Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.
Andy Burnham has won the Makerfield by-election with a commanding majority, strengthening expectations that he could mount a challenge to Prime Minister and Labour leader Keir Starmer in the near future.

Get today's headlines by email

The Greater Manchester mayor secured 54% of the vote, defeating Reform UK candidate Robert Kenyon by 9,231 votes. Reform UK finished with 35%, while the hardline Restore Britain party took 7%. Turnout reached 58.75%, six percentage points higher than at the 2024 general election, with 45,510 ballots cast.
Burnham Calls Result a Turning Point
In his victory speech, Burnham said the outcome could mark a significant moment in British politics, arguing that voters had backed change and greater power for regions outside Westminster.
He described the result as Labour's “final chance to change”, warning that the party could not expect another opportunity if it failed to respond to voters' concerns. Burnham said the country needed a politics based on unity and hope rather than growing division, and pledged to work toward a fairer political and economic system.
Addressing supporters in Wigan, he said many voters had told him they felt neglected and believed the country worked for other people and places rather than communities such as theirs. He argued the by-election result demonstrated a desire for change and stronger representation for northern England and other areas that feel overlooked by Westminster.
Leadership Speculation Intensifies
The victory is expected to increase speculation about Burnham's future ambitions. Following what many observers regard as one of the most consequential by-elections in recent British politics, he is widely seen as a potential contender should a Labour leadership contest be triggered.
Reports suggest some of Burnham's allies believe Starmer should first be given an opportunity to outline a timetable for any possible departure rather than face immediate pressure from within the party.
Burnham's result is likely to strengthen his standing among Labour MPs and members. He won more than 6,000 votes beyond the combined total of Reform UK and Restore Britain, while attracting support from voters who had previously backed other parties. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Greens together received just 3% of the vote, compared with a combined 22% in the constituency at the 2024 general election.
Return to Westminster
Known as the “King of the North”, Burnham first entered Parliament 25 years ago and served in the governments of former prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. His victory marks a return to Westminster nine years after leaving Parliament.
The by-election was triggered when former Labour MP Josh Simons stepped down to allow Burnham to contest the seat.
New Challenge Ahead
Burnham's election victory now creates another challenge for Labour: retaining the Greater Manchester mayoralty. A by-election for the post, involving around two million voters, is expected to take place on 30 July and is likely to become a major contest against Reform UK.
Meanwhile, Starmer continues to resist calls to step down, insisting he intends to fight any leadership challenge. He also faces pressure from former health secretary Wes Streeting, who has signalled he may support efforts to trigger a leadership contest.
Senior Labour figure Lisa Nandy described Burnham's victory as "history in the making", praising his willingness to confront difficult issues and arguing that his return to Westminster would strengthen Labour's efforts to deliver change.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Britain’s Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are expected to return to the United Kingdom with their children next month, marking the family’s first visit to Britain together in four years, according to British media reports.

Get today's headlines by email

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are expected to travel with their two children, Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five. The visit has been reported by the BBC, the The Daily Telegraph and ITV News.
Royal Rift Continues
Harry and Meghan relocated to North America in 2020 after stepping back from royal duties. Since then, relations between the couple and the British royal family have been strained, with disagreements playing out publicly through interviews, documentaries and Harry’s memoir.
The Sussexes have previously said their decision to leave Britain was influenced by intense tabloid scrutiny, racism within institutions, online abuse, family tensions and a desire to achieve financial independence.
Harry’s Recent UK Visits
While Meghan has not returned frequently to Britain, Harry has made several solo visits in recent years. He attended the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022 and the coronation of King Charles III in 2023.
In September last year, Harry met his father in England in their first face-to-face meeting in 19 months, fueling speculation that relations between the two sides of the family could be improving. His most recent visit came in January, when he attended court proceedings linked to a lawsuit against the publisher of the Daily Mail over allegations of unlawful information gathering.
Harry has repeatedly expressed a desire to repair relations with his family. However, it remains unclear whether King Charles will meet Archie and Lilibet during the upcoming trip. The King last saw his grandchildren in person in 2022, when the Sussex family visited Britain for celebrations marking the late Queen’s Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II.
Invictus Games Anniversary Event
The reported visit is expected to coincide with an event marking one year until the next Invictus Games, the international competition founded by Harry more than a decade ago for wounded, injured and sick service personnel and veterans.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026
webfact
webfact
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a federal law barring unlawful users of controlled substances from possessing firearms cannot be applied broadly to all marijuana users, marking a significant victory for gun-rights advocates and cannabis users.

Get today's headlines by email

In a 9-0 decision, the court found that the federal government could not constitutionally prosecute a Texas man solely because he used marijuana several times a week while owning a firearm. The ruling narrows the scope of a longstanding federal gun prohibition and places new limits on how prosecutors can enforce it.
Narrow Ruling on Drug Use and Firearms
Writing for the court, Justice Neil Gorsuch said unlawful drug use by itself is not sufficient justification for permanently stripping someone of their gun rights or sending them to prison.
Gorsuch acknowledged that marijuana or other drug use can, in some circumstances, make an individual dangerous. However, he noted that the government did not attempt to show that the defendant in this case posed any such threat.
The opinion warned that allowing the government to broadly classify groups as dangerous and deny them firearm ownership could undermine protections guaranteed by the Second Amendment.
Texas Case at the Center
The case centered on Ali Hemani, a Texas resident who admitted using marijuana every other day while keeping a Glock 9mm pistol at home.
Federal authorities charged Hemani with unlawful firearm possession by a drug user. He was not accused of being intoxicated or actively carrying the weapon when he was arrested.
A federal appeals court previously dismissed the indictment, concluding that applying the law to Hemani violated the Constitution. The Supreme Court agreed and upheld that decision.
Other Restrictions Remain Intact
The court emphasized that its ruling was limited and does not invalidate other firearm restrictions contained in federal law.
Gorsuch noted that bans on gun possession by drug addicts, intoxicated individuals, or people deemed dangerous to themselves or others remain unaffected.
The decision also would not have altered the prosecution of Hunter Biden, whose case involved admitted drug addiction while possessing a firearm.
According to the Justice Department, federal prosecutors bring roughly 300 cases each year in which the drug-user firearm ban is a primary charge.
Reactions From Advocacy Groups
The ruling drew praise from the American Civil Liberties Union, which argued that the government should not criminalize gun ownership solely because a person uses marijuana.
The organization said the decision protects the rights of millions of Americans, noting that marijuana use is common despite remaining illegal under federal law.
The National Rifle Association also welcomed the ruling, describing it as an important victory for gun owners and Second Amendment protections.
Gun-control advocates expressed disappointment but said the court reaffirmed lawmakers' authority to restrict firearm access for certain categories of people when public safety concerns are present.
Marijuana has been legalized in some form in more than 40 U.S. states, although it remains prohibited under federal law.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Brexit has reduced UK exports to the European Union by an estimated 12%, with most of the decline linked to the country's departure from the EU single market rather than its exit from the customs union, according to new research.

Get today's headlines by email

The analysis, conducted by economists John Springford and Anton Spisak of the Centre for European Reform (CER), comes as debate over the UK's future relationship with the EU gains renewed political attention nearly a decade after the 2016 referendum.
Exports to EU Remain Below Pre-Brexit Expectations
Their findings indicate that UK services exports to the EU are around 7% lower than they would have been had Britain remained a member of the bloc, while goods exports are 16% lower.
Using trade data and economic modelling, the researchers conclude that around 10 percentage points of the overall 12% decline in exports can be attributed to leaving the single market.
They argue that regulatory barriers introduced after Brexit, including certification requirements and checks to ensure compliance with EU standards, have had a greater effect on trade than customs-related obstacles.
Single Market Departure Seen as Main Factor
According to the study, sectors experiencing the largest losses include travel, finance and insurance, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and agrifood.
The researchers also suggest that previous estimates may have understated the impact on services exports. Their assessment takes into account a rise in services trade among EU member states following the Covid-19 pandemic, growth from which the UK has largely been excluded.
Political Debate Over Future EU Ties
The findings emerge as Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves continue to emphasise the importance of improving trade relations with the EU. A UK-EU summit is scheduled for next month.
However, the government has maintained its position that it will not seek to rejoin either the single market or the customs union, nor restore freedom of movement.
At the same time, potential future Labour leadership contenders Andy Burnham and Wes Streeting have both indicated support for eventual UK re-entry into the EU.
The Liberal Democrats have also shifted their stance. Party leader Ed Davey recently announced that the party would campaign for the UK to rejoin the single market, moving beyond its previous support for customs union membership alone.
Customs Union Benefits Viewed as Limited
The CER study argues that rejoining the customs union would provide only modest economic gains. While it would remove the need for businesses to comply with complex "rules of origin" requirements governing tariff-free trade, it would do little to address the challenges facing the services sector.
The researchers found that relatively few current exports are affected by those rules, suggesting the overall boost to trade would be limited.
They also note that customs union membership would restrict the UK's ability to negotiate independent trade agreements, since members must apply the EU's external tariff regime.
By contrast, regaining access to the single market could recover a much larger share of lost trade. However, the economists say such a move would involve significant political compromises, including accepting freedom of movement, contributing to the EU budget and aligning with EU regulations without direct influence over their creation.
The report also finds little evidence that stronger trade relationships with non-EU countries have compensated for reduced trade with Europe, contrary to arguments made by some Brexit supporters before the referendum.
Its conclusions are broadly in line with other studies estimating that Brexit has reduced UK economic output by between 4% and 8%.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Former US President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama officially opened the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago on Thursday, marking the culmination of a project more than a decade in the making since Obama left office.

Get today's headlines by email

The 19.3-acre campus in Chicago's South Side combines the functions of a presidential museum and archive with community-focused facilities, including a playground, basketball court, recording studio and public library.
Community at the Heart of New Chicago Campus
Located in the Jackson Park neighbourhood near the Obamas' former home, the centre was designed to serve as both a reflection of their time in the White House and a gathering place for local residents and visitors.
"For me, this centre could not be any place else," Obama said during the opening ceremony. He described the project as a way of thanking the city and surrounding communities that helped shape his life and career.
A Different Vision for a Presidential Library
Obama said the centre was created around the idea that people can come together to drive change, stressing that it was not intended to be a traditional presidential monument.
Instead, he described it as a place where people could learn, connect and participate in activities ranging from art and music to sports and recreation.
Michelle Obama highlighted the importance of community engagement, encouraging visitors to spend time together, use the public spaces and build new relationships.
She said the centre reflects democratic values through neighbourly interaction and shared responsibility for public spaces.
Former Presidents and World Leaders Attend
The opening ceremony drew a wide range of guests, including former US presidents George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Joe Biden.
Also attending were former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, both of whom served during Obama's presidency.
Valerie Jarrett, chief executive of the Obama Foundation and a longtime Obama adviser, said the centre was not intended as a monument to the former president and first lady, but rather as a tribute to the people who supported their journey.
Music and Politics Feature in Celebrations
The event included performances by a range of artists, including Jennifer Hudson, Christina Aguilera, John Legend, Common, Marc Anthony, Bono, The Edge, Bruce Springsteen and Stevie Wonder.
Eddie Vedder also performed an original song created with young participants from the Guitars Over Guns programme.
Current US President Donald Trump was not invited to attend. Although he was not mentioned directly during the event, several speakers, including the Obamas, referred to political and cultural divisions in the United States and expressed concerns about the state of American democracy.
Spectators attending the opening said they welcomed the decision to locate the centre on Chicago's South Side and thanked the Obamas for bringing the project to the area.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026

webfact
webfact
The United States has ended its naval blockade of Iran after Washington and Tehran signed an agreement aimed at ending the regional conflict, even as Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, said President Donald Trump had pursued the deal “out of desperation”.

Get today's headlines by email

US Central Command confirmed that enforcement of the blockade had ceased in line with presidential instructions. The move follows the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) designed to halt hostilities across the Middle East.
Blockade Lifted Following Agreement
Under the agreement, military operations are to stop immediately on all fronts and the strategically important Strait of Hormuz is to reopen.
In a written statement carried by Iranian media, Khamenei said he had initially opposed the agreement but ultimately allowed it to proceed after receiving assurances from Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Iran Signals Support but Expresses Reservations
He said officials involved in negotiations had acted with “sincere concern and goodwill” and argued that Trump had used every available form of leverage to secure the deal. While noting that future face-to-face talks between Tehran and Washington were expected, Khamenei stressed that such negotiations would not signify acceptance of the US position.
The statement marked the first public response from the supreme leader since the agreement was announced.
Khamenei has not appeared publicly since taking office in March after the death of his father and predecessor, Ali Khamenei, who was killed during US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February that helped trigger the wider conflict.
Further Negotiations Planned
US Vice-President JD Vance defended the agreement, saying Iran would not receive sanctions relief or financial benefits unless it fully complied with its commitments.
According to Vance, the MoU has already entered into force, beginning a 60-day period of additional negotiations. He said he was likely to travel to Switzerland for technical discussions but added that arrangements were still being worked out.
An official signing ceremony had been scheduled in Switzerland on Friday. However, mediator Pakistan said the event was cancelled because the agreement had already been signed remotely. Despite that change, US and Iranian officials are still expected to meet in Switzerland for further talks.
The MoU requires Iran to demonstrate compliance, including eliminating its stockpile of enriched uranium and showing that it will no longer support proxy groups in the region, before receiving any benefits.
Israeli Concerns and Ongoing Violence
Trump did not directly address Khamenei’s remarks but said he expected a ceasefire to take hold across the region, including between Israel and the Iran-backed organization Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasised the importance of maintaining close ties with Washington, saying the US had stood “shoulder to shoulder” with Israel during the conflict.
His comments came amid criticism of the agreement from members of his cabinet. Responding to those concerns, Vance argued that opponents of the deal had failed to offer a workable alternative. In separate remarks, he identified Israeli ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich as critics of the accord.
The 14-point agreement includes commitments to end fighting across the region, lift the blockade, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and establish a $300 billion reconstruction and development fund for Iran, although the United States is not obligated to contribute.
Despite the agreement, violence has continued. Israel and Hezbollah have both carried out attacks since the deal was announced. Strikes reported in Lebanon on Thursday killed three people.
Israel maintains that its campaign against Hezbollah is separate from its conflict with Iran, while Hezbollah has rejected the terms of the US-Iran agreement.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026
webfact
webfact
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Washington will carry out a six-month review of its military presence in Europe as it pushes NATO allies to take greater responsibility for the continent’s defense.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking on Thursday, Hegseth said the United States would continue pressing allies to increase defense spending and warned that future US contributions to NATO could depend on whether member states meet agreed spending targets.
Review of US Forces
Hegseth said the Pentagon would undertake what he described as a “real review” of US forces stationed across Europe.
The assessment will examine the benefits of maintaining American troops on the continent and is intended to support a shift toward greater European responsibility for regional security.
He said the review would help ensure that NATO is moving “fast and irreversibly” toward a model in which European allies take the lead in defending Europe.
Pressure on NATO Spending
The defense secretary reiterated Washington’s call for NATO members to increase military spending, arguing that the United States should not shoulder a disproportionate share of the alliance’s defense burden.
Hegseth said the US would be “doubling down” on efforts to encourage allies to spend more on defense.
He added that US payments to NATO could be tied to whether other countries meet their defense spending commitments.
“Where other allies do not spend with urgency, our dues, contributions will go down,” he said. “NATO will be a two-way street.”
End of ‘Free-Riding’
Hegseth said the era of allies relying heavily on US defense support was coming to an end.
“America cannot care for or pay more for Europe’s defence than our allies do,” he said, arguing that European governments must increase their own investments in security.
His remarks reflect the Trump administration’s broader push for NATO members to contribute more to collective defense and reduce dependence on Washington.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026
webfact
webfact
US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian have signed an initial agreement aimed at ending the conflict between the United States and Iran, marking a significant step toward a broader peace settlement.

Get today's headlines by email

The accord, contained in a 14-point memorandum of understanding, establishes a framework for further negotiations over the next 60 days. During that period, the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz is set to reopen, restoring access to one of the world's most important maritime oil transit routes.
Trump was shown signing the document as part of the announcement, while representatives from both countries are expected to continue discussions aimed at reaching a final and more comprehensive agreement.
Further Talks Planned
Under the memorandum, Washington and Tehran will engage in additional negotiations over the coming two months in an effort to convert the initial deal into a lasting settlement.
An official signing ceremony involving US and Iranian representatives had been scheduled to take place in Switzerland on Friday. However, it remains unclear whether that event will proceed following the signing of the initial agreement.
Oil Prices Fall
Financial markets reacted positively to news of the deal.
The price of Brent crude oil fell by around 1.5% on the day, with a barrel trading at approximately $78 (£59). The decline reflected investor expectations that the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz could ease concerns over disruptions to global energy supplies.
Reconstruction Fund and Nuclear Questions
The agreement also includes plans for a $300 billion reconstruction programme for Iran, intended to support the country's recovery following the conflict.
However, major questions remain unresolved, particularly regarding Iran's nuclear activities. While the memorandum outlines broad commitments and future discussions, it does not provide detailed answers on how Tehran's nuclear programme will be addressed in a final settlement.
Concerns Over Strategic Leverage
The deal has prompted debate over the long-term implications of reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
BBC international editor Jeremy Bowen noted that the agreement may reinforce the perception within Iran's leadership that the waterway can be used as a powerful strategic tool, given its importance to global shipping and energy markets.
Negotiators now face the challenge of turning the initial framework into a durable agreement while addressing unresolved issues that could determine the success of any lasting peace deal.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Senate Republicans are voicing growing concerns over President Trump’s agreement with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for sanctions relief, warning that the deal could strengthen Tehran while offering too little in return for the United States.

Get today's headlines by email

The criticism comes after more than 100 days of conflict involving the United States, Israel and Iran, a campaign that cost the lives of 13 American service members and required more than $100 billion in military spending, according to lawmakers.
Concerns Over Sanctions Relief
Several Republican senators argue that the agreement provides Iran with significant economic benefits while failing to secure major concessions on nuclear activity, missile development or regional influence.
Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana sharply criticized the outcome, describing it as a major foreign policy mistake. He argued that Iran’s nuclear ambitions remain intact and warned that Tehran had learned it could use threats to the Strait of Hormuz as leverage in future negotiations.
Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas also questioned the wisdom of easing sanctions, saying that providing financial relief to Iran’s leadership could have serious consequences.
The memorandum of understanding would immediately ease restrictions on Iranian oil exports and could lead to the release of frozen Iranian assets held abroad, a prospect that has alarmed some lawmakers.
Questions Over Nuclear and Missile Programs
Critics say the agreement leaves major uncertainties surrounding Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities.
According to senators who reviewed the deal, it does not explicitly prohibit Iran from continuing uranium enrichment. It also leaves unresolved questions about Tehran’s future role in administering traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
Lawmakers further pointed to intelligence assessments indicating that Iran retains much of its missile capability despite weeks of U.S. and Israeli strikes. A classified CIA assessment reportedly found that Iran still possesses roughly 70% of its pre-war missile stockpile and 75% of its mobile missile launchers.
Sen. John Cornyn of Texas argued that the deal fails to address Iran’s support for regional proxy groups and could provide additional resources that might be used to fund them.
Under the agreement, Iran is prevented from imposing tolls on vessels using the Strait of Hormuz for 60 days. After that period, Oman and Iran are expected to negotiate arrangements governing the waterway’s future administration and maritime services.
Debate Over the Cost of the Conflict
Some Republicans have questioned whether the military campaign achieved enough to justify its cost.
Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said the agreement appeared weak and suggested that the benefits currently outlined do not match the financial and human toll of the conflict.
He noted that the United States initially sought to eliminate Iran’s nuclear capabilities but has since shifted toward negotiations that leave many issues unresolved.
Cassidy compared the new agreement to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the nuclear accord negotiated under former President Barack Obama. Trump withdrew from that agreement in 2018, arguing at the time that it provided economic benefits to Iran without adequately restricting its activities.
The new memorandum also outlines plans for the United States and regional partners to develop a reconstruction and economic development programme for Iran valued at at least $300 billion.
Supporters See Opportunity for Diplomacy
Not all Republicans oppose the agreement.
Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio has defended the deal, arguing that reopening the Strait of Hormuz could lower global energy prices and reduce costs for American consumers.
Speaking on the Senate floor, Moreno said the agreement could create a path toward a lasting arrangement that prevents Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a close Trump ally, acknowledged that reaching a comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran may be difficult but argued that diplomacy remains worth pursuing.
He said the memorandum helps maintain the suspension of hostilities and provides an opportunity to seek a broader settlement on Iran’s nuclear programme.
Pressure Builds for Next Phase
Republican lawmakers say the administration now faces significant pressure to secure a stronger agreement within the next 60 days.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said lawmakers need a clearer understanding of the deal’s details and what benefits it delivers to the United States before making a final judgment.
Several Republican senators and senior aides also said they were unaware of any plans to provide a full Senate briefing on the agreement or on the negotiations expected to follow.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Ukraine carried out its largest attack on Moscow since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, sending nearly 200 drones towards the Russian capital and triggering fires, flight disruptions and injuries across the surrounding region.

Get today's headlines by email

According to Moscow region governor Andrei Vorobyov, 17 people were wounded in the attack. Russia’s Defence Ministry said almost 1,000 Ukrainian drones and four cruise missiles were intercepted and destroyed across the country over a 24-hour period. In the southern Rostov region, an oil depot was hit and one person was killed.
Moscow Region Hit by Mass Drone Strike
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described the strikes on the Moscow region as “long-range sanctions”, a term Kyiv has increasingly used for attacks deep inside Russian territory.


video screenshot

Zelensky said the operation was a response to a major Russian assault on Kyiv last week that set a prominent religious landmark on fire. He argued that Russia must take diplomatic steps to end the conflict.
“We don’t want this war and have never wanted it,” Zelensky said. “But if Ukraine burns, your Moscow will burn too.”
Refinery Fire and Airport Disruptions
One of the main targets was the Kapotnya oil refinery in south-east Moscow, which was struck for the third time in a month and for the second time this week. Thick black smoke rose above the facility as fires broke out. Videos circulating on social media appeared to show the top of a large oil storage tank being blown high into the air by an explosion.
A nearby shopping centre also caught fire, reportedly after drone debris fell onto the building. Several residential tower blocks in the area were evacuated as a precaution.
The attack caused major disruption to air travel. Moscow’s four airports were temporarily closed, while more than 500 flights were delayed or cancelled.
Despite restrictions imposed by Russian authorities on publishing images from strike sites, numerous videos appeared online showing drones crossing the sky in daylight and explosions near industrial areas on the outskirts of the capital.
Ukraine Expands Long-Range Capabilities
More than four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, fighting continues along the front line. Kyiv’s growing ability to strike targets deep inside Russia reflects Zelensky’s stated goal of bringing the consequences of the war closer to the Russian public.
Drone attacks on Moscow, located roughly 500 kilometres from the Ukrainian border, have become increasingly common since Ukraine began expanding its long-range strike capabilities. The first successful attacks on the capital took place in 2023, but involved far fewer drones than recent operations.
Russia has since strengthened air defences around Moscow, although Ukrainian attacks have also grown in scale and sophistication.
Russia and Ukraine Trade Fresh Blows
At the same time, Ukrainian officials said Russia launched more than 200 drones and several ballistic missiles against Ukraine overnight.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is attending a summit with Southeast Asian leaders in the city of Kazan, has not publicly commented on the attack.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha used social media to address residents of Moscow directly, saying Russians should ask Putin when he intends to bring the war to an end.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Australia's federal police have launched an investigation into allegations that Israeli forces raped, tortured and abused activists detained after attempting to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza by sea.
The inquiry was announced after four female activists from the Global Sumud flotilla met Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong and senior government officials, including police representatives, in Canberra on Monday.
Detentions After Aid Mission
The activists were among hundreds of people detained by Israeli forces on 18 May when a Gaza-bound humanitarian flotilla was intercepted.
Eleven Australians were among those taken into custody during the operation.
Following the meeting with officials, activist Juliet Lamont said the government had committed to pursuing an independent investigation into allegations including kidnapping, abuse, rape and torture.
"They have committed to an independent investigation into our allegations of kidnapping, abuse, rape, torture," Lamont told reporters.
Police Confirm Inquiries
The Australian Federal Police (AFP) later confirmed it had begun examining the claims.
In a statement, the AFP said it had "begun inquiries into allegations made by a representative of the group" and would handle the matter using a victim-centred, trauma-informed approach.
The force said further updates would be provided at an appropriate time.
A spokesperson for Wong's office said the meeting gave the minister and officials an opportunity to hear directly from the activists about their experiences during detention.
Calls for Independent Investigation
According to the spokesperson, Wong has raised the allegations with Israel on several occasions and expects an independent and transparent investigation into the claims.
The Australian government also criticised the conduct of Israeli authorities and referred to the actions of Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has previously been sanctioned by Australia.
Ben-Gvir drew widespread criticism after posting a video showing detained activists kneeling with their hands tied behind their backs while he taunted them.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later said the minister's conduct was not in line with Israel's values and norms.
Israel Rejects Allegations
The Israeli embassy in Australia dismissed the accusations, saying there was no credible evidence to support claims of physical or sexual assault.
In comments reported by the ABC, the embassy said no formal complaints had been submitted and described the activists as "professional provocateurs".
The embassy also said the allegations had already been proven false.
The activists, however, maintain that serious abuses occurred during their detention and continue to seek an independent investigation into the incident.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026
webfact
webfact
The BBC has announced plans to cut 550 jobs across its news, nations, television and radio operations as part of a wider programme aimed at saving £500 million over the next two years.

Get today's headlines by email

The measures, outlined to staff on Wednesday, mark the first phase of a cost-cutting strategy that is expected to eliminate between 1,800 and 2,000 positions across the corporation. The broadcaster currently employs around 21,500 full-time staff.
News and Radio Changes
In a message to employees, BBC News interim chief executive Jonathan Munro said around 200 jobs would be lost within the news division, generating savings of £25 million.
Among the most significant changes is the closure of Radio 4’s The World Tonight, which has been on air for 56 years. The programme will be replaced from April by a new schedule featuring a domestic news bulletin at 10pm, followed by a simulcast of the BBC World Service programme Newshour.
Several other Radio 4 programmes will also be discontinued over the coming year, including Midnight News, Money Box Live, AntiSocial, The Law Show and Crossing Continents. On the World Service, The Inquiry, The Conversation and The Fifth Floor will also end.
The number of permanent presenters on Radio 4’s Today programme will fall from five to four from September, coinciding with the previously announced departure of Amol Rajan. Saturday editions will be led by a single anchor.
Television Restructuring
BBC One’s Breakfast programme will no longer air on Sunday mornings from September, with viewers instead directed to the News Channel.
The production teams behind Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg and Newsnight will be merged, while some weekend television production will be shared between the News Channel and BBC One news bulletins.
The broadcaster will also review its chief news presenter roles to ensure what it described as a balance between audience needs and value for money.
Friday editions of Newsnight will move to a peak-time 7pm slot on BBC Two as part of a broader reshaping of the programme.
Wider Savings Programme
The BBC said it will review its television and radio portfolio as audiences increasingly consume content online.
Plans also include cutting between 100 and 150 hours of original television programming across commissioning genres by the end of the 2027-28 financial year, alongside a reduction of around 350 to 400 hours of audio content across stations and formats.
The news website’s InDepth section will operate with a smaller team, while the News Channel will place greater emphasis on international coverage to build on growth among audiences outside the UK.
BBC director-general Matt Brittin said the measures announced so far would deliver around £160 million of the overall savings target. He also confirmed a 10% reduction in senior leadership roles and said further cuts would be announced in coming months, including around 700 job losses in corporate divisions.
Union Criticism
The plans have drawn criticism from unions and former BBC staff.
Philippa Childs, head of the media union Bectu, questioned the timing of the cuts as the BBC prepares for charter renewal discussions ahead of the current charter’s expiry in 2027.
The National Union of Journalists described the proposals as damaging for audiences and warned that staff were already under significant pressure following previous reductions.
Former World Tonight presenter Robin Lustig said he was saddened by the programme’s closure, describing it as a respected and thoughtful part of the BBC’s news output.
Munro acknowledged ending the programme had been a difficult decision but said combining resources with Newshour would allow the BBC to serve both domestic and international audiences more efficiently.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026
webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump defended a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Iran during a press conference at the G7 summit in Évian-les-Bains, France, while acknowledging the agreement may not be permanent and warning that military action could resume if Tehran fails to comply.

Get today's headlines by email

The preliminary accord, signed electronically by Trump and Vice President JD Vance, ends the recent conflict with Iran and opens a 60-day period of negotiations focused on Tehran’s nuclear programme. Trump said a formal signing ceremony could take place later this week.
1. Trump Says Deal Depends on Iranian Compliance
Trump repeatedly stressed that the agreement is only a memorandum of understanding and not a final settlement.
He warned that if Iran fails to meet its commitments or violates unwritten understandings between the two sides, the United States could resume military operations. The president argued that recent strikes had helped bring Iran to the negotiating table and suggested force remained an option if diplomacy breaks down.
His remarks echoed earlier comments in which he threatened further bombing if Iran did not “behave.”
2. G7 Leaders Back End to Conflict
Trump highlighted support from fellow G7 leaders, saying member nations welcomed the agreement because it could help stabilize global energy markets.
A key element of the deal is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route through which roughly one-fifth of global oil supplies pass.
The closure of the strait had pushed up energy costs, particularly affecting European economies and Japan. Trump argued that continued military operations could have kept the route closed for months, worsening economic disruption.
He also dismissed suggestions that other G7 leaders had raised concerns about whether U.S. strikes on Iran violated international law, saying their focus was instead on the threat posed by Iran.
3. Trump Defends Iran Keeping Missiles
The president also defended provisions allowing Iran to retain part of its ballistic missile arsenal.
Trump argued it would be unrealistic to deny Iran missiles while regional rivals such as Saudi Arabia and Israel maintain similar capabilities.
He said missiles were not the central issue in the negotiations, which are primarily focused on Iran’s nuclear activities. Trump added that most of Iran’s missile stockpile had already been destroyed or rendered inaccessible during the conflict.
Iranian officials have consistently identified their missile programme as a non-negotiable issue in talks with Washington.
4. Differences With Netanyahu Remain
Trump also revealed continuing disagreements with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over military operations in Lebanon.
While reaffirming Israel’s right to defend itself, Trump suggested Netanyahu should show greater restraint in responding to attacks by Hezbollah.
The president said the two leaders had a “dispute” over how aggressively Israel should respond to incidents that cause little or no damage. His comments were notably more measured than criticism he directed at Netanyahu earlier in the week after retaliatory exchanges involving Israel, Hezbollah and Iran threatened to derail the agreement.
A ceasefire in Lebanon is one of Iran’s priorities under the MOU and appears prominently in the document.
5. Warning Over Oil Supplies
Trump argued that reopening the Strait of Hormuz was essential to protecting global energy supplies.
He claimed oil reserves could have been depleted within weeks had the waterway remained closed, leading to severe economic disruption. The president said continued bombing would have prevented commercial shipping from safely passing through the strait.
While it was unclear whether Trump was referring to U.S. reserves or global inventories, international energy agencies have recently warned about tightening oil markets and declining stockpiles.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026
webfact
webfact
French riot police deployed to northern France under a £660 million UK-France border security agreement are authorised to use water cannon against asylum seekers, according to informed sources.

Get today's headlines by email

The revelation has sparked criticism from refugee advocates, who argue that the tactic would represent a significant escalation in efforts to prevent small-boat crossings of the English Channel.
Riot Units Deployed to French Coast
Two specialist French police units, including a 50-officer contingent from the Compagnies Républicaines de Sécurité (CRS), have begun operations along the northern French coast ahead of the busy summer migration period.
Sources familiar with the arrangements said CRS officers are permitted to request the use of water cannon, CS gas and batons under their public-order powers when responding to disturbances or attempts to launch boats.
The deployment forms part of a broader package of measures agreed between London and Paris aimed at disrupting people-smuggling networks and reducing irregular Channel crossings.
Concerns Over Use of Water Cannon
Water cannon are capable of firing powerful, high-pressure jets that can knock people to the ground. Their use is banned on the British mainland, where concerns over safety and the principle of “policing by consent” led then home secretary Theresa May to rule out their deployment in 2015.
They remain available to police in Northern Ireland and were used there last week during anti-immigration disturbances near Belfast.
Refugee charity Care4Calais condemned the possibility of their use against migrants in France. Chief executive Steve Smith said such a move would amount to an escalation of state violence against refugees and questioned why the UK would support tactics that are prohibited in Great Britain.
Starmer Highlights Cross-Channel Cooperation
Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the deployment of the French units during the G7 summit in Évian-les-Bains on Wednesday.
Starmer described the specialist teams as part of a landmark agreement designed to deepen cooperation between the two countries in tackling irregular migration.
The UK government said the CRS unit had received specialist training in crowd-control operations and would help respond to increasingly aggressive tactics used by people smugglers.
Scrutiny of CRS Tactics
The CRS has previously used water cannon during public-order operations in France, including after celebrations following Paris Saint-Germain's Champions League triumph earlier this month.
Officers were also photographed in Calais and Dunkirk last year using CS gas and batons while attempting to stop migrants and smugglers reaching boats in shallow waters.
The force has faced controversy in the past. Earlier this year, nine CRS officers were convicted of assaulting peaceful demonstrators during the 2018 “gilets jaunes” protests. Separate reports have highlighted allegations of racism within the unit.
Wider Border Measures
The border security package also includes plans for a detention facility, expanded maritime interception tactics and a 40% increase in officers deployed on French beaches.
According to Downing Street, enhanced joint operations prevented 40% of attempted Channel crossings in May. Nevertheless, 2,726 people reached Britain by small boat during the month, around 1,000 fewer than in May of the previous year.
Home Office sources said funding for the CRS deployment would come from the French government, although the deployment itself was agreed as part of the bilateral deal. Officials stressed that operational policing decisions remain the responsibility of French authorities.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026


webfact
webfact
The European Union and the United Kingdom have confirmed that their next summit aimed at improving post-Brexit relations will take place on 22 July in Brussels, following months of delays linked to disagreements over a proposed youth mobility scheme.

Get today's headlines by email

The meeting had originally been scheduled for May but was pushed back several times as negotiators struggled to reach common ground on a programme that would allow people under 30 to work, study and travel more freely between the UK and EU.
Youth Mobility Talks Remain Key Obstacle
The proposed scheme has emerged as one of the most contentious issues in the negotiations. Discussions stalled in recent weeks, prompting speculation that the summit could be postponed until later in the year.
Speaking at the G7 gathering in Evian on Tuesday, António Costa confirmed the summit date and stressed the importance of closer cooperation between the two sides.
He said strong collaboration between the EU and UK was vital for Europe's security, resilience and economic prosperity, adding that both parties were working to ensure the summit's success.
EU diplomats have indicated that progress on a youth experience programme remains a key condition for holding the summit. The bloc has reportedly insisted that an agreement on the issue is necessary before leaders meet.
Starmer Pushes for Closer Ties
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said his government was fulfilling its pledge to improve relations with Europe and place Britain at the centre of European affairs.
He said closer cooperation would help address living costs, support employment and create opportunities for younger people.
Meanwhile, Naomi Smith, head of the pro-EU organisation Best for Britain, said the importance of the EU was growing and argued that even signalling a future ambition to seek membership could strengthen support for closer ties.
Trade and Climate Issues Also on Agenda
Alongside youth mobility, negotiators are working on a food and agricultural trade agreement designed to reduce border bureaucracy and physical inspections on UK exports entering the EU.
The proposed sanitary and phytosanitary arrangement would involve Britain aligning with EU standards. Parts of the deal have already been agreed, and the UK has begun outlining some of the checks that would be removed ahead of its expected implementation, likely next summer.
Discussions are also advancing on linking emissions trading systems. Such an arrangement would align UK and EU carbon trading rules and help address charges applied to products with high carbon emissions.
Delays Frustrated EU Officials
In recent months, some senior EU diplomats expressed concern that progress in the reset process was slowing despite repeated commitments from Starmer's government since taking office in 2024.
A further sticking point has been UK opposition to some EU proposals within the youth programme, including restoring home-fee tuition status for EU students studying in Britain, a benefit that existed before Brexit.
Despite the delays, both sides are now preparing for the July summit as negotiations continue on the remaining unresolved issues.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Details of a reported 14-point memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the United States and Iran have emerged, outlining a framework for extending a ceasefire, easing sanctions and opening negotiations toward a broader agreement between the two countries.

Get today's headlines by email

The document has not been officially released by either government. However, Bloomberg News and Al Arabiya published what they described as the text of the agreement, which is expected to be signed on Friday.
A central feature of the reported framework is a commitment by Iran not to produce or acquire nuclear weapons. While the document addresses future discussions on Tehran’s nuclear programme, it does not appear to provide a detailed solution to outstanding nuclear issues.
Nuclear talks and negotiation timeline
Under the reported terms, Iran and the United States would begin negotiations aimed at reaching a final agreement within 60 days of signing the MoU. The deadline could be extended if both sides agree.
The text states that Iran would reaffirm its pledge never to develop nuclear weapons. It also says that the future of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles and other nuclear-related matters, including the country’s civilian nuclear requirements, would be addressed during negotiations on a final agreement.
The agreement further provides that, after a final deal is signed, Iran would maintain the existing status of its nuclear programme while the United States would refrain from imposing new sanctions or increasing its military presence in the region.
Ceasefire and regional security
According to the reported document, the agreement would establish an immediate and permanent end to hostilities “on all fronts, including Lebanon”. Both sides, along with their allies involved in the conflict, would commit not to carry out hostile actions or threaten the use of force against one another.
Although Israel is not named in the text, references to allies involved in the conflict suggest that Israeli military operations in Lebanon are included within the ceasefire framework.
The MoU also calls on both countries to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and avoid interference in domestic affairs.
In addition, the United States would reportedly lift the naval blockade on Iranian ports immediately after the agreement is signed and withdraw its forces from surrounding areas within 30 days of a final settlement.
Iran, for its part, would take immediate steps to restore shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, with the aim of returning commercial traffic between the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman to pre-war levels within 30 days.
Sanctions relief and economic support
The reported framework outlines extensive sanctions relief for Iran.
The United States would commit to ending sanctions imposed through multiple channels, including unilateral American measures and sanctions linked to international bodies, according to a timetable to be determined in a final agreement.
Washington would also issue waivers allowing exports of Iranian oil, petrochemical products and related services, including banking, insurance and transportation, until broader sanctions are lifted.
The document additionally states that the US would release frozen or restricted Iranian assets as negotiations progress. Those funds would be available for use under the direction of Iran’s central bank.
Toward a final agreement
Another provision calls for the United States and regional partners to develop a programme for Iran’s economic rehabilitation and growth, supported by at least $300 billion in financing. The mechanism for implementing the plan would be negotiated within 60 days.
The MoU also proposes the creation of an oversight mechanism to monitor implementation and compliance with a future agreement.
Once key provisions related to military withdrawals, maritime access, sanctions waivers and asset releases begin to take effect, negotiations would continue on the remaining elements of a final settlement.
According to the reported text, any final agreement would ultimately be endorsed through a binding resolution of the UN Security Council.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026
webfact
webfact
A Swedish court has sentenced a 61-year-old man to four years and five months in prison after finding that he forced his wife to provide sexual services to more than 120 men.

Get today's headlines by email

The ruling followed a trial in Härnösand on Sweden's eastern coast, where judges convicted the man of attempted rape, aggravated pimping, assault and unlawful threats. The court concluded that he exercised extensive control over his wife through intimidation, violence and surveillance.
Abuse Spanned Several Years
The case has attracted international attention and has been compared by some observers to the crimes committed by Dominique Pelicot in France, although the circumstances differed.
Neither the convicted man nor his wife has been publicly identified.
Threats and Surveillance
Prosecutors said the abuse began in 2022 and continued until October 2025, when the woman reported her husband to police.
According to the court, the man used drugs, threats and the isolated location of the couple's farm near Kramfors to maintain control over his wife. Prosecutors said he threatened to kill her, burn her with petrol and sever her fingers.
Security cameras installed around the home were also used to monitor her movements, with some sexual encounters recorded by the surveillance system.
Swedish broadcaster SVT reported that the woman eventually escaped by using an area of the house not covered by the cameras before contacting police.
Court Rejects Consent Defence
Throughout the investigation and trial, the man denied wrongdoing, arguing that he had merely helped arrange consensual sexual encounters.
The court rejected that defence, finding that he had "ruthlessly exploited" his wife. Judges ruled that he pressured and manipulated her into performing sexual acts, broadcasting some online, receiving additional sex buyers and attempting to involve neighbours and customers.
The judgment stated that much of this coercion involved persistent pressure and degrading treatment. The court also found that the man initiated the sale of her sexual services and managed most aspects of the operation.
Charges Against Buyers
Authorities identified around 120 men who had obtained sexual services through the arrangement. However, only 29 were ultimately charged.
Most denied the allegations, claiming either that no sexual activity occurred or that no payment was made.
The court convicted 28 of purchasing a total of 56 sexual services. Two received prison sentences, while the remaining defendants were given suspended sentences or placed on probation.
Judges dismissed eight rape charges against the husband, saying prosecutors had not proven that the woman's participation was involuntary in those cases or, in one instance, could not determine exactly what sexual acts had taken place. Three additional attempted rape charges were also dismissed, although one count of attempted rape resulted in conviction.
In addition to his prison sentence, the court ordered the man to pay his wife 200,000 Swedish krona (£15,900) in damages.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Police in Vietnam have rescued more than 500 cats after dismantling a suspected cat meat trafficking network in one of the country's largest animal welfare operations in recent years.

Get today's headlines by email

The raid, carried out in and around Ho Chi Minh City last week, followed an investigation into a series of pet thefts. Authorities detained nine suspects and uncovered hundreds of live cats allegedly destined for the meat trade, according to local media reports and animal welfare groups.
Major Rescue Operation
Police discovered 45 cages containing around 400 live cats, along with four foam containers packed with ice that held about 80 dead cats. A further 21 live cats were recovered at another location, bringing the total number of animals seized to more than 500.
Authorities said the suspects admitted collecting and trapping cats across southern Vietnam over the past three years, including in Ho Chi Minh City and the cities of Tay Ninh and An Giang.
More than 40 rescued cats have since been reunited with their owners. However, animal welfare groups said dozens of animals later died because of the poor conditions in which they had been kept.
Families Reunited With Pets
Karanvir Kukreja, who leads a campaign against dog and cat meat consumption for Humane World for Animals, described the case as a stark reminder of the scale of Vietnam's cat meat trade.
Phuong Pham, the organisation's country director in Vietnam, said thousands of cats are believed to be stolen, transported and slaughtered for meat across the country each month.
Several of the rescued cats were pregnant, and some have since given birth while in police care.
Chris Gindelhumer of Vietnam Cat Welfare, which is helping care for the animals, said the rescue effort had been emotional for both volunteers and pet owners.
He said many families had arrived searching for missing cats, with some successfully reunited with their pets while others were unable to find them.
Veterinarians and volunteers have been working continuously to treat and care for the rescued animals.
Debate Over Cat Meat Trade
The consumption of dog and cat meat remains legal in Vietnam, although vendors are required to hold permits verifying the origins of the animals they sell.
Some local authorities are seeking to reduce the practice. The city of Hoi An has been working with international animal welfare organisations to discourage dog and cat meat consumption.
Following South Korea's decision in 2024 to ban the dog meat trade, Vietnamese officials said they planned to strengthen legal protections for pets and their owners.
The latest rescue has also drawn public attention. An Pham, a graduate student and cat owner in Ho Chi Minh City, said the case had shocked many people and increased awareness of the issue of cat meat consumption.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026
webfact
webfact
A decades-old agreement governing Jerusalem’s most sensitive religious site is facing renewed pressure as Israeli nationalist activists and politicians increasingly challenge restrictions on Jewish prayer at the al-Aqsa mosque compound.

Get today's headlines by email

The issue was highlighted by comments from Israeli nationalist politician Moshe Feiglin, who openly advocated building a new Jewish temple on the site while visiting the compound, known to Muslims as al-Haram al-Sharif and to Jews as the Temple Mount.
Growing Challenge to Longstanding Holy Site Arrangement
Feiglin prayed and sang religious songs with a group of Jewish worshippers at the site, actions that critics say violate longstanding arrangements intended to preserve stability at one of the world’s most contested religious locations.
Under the Status Quo system, custody of the compound remains with the Jordanian-administered Islamic Waqf. While non-Muslims may visit, Muslim worship is traditionally the only form of prayer permitted inside the compound.
Reports Fuel Concern Over Possible Changes
Recent media reports claiming Israeli and American officials have discussed altering the current arrangements have triggered concern across the region.
According to those reports, a new Israeli body could eventually designate the site as a “multi-faith centre,” potentially allowing expanded Jewish prayer and increasing Israeli oversight of the compound.


video screenshot

At a congressional hearing, Marco Rubio said he had no knowledge of such plans. Meanwhile, Mike Huckabee has frequently emphasised Jewish historical ties to religious sites in Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank.
The office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly stated that there has been no change to the Status Quo arrangements.
Islamic Authorities Warn of Consequences
Palestinian and regional officials have warned that any formal alteration to the existing system could provoke serious unrest.
Dr Mustafa Abu Sway, deputy head of the Islamic Waqf Council, said changing the status of the site would risk destabilising relations between Muslims and Jews and could threaten broader regional peace.
Jordan, Egypt and several Gulf states have also expressed concern about what they see as a gradual erosion of Islamic authority at the compound. The British government has likewise called for the historic arrangements governing Jerusalem’s holy sites to be respected.
Nationalists Push for Greater Israeli Control
Among those advocating greater Jewish access is Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has become a prominent supporter of expanded Jewish prayer rights at the compound.
During last month’s Jerusalem Day celebrations, Ben-Gvir led nationalist supporters through East Jerusalem and visited the site, where he declared that the Temple Mount belonged to the Jewish people. He has previously supported Jewish prayers and religious songs in parts of the compound despite objections from Muslim authorities.
Supporters view such moves as correcting historical restrictions, while opponents argue they undermine a fragile arrangement that has helped prevent wider conflict.
Echoes of Past Violence
The dispute carries particular sensitivity because of its role in previous outbreaks of violence.
In September 2000, then-opposition leader Ariel Sharon visited the compound under heavy police protection. The visit was widely viewed by Palestinians as provocative and became one of the events associated with the outbreak of the Second Intifada.
Over the following five years, violence across Israel, the West Bank and Gaza claimed more than 4,000 lives.
As pressure grows from nationalist groups seeking changes at the site, many observers fear that any significant alteration to the governance or religious practices at Jerusalem’s holiest and most politically sensitive location could once again inflame tensions across the region.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026
webfact
webfact
A British couple have described the “surreal” moment a Russian warship fired warning shots near their yacht in the English Channel, as UK authorities investigate the incident.

Get today's headlines by email

Jane and Alan Kelvey were sailing aboard the UK-registered yacht Bright Future about 23 miles south of the Isle of Wight on Tuesday morning when they encountered the Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich.
Couple Describe Warning Fire
Speaking to BBC Newsnight, Jane Kelvey said the warship first sounded its horn with five short blasts, a maritime signal used to attract attention and indicate uncertainty over another vessel’s intentions.
The couple responded by altering course slightly to port to show they had seen the frigate. According to Jane, another series of horn blasts followed about a minute later, immediately accompanied by several rounds of small-arms fire.
She said the shots appeared to be warning fire directed into the air rather than at the yacht itself.
Jane insisted the vessel was not on a collision course with the Russian warship and said the situation only became concerning once the gunfire began.
Alan Kelvey described the use of warning shots as unnecessary. Shortly afterwards, a team from the Royal Navy patrol vessel HMS Tyne arrived to check on the couple’s welfare and gather details about the encounter.
Conflicting Accounts
The Russian Defence Ministry said the yacht had been making a “dangerous approach” toward the frigate. It stated that the crew attempted to establish radio contact, launched warning flares and eventually fired rifles into the yacht’s path in accordance with international maritime regulations.
The Kelveys disputed parts of that account.
British officials believe the yacht, which has no engine, may have drifted toward the frigate in foggy conditions after departing the UK. The assessment is that the Russian crew may have concluded the vessel was less manoeuvrable and at greater risk of collision.
A UK Ministry of Defence spokesperson said the warning shots were not aimed at the yacht and were intended to prevent a possible collision after attempts to communicate with the vessel.
Russian Naval Activity in the Channel
The incident occurred outside UK territorial waters and has been described by the Ministry of Defence as an isolated event unrelated to the recent interception of a Russian shadow fleet tanker in the Channel.
Russian naval vessels regularly transit the waterway and are routinely monitored by the Royal Navy. The Admiral Grigorovich was being shadowed by the patrol vessel HMS Mersey as part of a routine operation.
According to NATO sources cited by BBC Verify last week, Moscow had tasked the frigate with escorting shadow fleet vessels through the Channel. The ship has reportedly remained at sea for extended periods with support from the repair vessel PM-82.
Satellite imagery reviewed by BBC Verify showed the support vessel operating between the Channel and the North Sea in recent months.
Expert: Likely a Miscalculation
Former Royal Navy rear admiral James Parkin said the use of armed force at sea is normally a last resort and generally reserved for self-defence.
He suggested the episode was more likely the result of a misjudgment than a deliberate attempt to target a British yacht near UK waters.
Although British officials do not believe the incident was linked to the seizure of a shadow fleet tanker days earlier, Parkin noted that operation had been an embarrassment for Moscow, given the presence of a Russian naval vessel in the area.
The encounter comes amid heightened tensions between the UK and Russia and has drawn added attention against a backdrop of growing concern among British officials about increasingly assertive Russian activity.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026
webfact
webfact
A Russian artist who openly criticized President Vladimir Putin has been shot dead in eastern Poland, prompting a murder investigation and the detention of two Belarusian nationals.

Get today's headlines by email

Polish prosecutors said Robert Kuzovkov, 44, who worked under the artistic name Semyon Skrepetsky, was killed on Monday morning in the town of Biała Podlaska, around 40km from the Belarusian border.
Fatal Shooting Near Belarusian Consulate
According to prosecutors, Kuzovkov was attacked in a car park about 600 metres from the Belarusian consulate.
Marcin Kozak, a spokesman for the district prosecutor's office in Lublin, said an unidentified gunman approached the artist and fired two shots. After the victim fell to the ground, the attacker allegedly moved closer and fired three additional rounds before fleeing.
Kuzovkov died at the scene. Authorities said he suffered gunshot wounds to the head, chest and back.
Investigators recovered five shell casings and a Geco 9mm Luger bullet. A post-mortem examination is scheduled for Wednesday.
Two Belarusians Detained
Police have detained two Belarusian citizens, aged 33 and 37, near the Belarusian consulate. Prosecutors said their involvement, if any, remains under investigation.
No motive has been officially established.
Kuzovkov had been granted asylum in Poland after leaving Russia in 2021, saying he feared criminal prosecution in his home country. He settled in Biała Podlaska, a town of fewer than 60,000 residents.
Known for Political Caricatures
Using the name Semyon Skrepetsky, Kuzovkov became known for satirical drawings targeting political figures including Putin, Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko and Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov.
His work portrayed Putin in the arms of Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, depicted Lukashenko as Adolf Hitler, and mocked Kadyrov and his son Adam. He also produced cartoons criticizing Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny as well as ordinary Ukrainians.
His cartoons were distributed through Telegram and his YouTube channel, while his home address in Poland was publicly available online.
Friends Recall Security Fears
Belarusian artist Vladislav Bokhan, who knew Kuzovkov, said he learned of the shooting through Polish radio reports and quickly feared his friend might be the victim because of the small size of the town where he lived.
Video posted on social media the evening before the killing showed Kuzovkov attending a Russia Day protest outside the Russian embassy in Berlin. He was carrying artwork depicting Putin and Stalin and dragging a Russian flag behind him.
A friend, Bulat Subkhankulov, said he had repeatedly warned Kuzovkov about the risks associated with his activism and public criticism.
Subkhankulov said he believed the artist had become increasingly fearless despite concerns for his safety, adding that warnings about potential consequences ultimately had little effect.
Kuzovkov is survived by his wife and five children, who remain in Poland.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Recent US intelligence assessments conclude that Iran can effectively shut down the Strait of Hormuz whenever it chooses, giving Tehran a powerful tool to disrupt global trade and energy markets after the recent conflict, according to sources familiar with the findings.

Get today's headlines by email

The assessments suggest Iran demonstrated its ability to block access to the strategic waterway during the war and could repeat the tactic in future crises, even if a framework agreement expected to be signed on Friday succeeds in reopening the route and launching new nuclear negotiations.
Iran's Strait Leverage Raises New US Concerns
One source familiar with the intelligence findings said the conflict had fundamentally changed Iran's calculations, describing control of the strait as a strategic asset with far-reaching economic consequences.
Military Capabilities Remain Intact
US officials believe Iran retains a substantial portion of its military arsenal, including missiles, drones, launch systems and hundreds of fast attack boats capable of harassing shipping or deploying naval mines.
According to sources, intelligence agencies have also observed Iran rebuilding parts of its military-industrial base faster than expected and restarting drone production.
The assessments further conclude that Iran learned it could use strikes against Gulf energy infrastructure as an effective asymmetric weapon, adding another source of leverage beyond direct military confrontation.
Although discussions have taken place about possible allied efforts to help secure the waterway after it reopens, officials remain uncertain about how such arrangements would operate.
Agreement Tied to Reopening the Waterway
A senior US official told CNN that Iran will receive no benefits from the framework agreement unless it keeps the strait open and complies with other commitments. The official said the United States would ease its blockade in proportion to Iran's restoration of maritime traffic.
Another source familiar with the negotiations said Iran's disruption of shipping had strained relations with China and Gulf states, highlighting the economic costs Tehran faces when interfering with global energy flows.
Even if the agreement is implemented, shipping experts and industry officials expect uncertainty to limit traffic through the chokepoint for weeks or months.
Concerns Over Wider Regional Disruption
US intelligence officials are also examining the possibility that Iran could seek to pressure global markets through another key trade route, the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait.
Sources said Tehran has considered using the Houthis in Yemen to disrupt traffic through the Red Sea gateway if negotiations with Washington collapse. Closing both Bab-el-Mandeb and the Strait of Hormuz would have severe consequences for global trade and energy supplies.
While officials noted the Houthis have so far refrained from broad attacks on Western shipping, expanding operations beyond Israeli-linked vessels would represent a major escalation.
Questions Over US Strategy
The assessments have renewed scrutiny of President Donald Trump's decision to launch military operations against Iran. Sources said the administration underestimated Tehran's willingness to close the Strait of Hormuz, partly because officials believed such a move would inflict greater harm on Iran than on the United States.
US officials also expected China to use its influence to discourage Tehran from taking that step.
Instead, intelligence agencies now believe Iran was emboldened by its ability to disrupt shipping and target regional energy infrastructure without exhausting significant military resources.
Some officials assess that Tehran is now more likely to consider closing the strait in future confrontations, particularly after demonstrating both the intent and capability to do so.
Trump said this week that the strait is already partially reopened and should be fully open by Friday when Washington and Tehran are expected to sign a memorandum of understanding. However, questions remain about how any agreement would prevent Iran from using the same tactic again in the future.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026

webfact
webfact
Nearly half of Americans now identify as political independents rather than members of either major party, according to a new CNN poll, marking the highest level of partisan independence recorded by the network in more than a decade.

Get today's headlines by email

The survey found that 47% of Americans consider themselves independents, an increase of roughly 10 percentage points since the period following President Donald Trump's first term. The figure is close to the previous high of 48% recorded in CNN polling during 2015.
Shift Away From Party Labels
Democrats and Republicans divide the rest of the population almost evenly. The poll found that 27% of Americans identify as Democrats and 26% as Republicans.
Many independents, however, still lean toward one of the two major parties. When those partisan leanings are taken into account, 39% align more closely with Democrats, 37% with Republicans, and 25% say they do not lean toward either side.
Even when respondents who initially expressed no preference were asked to choose a side, the electorate remained closely divided, underscoring the narrow political balance in the United States.
CNN's polling shows neither party has maintained a significant advantage in overall identification since 2021, when Democrats held a six-point lead. Since then, the gap between the two parties has remained at about one percentage point each year.
Registered Voters Show GOP Decline
Among registered voters, Democrats now hold a slight edge. The poll found that 31% identify as Democrats, compared with 28% who identify as Republicans, while 41% say they belong to neither party.
That represents a notable change from 2024, when 34% of registered voters identified as Republicans, 31% as Democrats and 35% as independents.
The findings suggest Republicans have lost some ground among voters since last year's election cycle, potentially adding to concerns for the party ahead of the midterm elections as Trump's approval ratings have weakened.
Younger Voters Driving Independence
Several demographic groups have moved away from Republican identification since 2024, including younger voters, men and White voters without college degrees.
Among voters under 45, only 17% now identify as Republicans, down from 26% in 2024. Democratic identification among that group has remained largely unchanged at 33%, while half now say they do not belong to either party.
Similar trends were observed among men, particularly younger men, and among White voters without college degrees, with many shifting toward independent status rather than switching directly to the Democratic Party.
Independents Less Engaged Politically
The poll also highlights key differences between independents and partisan voters.
Independents tend to be younger, with 63% under the age of 50, compared with 52% of Democrats and 38% of Republicans. They are also more likely than Republicans to live in urban areas, though less likely than Democrats to do so.
Income levels among independents are generally lower, with nearly half reporting annual household earnings below $50,000.
Politically, independents appear less engaged than partisans. Only 67% are registered to vote, compared with more than 80% of Democrats and Republicans. Just one-quarter say they regularly seek out political news.
Poll Methodology
The CNN poll was conducted by SSRS between May 7 and May 31 among 2,480 adults nationwide using online and telephone interviews. Participants were selected through address-based sampling and random cellphone number sampling. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.7 percentage points.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026

webfact
webfact
The FBI says it has disrupted an alleged plot to attack a UFC event held at the White House, leading to the arrest of five men across four states.

Get today's headlines by email

According to the US Department of Justice, the suspects planned to use explosive-laden drones and sniper teams to target attendees at Sunday's event on the White House South Lawn. Prosecutors allege the operation was designed to create panic among spectators before launching further attacks.
The suspects were identified as Tycen Proper, Bryan Roa, Michael Thomas, Daniel Eskridge and Abraham Alvarez. Authorities arrested them in Ohio, Missouri, Nebraska and California.
Alleged Multi-Stage Attack Plan
Court documents state that the group intended to fly drones into nearby buildings, triggering chaos and driving crowds toward positions where snipers would open fire on what they described as "high-value targets".
Prosecutors further allege that a second group of attackers planned to advance on the White House gates.
The event drew around 4,300 invited guests, while an estimated 85,000 people watched from a nearby fan zone. Fourteen mixed martial arts fighters competed in a series of bouts as part of celebrations marking the 250th anniversary of the United States.
Investigation Began With Family Warning
Investigators say the case came to light after Proper's mother contacted local authorities on 10 June, expressing concern about her son's firearms purchases and online communications.
Prosecutors said Proper, 19, had been interacting with an online group that expressed anti-government and religious extremist views.
During an FBI interview on 11 June, Proper allegedly admitted involvement in planning the attack. Authorities say members of the group first communicated through a TikTok chat called "Vanguard of the Old" before moving some discussions to the encrypted messaging app Signal.
Motives Detailed in Court Documents
According to court filings, participants discussed launching a revolution by attacking wealthy individuals and politicians attending the event.
Prosecutors said conversations included grievances about government corruption, the handling of the Epstein files, data centres and other government policies.
Proper has been charged with conspiracy to commit an offence against the United States and attempted murder of a federal officer. His lawyer has not publicly commented.
Officials Cite Growing Security Concerns
FBI Director Kash Patel said the alleged attack plans had been stopped through a multi-state operation.
Secret Service Deputy Director Matt Quinn later described the case as a serious threat but declined to discuss details while the investigation remains active.
Asked about the alleged plot during the G7 summit in France, President Donald Trump said he had not been briefed on the matter. Vice-President JD Vance told Fox News that the public was being informed because of the scale of the alleged plan.
The arrests come amid growing concern over political violence in the United States. Researchers have reported a rise in targeted political attacks in recent years, while experts warn that such incidents can contribute to further cycles of violence.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 17 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he is pleased that “justice has been done” after two men were convicted over a series of arson attacks targeting property linked to him.

Get today's headlines by email

Roman Lavrynovych, 22, a Ukrainian national, and Stanislav Carpiuc, 27, a Romanian citizen born in Ukraine, were found guilty on Monday of conspiring to carry out arson attacks on properties and a vehicle connected to Starmer in 2025.
Prime Minister Responds After Guilty Verdicts
Speaking from the G7 summit in France, Starmer said he was “very pleased for my family's sake” that the men had been convicted.
“Obviously it was a bad attack, and all the details have now come out in court and justice has been done,” he told reporters.
Focus Turns to Alleged Russian Involvement
The verdicts came shortly before a BBC Panorama investigation reported that Russia was behind the attacks.
Starmer said the incidents should be viewed within the wider context of Russia’s war against Ukraine. He pointed to Ukraine’s battlefield successes and the impact of Western sanctions on Moscow, arguing that G7 nations should increase pressure on Russia.
The UK has since announced 70 new sanctions targeting Russia, including measures aimed at the Kremlin’s so-called “shadow fleet” used to transport oil and gas, as well as financial networks accused of helping Moscow circumvent existing restrictions.
The sanctions followed the boarding of a suspected Russian shadow fleet oil tanker in the English Channel on Sunday.
Investigation Traces Recruitment to Telegram Contact
Prosecutors said the attacks were organised after one of the suspects was recruited online by a Russian-speaking Telegram user known as “El Money”, who allegedly promised payment for carrying out the crimes.
The Panorama investigation reported evidence suggesting “El Money” is Evgeny Lyukshin, a 23-year-old Russian diplomat and the son of a senior Russian official.
According to the BBC, the Telegram account offered Russian citizenship in exchange for carrying out additional attacks and circulated messages praising Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russian-based online accounts also allegedly spread disinformation about the motives behind the attacks.
Security Concerns Raised
Former MI6 chief Sir Richard Moore said on Tuesday that Putin was attempting to intimidate Britain through sabotage, cyber operations and arson attacks.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Moore said Britain should not be surprised if Russian involvement were eventually confirmed, although the government and intelligence services have not formally attributed the attacks to the Kremlin.
He argued that Moscow may be seeking to expand the conflict beyond Ukraine through disruptive actions designed to distract and intimidate countries supporting Kyiv.
Moore called for continued backing for Ukraine, stronger cyber defences and increased investment in intelligence capabilities. He also said individuals recruited online to act on behalf of hostile states should face lengthy prison sentences if convicted.
Political Reaction
The case has renewed debate over Britain’s security and defence posture.
Former Armed Forces Minister Al Carns, who resigned from government last week alongside Defence Secretary John Healey in a dispute over military funding, said the attacks and subsequent disinformation campaign demonstrated the need to rethink national defence priorities.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also condemned the attacks, saying public officials should never face intimidation or violence because of their role.
“Democracy is settled at the ballot box, not through fear or violence and definitely not through foreign interference from hostile countries,” she said.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.