorting him and his team safely from the scene.
Nevertheless, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles is expected to convene a meeting with operations staff, along with representatives from the Secret Service and the Department of Homeland Security, to review security arrangements for events involving the president.
The discussion will examine how the response unfolded and consider whether additional precautions are needed ahead of several major public appearances planned for the coming months.
“The meeting will discuss the processes and procedures that worked to stop Saturday’s attempt, while exploring additional options to ensure all relevant components are doing everything possible to secure the many major events planned for President Trump,” the official said.
Secret Service response defended
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also defended the agency’s response, telling reporters that officers prevented the suspect from reaching the ballroom and quickly escorted the president and other officials to safety.
However, she said potential adjustments to security protocols could be considered. Any changes would not be publicly disclosed, she added, in order to avoid revealing details that could be exploited by future attackers.
Leavitt said the White House would also review which public events Trump attends, though she stressed that the president did not want violent incidents to alter normal public life.
“He’s undeterred,” she said, adding that Trump intends to take part in several upcoming events.
Concerns over event security
The shooting has raised questions about security arrangements at the high-profile dinner, which brought together journalists, politicians and public figures.
Guests entering the Washington Hilton were not asked to show identification, according to attendees. Tickets displayed table numbers but did not include names.
Those attending the event passed through a single security checkpoint with metal detectors located one level above the ballroom. The suspect was stopped near the top of a staircase leading to the ballroom doors.
Separately, Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley said he would seek a briefing from Secret Service leadership about the incident and current protection protocols. Grassley, 92, is fourth in the presidential line of succession after Trump, Vice-President JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson, all of whom attended the dinner.
Major events ahead
The review comes as Trump is expected to attend several large public gatherings in the coming months.
These include events connected to the United States’ 250th anniversary celebrations in July, as well as appearances linked to the upcoming World Cup. The president is also expected to attend other high-profile events, including a proposed UFC fight planned for the White House grounds.
Speaking shortly after the incident on Saturday, Trump acknowledged the risks associated with public life.
“I can’t imagine that there’s any profession that is more dangerous,” he said.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 0 comments
• 115 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

Iran FM Meets Putin as Israel Strikes Continue in Lebanon

Russia

Iran FM Meets Putin as Israel Strikes Continue in Lebanon

Iran’s foreign minister has met Russia’s president in St Petersburg, praising close ties between the two countries while fighting continues between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Abbas Araghchi held talks with Vladimir Putin on Monday, describing the relationship between Iran and Russia as a “strategic partnership”.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to reporters in St Petersburg, Araghchi said Tehran was confronting what he called “the world’s greatest superpower”, referring to the United States. He said Washington had failed to achieve its objectives and suggested the US had sought negotiations.
“We are standing up to the world’s greatest superpower,” Araghchi said. “They have not achieved a single one of their goals.”
He added that Iran had not yet received direct communication from Washington but said Tehran was considering the possibility of talks.
Russia offers mediation role
During the meeting, Putin signalled Moscow’s support for Tehran and indicated that Russia could play a role in diplomatic efforts.
According to the Kremlin, the Russian president told Araghchi he had received a message last week from Iran’s Supreme Leader, although he did not disclose its contents.
Putin described the Iranian nation as “fighting for its sovereignty” and said Russia would do everything possible to promote peace in the region while protecting the interests of Iran and neighbouring countries.
Dmitry Peskov said Moscow was prepared to offer mediation or other assistance if negotiations between Iran and the United States were to take place.
Russia has previously suggested it could help broker talks or store Iran’s enriched uranium as part of a possible settlement, though Washington has not accepted the proposal.
Delegations hold ‘useful’ talks
The meeting between Russian and Iranian delegations lasted about 90 minutes, according to Russian media reports.
Afterwards, Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said the discussions had been productive, describing them as “useful”.
Among those attending the talks was Igor Kostyukov, underscoring the security dimension of the relationship between the two countries.
Moscow and Tehran maintain a comprehensive strategic partnership, though Russia is not formally obliged to provide military assistance to Iran. At the same time, the Kremlin has sought to keep working relations with Gulf states, Israel and the US.
European intelligence agencies warned last month that Russia might supply advanced drone technology to Iran, though no such transfer has been publicly confirmed.
The conflict has also had economic implications. Higher global oil prices linked to the war have increased revenue from Russian energy exports.
Separately, former US president Donald Trump said a planned trip by American officials to Pakistan to discuss the conflict had been cancelled over the weekend, saying it would have taken “too much time”.
Fighting continues in Lebanon
While diplomatic contacts continued in Russia, violence persisted in Lebanon.
Lebanon’s health ministry said Israeli strikes on Sunday killed 14 people. The Israeli military said one soldier from the Israel Defense Forces was killed in a drone attack by Hezbollah.
According to Lebanon’s National News Agency, the death toll since Israel launched its latest offensive against Hezbollah has reached 2,521, with 7,804 people wounded. Those figures have not been independently verified.
The fighting marks the latest escalation along Israel’s northern frontier, as regional tensions remain high.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 5 comments
• 159 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

French Coastguard Rescues 106 Migrants in Channel Boat Incident

Report

French Coastguard Rescues 106 Migrants in Channel Boat Incident

French rescue crews have saved more than 100 migrants after a boat attempting to cross the English Channel broke down off the northern coast of France, authorities said. The French coastguard said 106 people were rescued from a single vessel that had run into difficulty during the journey towards the United Kingdom.

Get today's headlines by email

The migrants were transferred to a rescue ship and brought to Calais in the early hours of Sunday. Officials said they were first alerted to the stricken boat on Saturday.
Rescue operation off northern coast
Earlier in the incident, rescue teams intervened to assist several people who encountered problems while boarding the vessel near Wimereux.
Seven migrants got into difficulty while climbing into the boat. Among them was a woman who lost consciousness and had to be airlifted by helicopter for medical treatment.
Authorities later recovered the remaining passengers and transported them safely to shore.
In a separate operation, six additional migrants were rescued from another boat, bringing the total number of people assisted during the incidents to 119.
One of the world’s busiest sea routes
A spokesperson for the French coastguard warned that the Channel remains a particularly hazardous area for small craft.
They noted that the stretch of water is among the busiest shipping routes in the world and can present dangerous conditions even when the sea appears calm.
Strong winds, powerful currents and shifting sandbanks can make navigation difficult, while cold water temperatures significantly reduce survival time for anyone who falls overboard, especially during winter months.


New UK–France migration agreement
The rescue comes days after the United Kingdom and France announced a new three-year agreement aimed at preventing migrants from attempting the dangerous crossing.
Under the £662m deal, riot-trained French police are expected to patrol beaches along the northern coastline to stop small boats launching towards the UK.
The British government said the agreement could lead to hundreds of migrants each year being removed from French beaches and deported either to their countries of origin or to other European Union states they previously travelled through.
Around £501m of the funding will be used to strengthen enforcement efforts along the coast.
An additional £160m may be made available if the measures prove effective in reducing the number of crossings. However, officials said that funding could be reduced if the new approach fails to deliver results.
Crossings down compared with last year
Official figures suggest the number of people making the journey so far this year has fallen compared with the same period in 2025.
Between 1 January and 22 April 2026, 6,077 people crossed the English Channel in small boats from France. That represents a 37% decrease compared with the same period the previous year.
Authorities on both sides of the Channel have repeatedly warned that the route remains extremely dangerous for migrants attempting the journey in overcrowded and often unseaworthy boats.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• UK-Asylum crisis

• 5 comments
• 212 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

Starmer Faces MP Vote on Mandelson Vetting Inquiry

UK-Politics

Starmer Faces MP Vote on Mandelson Vetting Inquiry

Sir Keir Starmer is facing a vote in Parliament over whether MPs should launch an investigation into claims he misled the Commons about the vetting of Lord Peter Mandelson. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle confirmed that MPs will debate the issue on Tuesday before deciding whether to refer the matter to the Privileges Committee for investigation.

Get today's headlines by email

The prime minister denies accusations that he misled Parliament about the process that cleared Lord Mandelson to become the UK’s ambassador to the United States. The dispute centres on Starmer’s statements that the vetting followed “due process” and that “no pressure whatsoever” had been placed on Foreign Office officials.
Starmer has dismissed the move as a politically motivated attempt by the Conservative Party to undermine his government.
Debate and potential inquiry
If MPs approve the motion, the Privileges Committee would examine whether the prime minister misled Parliament — a breach of parliamentary rules.
Addressing a meeting of Labour MPs on Monday evening, Starmer described the planned vote as “pure politics” and urged his party to unite against it.
The BBC understands Labour MPs are likely to be formally instructed to vote against the Conservative motion rather than being granted a free vote. Because Labour holds a majority in the House of Commons, a large number of its backbench MPs would have to rebel or abstain for the proposal to pass.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has accused Starmer of misleading MPs “multiple times” over the appointment.
She has called on Labour MPs to support an inquiry, urging them to “look into their consciences” and back a referral to the Privileges Committee.
Downing Street rejected the criticism, saying the government was already cooperating with existing parliamentary scrutiny over Mandelson’s appointment.
A spokesperson said the Conservatives were staging a “desperate political stunt” ahead of local elections, adding that the opposition had “no answers on the cost of living or the NHS”.
Existing parliamentary scrutiny
Two separate parliamentary processes examining Mandelson’s appointment are already underway.
Under a procedure known as a humble address, the government must publish documents relating to the decision. Meanwhile, the Foreign Affairs Committee is holding evidence sessions to assess how the vetting process was carried out.
On Monday, the government released a letter from September 2025 written by the then head of the civil service, Sir Chris Wormald. In the letter, Wormald told the prime minister that “appropriate processes” had been followed during the appointment.
Additional written evidence from the Foreign Office was also published by the Foreign Affairs Committee.
Evidence about pressure claims
The evidence included comments from Ian Collard, the Foreign Office’s former head of security, who oversaw the vetting clearance.
According to the committee documents, Collard said he “felt pressure to deliver a rapid outcome” because of “regular contact from No 10” with the department’s permanent under-secretary.
However, the evidence also stated that Collard did not personally speak with Downing Street officials and did not believe the contact affected the professional judgement of himself or his team.
The Privileges Committee has previously investigated allegations that a prime minister misled Parliament. In 2023 it concluded that former prime minister Boris Johnson had misled MPs over gatherings held in Downing Street during the Covid pandemic.
Under the Ministerial Code, ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament are expected to resign, while any inadvertent mistake should be corrected as soon as possible.
Speaker allows vote
At the start of parliamentary business on Monday, Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle said “numerous” MPs had requested a vote on the issue.
He said his role was to act as a “gatekeeper” for such debates and to allow them only sparingly. Hoyle emphasised that permitting the vote did not represent a judgement on the substance of the allegations.
MPs will now decide whether the matter should proceed to a formal inquiry.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 4 comments
• 134 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

Melania Trump Condemns Jimmy Kimmel Over ‘Widow’ Joke

USA

Melania Trump Condemns Jimmy Kimmel Over ‘Widow’ Joke

Melania Trump has criticised late-night host Jimmy Kimmel after he joked that she looked like an “expectant widow” days before a shooting disrupted the White House Correspondents’ Dinner attended by the US president and first lady.

Get today's headlines by email

The comment, delivered during Kimmel’s show ahead of the annual Washington event, has drawn renewed scrutiny following the weekend attack. Melania Trump said the remarks were “hateful and violent” and called on broadcaster ABC to take action. The network has not yet publicly responded.
First Lady Calls for Action
In a post on social media platform X on Monday, Melania Trump said Kimmel’s comments went beyond comedy and contributed to a harmful political climate.
“People like Kimmel shouldn’t have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate,” she wrote, urging ABC to “take a stand”.
She described the remarks about her family as “corrosive” and said they deepened political divisions in the United States.
The joke had aired on Thursday during a monologue in which Kimmel previewed the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Referring to the first lady in the audience at the upcoming event, he said: “Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow.”
President Trump Joins Criticism
President Donald Trump also criticised the comedian, saying he was grateful that many people had expressed anger about the comments.
Writing on his Truth Social platform on Monday, Trump described the joke as a “call to violence”.
“This is something far beyond the pale,” he wrote. “Jimmy Kimmel should be immediately fired by Disney and ABC.”
ABC’s parent company, the Walt Disney Company, has not responded to requests for comment.
Joke Resurfaces After Shooting
The monologue resurfaced on social media following the shooting at Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington.
Authorities say a gunman opened fire near a security checkpoint at the event, which was held at the Washington Hilton and attended by hundreds of journalists, government officials and public figures.
President Trump and Melania Trump were evacuated from the venue but were not injured.
Law enforcement officials identified the suspect as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen. He was tackled by security agents near a staircase leading to the ballroom where the dinner was taking place.
Officials say the attack may have been intended to target members of the Trump administration.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt criticised Kimmel’s remarks during a news conference on Monday, describing such rhetoric about the president, the first lady and their supporters as “completely deranged”.
Previous Controversy
Kimmel has faced criticism in the past over comments related to political violence.
Last September, his late-night programme was temporarily taken off air after he discussed the shooting of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk during a monologue. In that segment, he accused what he called the “MAGA gang” — referring to supporters of President Trump — of attempting to score political points from Kirk’s death.
The show returned to broadcast a week later.
After resuming the programme, Kimmel acknowledged that some viewers believed his remarks had been poorly timed or unclear.
“I get why you’re upset,” he said at the time, adding that he understood why some people viewed the comments as inappropriate.
In the wake of the latest controversy, some conservative commentators and social media users have again called for Kimmel to be removed from television.
Speaking after the shooting at the correspondents’ dinner, President Trump said the incident had been “a rather traumatic experience” for his wife.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 39 comments
• 180 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

King Charles III begins US state visit

UK Monarchy

King Charles III begins US state visit

King Charles III arrived at the White House on Monday for a four-day state visit to the United States, taking place amid political tensions between London and Washington and heightened security concerns following a weekend shooting incident in the capital.

Get today's headlines by email

The visit comes nearly 250 years after the American colonies declared independence from Britain during the reign of Charles’s ancestor, King George III. Officials on both sides say the trip is meant to highlight the enduring relationship between the two countries as the United States prepares to mark its 250th anniversary.
Security was reassessed shortly before the visit after gunfire erupted near a Washington dinner attended by President Donald Trump on Saturday. Buckingham Palace said the king was “greatly relieved” that the president, Melania Trump, and other guests were unharmed.
Trump and the first lady welcomed Charles and Queen Camilla at the White House’s South Portico. The two couples were scheduled to share tea before viewing a beehive shaped like the White House, recently installed by the first lady. Charles has long supported beekeeping and maintains several hives at his private residence in England as part of his environmental advocacy.
Political strains between allies
The visit takes place against the backdrop of a diplomatic rift between the United States and the British government. Trump has publicly criticised Prime Minister Keir Starmer for declining to support U.S. military strikes against Iran.
In recent remarks, Trump dismissed Starmer as “not Winston Churchill,” referencing the wartime leader who popularised the phrase “special relationship” to describe U.S.-U.K. ties. The president has also criticised several NATO allies for failing to join the campaign against Iran.
Despite the political disagreement, Trump has said tensions with the British government would not affect the royal visit, emphasising his personal respect for the king. He has repeatedly referred to Charles as a friend and praised their relationship following his own visit to Britain last year.
During that trip, the royal family hosted Trump and the first lady with ceremonial events, including a state banquet at Windsor Castle.
Debate over the visit
Some British politicians and commentators have questioned whether the visit should proceed under current circumstances.
Ed Davey called earlier this month for the trip to be cancelled, warning that Trump’s conduct could place the monarch in an uncomfortable position during public appearances.
Starmer defended the visit, arguing that the monarchy can play a unique diplomatic role. He said the institution often helps maintain relationships across decades through personal connections and symbolic engagement.
Kristofer Allerfeldt, a historian at the University of Exeter, said the two governments likely view the visit differently. According to Allerfeldt, the monarchy seeks to reinforce long-term diplomatic ties and demonstrate Britain’s continuing influence, while the White House may see the trip as a high-profile public event.
Past controversies and royal diplomacy
The visit also comes amid renewed attention on Charles’s younger brother, Prince Andrew, whose association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has drawn criticism. Andrew, whose full name is Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, stepped back from public duties and lost his royal titles following the scandal. He denies wrongdoing.
Advocates for survivors of sexual abuse have urged the king to meet victims during his trip, though such a meeting is considered unlikely.
Charles, 77, has visited the United States many times but this marks his first state visit since becoming monarch in 2022 following the death of Queen Elizabeth II. Elizabeth made four state visits to the U.S., including a landmark address to Congress in 1991.
During the current visit, Charles is expected to deliver a speech to a joint session of Congress — only the second time a British monarch has done so. Other events include a White House state dinner, a visit to the September 11 memorial in New York, and participation in anniversary celebrations in Virginia.
The king will also meet Indigenous leaders involved in conservation projects, reflecting his long-standing interest in environmental protection.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• USA

• 0 comments
• 128 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

Press Gala Gunman Charged in Attempted Trump Assassination

USA

Press Gala Gunman Charged in Attempted Trump Assassination

A man accused of attempting to assassinate US President Donald Trump during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner has been charged with three federal crimes, prosecutors said following his first court appearance.

Get today's headlines by email

Cole Tomas Allen, 31, from Torrance, California, appeared in federal court on Monday after authorities said he tried to force his way toward the ballroom hosting the annual press gala in Washington on Saturday night. Prosecutors charged him with attempting to assassinate the president, transporting firearms to commit a felony and unlawfully discharging a firearm during a violent crime.
The attempted assassination charge carries a possible life sentence if he is convicted.
Allen, dressed in a blue jail jumpsuit, sat beside lawyers from the federal defender’s office during the hearing. Three US marshals stood behind him throughout the proceedings.
Alleged attack at hotel gala
According to prosecutors, Allen arrived at the Washington Hilton on Friday, 24 April, where the high-profile dinner was being held. Authorities said that shortly before 8:40 p.m. on Saturday he rushed through security on a floor above the event’s reception area.

Officials said he was confronted by law enforcement officers as he attempted to move toward the ballroom where the black-tie event was under way.
During the confrontation, a federal officer was shot in the chest. The officer was protected by a ballistic vest and survived the incident. The officer returned fire five times but did not hit the suspect, officials said.
Allen was arrested at the scene.
Prosecutors told the court that the suspect was carrying a 12-gauge pump-action shotgun, a handgun and three knives when he was detained.
Officials say more charges possible
Jeanine Pirro, the US attorney for the District of Columbia, attended the hearing and later spoke at a press conference alongside acting attorney general Todd Blanche and FBI director Kash Patel.
Pirro said prosecutors expected additional charges to be filed as investigators continue examining the case.
“Let this be a message to anyone who thinks Washington DC is the place to act out political violence,” she said. “If you cross state lines with a firearm to carry out such plans, we will track you and prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law.”
Blanche told reporters that authorities believe Allen had travelled by train from California to Chicago and then onward to Washington before checking into the hotel.
Investigators have been searching an address in Torrance linked to the suspect and are examining writings reportedly found in his hotel room. Officials said Allen is not actively cooperating with investigators.
A records search in Los Angeles County found no previous criminal or civil court cases linked to Allen.
Security response and investigation
Authorities said the suspect is believed to have acted alone, and investigators have not yet determined a clear motive.
President Trump and senior administration officials were moved to safety during the incident. A federal agent who was injured in the shooting was later released from hospital on Sunday.
Trump had agreed to attend the White House Correspondents’ Dinner for the first time as a sitting president after previously declining invitations during earlier years of his presidency.
Several senior officials were present at the event, including Vice-President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, along with hundreds of journalists and invited guests.
After the incident, Trump described the suspect as a “lone wolf” attacker and said being president was “a dangerous profession”.
Allen is scheduled to return to court for a detention hearing on 30 April and a preliminary hearing on 11 May as the investigation continues.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 3 comments
• 137 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27