World News

Burnham sworn in as MP in hours after Starmer's resignation

UK-Politics

Burnham sworn in as MP in hours after Starmer's resignation

Former Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham has been sworn in as the new MP for Makerfield, receiving a rousing welcome from Labour colleagues in the House of Commons just hours after Sir Keir Starmer announced his resignation as prime minister and Labour leader.

Get today's headlines by email

Burnham, who won last week's Makerfield by-election by a margin of 9,000 votes over Reform UK, formally took his seat in Parliament and immediately positioned himself as a contender to succeed Starmer.
Warm Commons Welcome
The Labour politician bowed his head several times as he entered the Commons chamber and smiled as colleagues greeted him. His arrival was met with loud cheers from Labour MPs, reflecting what observers described as an exceptionally celebratory atmosphere.
Conservative former minister Desmond Swayne heckled Burnham during the swearing-in ceremony, joking: "Rome is saved."
Other MPs shouted remarks including "he's not the messiah" and "water into wine", references to the comedy film Life of Brian. Burnham responded with a smile, saying: "Naughty boy."
Around 200 Labour MPs later gathered in Westminster Hall for the traditional photograph marking a by-election winner's arrival. Senior Labour figures including Rachel Reeves, Jonathan Reynolds, Steve Reed and Nick Thomas-Symonds were among those attending. Starmer was absent from the event.
Burnham also took a selfie with the assembled MPs.
Leadership Ambitions Confirmed
Earlier in the day, Burnham confirmed he would enter the contest to replace Starmer as Labour leader.
In a statement, he praised Starmer's service and said the leadership transition should be conducted in an orderly and responsible manner. He pledged to focus on economic growth, the cost of living, public services, housing and opportunities for younger generations.
Burnham said political change should not distract from efforts to improve people's lives and called for Labour to move forward with confidence and purpose.
His bid quickly received support from former health secretary Wes Streeting, who resigned from government last month after saying he had lost confidence in Starmer's leadership.
Farewell to Greater Manchester
Before travelling to London, Burnham said goodbye to staff at the Greater Manchester Combined Authority after stepping down as mayor.
Staff presented him with a Manchester-themed armchair embroidered with bees, a symbol of the city, alongside a depiction of the Manchester skyline. The chair also featured the phrase: "We do things differently here."
Addressing staff, Burnham thanked them "from the bottom of his heart" and became emotional as he reflected on his time in office.
He described serving as Greater Manchester mayor as the "privilege" of his life, bringing to a close a role he had held since 2017 after previously representing the neighbouring constituency of Leigh from 2001 to 2017.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 23 June 2026

• 2 comments
• 188 views

webfact

June 22Jun 22

Russian Advance Puts Key Donbas City Under Pressure

Ukraine Conflict

Russian Advance Puts Key Donbas City Under Pressure

Russian forces have infiltrated the strategic eastern Ukrainian city of Kostyantynivka and are attempting to surround it, raising concerns over the future of one of Kyiv's most important defensive positions in the Donbas region.

Get today's headlines by email

Ukrainian soldiers told the BBC that fighting has spread across the city, with some describing Kostyantynivka as effectively a "grey zone" where neither side maintains full control.
A Ukrainian drone operator, speaking anonymously, said Russian troops had managed to move into areas behind Ukrainian lines, making them difficult to dislodge in densely built-up urban terrain.
Russian Troops Push Into Strategic Eastern Ukrainian City
Kostyantynivka is regarded as a key gateway to the rest of the Donbas. If Russian forces capture the city, they could advance toward the nearby cities of Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, Ukraine's remaining major strongholds in the east, bringing Moscow closer to its objective of securing the entire region.
Gateway to Remaining Donbas Strongholds
The fighting comes despite a largely static front line in recent months. Ukrainian commanders say their forces have regained more territory this year than they have lost, while also targeting Russian supply routes linking the border with occupied Crimea.
Kyiv has also continued long-range strikes on oil refineries and infrastructure inside Russia. Meanwhile, Russian-installed authorities in Crimea recently suspended public fuel sales, citing shortages.
Conflicting Accounts of the Situation
Russian officials say their troops are advancing rapidly in southwestern Kostyantynivka and have surrounded Ukrainian units. Kyiv rejects those claims.
Brigadier General Oleksandr Bakulin, commander of Ukraine's 19th Corps, said the situation remained under control and that Russian forces had achieved no significant success. However, he acknowledged that around 130 Russian soldiers remained inside the city.
Several Ukrainian servicemen who spoke anonymously painted a more troubling picture. One officer operating in Kostyantynivka said Russian troops continued to build up their presence inside the city despite ongoing Ukrainian clearing operations.
The officer said every building offered potential cover for advancing troops, while summer foliage further complicated efforts to detect movement.
Drone War Shapes the Battlefield
The battle has increasingly become a contest between drone units.
According to Ukrainian soldiers, Russian drone operators have focused on locating and destroying Ukrainian drone launch sites, creating opportunities for infantry assaults. While Ukrainian crews concentrate on attacking advancing troops, Russian forces often use artillery, rocket systems and aircraft to support their operations.
A Ukrainian drone pilot said limited personnel and resources have left many operators overstretched, reducing their ability to target Russian drone teams.
As a result, Russian crews can identify Ukrainian positions more easily, forcing defenders to withdraw and gradually shifting the front line.
Although one Ukrainian officer described the Russian advance as slow—sometimes only around 100 metres a day—he said the tactic mirrors previous operations in eastern Ukraine, where Russian forces advanced along the flanks before surrounding key cities and severing supply routes.
Fears Over the City's Future
Recent Russian claims of capturing villages west of Kostyantynivka have added to concerns about the city's position.
The Ukrainian monitoring group DeepState described the situation as a major crisis and warned that the city's fall could be only a matter of time. It said losing Kostyantynivka would complicate logistics across the area and make operations in nearby Kramatorsk significantly more dangerous.
Another Ukrainian soldier said frontline units were struggling with manpower shortages and insufficient reinforcements, while commanders were often reluctant to acknowledge lost positions because they would be ordered to retake them.
Despite the pressure, Ukrainian troops continue to fight inside the city. One drone operator argued that unless Ukrainian forces place greater emphasis on disrupting Russian logistics and targeting enemy drone crews, Moscow's advance is likely to continue.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 June 2026

• 0 comments
• 215 views

webfact

June 22Jun 22

Five Hurt in Suspected Anti-Muslim Attacks in Edinburgh

UK

Five Hurt in Suspected Anti-Muslim Attacks in Edinburgh

Police investigating a series of suspected anti-Muslim attacks in Edinburgh have released new details after CCTV footage captured the moments leading up to the arrest of a 36-year-old man accused of carrying out assaults across the city.

Get today's headlines by email

The footage, obtained by the BBC, shows a topless man driving erratically along Leith Walk on Friday evening before abandoning his vehicle and confronting several people while carrying two large knives and smoking a cigarette.
CCTV Captures Sequence of Attacks
The video shows a dark-coloured car swerving onto Leith Walk and stopping across a cycle lane. The driver then exits the vehicle and runs towards a man riding an e-bike before moving out of view.
He later returns to the car briefly before approaching a Black man who had just stepped off a tram. The footage appears to show the suspect repeatedly swinging two knives at the man, who manages to flee.
After abandoning the pursuit, the man is seen striking the door of a nearby pizzeria while members of the public run from the area. Minutes later, he allegedly attacked a delivery rider on an e-bike, causing the victim to fall.
Police officers arrived shortly afterwards and detained the suspect about five minutes after he first stopped on the street.
Earlier Stabbings Near Mosque
Police Scotland said five people were injured in a series of incidents across Edinburgh, with four requiring hospital treatment. None of the injuries are believed to be life-threatening.
Investigators said the violence began near Broomhouse Mosque in western Edinburgh. Two 22-year-old men were sitting in Sighthill Park after attending Asr prayers at the mosque when they were approached and stabbed multiple times. Both were treated in hospital and discharged the following day.
The other injured victims were aged 24, 27 and 39.
Members of Edinburgh's Muslim community expressed shock at the attacks. A local community figure told the BBC it was difficult to believe such incidents could occur in a city known for its strong community relations.
Aaquil Hussain, a liaison officer at Broomhouse Mosque, described the attacks as contrary to British values while stressing that they did not reflect the wider city, Scotland or the UK. He said the community remained resilient despite the distress caused.
Damage at Other Locations
Police believe the suspect travelled from Sighthill to a petrol station on Telford Road, where a taxi driver was confronted, his vehicle damaged and an axe thrown through a window.
Additional videos circulating on social media appear to show disorder at other sites. CCTV from a petrol station on Ferry Road shows a man beside a damaged black vehicle before entering the shop and knocking over shelves.
Another video shows police restraining a topless man on the ground while he shouts that he is "protecting the country".
Police Scotland said officers equipped with Tasers detained the suspect but did not deploy the devices. He has since been charged.


video screenshot
Leaders Condemn Violence
Assistant Chief Constable Paton described the incidents as a "shocking attack" and said there was no place for racism or faith-based hatred in Scotland.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the suspect appeared to have been motivated by anti-Muslim hatred. Scotland's First Minister John Swinney condemned the violence and is expected to meet members of the local Muslim community.
The attacks occurred amid wider tensions in parts of the UK following recent incidents of unrest and racially motivated violence. Political leaders across Scotland, including opposition figures and local representatives, condemned the Edinburgh attacks and expressed support for affected communities.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 June 2026

• 1 comment
• 221 views

webfact

June 22Jun 22

Japan Raises Visa Fees Fivefold in First Hike Since 1978

Japan

Japan Raises Visa Fees Fivefold in First Hike Since 1978

Japan has announced a sharp increase in visa fees for foreign visitors, marking the country's first revision of visa charges in nearly five decades.

Get today's headlines by email

Under the new fee structure, which takes effect on 1 July, the cost of a single-entry visa will rise from 3,000 yen ($18.69) to 15,000 yen. Multi-entry visas will increase from 6,000 yen to 30,000 yen.
First Increase in Nearly 50 Years
The fee changes represent the first adjustment to Japan's visa charges since 1978. Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi said the revisions were intended to reflect inflation and fluctuations in exchange rates.
Speaking to reporters on Friday, Motegi said the government did not expect the higher fees to have an immediate effect on inbound tourism.
Weak Yen and Tourism Boom
Japan's currency has weakened steadily since 2021 and remains close to its lowest levels in around four decades.
The weaker yen, combined with a strong recovery in international travel following the pandemic, has helped fuel a surge in visitors. Japan welcomed a record 42.7 million international tourists last year.
Higher Residency-Related Charges
The visa fee increases come after Japan's upper house passed legislation in May raising several other charges affecting foreign residents.
Under the changes, the maximum fee for permanent residency applications will increase to 300,000 yen, up from the current cap of 10,000 yen. Fees for changing residency status or extending a stay will also rise significantly, reaching up to 100,000 yen from the current 10,000 yen.
Aligning With Other G7 Nations
Japanese authorities have argued that visa and residency-related charges should be brought closer to the levels seen in other major advanced economies.
In the United States, fees for non-immigrant visa applications typically range from $185 to $315. In the United Kingdom, a standard visitor visa allowing stays of up to six months costs £135.
The government says the revised fee structure will better reflect administrative costs and bring Japan's charges more in line with those of its G7 counterparts.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 June 2026

• 3 comments
• 223 views

webfact

June 22Jun 22

Starmer Resigns as PM, Burnham Tipped to Succeed

UK

Starmer Resigns as PM, Burnham Tipped to Succeed

Keir Starmer has announced that he is stepping down as both prime minister and leader of the Labour Party.

Get today's headlines by email

Starmer Announces Departure
Speaking outside 10 Downing Street, Starmer said he was resigning after a period in office during which, he argued, every decision had been guided by a commitment to put the country first.
His statement was delivered in front of the prime minister's residence, with live coverage available as the announcement unfolded.
Burnham Emerges as Leading Candidate
Attention has quickly turned to who could replace Starmer at the head of the government and the Labour Party.
Andy Burnham, widely viewed as a potential successor, is due to be in Westminster on Monday to be sworn in as the Member of Parliament for Makerfield. He secured the seat in a by-election last week.
Burnham's arrival in Parliament is expected to intensify speculation about the party's next leadership move.
Labour Weighs Succession Process
Within Labour, many figures are reportedly anticipating what is known as a "coronation" process if Starmer's resignation triggers a leadership transition.
Under that scenario, Burnham would stand as the sole candidate, avoiding a contested leadership race and allowing him to take over without a lengthy campaign.
Questions Over Timing
Current expectations suggest Burnham could formally assume the leadership by late September, around the time of Labour's annual party conference.
However, some of his supporters believe that timetable would take too long and argue that the transition should happen more quickly.
The coming weeks are likely to determine both the process and the pace of Labour's leadership change following Starmer's departure.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 June 2026

• UK-Politics

• 114 comments
• 334 views

webfact

June 22Jun 22

Brexit’s Legacy Still Divides Britain a Decade Later

UK

Brexit’s Legacy Still Divides Britain a Decade Later

Ten years after voters chose to leave the European Union, Brexit remains one of the most consequential and divisive events in modern British history.

Get today's headlines by email

In the June 23, 2016 referendum, 52% of voters backed leaving the EU, setting the United Kingdom on a path that ultimately ended nearly five decades of integration with the European bloc. Although the vote was close, it triggered sweeping political, economic and social changes. The formal departure process took almost five years to complete.
Brexit emerged amid growing public frustration with the EU and broader dissatisfaction following the 2008 global financial crisis. Supporters argued that Britain would regain control of its affairs and unlock new economic opportunities outside the bloc. Critics warned that leaving would damage trade, weaken economic growth and reduce the country's international influence.
Economic Impact Remains a Key Debate
Brexit supporters envisioned a more agile economy able to thrive independently through new trade relationships and greater policy flexibility. However, the expected economic revival has yet to materialize.
Businesses have faced additional barriers when trading with the EU, which remains the UK's largest trading partner. While British exports are not subject to EU tariffs, firms must contend with customs procedures, certification requirements and other regulatory checks. Several trade agreements promoted during the Brexit campaign, including a major deal with the United States, have not been achieved.



Economists estimate the British economy is between 4% and 8% smaller than it would have been if the country had remained in the EU. Critics say this has reduced living standards and limited funding available for public services, including the National Health Service.
According to analysts, Brexit's effects have been gradual rather than sudden, weighing on trade, investment and productivity over time.
Supporters of Brexit counter that the long-term benefits should not be judged solely on short-term economic performance, arguing that greater national control over policies, particularly immigration, remains a significant achievement.
Immigration Remains a Flashpoint
Ending free movement between the UK and EU was a central Brexit objective. Migration from EU countries has fallen sharply, but arrivals from outside Europe increased after visa rules were expanded to address labor shortages in sectors such as social care.
Overall net migration has declined significantly, falling from more than 900,000 in 2023 to 171,000 last year.
However, public concern remains focused on irregular migration, particularly migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats. Although these arrivals represent only a small share of total migration, the issue has become a major political battleground. Protests have taken place outside accommodation facilities housing asylum seekers, with some demonstrations turning violent.
Public Opinion Has Shifted
Britain's political landscape has been reshaped by Brexit. Support for the traditionally dominant Conservative and Labour parties has weakened, while the anti-establishment Reform UK party, led by Nigel Farage, has gained ground and led many opinion polls.



Surveys suggest public sentiment has become increasingly skeptical about Brexit. Recent polling indicates a majority of Britons would support rejoining the EU, while many believe Brexit has produced worse outcomes than expected.
Rejoining the EU Remains Unlikely
Despite growing public dissatisfaction, a return to the EU appears politically difficult.
The governing Labour Party has ruled out reversing Brexit or re-entering the EU's single market. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has instead pursued a limited reset of relations with Brussels aimed at improving cooperation and reducing trade friction.
His potential successor, Andy Burnham, has also rejected calls to seek renewed EU membership, arguing that the result of the 2016 referendum should be respected.
A decade after the vote, Brexit remains unresolved in one important sense: while the UK has left the EU, the debate over whether it was the right decision continues to shape British politics and public opinion.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 June 2026

• EU

• 36 comments
• 244 views

webfact

June 22Jun 22

Iran Suspends US Talks in Switzerland After Trump Threats

Iranian Conflict

Iran Suspends US Talks in Switzerland After Trump Threats

Iranian negotiators have suspended high-level talks with the United States in Switzerland after protesting a series of threats made by US President Donald Trump, including warnings of military action and remarks interpreted by Tehran as threats against the safety of its delegation.

Get today's headlines by email

The talks, held in Burgenstock, were the first direct negotiations since Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending the confrontation over the Strait of Hormuz and opening a 60-day process on Iran’s civilian nuclear programme.
Negotiators Walk Out of Switzerland Talks
It was not immediately clear whether the Iranian walkout marked a permanent breakdown in negotiations or a temporary protest. Before leaving the talks, however, Iranian and US officials reportedly reached a draft agreement outlining how Washington could issue waivers easing sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
Progress on Oil Sanctions and Frozen Assets
Iranian officials said the proposed waivers could be issued soon and added that discussions had also advanced on the release of Iranian assets frozen in overseas bank accounts.
The talks followed last week’s agreement between the two countries designed to secure the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route for global energy supplies.
Tensions rose after Trump repeatedly warned Iran to rein in the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, which has continued clashes with Israeli forces in southern Lebanon. Iranian officials argued that the US president’s comments violated the non-aggression provisions included in last week’s memorandum.
Trump and Ghalibaf Exchange Warnings
Iran’s chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, dismissed Trump’s threats, saying Tehran would not be influenced by pressure from Washington.
The Iranian delegation also faced domestic pressure to demonstrate scepticism toward the Trump administration, contributing to the decision to leave the talks.
Iran has reimposed its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, saying the move was a response to ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon. Tehran argues that Israel’s actions violate the ceasefire provisions outlined in the memorandum signed by Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
On social media, Trump warned Iran to stop supporting Hezbollah and threatened further military action if it failed to do so. During an interview with Fox News, he also suggested the United States could take control of the strait if negotiations collapsed.
Iran lodged a formal protest with mediators, describing Trump’s remarks as unacceptable and demanding action against what it called “bullying”.
Vance Strikes More Conciliatory Tone
While Trump adopted a confrontational approach, US Vice-President JD Vance presented a more conciliatory message in Switzerland.
Vance said the administration wanted to “turn over a new leaf” with Iran and indicated Washington was prepared to transform relations if Tehran abandoned what the US describes as regional destabilisation and long-term nuclear weapons ambitions.
The negotiations also involved representatives from Pakistan and Qatar, which are acting as mediators. Iran declined to appear publicly alongside the US delegation, led by Vance, along with Jared Kushner and US envoy Steve Witkoff.
Nuclear Issues Remain Unresolved
Iran says the immediate priorities are securing a ceasefire in Lebanon, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, lifting sanctions on oil exports and unfreezing overseas assets.
The head of the UN nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, was also present in Switzerland. However, Tehran wants discussions on future inspections of its nuclear facilities postponed until sanctions-related disputes are resolved.
Under the current framework, both sides aim to settle outstanding nuclear issues, including the scope of inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency, within 60 days, although the deadline can be extended by mutual agreement.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 June 2026

• 29 comments
• 269 views

webfact

June 21Jun 21

Iranian Singer Gets 74 Lashes for Singing Without Hijab

Iran

Iranian Singer Gets 74 Lashes for Singing Without Hijab

An Iranian court has sentenced singer Parastoo Ahmadi and seven fellow artists to 74 lashes each after they livestreamed a concert on YouTube, according to local media and members of the production team.

Get today's headlines by email

The performance, broadcast in December 2024, featured Ahmadi singing to an empty venue on a dimly lit stage decorated with a large Persian carpet inside a traditional caravanserai complex. She was accompanied by a pianist, drummer, guitarist and bassist.
YouTube Performance Draws Millions of Views
The artists were dressed in black, while Ahmadi wore a long gown and red lipstick. In Iran, women are prohibited from singing publicly and are required to follow strict dress regulations, including wearing a headscarf.
The concert was streamed on Ahmadi’s YouTube channel and has attracted around three million views. It has also been widely shared and viewed on other platforms.
Artists Face Travel and Work Bans
Videographer Tahmineh Monzavi said in an Instagram post on Thursday that those involved in the production had been sentenced to “74 lashes”, a two-year ban on artistic activities and a two-year prohibition on leaving the country.
Authorities first detained Ahmadi, Monzavi, the musicians and other members of the production team days after the concert took place in December 2024. They were later released on bail.
At the time, Iran’s judiciary-linked Mizan Online news website reported that a case had been opened over the performance for producing music without complying with what it described as legal and religious standards.
Official judicial outlets have not confirmed the latest ruling. However, Iran’s Emtedad news platform reported that Ahmadi and other participants had received sentences including lashes, travel restrictions and bans on artistic work.
Court Cites Public Decency Charges
According to Emtedad, the verdict was issued by the Criminal Court of Qom Province. The report said the defendants were accused of offending public decency by creating and publishing content deemed immoral online.
The case comes amid continuing tensions over women’s rights and dress-code enforcement in Iran. Growing numbers of women have appeared in public without a hijab since nationwide protests erupted following the death of Mahsa Amini in custody in September 2022 after her arrest for an alleged dress-code violation.
Performance Referenced Protest Detainees
Some of the songs performed by Ahmadi contained references to young Iranians detained during anti-government protests. Among the lyrics were lines expressing longing for the homeland and comparing detained protesters to captive birds yearning for freedom.
The sentencing has drawn renewed attention to restrictions on artistic expression and the role of women performers in Iran.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

• 29 comments
• 299 views

webfact

June 21Jun 21

Trump Says Multiple Arrested Over Reflecting Pool Damage

USA

Trump Says Multiple Arrested Over Reflecting Pool Damage

President Donald Trump said multiple people have been arrested in connection with alleged vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, which has come under scrutiny after algae growth and peeling paint appeared shortly after a costly renovation project was completed.

Get today's headlines by email

The president made the announcement on social media on Saturday, accusing those involved of committing serious crimes against national monuments. He did not provide details about the number of arrests or the specific acts that led to them.
“These are very serious crimes having to do with the destruction of National Monuments,” Trump wrote, adding that those responsible could face prison sentences.
Renovation Problems Draw Attention
The Reflecting Pool has attracted widespread attention in recent days after visitors shared photos and videos online showing algae forming in the water and sections of the newly painted lining peeling away.
The Interior Department recently completed a repainting project at the site, with the final cost exceeding $14.65 million, about $4 million above the original estimate.


Picture courtesy of CNN/Aaron Schwartz/Reuters

Trump said repair work would begin immediately and suggested that part of the pool may need to be drained to address the damage.
“We met with contractors today, will probably be forced to release and drain much of the water in order to do the necessary repairs,” he wrote.
Sabotage Claims Without Evidence
The president also repeated claims that the damage was the result of deliberate sabotage. He alleged that vandals poured “corrosive and destructive chemicals” into the pool, causing the lining to peel.
Trump further claimed that someone used a knife or blade to create a 250-foot gash in what he described as the structure’s facade. He did not clarify whether he was referring to the Reflecting Pool itself or another nearby monument.
No evidence was publicly presented to support the sabotage allegations.
Trump linked the alleged vandalism to the large “86 47” message recently marked in grass on the National Mall and described the incidents as an insult to Presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.
Olympian Denies Wrongdoing
Hours before announcing the arrests, Trump shared a report about the arrest of a man near the Reflecting Pool on Friday.
According to The Washington Post, the man was identified as 67-year-old David Hearn, a three-time U.S. Olympic canoeist.
Hearn denied damaging the pool in an interview with the newspaper.
“I didn't vandalize anything,” he said. “I didn't destroy or break or peel anything.”
He said he had only touched a section of material that was already peeling and remained attached to the bottom of the pool.
According to the Post, Hearn was arrested on a misdemeanor charge of destruction of government property and is scheduled to appear in D.C. Superior Court on July 9.
The U.S. Park Police did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the arrests mentioned by Trump.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

• 27 comments
• 286 views

webfact

June 21Jun 21

Starmer Expected to Resign Monday, Outline Exit Plan

UK-Politics

Starmer Expected to Resign Monday, Outline Exit Plan

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to outline a timetable for his departure from Downing Street this week following Andy Burnham’s victory in the Makerfield by-election, according to senior Labour figures.

Get today's headlines by email

People close to Starmer said he has increasingly concluded that his position is no longer sustainable after discussions with cabinet colleagues, advisers, trade union leaders and party donors.
Pressure Mounts After Makerfield Result
The prime minister spent the weekend at Chequers with his wife, Victoria, and is expected to make a final decision after further discussions. Senior figures within Labour believe he could issue a statement as early as Monday.
One ally said Starmer did not intend to leave office abruptly and was instead focused on ensuring an orderly transition. The source said he now viewed stepping aside as the best way to serve both the country and the party.
Burnham's Return Changes the Landscape
Burnham’s decisive win over Reform UK in the Greater Manchester constituency has strengthened his standing within Labour and intensified pressure on Starmer.
Burnham is due to be sworn in as an MP on Monday and is expected to meet the prime minister later in the week.
Supporters of the former Greater Manchester mayor claim he now has the backing of more than 201 Labour MPs if a leadership contest is triggered. According to allies, that level of support demonstrates that a majority of Labour parliamentarians favour a change in leadership.
One senior Labour figure said Burnham’s victory had persuaded many MPs that he could be the strongest candidate to prevent Reform UK from making further electoral gains.
Former cabinet minister Charlie Falconer told the BBC that Starmer had lost authority because many within the party now expect Burnham to challenge for the leadership and believe he would win.
Cabinet Ministers Seek Clarity
Starmer is facing calls to clarify his intentions before a cabinet meeting scheduled for Tuesday.
Several senior ministers, including Ed Miliband, Shabana Mahmood, Yvette Cooper and Heidi Alexander, are reported to have urged him to establish a clear timetable for stepping down.
Party officials have also conveyed strong support among Labour MPs for what they describe as an orderly transition.
According to Starmer’s supporters, the most likely outcome would see him remain in office until September, allowing a successor to be formally endorsed at Labour’s annual conference.
Those who have spoken to the prime minister in recent days describe him as reflective rather than confrontational. Allies say he is assessing the implications of both the Makerfield result and a potential leadership contest.
Leadership Contest Taking Shape
While Burnham is widely viewed as the frontrunner, other figures are still considering leadership bids.
Allies of Wes Streeting insist he intends to run if a contest takes place. Streeting has reportedly secured office space for campaign staff and recently received financial backing from prominent Labour donor Fran Perrin.
However, some Labour figures believe Streeting could eventually support Burnham in exchange for a senior cabinet role in a future administration.
Despite mounting speculation, Downing Street dismissed reports of an imminent resignation as conjecture. On Friday, Starmer said he would take part in any Labour leadership election and maintained that he still had work to complete in government.
Meanwhile, Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said Labour would benefit from a clear and orderly leadership transition, while stressing the need for a wider debate on policy priorities.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

• 63 comments
• 321 views

webfact

June 21Jun 21

Trump Seeks Vote to Rename ICE to 'NICE'

USA

Trump Seeks Vote to Rename ICE to 'NICE'

US President Donald Trump has suggested renaming the country's immigration enforcement agency from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to “NICE”, arguing that the change could improve public perceptions of the agency and counter criticism of its work.

Get today's headlines by email

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said he was considering launching a public poll on the proposal, which would add an “N” for “National” to the agency's name.
Trump Suggests New Name
Trump claimed that ICE officers had been unfairly portrayed by media organisations and praised their work enforcing immigration laws.
“ICE has been abused by the Fake News Media at levels never seen before,” he wrote, describing agency personnel as “great patriots” operating in a difficult environment.
He argued that changing the name to “NICE” would alter how journalists and the public discuss immigration enforcement activities.
Trump said reporters would be forced to use phrases such as “NICE facility” or “NICE agents,” adding that the change would make it harder for critics to portray the agency negatively.
Mixed Reaction Within Administration
The president said the idea had been discussed with border enforcement official Tom Homan, who he described as “legendary”.
According to Trump, the proposal has been well received by many people, although ICE agents themselves may be less enthusiastic.
“Everyone loves it, but I have been told by Tom Homan that the agents do not love it as much as the other population,” Trump wrote.
He also described the proposed rebranding as a way to give the agency what he called a “more prestigious name”.
Immigration Debate Continues
The proposal comes as immigration enforcement remains a contentious political issue in the United States.
According to reports by the New York Post, recent demonstrations outside the Delaney Hall migrant detention facility in Newark have led to clashes between protesters and law enforcement officers. Several people from outside the state were arrested during confrontations at the site.
The newspaper reported that some of those detained had connections to the Sunrise Movement, a progressive organisation that has campaigned for the closure of Delaney Hall and the abolition of ICE.
The report also referenced anti-ICE protests in Minneapolis earlier this year that drew national attention and became a rallying point for immigration activists.
Agency's History
The immigration enforcement body was originally established under the Homeland Security Act of 2002 as the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
However, the acronym “BICE” failed to gain widespread use, and the Department of Homeland Security formally adopted the shorter name “ICE” in 2007.
Trump's proposal has generated discussion online but no formal plans for a name change have been announced.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

• 27 comments
• 286 views

webfact

June 21Jun 21

Trump Jokes as Vance Takes Heat Over Iran Deal

Iranian Conflict

Trump Jokes as Vance Takes Heat Over Iran Deal

President Donald Trump joked this week that Vice President JD Vance would be responsible if the administration's Iran agreement falls apart, a remark that highlighted Vance's increasingly prominent role in one of the White House's most closely watched foreign policy efforts.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking on Wednesday, Trump said he would take the credit if the Iran initiative succeeds but would blame Vance if it fails.
“You better be careful, JD!” Trump quipped. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who had advocated a tougher approach toward Iran earlier in the conflict, stood nearby but did not join the exchange.
The comment drew laughter but also underscored a political reality that has emerged during the war and the negotiations that followed.
Trump Joke Highlights Political Stakes
As talks over a potential agreement progressed, Vance became the administration's most visible representative on the issue, a notable shift given his earlier opposition to military action.
His elevated profile has prompted discussion among Republican strategists and political observers about why he, rather than Rubio, has taken center stage during negotiations.
The development has also fueled speculation that Vance could end up carrying political responsibility for an agreement that remains controversial within parts of the Republican Party.
One former Trump administration official argued that Trump's joke reinforced a growing perception among Republicans that the agreement has become associated with Vance.
The former aide said comments from Republican figures, including Senator Lindsey Graham, have increasingly linked the deal to the vice president rather than to other senior administration officials.
Vance Becomes Face of Iran Negotiations
The focus on Vance has intensified as he promotes his new book, Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith.
During a series of high-profile interviews, the vice president has frequently been asked about the Iran negotiations alongside questions about his political future and the possibility of a presidential run in 2028.
On Thursday, Vance appeared at a White House briefing for the second time in recent weeks, standing in for press secretary Karoline Leavitt. He answered questions about the Iran agreement and ongoing discussions with Tehran.
Vance also responded to criticism from Israel and supporters of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, warning against attacking the United States while it remains Israel's most powerful ally.
When asked about Trump's joke, Vance dismissed it, saying the president was "joking as he often does."
Republicans Debate Risks and Rewards
Despite Vance's public response, Republican strategists said the remark reflected a familiar pattern in Trump's political approach.
Veteran Republican strategist Doug Heye said Trump traditionally claims credit for successful outcomes while directing blame elsewhere when things go wrong.
He argued that anyone working closely with Trump understands that political fortunes can change quickly and that no ally is guaranteed protection if circumstances deteriorate.
Republican strategist Susan Del Percio echoed that view, suggesting Trump could eventually point to communication failures or other issues if the agreement encounters problems.
Supporters of Vance, however, contend that his leading role demonstrates Trump's confidence in him. They argue that the vice president helped guide efforts to end the conflict and that his visibility reflects the trust placed in him by the president.
Rubio Steps Back as Vance Takes Center Stage
At the same time, Vance's prominent role has drawn attention away from Rubio, who was initially viewed as one of the administration's strongest advocates for military action.
Reports have since indicated that Rubio privately argued against the agreement, citing intelligence assessments suggesting Iran was unlikely to abandon its pursuit of nuclear capabilities.
Political observers noted that Rubio has largely remained out of the spotlight as negotiations have advanced, leaving Vance as the administration's primary public defender of the deal.
Iran Deal Could Shape Vance's Future
Strategists say Vance could benefit politically if the agreement proves durable and successful.
However, they also warn that a breakdown in the deal could create challenges for a potential 2028 presidential campaign by tying him closely to an issue that has divided Republicans.
Del Percio compared the situation to the difficulties former Vice President Kamala Harris faced when attempting to distinguish herself from the policies of former President Joe Biden during the 2024 election campaign.
Others argued that Vance may find it even harder to separate himself from the administration's Iran policy if he remains its most visible advocate.
For now, the vice president remains closely associated with an agreement that could either strengthen his political credentials or become a significant liability.
As one former Trump administration official put it, the vice president who initially opposed the war is now increasingly identified with the effort to secure the peace.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

• 6 comments
• 279 views

webfact

June 21Jun 21

Chicago Mass Shooting Leaves at Least 12 Wounded

Mass Shooting

Chicago Mass Shooting Leaves at Least 12 Wounded

At least 12 people were wounded after gunmen opened fire from an SUV into a crowd on a street in Chicago's South Side, police said.

Get today's headlines by email

The shooting occurred late Friday when an SUV pulled up and two people inside began firing at a group gathered in the neighbourhood before driving away, according to police.
Two Victims in Critical Condition
Police said 12 people — eight men and four women aged between 17 and 47 — suffered gunshot wounds and were taken to four different hospitals for treatment.
Two male victims were listed in critical condition. One had been shot in the thigh. Authorities did not immediately release details on the other critically injured victim.
Another man sustained injuries of an unknown nature but declined medical treatment.
Initial Response
Officers were first dispatched following reports of a single shooting victim. Upon arrival, they found a woman with two gunshot wounds to her back and a man who had suffered four graze wounds to his back. Both were reported to be in fair condition.
Police have not announced any arrests, and detectives are continuing to investigate the circumstances surrounding the attack.
Violence on Juneteenth
The shooting took place on Juneteenth, the US holiday commemorating the end of slavery.
Earlier in the day, former US President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama welcomed the first visitors to the Obama Presidential Center on Chicago's South Side.
Chicago police said at least 21 people had been shot across the city since Friday evening, with four fatalities recorded.
Local anti-violence advocate Donovan Price described the mass shooting as especially tragic given the significance of the holiday.
"It should be celebrating," he told CBS News. "Fireworks should not turn into gunshots."
Investigation Under Way
Authorities have not released information on a possible motive, and further details were not immediately available.
Detectives are continuing to gather evidence and seek information about the occupants of the SUV involved in the attack.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

• USA

• 14 comments
• 276 views

webfact

June 21Jun 21

Meloni Tells Trump to Focus on His Own Popularity

Report

Meloni Tells Trump to Focus on His Own Popularity

Italy’s Prime Minister, Giorgia Meloni, has intensified her public dispute with US President Donald Trump, telling him to focus on his own popularity after he questioned her standing with Italian voters and repeated claims that she repeatedly sought a photograph with him.

Get today's headlines by email

The latest exchange unfolded on social media after Trump said on Saturday that Meloni was “doing poorly in Italy with her level of popularity”. He also accused her of failing to support US efforts to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
In a post on Instagram, Meloni dismissed what she described as Trump’s “constant, unprovoked attacks” as “senseless”.
Addressing his remarks about her domestic support, she said that being associated with Trump had certainly not boosted her popularity and that her political standing did not depend on her relationship with the US president.
“My popularity is none of your concern. I suggest you focus on yours,” she wrote.
Dispute Over Military Facilities
Trump also accused the Italian leader of creating “a great logistical inconvenience” by refusing to allow the United States to use Italian air facilities for military operations involving Iran.
Meloni rejected the criticism, saying access to Italian bases is governed by longstanding agreements that Italy has consistently respected. She added that those arrangements would not be violated while she remained prime minister.
Row Began After G7 Summit
The dispute escalated following the recent G7 summit in France, where the two leaders were seen speaking privately and appeared to maintain cordial relations.
After the meeting, Meloni told reporters that their relationship remained unchanged and that there had been “no recriminations”.
However, Trump later told Italy’s La7 television channel that Meloni had “begged” him to take a photograph with her.
“She begged me to take a photo with her; I felt sorry for her,” Trump said during the interview. He also suggested she should be pleased that he had spoken with her.
Meloni responded in an Instagram video, saying she was “frankly stunned” by the comments.
“I don’t know why the US president behaves this way towards allies,” she said, adding that such behaviour was not unprecedented.
“But there is one thing he needs to remember: neither I nor Italy ever beg.”
Growing Strains Between Allies
The continuing war of words has highlighted increasing tensions between Rome and Washington following Trump’s military action against Iran earlier this year.
Italy’s Foreign Minister, Antonio Tajani, has since cancelled a planned visit to the United States scheduled for early next week.
Meloni’s response has drawn support from across Italy’s political spectrum, with politicians from different parties backing her defence of Italy’s position.
The pair have also clashed previously. Earlier this year, Trump criticised Pope Leo XIV on social media, describing him as weak on crime and poor on foreign policy. Meloni condemned those remarks as “unacceptable”.
Despite the recent tensions, the two leaders had previously maintained a close political relationship. Meloni was the only European leader to attend Trump’s inauguration in January 2025, underscoring what had been viewed as a strong partnership between the two governments.

RELATED ARTICLE:
https://aseannow.com/topic/1397103-italys-meloni-rebukes-trump-over-begged-for-photo-claim/


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

• 15 comments
• 244 views

webfact

June 21Jun 21

Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz, Blames US and Israel

BREAKING NEWS

Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz, Blames US and Israel

Iran said it is closing the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important shipping routes, citing what it described as Israeli violations of a ceasefire in Lebanon and Washington's failure to implement the first phase of a tentative agreement aimed at ending the conflict.

Get today's headlines by email

The announcement came as renewed fighting between Israel and Hezbollah intensified pressure on ongoing diplomatic efforts to secure a broader regional settlement.
Strait of Hormuz Closure
Tehran also confirmed it will send a delegation to negotiations in Switzerland in the coming days. US envoy Steve Witkoff and President Donald Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, are expected to attend as mediators work to keep discussions on track and achieve a lasting peace agreement within a 60-day framework outlined in the proposed deal.
Diplomatic efforts have been overshadowed by continued violence in Lebanon.
Renewed Violence in Lebanon
At least 16 people were killed in Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon on Saturday, according to local reports. Israel said the attacks were carried out in response to Hezbollah operations.
The latest escalation has raised concerns that continued fighting could undermine the diplomatic process and complicate efforts to reach a broader agreement.
Vance Highlights Differences with Israel
Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance suggested that Washington and Israel may differ more in their approach than in their ultimate objectives regarding Iran.
Speaking in an interview with Fox News, Vance said he was unsure whether there was a "divergence of goals" between the two allies but acknowledged there could be differences over how those goals should be achieved. He reiterated that the Trump administration intends to give diplomacy a chance despite concerns voiced by some figures within the Israeli government.
His comments followed criticism he directed at Israel earlier this week during a White House briefing, where he expressed frustration over continued military operations in Lebanon while negotiations were underway.
Vance argued that US President Donald Trump remained one of Israel's strongest international supporters and suggested Israeli leaders should be mindful of the importance of maintaining alignment with Washington.
He also highlighted Israel's reliance on American military support and urged some Israeli officials to recognize the country's strategic realities as diplomatic efforts continue.
Trump's Message to Netanyahu
In a recent interview with the Financial Times, Trump said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would ultimately have to accept any agreement negotiated between the United States and Iran.
The latest developments underscore the challenges facing negotiators as escalating violence in Lebanon threatens to derail talks intended to reduce tensions between Iran, Israel and the United States.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 June 2026

• Iranian Conflict

• 46 comments
• 321 views

webfact

June 20Jun 20

US to End HIV Funding for South Africa

Health Care

US to End HIV Funding for South Africa

The United States will phase out funding for HIV and Aids programmes in South Africa, ending support that has contributed hundreds of millions of dollars annually to the country's efforts to combat the epidemic.

Get today's headlines by email

South Africa has the world's largest HIV-positive population, with more than eight million people living with the virus.
Funding Withdrawal Confirmed
Until 2025, the US provided about $400 million (£300 million) a year through the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (Pepfar), accounting for roughly one-fifth of South Africa's HIV programme spending.
After receiving a temporary extension under a "bridge plan" last October, a US State Department official has now confirmed that a phased withdrawal of Pepfar funding will begin.
The official said the move was linked to South Africa's failure to make sufficient progress on policy requests made by the Trump administration. The US government said the decision was intended to encourage greater self-reliance and reduce dependence on American assistance, arguing that South Africa, as a middle-income country, is capable of funding its own health programmes.
Growing Diplomatic Tensions
Relations between Washington and Pretoria have deteriorated since President Donald Trump returned to office.
Soon after taking office, Trump signed an executive order alleging that South African policies undermined equal opportunities and contributed to violence against white landowners. The South African government has rejected those claims, defending its Black Economic Empowerment policies as necessary measures to address inequalities rooted in apartheid.
The White House has also criticised South Africa over its case against Israel at the International Court of Justice and its ties with Iran, citing these issues as reasons for ending further aid.
Trump has repeatedly claimed that a "white genocide" is taking place in South Africa, an allegation widely dismissed by experts and the South African government. The administration has also established a refugee programme for Afrikaners, descendants of European settlers, who are currently among the few refugee groups being admitted to the United States.
South Africa Responds
South Africa's health ministry said it had not been formally notified of the funding decision but stressed that the country had long been preparing for greater financial independence.
The ministry noted that while Pepfar funding supported important HIV-related services, life-saving antiretroviral medication is funded separately, with the majority paid for by the South African government.
Efforts to repair relations between the two countries have struggled in recent years. A high-profile meeting between Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa reportedly failed to ease tensions, while the US also boycotted a G20 meeting hosted by South Africa last year.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 June 2026

• 6 comments
• 247 views

webfact

June 20Jun 20

Trump Unveils Qatar-Gifted Jet for Air Force One

USA

Trump Unveils Qatar-Gifted Jet for Air Force One

President Donald Trump has unveiled a modified Boeing 747-8 that was donated by the Qatari government and will join the Air Force One fleet on an interim basis.

Get today's headlines by email

The aircraft, valued at an estimated $400 million (£300 million), has undergone extensive military modifications and is now preparing for commissioning flights, the final stage of testing before it begins transporting the president.
Speaking at Joint Base Andrews on Friday, Trump praised the aircraft, describing it as a “flying White House” featuring an unprecedented level of luxury.
Final Testing Before Service
According to the United States Air Force, the aircraft has received upgrades to security systems, mission communications, logistics support and other advanced technologies. Officials said any potential risks associated with the previously owned aircraft have been eliminated.
While most of the interior remains largely unchanged, the jet has been repainted in red, white, blue and gold.
The Air Force said the aircraft will undergo initial commissioning flights before entering presidential service.
Controversial Gift
The luxury Boeing 747-8 was donated by the Qatari royal family to the United States Department of Defense in May 2025 for use within the Air Force One fleet.
The donation sparked criticism from both Democrats and Republicans, including some Trump allies. Opponents argued that accepting such a valuable gift could create a conflict of interest and potentially raise constitutional concerns.
Federal law generally limits gifts accepted by US officials to $480. However, the White House has maintained that the transfer is legal and has said the aircraft will ultimately be donated to Trump’s presidential library after he leaves office.
Trump Praises Aircraft
During the unveiling, Trump highlighted the aircraft’s craftsmanship and materials.
“The workmanship of this plane, when you see it, you won't believe it,” he said, praising the quality of the woodwork, materials and engines.
He also thanked Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, calling the donation an honour.
Replacing an Aging Fleet
Before the addition of the Qatari jet, the Air Force One fleet consisted of two Boeing 747-200B aircraft that have been in service since 1990.
One of those aircraft appears to have been retired, with White House communications director Steven Cheung posting a farewell message alongside a photograph of the older jet.
The new aircraft will serve as a temporary solution while Boeing completes delivery of two VC-25B presidential aircraft. Those planes, intended to become the long-term Air Force One fleet, have faced years of production delays.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 June 2026

• 10 comments
• 250 views

webfact

June 20Jun 20

Poland Revokes Zelensky Honour Over UPA Army Name

Report

Poland Revokes Zelensky Honour Over UPA Army Name

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been stripped of Poland's highest state distinction, the Order of the White Eagle, after Kyiv named a military unit in honour of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), a World War Two-era nationalist force that remains deeply controversial in Poland.

Get today's headlines by email

Polish President Karol Nawrocki condemned the decision, describing it as "outrageous", "incomprehensible" and "deeply disappointing". He said the move damaged trust between the two countries but stressed it would not affect Poland's support for Ukraine in its war against Russia.
Conflicting Views of the UPA
The dispute centres on the UPA, which operated during the 1940s and 1950s. In Ukraine, many view the group as fighters for independence who resisted Soviet, Nazi German and Polish forces. The title "Heroes of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army" is regarded by many Ukrainians as a significant honour.
Poland, however, holds the UPA responsible for the mass killing of ethnic Poles in Volhynia between 1943 and 1945. Warsaw considers the massacres a genocide, with estimates suggesting around 100,000 ethnic Poles were killed.
In a video statement, Nawrocki said that for most Poles, the UPA is remembered primarily for crimes committed against Polish citizens during World War Two. He argued that Ukraine's decision to celebrate the group not only hurts historical memory but also undermines years of efforts to build mutual trust.
The Polish leader highlighted the support his country provided following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, noting that Poland welcomed millions of Ukrainian refugees.
EU Ambitions and Political Fallout
Nawrocki also linked the issue to Ukraine's ambitions to join the European Union, arguing that prospective members must be willing to confront difficult aspects of their history. He said the principles on which modern Europe was built leave no room for glorifying violence or totalitarianism.
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha sharply criticised the decision, calling it a "strategic mistake" that benefits Moscow. He also announced he would return an award granted to him by Poland in 2022, insisting that foreign leaders should not dictate Ukraine's interpretation of its own history.
The controversy comes as Ukraine continues its push toward EU membership, having taken part in the first stage of accession negotiations this week in Luxembourg.
Calls to Ease Tensions
Meanwhile, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk sought to ease tensions. Writing on social media, he warned that the dispute would please Russian President Vladimir Putin and urged both Zelensky and Nawrocki to reduce tensions rather than inflame them.
The Order of the White Eagle had been awarded to Zelensky in 2023 by former Polish President Andrzej Duda. Zelensky has not publicly commented on the decision to revoke the honour.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 June 2026

• 8 comments
• 279 views

webfact

June 20Jun 20

Train Driver Killed, 89 Injured in UK Rail Collision

UK

Train Driver Killed, 89 Injured in UK Rail Collision

A train driver has died and 89 people have been injured after two passenger trains collided near Bedford, prompting a major emergency response and a full investigation into the crash.

Get today's headlines by email

Emergency services remained at the scene into the night following the collision, which involved two East Midlands Railway services operating between the East Midlands and London.
Casualties and Emergency Response
The East of England Ambulance Service said 11 people suffered very serious injuries, while 22 others were seriously injured. A further 56 people sustained minor injuries and were either treated at the scene or taken to hospital.
Air ambulance helicopters were deployed after the crash occurred south of the Elstow interchange, between the A421 and A6 roads.
Authorities urged members of the public to avoid local hospital emergency departments unless they required urgent medical treatment.
Trains Involved
East Midlands Railway said the trains involved were the 4.40pm service from Corby to London St Pancras and the 3.50pm service from Nottingham to London St Pancras.
Rail services to and from London St Pancras on the operator's network were suspended for the remainder of the evening.
One of the trains involved was an Aurora train, a new East Midlands Railway fleet introduced into service last year.
Witness Describes Impact
Passenger Dr Peter Knapp, who was travelling in the front carriage of one of the trains, said there had been no warning before the collision.
He described a sudden impact that threw passengers to the floor, leaving some with bloodied faces as smoke filled the carriage. Knapp said people were crying and screaming in the aftermath as passengers attempted to escape.
He said he managed to open a door and leave the train, later discovering injuries to his legs and back.
Investigation Begins
The Rail Accident Investigation Branch confirmed inspectors had arrived at the scene and had begun gathering evidence.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said she was deeply saddened by the loss of life and the injuries suffered in the collision. She confirmed that police had declared a major incident and that a full investigation would take place.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer expressed condolences to the family of the driver who died and to those seriously injured, while thanking emergency services for their response.
Rail Industry Shock
The circumstances of the crash remain unclear. Investigators are expected to examine why one train had come to a halt and why the other failed to stop, despite modern railway safety systems.
The collision is likely to be regarded as one of the most serious rail accidents in Britain in recent years. It is the first fatal collision between two passenger trains on a British mainline railway this century and has resulted in the highest number of serious injuries in a UK rail accident for around two decades.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 June 2026

• 6 comments
• 247 views

webfact

June 20Jun 20

Key Republican Senators Break With Trump Over Iran Deal

USA

Key Republican Senators Break With Trump Over Iran Deal

Several prominent Republican senators have publicly questioned President Donald Trump's new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Iran, exposing divisions within the party over an agreement that supporters say could pave the way for diplomacy but critics argue offers Tehran major economic benefits with limited concessions.

Get today's headlines by email

The concerns centre on provisions that would provide Iran with access to frozen assets, sanctions relief and support for reconstruction efforts following years of conflict and economic pressure.
Economic Relief Draws Criticism
Among the most vocal critics is Ted Cruz, who warned that directing billions of dollars toward Iran would be a mistake.
Cruz said he supported Trump's overall approach to Iran but argued that providing financial assistance to the Iranian government risked empowering a regime hostile to the United States and its allies.
Tom Cotton, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, also expressed reservations, saying parts of the agreement appeared to move in the wrong direction. Cotton argued that the United States had spent years building leverage over Iran and should avoid weakening its position.
Critics have focused particularly on plans outlined in the memorandum to facilitate access to roughly $24 billion in Iranian assets and establish a $300 billion reconstruction and development fund. Trump has insisted the United States would not contribute money to the fund, saying any financing would come from other partners.
Concerns Over Sanctions and Security
Roger Wicker, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, sharply criticised the proposal, arguing that the scale of economic support discussed would exceed the benefits Iran received under the 2015 nuclear agreement negotiated during the administration of Barack Obama.
Wicker also opposed lifting sanctions, releasing Iranian assets and any measures that could limit Israel's ability to act against Hezbollah. He said Iran had not abandoned its longstanding hostility toward the United States and Israel and warned that additional funds could strengthen the regime.
Questions have also been raised about the future of the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route. Some lawmakers fear the agreement does not provide sufficient guarantees that Iran would refrain from disrupting traffic or imposing future restrictions.
John Cornyn said recent military pressure on Iran had achieved important objectives but warned the agreement could leave unresolved threats that might resurface later.
Nuclear Provisions Under Scrutiny
Another major source of concern is the memorandum's treatment of Iran's nuclear programme.
Several senators noted that the agreement does not require Iran to immediately eliminate its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Instead, Iran reiterates its commitment not to pursue nuclear weapons and agrees to negotiate the future of its nuclear materials.
Wicker argued that the agreement provides significant economic benefits before Iran makes substantial nuclear concessions. Bill Cassidy similarly questioned whether the arrangement adequately addresses Iran's nuclear ambitions.
Supporters See Path to Diplomacy
Not all Republicans oppose the framework.
Lindsey Graham acknowledged many of the concerns raised by fellow Republicans but said diplomacy offered a preferable alternative to continued conflict or a return to the previous stalemate.
Graham said the agreement should be viewed as an opening step rather than a final settlement and urged negotiators to pursue a strong deal while remaining prepared to abandon talks if necessary.
The administration has defended the memorandum, describing it as a framework for further negotiations rather than a completed agreement. Officials say any sanctions relief or access to assets is linked to specific nuclear commitments by Iran and that additional negotiations are expected before a final deal is reached.
Vice President JD Vance also defended the approach, arguing that Iran's weakened position created an opportunity to test whether diplomacy could change the country's behaviour and reduce tensions in the region.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 June 2026

• 12 comments
• 294 views

webfact

June 19Jun 19

Italy's Meloni Rebukes Trump Over ‘Begged for Photo’ Claim

Report

Italy's Meloni Rebukes Trump Over ‘Begged for Photo’ Claim

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has strongly rejected a claim by US President Donald Trump that she "begged" him for a photograph during this week's G7 summit, opening an unusually public dispute between two leaders once regarded as close political allies.

Get today's headlines by email

Meloni said she was "frankly stunned" by Trump's remarks, which he made during a telephone interview with Italian broadcaster La7. According to the broadcaster's translation, Trump said: "She begged me to take a photo with her; I felt sorry for her."
The Italian leader dismissed the account as entirely fabricated and used a message on Instagram to express her disbelief.
"I don't know why the US president behaves this way towards allies," Meloni said. "But there is one thing he needs to remember: neither I nor Italy ever beg."
The dispute has prompted a diplomatic response from Rome. Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani has cancelled a planned visit to the United States, while the White House has not publicly responded to requests for comment.
Relationship Under Strain
The exchange comes despite the two leaders appearing cordial at the G7 summit in Evian-les-Bains, France. Video footage from the gathering showed Trump and Meloni engaged in lengthy conversations, including a widely circulated clip of the pair speaking on a sofa during the summit.
After the meeting, Meloni told reporters there had been no disagreements between them and that their relationship remained unchanged.
However, tensions between the two have been growing in recent months, particularly since Trump's decision to launch military action against Iran. Meloni has openly opposed the conflict, creating a significant policy divide between Rome and Washington.
Once viewed as one of Trump's closest partners in Europe, Meloni attended his inauguration in January 2025 and was seen by many European leaders as a potential intermediary between the United States and the European Union.
Relations began to cool after disagreements over Iran and other international issues. Earlier this year, Trump questioned Meloni's political courage after she criticised US policy, while she also condemned his criticism of Pope Leo XIV as unacceptable.
Italian Leaders Rally Behind Meloni
Political figures across Italy quickly came to Meloni's defence following Trump's latest comments.
Italian President Sergio Mattarella reportedly contacted the prime minister to express support. Opposition politicians and coalition allies alike criticised Trump's remarks as disrespectful toward Italy and its elected leader.
Members of Meloni's governing coalition argued that the footage from the G7 summit contradicted Trump's description of events and suggested his criticism reflected broader frustrations with European leaders who have increasingly challenged US positions.
Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini voiced support for Meloni, declaring that attacks on her amounted to attacks on the country as a whole.
Wider European Shift
The disagreement reflects a broader change in Europe's approach to Trump. Several European leaders have become more willing to publicly oppose Washington on foreign policy issues, including the conflict with Iran.
Officials and diplomats across Europe have increasingly discussed strengthening the continent's strategic independence, amid concerns about relying too heavily on the United States.
Political analysts also note that some right-wing European parties that once viewed Trump as a natural ally have begun putting greater distance between themselves and his administration as they respond to changing public opinion ahead of elections across Europe.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 June 2026

• 63 comments
• 300 views

webfact

June 19Jun 19

UK Actress Accused in 320kg Meth Smuggling Plot

Australia

UK Actress Accused in 320kg Meth Smuggling Plot

British actress Emaa Hussen has been charged in Australia over an alleged attempt to import 320kg of methamphetamine concealed in shipments of charcoal from Ghana, authorities said.

Get today's headlines by email

Hussen, 34, appeared in a Sydney court on Thursday after being charged with attempting to import a commercial quantity of methamphetamine, an offence that carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.
The actress is best known for playing Naz in the spin-off of the TV show E20, which debuted in 2010. She also appeared alongside Jason Statham in the 2013 action film Hummingbird.
Drugs Allegedly Hidden in Charcoal
Police allege Hussen was involved in a scheme to import methamphetamine hidden inside bags of charcoal shipped from Ghana to Australia.
The Australian Federal Police said the drugs, with an estimated street value of A$296 million (US$208 million), were discovered after border authorities detected irregularities in two shipping containers that arrived at Sydney's Port Botany in April.
An X-ray examination of the containers, which were declared as carrying charcoal, revealed a white crystalline substance. Subsequent testing confirmed it was methamphetamine.
Authorities removed the drugs before allowing the shipment to continue to a storage facility in the western Sydney suburb of Girraween.


Picture courtesy of Australian Federal Police/Australian Border Force
Arrests in Sydney and Adelaide
Investigators allege Hussen later attended the storage facility and oversaw the unloading of the container by several men.
According to police, a number of bags were loaded into a vehicle and transported to a property in Blacktown, where officers subsequently arrested Hussen. Electronic devices and a notebook were also seized during the operation.
As part of the wider investigation, police arrested a 30-year-old woman and a 32-year-old man in Adelaide. The pair have been charged with allegedly using false identities to rent the Sydney storage units where the shipment was delivered.
Authorities Highlight Scale of Seizure
Detective Acting Superintendent Trevor Robinson of the Australian Federal Police said the seizure had prevented a large quantity of drugs from entering the community.
He said the haul, valued at A$296 million, could have resulted in an estimated 3.2 million street-level drug deals.
Australian Border Force Superintendent Jared Leighton said criminal groups frequently attempt to conceal illicit substances within legitimate cargo.
He said officers are trained to identify sophisticated concealment methods, including drugs hidden in everyday products such as charcoal.
Hussen was previously denied bail and is scheduled to return to court in August.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026

• 11 comments
• 280 views

webfact

June 19Jun 19

Israeli Strikes Kill 18 in Lebanon as Four IDF Soldiers Die

Middle East

Israeli Strikes Kill 18 in Lebanon as Four IDF Soldiers Die

Israeli air strikes across southern Lebanon killed at least 18 people overnight, Lebanese authorities said on Friday, while Israel's military reported that four of its soldiers had been killed in fighting with Hezbollah.

Get today's headlines by email

The Israeli military said it struck around 80 Hezbollah-linked targets and killed dozens of the group's fighters. The escalation came just one day after the United States and Iran signed an agreement intended to end hostilities across the Middle East, including a permanent ceasefire in Lebanon.
Fighting Continues Despite Agreement
The US-Iran accord calls for an end to hostilities on multiple fronts and stresses respect for Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Despite the agreement, both Israel and Hezbollah have continued military operations, raising doubts about whether the broader ceasefire framework can hold.
Israel has maintained that its campaign against Hezbollah is separate from its conflict with Iran and has said it does not plan to withdraw troops from southern Lebanon.
Lebanon's state news agency described the overnight attacks in the Nabatieh district as among the heaviest bombardments of the war. The country's health ministry reported 18 deaths and 33 injuries, with several buildings damaged.
Hezbollah said it had carried out an ambush against Israeli forces in southern Lebanon, destroying three tanks with guided missiles and targeting troops with rocket and artillery fire.
Heavy Human Toll
Lebanon became involved in the wider regional conflict after Hezbollah launched attacks on Israel following a strike that killed Iran's supreme leader.
Israel responded with a large-scale air campaign and a ground presence in southern Lebanon, saying it aimed to push Hezbollah fighters away from its northern border.
According to Lebanon's health ministry, at least 3,912 people have been killed and 11,699 wounded since the latest phase of the conflict began. The dead include women and children.
About one million people remain displaced, while numerous communities in southern Lebanon have been destroyed.
Hezbollah has said it will continue its attacks as long as Israeli forces remain in Lebanese territory.
Political Tensions Grow
The deaths of the four Israeli soldiers prompted strong reactions from members of Israel's government.
National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called for intensified action, saying "all of Lebanon must burn" and arguing that Israel's security could not be subject to negotiations.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot urged Israel to respect the agreement and called on Washington to pressure the Israeli government to comply with its terms.
The US-Iran deal signed on Thursday includes provisions covering Iran's nuclear programme, sanctions relief and a commitment to pursue a final settlement within 60 days, with the possibility of an extension.
US-Israel Differences Emerge
A new round of talks planned for Friday was postponed after US Vice-President JD Vance cancelled a scheduled trip to Switzerland.
Vance has publicly criticised some members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet for opposing the agreement. He specifically named Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich as critics and questioned what alternatives they proposed to the current diplomatic effort.
Netanyahu, meanwhile, emphasised the importance of Israel's relationship with Washington, noting that the United States had stood "shoulder to shoulder" with Israel during the conflict with Iran.
Recent reports, however, have suggested growing friction between Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump over Israel's conduct in Lebanon.
US officials have previously stated that while Lebanon is covered by the ceasefire framework, Israel's withdrawal from Lebanese territory is not a requirement of the agreement and that Israel retains the right to act in self-defence.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026

• 161 comments
• 377 views

webfact

June 19Jun 19

How Trump’s Iran Deal Differs From Obama’s

Analysis

How Trump’s Iran Deal Differs From Obama’s

With President Donald Trump announcing a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Iran, comparisons have quickly emerged with the landmark nuclear agreement negotiated by President Barack Obama in 2015. While both arrangements involve Iran and sanctions relief, the similarities largely end there.

Get today's headlines by email

ANALYSIS
The most important distinction is that Obama’s agreement — the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — was a completed nuclear accord. Negotiated among Iran, the United States, China, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, Germany and the European Union, it imposed specific restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.
One Is a Nuclear Deal, the Other Is Not
Trump’s agreement is not a final nuclear deal. The MOU primarily establishes a framework to halt the current conflict, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and launch further nuclear negotiations. While Iran has again pledged not to obtain a nuclear weapon, details on verification and enforcement remain unresolved and are expected to be negotiated during a 60-day follow-up process.
As a result, the MOU resembles a ceasefire and negotiating framework more than a completed nuclear accord.
Diplomacy Versus Military Pressure
The paths leading to the two agreements were markedly different.
The Obama administration spent roughly 20 months conducting negotiations that culminated in the JCPOA.
The Trump administration also pursued diplomacy but ultimately concluded that military action was necessary. In July 2025, the United States launched strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities, which experts said set back Tehran’s nuclear programme significantly.
Later, Washington and Israel conducted Operation Epic Fury, targeting nuclear infrastructure and military assets. Iran responded by disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and launching attacks against U.S. interests and regional partners. Israel meanwhile remained engaged in conflict with Iran-backed groups in Lebanon.
The fighting carried substantial costs. Thirteen U.S. service members were reported killed during Operation Epic Fury, while the overall conflict has been estimated to have cost American taxpayers more than $25 billion.
What Iran Received
Both agreements offered economic incentives to Iran, but the terms differed substantially.
Under the JCPOA, Iran gained access to frozen assets and received relief from U.S., European Union and United Nations sanctions. Restrictions on oil exports were eased, the Iranian central bank regained broader access to the global financial system and previously seized funds, including $1.7 billion, were returned.
In exchange, Iran agreed to major nuclear restrictions. These included reducing the number of operating centrifuges, limiting uranium enrichment activities, shrinking its stockpile of enriched uranium, modifying a heavy-water reactor and accepting inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Critics argued that some inspection provisions were insufficient and that the agreement’s limits would eventually expire.
Trump’s MOU also includes sanctions relief measures, the easing of oil restrictions and a proposed $300 billion reconstruction fund involving regional partners. However, much of the promised relief depends on future negotiations that have yet to produce a broader nuclear agreement.
In return, Iran agreed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Critics note that this largely restores conditions that existed before the conflict. Moreover, the MOU leaves open questions about the future governance of the strategic waterway. One provision states that the strait will remain toll-free for 60 days, after which Iran and Oman will discuss future administration and maritime services.
How the Deals Are Being Sold
When Obama unveiled the JCPOA, he described it as the strongest nuclear non-proliferation agreement ever negotiated. He acknowledged that Iran would receive substantial economic benefits and argued that, despite its imperfections, the agreement was preferable to military conflict.
Trump has similarly promoted his MOU, saying it achieved more than his administration initially sought.
At the same time, he has emphasized the economic risks of allowing the conflict to continue. After previously dismissing Iran’s leverage, Trump said prolonged disruption could have triggered severe economic consequences, particularly through energy markets.
Speaking after the G7 summit in France, Trump said concerns about economic damage influenced his decision to pursue an agreement, noting that financial markets reacted positively whenever prospects for peace improved. He also warned that a prolonged crisis could have risked pushing the United States into an economic downturn.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026

• 15 comments
• 294 views

webfact

June 19Jun 19

US-Iran Talks Cancelled, Casting Doubt on Truce

Iranian Conflict

US-Iran Talks Cancelled, Casting Doubt on Truce

Switzerland has confirmed that planned talks between US and Iranian negotiators aimed at ending the Middle East conflict will not take place on Friday, adding fresh uncertainty over efforts to secure a lasting peace.

Get today's headlines by email

The development came after US Vice President JD Vance abandoned plans to travel to Geneva. The White House said preparations had been made for Vance and the US delegation to depart once arrangements were finalised, but acknowledged the difficulties involved in organising the negotiations.
“The logistics of these negotiations have never been simple or predictable,” a White House spokesperson said on Thursday night.
Swiss officials said the meeting, which had been scheduled at the resort of Bürgenstock Resort, would not go ahead, but provided no further explanation.
Uncertainty over next steps
Iran did not immediately comment on the cancellation. Earlier, Tehran had indicated it was prepared to begin technical discussions following a 14-point agreement reached on Wednesday that extended a fragile ceasefire for at least 60 days.
According to Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency, Iranian negotiators wanted evidence that Washington was implementing the interim agreement before proceeding. There had also been no confirmation that Iran’s delegation would travel to Switzerland.
US officials had previously suggested a formal signing ceremony for the agreement could take place in Switzerland. However, Iran’s Foreign Ministry questioned the need for such an event after both countries’ presidents had already signed the accord.
Deal faces political and regional challenges
The conflict began on 28 February with US and Israeli air strikes on Iran. The war has reportedly killed at least 7,000 people, disrupted energy markets and unsettled global investors.
Although the agreement seeks to reduce tensions, Israel has distanced itself from the US-Iran deal and continued military operations against the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement in Lebanon. Fresh Israeli strikes on Friday reportedly killed at least 15 people, according to Lebanon’s state news agency.
The accord calls for a permanent end to the war in Lebanon, but Israel has said it does not intend to withdraw from occupied areas and has published a map showing an expanded security zone.
The issue has deepened tensions between US President Donald Trump and Israel, with Trump increasingly critical of Israeli operations in Lebanon.
Nuclear negotiations remain difficult
The agreement provides Iran with sanctions relief, access to frozen assets worth tens of billions of dollars and immediate waivers for oil exports. It also establishes a $300 billion reconstruction fund and gives negotiators 60 days to reach a broader settlement on Iran’s nuclear programme.
Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, said Trump signed the agreement “out of desperation” and warned that future nuclear talks would be challenging.
“If the American side wants to be too demanding, we will not accept it,” he said.
Under the deal, Iran reaffirmed that it would not seek nuclear weapons and agreed to inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. It also accepted the dilution of its highly enriched uranium stockpile within the country, rather than transferring it abroad as Washington had sought.
Economic impact in focus
The cost of the conflict is also attracting scrutiny. The US Defence Department has reportedly told lawmakers it requires $80 billion to cover war-related expenses and other funding needs.
Meanwhile, oil prices fell on Friday as shipping resumed through the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global energy supplies. Iran said it would continue to oversee traffic through the strait alongside Oman and plans to introduce service fees for vessels after the current negotiation period ends.
US officials remain hopeful that upcoming talks could produce a stronger nuclear agreement than the 2015 accord that Trump withdrew from during his first term. Critics, however, argue that Iran has emerged from the conflict in a stronger position, having resisted military pressure, retained influence over the Strait of Hormuz and secured significant sanctions relief.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026

• 29 comments
• 300 views

webfact

June 19Jun 19