Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has promised “decisive” action to address the impact of social media on children in the UK, following a meeting with bereaved parents and campaigners pressing for stricter online safety measures.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking after talks at Downing Street on Tuesday, Sir Keir said the government was committed to acting as a consultation on children’s social media use reached its final day. Campaigners have urged ministers to introduce tougher restrictions, including a possible ban on social media access for under-16s.
Parents who attended the meeting said they welcomed the opportunity to present their concerns directly to the prime minister, but some remained doubtful about whether the government would introduce strong enough measures.
Calls for tougher restrictions
Among those attending was Ellen Roome, whose son Jools Sweeney died aged 14 in 2022. She said she remained unconvinced that meaningful change would follow.
“I think we’ve heard it so many times before,” she told the BBC outside Number 10, adding that she would stay “sceptical” until concrete measures were introduced.
Roome and other campaigners urged the government to raise the minimum age for access to social media platforms considered harmful to 16.
Mariano Janin, whose daughter Mia died by suicide aged 14 in 2021 after experiencing bullying at school and online, also attended the meeting. He said he wanted to believe action would follow but argued that the current “status quo” remained unchanged while technology companies continued rapidly introducing new products, including AI chatbots.
Parents described the talks as a “listening exercise”, saying they had outlined their concerns in detail in an effort to prevent further harm to children online.
Government considers next steps
The government’s consultation on children’s social media use closes on Tuesday evening after receiving more than 80,000 submissions from parents, young people, charities and campaign groups.
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said the government would publish its response during the summer, with new protections for under-16s expected by the end of 2026.
Measures under consideration include stronger age verification checks, night-time app curfews, and limiting features such as autoplay and infinite scrolling. Officials are also examining whether restrictions should apply to platforms including Roblox Corporation’s Roblox and Discord.
Kendall said ministers wanted to ensure any new rules were effective and durable.
“We’ve got to get this right, and we’ve got to make it last,” she told the BBC.
Debate over bans and platform controls
Former health secretary Wes Streeting added pressure on the government by backing calls for a social media ban for under-16s. Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Streeting said regulators and politicians had been “asleep at the wheel” while technology firms developed addictive platforms for children.
He compared the behaviour of large technology companies to the tactics once used by the tobacco industry, arguing that the “precautionary principle” should apply to social media regulation.
Others, however, warned against blanket bans. Police leaders and industry representatives have argued that regulation should focus on specific high-risk features rather than entire platforms.
Donya Soni-Clark of trade association TechUK said restrictions targeting features such as private messaging would be more effective than banning individual apps.
Meanwhile, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges called for doctors to routinely ask children about their device and social media use, citing concerns over mental and physical health impacts linked to online content.
Pressure on technology firms
Campaigners and child safety groups have also called for technology companies to align content standards with age ratings used by the British Board of Film Classification.
Some campaigners pointed to Australia’s move to restrict social media access for under-16s, although reports that children had still managed to bypass controls have raised concerns over how effective such laws can be.
Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, has said age verification should be managed at device level so underage users are prevented from downloading apps.
Kendall insisted the government would continue with reforms even if technology companies opposed them.
“No one’s going to stop me from doing what I think is right for this country,” she said.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Nasa has outlined a series of robotic missions, drones and lunar vehicles it plans to send to the Moon as part of a wider effort to establish a permanent US base on the lunar surface.

Get today's headlines by email

Several private companies, including Blue Origin, have been selected to build the equipment. The programme forms part of the United States’ push to return astronauts to the Moon before President Donald Trump leaves office in 2028.
The plans come as competition between the US and China over lunar exploration intensifies. China aims to land astronauts on the Moon by 2030 and continues to expand its space programme.
Robotic missions to pave way for lunar base
On Monday, China launched the Shenzhou-23 mission, carrying astronauts to the Tiangong space station space station.
Earlier this year, Nasa announced a $20bn initiative to build a permanent base near the Moon’s south pole by 2032. The proposed outpost would use both solar and nuclear energy.
Nasa administrator Jared Isaacman said the latest announcements showed the US would “never give up the Moon again”.
China challenge adds pressure to Moon programme
A permanent base on the Moon could support scientific research, future mining operations and eventual missions to Mars.
However, some experts believe Nasa’s timetable may be difficult to achieve.
Although the US successfully sent four astronauts around the Moon during the Artemis II mission in April, concerns remain about whether the agency can develop a reliable system for landing astronauts on the lunar surface in time.
Dr Simeon Barber told BBC News that China could still become the next nation to land humans on the Moon.
“It would not surprise me at all if China gets there first,” he said, pointing to delays in developing lunar landing technology.
Landers, drones and lunar vehicles planned
Nasa’s Ignition Moon Base programme is divided into three stages.
The first phase focuses on robotic exploration before astronauts arrive. The agency plans to send robotic landers and hopping drones to survey and map difficult terrain near the lunar south pole.
Cargo vehicles and rovers would also be deployed to transport scientific instruments, communications equipment and astronauts across the surface.
On Tuesday, Nasa said contracts had been awarded to companies including Blue Origin, Intuitive Machines and Astrobotic.


Courtesy of CBS News

Blue Origin’s proposed lander, Endurance, is expected to perform precise autonomous landings and navigation. Astrobotic’s Griffin-1 lander is planned to touch down near Nobile Crater close to the Moon’s south pole.
The missions will also deliver scientific instruments, including high-resolution cameras and laser-based landing systems.
According to Moon Base programme executive Carlos García-Galán, the robotic phase is expected to continue until 2029, involving 25 launches and the delivery of four metric tonnes of cargo to the Moon.
Power systems and housing planned by 2032
The next phase would involve building solar and nuclear power facilities on the Moon, including fission reactors designed to provide long-term energy supplies.
By 2032, Nasa hopes astronauts will be able to live in semi-permanent housing on the lunar surface. Long-range rovers would allow crews to travel greater distances across the Moon.
The Moon’s south pole is seen as especially valuable because of frozen water deposits that could provide drinking water and oxygen.
Much of the project depends on the readiness of the Human Landing System being developed by SpaceX. The spacecraft, known as Starship, has experienced repeated delays and technical setbacks.
Dr Barber said the biggest challenge remained landing astronauts safely on the Moon. He added that political pressure appeared to be influencing the pace of the announcements.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Israel’s opposition leader Yair Lapid has criticised an emerging agreement between the United States and Iran, calling it harmful to Israel and the wider Middle East while accusing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of failing to influence negotiations with Washington.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to reporters in Jerusalem on Monday, Lapid said the proposed deal under discussion “fails to achieve any of Israel’s goals for the war” and described its details as “disturbing”.
“The deal is bad for Israel, bad for the region, bad for the citizens of Iran,” he said.
War aims and proposed terms
Israel and the US launched military operations against Iran on 28 February, saying they aimed to dismantle Iran’s ballistic missile programme, curb its support for regional proxy groups and prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon.
Both Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump had also said they hoped the conflict would create conditions for the fall of Iran’s government.
According to regional officials, the proposed agreement would require Iran to surrender its stockpile of highly enriched uranium and reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz. In return, the US would end its blockade of Iranian ports and lift sanctions on Tehran.
The deal would reportedly leave broader negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme to a later 60-day period. It remains unclear whether the talks would also cover Iran’s missile capabilities or its backing of armed groups across the region.
Lapid thanked Trump for joining Israel in the conflict, but said Netanyahu had failed to maintain influence over Washington during negotiations.
“The Israeli government is at an all-time low in its ability to influence decisions in Washington,” Lapid said, referring to Trump’s recent remark that “Netanyahu will do whatever I want him to do.”
Israel’s position on sovereignty
An Israeli official familiar with conversations between Netanyahu and Trump said the prime minister had repeatedly stressed that Israel retained “freedom of action” against threats in any arena.
“Israel is a sovereign state, we are not a vassal state and we are not a protectorate,” Lapid said.
Lapid currently leads the centrist Yesh Atid party and served briefly as Israel’s prime minister in 2022 under a rotation agreement with former premier Naftali Bennett.
The pair have now merged their political factions ahead of elections due by the end of October, seeking to unite opposition groups against Netanyahu after years of political fragmentation.
Debate over Palestinian statehood
Lapid also addressed the issue of Palestinian statehood, saying the next Israeli government would not pursue a two-state solution in the near future.
He said the aftermath of the 7 October 2023 attacks by Hamas and the wars that followed had fundamentally changed Israeli public opinion.
“There will be no two-state solution in the coming years, because Israelis now understand this will become just another failing terrorist state on our borders,” Lapid said.
At the same time, he said he would oppose unilateral moves that could permanently prevent the creation of a Palestinian state in the future. Lapid added that Bennett had assured him Israel would not move towards annexing the occupied West Bank.
Coalition plans before election
Lapid also ruled out forming a future governing coalition with Arab political parties.
Opinion polls suggest the opposition alliance may struggle to secure a parliamentary majority without support from Arab lawmakers, as happened in 2021 when Lapid and Bennett formed a coalition government with backing from Mansour Abbas and his small Arab faction.
Lapid defended that earlier arrangement as “the right government for the moment” but said Israel’s political climate had shifted after nearly three years of conflict.
He said neither he nor Bennett intended to rely on Abbas’ party in the next election cycle.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 Ma
webfact
webfact
European officials have dismissed renewed Russian threats against Ukraine and Western diplomats, accusing Moscow of trying to intimidate Europe as the Kremlin escalates warnings over Kyiv.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking ahead of a meeting of the EU General Affairs Council on 26 May, Polish Foreign Ministry State Secretary Ignacy Niemczycki said Russia’s rhetoric was part of a long-standing strategy aimed at spreading fear across Europe.
“This is nothing new,” Niemczycki said, according to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. “Putin uses this tactic to spread fear among us here in Europe. And I just want to say: It will not work.”
His comments came after Moscow intensified warnings following a new wave of attacks on Ukraine and statements concerning the Oreshnik missile, which Russia says is capable of carrying nuclear weapons.
Niemczycki said Poland’s position remained unchanged, arguing that Europe should both increase pressure on Russia and strengthen support for Ukraine.
Baltic states dismiss missile threats
Latvian Foreign Ministry Parliamentary Secretary Artjoms Uršuļskis also downplayed the significance of Russia’s references to the Oreshnik missile.
He described the weapon as largely a propaganda tool in the imagination of Russian President Vladimir Putin, saying recent strikes and messaging campaigns had not altered Latvia’s assessment of the war.
Uršuļskis said Russia appeared unable to make meaningful progress on the battlefield, while Ukraine was growing stronger. He added that he saw no indication Russian attacks would change the overall direction of the conflict.
Meanwhile, French Foreign Ministry spokesperson Pascal Confavreux said leaving Kyiv was “out of the question” despite Russia’s threats of further strikes.
Diplomats vow to remain in Kyiv
EU Ambassador to Ukraine Katarína Mathernová said diplomats and foreign nationals had no plans to leave the Ukrainian capital.
Mathernová criticised Russia for invoking international humanitarian law while continuing attacks on civilian targets in Ukraine.
“Russia is again threatening diplomats and foreigners, demanding that we leave Kyiv. But we are not going anywhere,” she said.
She accused Moscow of hypocrisy, pointing to years of strikes on apartment buildings, schools, hospitals, museums and power infrastructure across Ukraine.
Moscow warns of sustained strikes
On 25 May, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said Russian attacks on Kyiv were being carried out in response to Ukrainian actions and would continue.
Russia’s Foreign Ministry later announced what it described as a sustained campaign of “systematic strikes” targeting defence industry facilities in Kyiv. It also urged foreign nationals to leave the city “as soon as possible”.
The ministry said Russian forces could target facilities involved in the design, production and operation of drones, along with what it called “decision-making centres and command posts” in the Ukrainian capital.
Moscow also repeated accusations that Ukraine had attacked a university in Starobilsk, describing the incident as “the last straw” that prompted the latest strikes on Kyiv. The Kremlin accused Ukraine of violating the Geneva Conventions, while making no reference to Russia’s own continuing attacks on Ukrainian towns and cities, which have killed civilians throughout the war.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 M
webfact
webfact
-fifthIran has accused the United States of committing a “gross violation” of the ceasefire after American forces launched new air strikes in southern Iran, raising fresh doubts over efforts to extend the truce and end the conflict.

Get today's headlines by email.

The US Central Command said on Monday that it carried out what it described as “self-defence strikes” against Iranian missile sites and boats attempting to place mines in southern Iran.
Iran’s foreign ministry condemned the attacks as “aggressive and unjustified actions” and warned that Tehran would respond.
“Without a doubt, the Islamic Republic of Iran will not leave any evil unanswered and will not hesitate to defend the Iranian nation,” the ministry said in a statement.
Strikes near Strait of Hormuz
The reported strikes took place in Hormozgan province, which borders the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically important shipping route through which roughly one fifth of the world’s oil supplies pass.
Iran has effectively blocked the waterway since the conflict began on 28 February, contributing to a sharp rise in global energy prices.
The US military did not specify the exact locations targeted. However, an unnamed US official cited by the New York Times said the operation focused on an area near Bandar Abbas, a major southern port city that hosts an Iranian naval base on the Strait of Hormuz.
Iranian state media earlier reported explosions in Bandar Abbas, saying local authorities were investigating.
Later, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said it had shot down a US drone and fired at an American fighter jet that entered Iranian airspace, although it gave no further details about the timing of the incident.
Ceasefire under pressure
The US and Israel launched military operations against Iran on 28 February with a series of attacks that included one which killed Iran’s supreme leader.
Following weeks of fighting, a ceasefire was agreed on 8 April. The truce has largely held, despite a significant clash earlier this month.
In its statement, US Central Command said the latest strikes were intended “to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces”.
The renewed military action comes as diplomatic efforts continue to preserve and potentially extend the ceasefire agreement.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said a deal remained possible but cautioned that negotiations would require “a few days” more.
At the weekend, President Donald Trump first indicated that an agreement was close before later saying negotiators had been instructed “not to rush into” a settlement.
Talks continue in Doha
According to US media reports, negotiators are discussing a memorandum of understanding rather than a final peace agreement. The reported proposal includes a 60-day extension of the ceasefire, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and further negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme.
Iran said on Monday that progress had been made in the talks but stressed that a deal was “not imminent”.
One of the main obstacles is understood to be Tehran’s demand for the release of frozen Iranian assets held overseas.
The negotiations have largely been mediated by Pakistan, while Qatari mediators have also hosted talks this week in Doha.
A source briefed on the discussions told Reuters that Iran’s central bank governor attended Monday’s meetings, where talks focused mainly on frozen Iranian funds, Tehran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, and the future of the Strait of Hormuz.
The US, Israel and several Western countries accuse Iran of enriching uranium to develop nuclear weapons. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful civilian purposes.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Two children and two adults have died after a train collided with a school minibus at a level crossing in northern Belgium, authorities said.

Get today's headlines by email

The crash happened shortly after 08:00 local time on Tuesday in the town of Buggenhout, near Aalst, northwest of Brussels.
The minibus was carrying seven children, a 49-year-old driver and a 27-year-old chaperone on the way to a special education school when the collision occurred.
Federal police spokeswoman An Berger said the victims included two children aged 12 and 15, along with the driver and chaperone. The five other children were taken to hospital in a critical but stable condition.
Belgian officials said nobody on board the train was injured, although one person was treated for shock.
Crossing barriers were down
Belgian mobility minister Jean-Luc Crucke said initial reports indicated the level crossing barriers were already lowered when the minibus entered the tracks.
“My first thoughts are with the victims,” he said.
According to police, the driver had been travelling along a road running parallel to the railway before turning left onto the crossing.
A train approaching Buggenhout station then struck the vehicle.
Thomas Baeken, a spokesman for Belgian rail infrastructure operator Infrabel, said CCTV footage appeared to confirm that warning lights were red and the barriers were down at the time of the collision.
“The train was slowing down as it approached Buggenhout station,” he told Belgian broadcaster VRT.
“How this accident could have happened, we don't know. That is for the police and the public prosecutor’s office to investigate,” he added.
Investigation launched
Prosecutors have opened an investigation into the cause of the crash.
Images from the scene showed the overturned minibus beside the railway line near residential homes. Witnesses said the force of the impact threw the vehicle some distance from the crossing.
Belgian officials said it was too early to assign responsibility for the incident.
Flemish transport minister Annick De Ridder described the collision as “terrible news”.
Flemish education minister Zuhal Demir said on social media that her thoughts were with the victims, their families and those affected by the tragedy.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also expressed condolences, saying: “Today, Europe grieves with Belgium.”
Community in shock
Buggenhout, a small town in the Flemish region of Belgium, was left shaken by the incident as emergency services continued working at the scene throughout the morning.
Rail services in the area were disrupted following the crash while investigators examined the crossing and gathered evidence. Authorities have not yet released the identities of the victims.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 May 2026
webfact
webfact
The US military has carried out fresh strikes in southern Iran, targeting missile sites and boats that were allegedly attempting to lay naval mines, according to US Central Command.

Get today's headlines by email

In a statement, Central Command said the operation was conducted in “self-defence” and aimed at protecting American troops from threats posed by Iranian forces.
A spokesperson for the command said US forces were continuing to defend personnel in the region while showing restraint during what it described as an ongoing ceasefire.
The latest attacks come amid continuing diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran to end the conflict that has spread across the Middle East in recent months.
Speaking on Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baqai said negotiators had made progress in discussions with the United States, but warned that an agreement was still not close.
“It is correct to say that we have reached a conclusion on a large portion of the issues under discussion,” Baqai said. “But to say that this means the signing of an agreement is imminent — no-one can make such a claim.”
Iran has not yet publicly responded to the latest US strikes. It remains unclear whether the attacks could affect ongoing negotiations between the two sides.
Diplomatic efforts
At the weekend, President Donald Trump suggested that Washington and Tehran were nearing a deal. However, he later said he had instructed negotiators “not to rush into” an agreement.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also said on Monday that a breakthrough remained possible.
The conflict began after the US and Israel launched large-scale strikes on Iran on 28 February. Tehran responded with attacks on Israel and Gulf states allied with Washington.
Regional impact
Iran also effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important shipping routes for oil exports. The disruption caused a sharp rise in global oil prices and increased concerns about wider instability in the region.
Fighting and military exchanges have continued despite diplomatic contacts between the two sides, with both Washington and Tehran accusing each other of escalating tensions.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Compiled from various sources. 26 May 2026

webfact
webfact
A group of Vietnam War veterans and a historian are challenging President Donald Trump’s proposed triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery, arguing the project disrespects fallen service members and reflects authoritarian symbolism rather than national unity.

Get today's headlines by email

Retired Army Special Forces officer Jon Gundersen and former Navy officer Shaun Byrnes are among the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed in February seeking to halt construction of the 250-foot monument planned for a traffic circle between Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial.
The lawsuit claims the administration rushed the project without proper congressional approval. The plaintiffs also argue the structure would disrupt a historic sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and the Robert E. Lee Memorial, which they say was designed to symbolise reconciliation after the US Civil War.
Renderings released for the project show an arch more than twice the height of the Lincoln Memorial. The design has drawn comparisons to Paris’s Arc de Triomphe.
Gundersen and Byrnes insist their opposition is not politically motivated. Speaking to CBS News, Gundersen said their actions reflected loyalty to the United States rather than to any president.
“I think what we’re doing is being loyal to the country,” he said.
Duty to fallen soldiers
Byrnes, who served two tours in Vietnam, said he joined the legal challenge out of a sense of duty to fellow soldiers buried at Arlington.
He described the proposal as disrespectful to those who died in service and said it had caused him to reconsider plans to be buried at the cemetery himself.
Veterans say monument reflects authoritarian politics
The lawsuit, led by the Public Citizen Litigation Group, faces opposition from the US Justice Department, which has argued the plaintiffs do not have legal standing to sue.
Although Congress has not formally voted on the current proposal, administration officials have said earlier authorisation exists through a century-old plan that envisioned “two stately columns” representing the North and South after the Civil War.
Last month, a federal judge declined to temporarily block construction, though work on the project has not yet begun.
Plaintiffs argue project disrespects Arlington dead
Gundersen, 81, and Byrnes, 83, said they view the arch less as a celebration of America’s 250th anniversary and more as a monument to President Donald Trump personally.
Last year, Trump displayed a model of the proposed structure in the Oval Office and described it as “fantastic”. When asked by CBS News correspondent Ed O’Keefe who the monument was intended for, Trump replied: “Me.”

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Portable chargers are causing a growing number of problems on flights, the UK aviation regulator has warned, as it urged passengers to follow airline safety rules on lithium-ion batteries.

Get today's headlines by email

The UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said more awareness was needed about the risks linked to power banks, which can overheat or catch fire if damaged, poorly made or used incorrectly.
Jonathan Nicholson, from the CAA, said restrictions on carrying portable chargers were essential safety measures rather than unnecessary bureaucracy.
“It’s not somebody being pedantic or doing it for the sake of it,” he told BBC News, urging travellers to “do the right thing”.
Rules for carrying power banks
The warning follows an incident last week involving an EasyJet flight from Hurghada in Egypt to London Luton that was diverted to Rome after a passenger reported a portable charger had been packed in checked luggage.
The aircraft landed at Rome Fiumicino Airport as a precaution and passengers were forced to stay overnight before continuing to London the next day.
Nicholson said international aviation rules require passengers to keep power banks in their carry-on luggage rather than in the aircraft hold.
He said passengers should also limit themselves to a maximum of two power banks and avoid using them during flights.
“Absolutely do not charge the power bank itself because that’s when they become really hot and most susceptible to having an issue,” he said.
The CAA plans to launch a joint awareness campaign with UK airlines this summer to explain the rules to holidaymakers and business travellers.
Incidents increasing worldwide
Nicholson said incidents involving power banks were “certainly on the rise” as portable chargers become more common, alongside devices such as vapes, which are also banned from checked luggage.
He pointed to research released last year by UL Standards & Engagement, a US-based safety organisation, which found airlines were experiencing an average of two “thermal runaway” incidents per week in 2024.
Thermal runaway refers to lithium-ion batteries overheating, potentially causing fires or explosions.
The data, collected from 37 passenger and cargo airlines, covered rechargeable devices including phones, laptops, tablets and power banks.
According to the organisation, incidents increased by 15% between 2019 and 2024.
Confusion among passengers
A CAA survey of 1,000 UK passengers conducted in November 2025 found that more than a third understood lithium battery rules existed but were unclear about the details.
Passengers aged over 55 were generally more familiar with the regulations.
Nicholson said power banks present greater risks than devices such as laptops or cameras because they contain larger, more powerful batteries that can generate significant heat.
“When they catch fire, they really go,” he said, adding that cabin crews receive specialist training to deal with battery fires.
He also urged people to handle portable chargers more carefully in everyday life, saying they are often thrown into bags and damaged more easily than mobile phones.
Nicholson advised consumers to buy higher-quality products where possible, warning that poorly made chargers and replacement batteries can carry greater safety risks.
Although airline guidance differs slightly between carriers, passengers are generally advised to store power banks under the seat in front of them rather than in overhead lockers.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Pope Leo has issued the first major teaching document of his papacy, warning that artificial intelligence must be “disarmed” and urging global action to prevent the technology from enabling exploitation, warfare and social manipulation.

Get today's headlines by email

In the encyclical Magnifica Humanitas (“Magnificent Humanity”), the Pope argued that humanity faced a moral turning point similar to earlier historical failures to confront slavery and colonialism.
“The word is strong, I know, but deliberately chosen because this moment needs words capable of attracting attention,” he said of his call to “disarm” AI.
Encyclicals are formal letters traditionally addressed to Catholic bishops, but modern popes have increasingly used them to address global political, social and ethical issues.
Slavery parallels
A central theme of the document was the comparison between historical slavery and what the Pope described as emerging forms of “digital slavery”.
Leo warned that AI systems risked normalising exploitation both through the conditions under which some technologies are developed and through the ways they are deployed.
“It was impossible not to feel deep sorrow when contemplating the immense suffering and humiliation endured by so many,” the Pope wrote in one of the Vatican’s strongest apologies for the Catholic Church’s role in slavery. He added that he “sincerely asked for pardon” in the name of the Church.
The Pope also referred to the dangers of “digital colonialism”, drawing parallels between abuses committed during the colonial era and modern technology practices.
He said humanity risked repeating past moral failures if governments and companies failed to establish safeguards around AI.
Warning over warfare and politics
The encyclical sharply criticised the growing use of AI in military systems and warned against the development of an AI arms race.
“No algorithm can make war morally acceptable,” the Pope wrote.
He argued that reducing direct human control over weapons systems made it harder to justify war ethically and could lower the threshold for violence by transforming defence into predictive threat analysis.
The Pope also expressed concern about the political effects of AI, including the manipulation of images and videos that could expose people to misleading or biased information.
Leo urged those developing the technology to recognise what he called their “ethical and spiritual responsibility”.
“Every design choice reflects a vision of humanity,” he said in a direct appeal to AI developers.
AI leaders join Vatican launch
In an unusual move, the Pope personally presented the encyclical at the Vatican alongside AI researchers, including Christopher Olah, co-founder of Anthropic.
Olah said AI companies often operated within incentives that could conflict with ethical decision-making.
“The questions raised by AI are bigger than the AI research community,” he said, adding that responsibility for regulating the technology could not rest solely with computer scientists.
The Pope has previously compared the need for AI protections to labour and human dignity reforms introduced during the industrial revolution.
However, questions remain about how much influence the Vatican can exert over the rapidly advancing technology sector.
The late Pope Francis issued repeated warnings about climate change after publishing his 2015 encyclical Laudato Si, later expressing disappointment at the lack of global action.
Pope Leo has now established a commission to continue work on AI ethics, though the long-term impact of the Vatican’s intervention remains uncertain.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Prime Minister Mark Carney has described Alberta’s planned referendum on separation from Canada as a “dangerous bluff”, warning that voters could face unintended consequences similar to those that followed the UK’s vote to leave the European Union.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Carney drew parallels with Brexit, which took place while he was governor of the Bank of England. He said many British voters had not fully understood the long-term impact of the 2016 referendum.
“Ten years on, the UK is trying to undo what people didn’t think they were voting for, but what they ended up having,” Carney said.
Alberta voters are due to go to the polls on 19 October to decide whether the province should remain part of Canada or move toward a later binding vote on separation.
Campaign for unity
Carney said he would campaign in favour of national unity ahead of the referendum.
“We have to be very careful about this,” he said, arguing there was a “strong, positive case” for keeping Alberta within Canada while maintaining a strong provincial identity.
Supporters of Alberta independence say the oil-rich province has long been neglected by policymakers in Ottawa. They argue that federal environmental measures have limited Alberta’s ability to expand oil and gas pipelines and fully develop its natural resources.
The push for a referendum gathered momentum earlier this year after a grassroots campaign collected more than 300,000 signatures in support of a petition calling for a vote on separation.
Court challenge and political response
The petition was later struck down by a court after Indigenous First Nations groups argued they had not been properly consulted during the process.
Despite the ruling, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said the province would still move ahead with a referendum question on separation.
Smith pointed to a separate petition supporting Alberta remaining within Canada that attracted more than 400,000 signatures, saying Albertans should still be allowed to express their views in a plebiscite.
She also criticised the court’s decision and defended the referendum process as a democratic exercise.
Although Smith supports holding the vote, she has said she will campaign for Alberta to stay in Canada. She has argued that relations between Alberta and the federal government have improved in recent months.
Poll suggests majority back staying
A poll released on Monday by Canadian research company Angus Reid Institute suggested that about three in five Albertans would vote to remain part of Canada.
Carney’s comparison with Brexit reflects wider concerns among some Canadian politicians and analysts about the risks of constitutional uncertainty and economic disruption if Alberta were to pursue independence.
The UK’s Brexit referendum in 2016 ended with 52% voting to leave the European Union and 48% choosing to remain. Britain formally left the bloc in 2020.
Brexit supporters argued that EU membership restricted British sovereignty and economic flexibility, while critics said leaving created years of political and economic instability.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 May 2026
webfact
webfact
The UK has recorded its hottest May day on record after temperatures climbed to 34.8°C in west London as an early-season heatwave gripped much of the country.

Get today's headlines by email.

The provisional reading was recorded at Kew Gardens on Monday, according to the Met Office. It also exceeded the previous record for the hottest bank holiday Monday, which stood at 33.3C during the August bank holiday in 2019.
Forecasters said temperatures could rise even higher on Tuesday, with some parts of England expected to approach 35C.
Record temperatures across UK
Wales also set a new May temperature record, with Hawarden Airport in Flintshire reaching 32.2C. Scotland and Northern Ireland recorded their warmest days of the year so far, with highs of 25.5°C at Charterhall and 24.6°C at Hillsborough, respectively.
The Met Office described the conditions as unusually intense for this time of year.
“This heat would be exceptional in the UK even in mid-summer, let alone in May,” the agency said.
The UK also experienced its warmest May night on record on Sunday, when temperatures in London remained as high as 19.4C overnight.
According to the Met Office, more than half of the UK’s monthly temperature records have now been set since 2003, reflecting a broader rise in extreme heat events.
Chief operational meteorologist Dan Suri said the current spell had been caused by warm air building beneath a high-pressure system near the UK. Typical temperatures for late May range between 14C and 20C.
Health alerts and disruption
The UK Health Security Agency issued its first amber heat-health alert of 2026 on Friday, covering London, the South East, the East Midlands, the West Midlands and eastern England. Yellow alerts were issued for several other English regions, with all warnings remaining in place until Wednesday evening.
The hot weather caused disruption in parts of southern England, where around 500 properties in Sussex and Kent lost water supplies or experienced interruptions because of increased demand.
Water company South East Water apologised and said crews were working to restore normal service as quickly as possible.
Several outdoor events were either cancelled or altered because of the heat. In Surrey, organisers of the Leatherhead Lions Club donkey derby removed the donkey races and dog show from the programme over concerns for animal welfare.
Elsewhere, thousands of spectators attended the annual cheese-rolling competition at Cooper’s Hill in Gloucestershire despite the high temperatures. German YouTuber Tom Kopke, known online as Tooleko, won the first race ahead of local competitor Chris Anderson.
Warnings as heat continues
Forecasters said thunderstorms could develop in parts of England on Tuesday evening as the heat persists.
Temperatures are expected to remain around 30C across England and Wales through Thursday before easing slightly later in the week.
Heatwave conditions were officially recorded in eight areas of England on Sunday, including Heathrow, Kew Gardens and Northolt in London, as well as locations in Suffolk, Essex and Oxfordshire.
The AA urged motorists to take precautions during the hot spell, warning that temperatures inside parked vehicles could reach 60C.
It said children, vulnerable passengers and pets should never be left unattended in cars, even briefly.
Age UK advised older people to avoid going outside during the hottest part of the day and recommended cold showers and baths to stay cool.
Climate and European heatwave
Scientists say climate change is increasing the likelihood and intensity of extreme heat events.
The Met Office’s State of the UK Climate report found the number of days above 28C has more than doubled compared with the 1961–1990 average, while days above 30C have more than tripled over the past decade.
The heatwave has extended across much of Europe. Spain recorded temperatures of 38C on Sunday, while France, Germany, Switzerland and northern Italy also experienced temperatures far above seasonal averages, with multiple local May records broken.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Russia has warned it could launch a new wave of strikes on Kyiv, days after carrying out one of the largest attacks on the Ukrainian capital since the war began.

Get today's headlines by email

Russia’s foreign ministry said future attacks would target “decision-making centres and command posts”, as well as drone production facilities in Kyiv. Moscow also urged foreign nationals and diplomats to leave the city “as soon as possible” and advised people to avoid military and administrative sites.
The warning followed large-scale Russian missile and drone attacks overnight on Saturday, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said killed four people and injured around 100 others in Kyiv and surrounding areas.
Claims over Starobilsk attack
Moscow said the strikes were retaliation for what it described as a deliberate Ukrainian attack on a student dormitory in Starobilsk, a Russian-occupied town in eastern Ukraine. Russian officials said 21 people were killed in the incident on Friday.
Ukraine’s military said it had targeted an elite Russian drone unit operating in the area and denied attacking civilians.
Russia has intensified aerial assaults on Kyiv since a short ceasefire linked to Moscow’s Victory Day celebrations ended earlier this month.
In another recent strike, Russian attacks on the capital killed 24 people, including three children, after a residential apartment block was hit.
Escalating aerial attacks
Days later, Russian authorities reported that three people were killed in a major Ukrainian drone attack on the Moscow region. Zelensky described those strikes as an “entirely justified” response to repeated Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities.
Kyiv then came under one of the heaviest aerial bombardments of the war overnight on Saturday.
Videos shared online showed explosions across the skyline throughout the night, while residents reported repeated blasts as civilian areas were struck.
Ukraine said Russia launched dozens of ballistic and cruise missiles alongside hundreds of drones. Moscow also fired an Oreshnik hypersonic missile towards Bila Tserkva, a city about 90km south of Kyiv. The missile is capable of carrying nuclear warheads.
Several non-military sites were damaged, including the Chernobyl Museum and the National Art Museum of Ukraine. A shopping centre, market and residential buildings in the Lukanivka district were also destroyed.
Diplomatic pressure and air defence concerns
On Monday evening, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov urged US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to evacuate American diplomats from Kyiv during a phone call, according to Russia’s foreign ministry.
Many observers view Russia’s warning to foreign nationals as psychological pressure rather than a sign of a major policy shift, as Moscow has repeatedly targeted Kyiv since launching its full-scale invasion in 2022.
Over the course of the war, Ukraine has built a more advanced air defence network capable of intercepting many incoming drones and missiles. However, Russian attacks often involve such large numbers of weapons that some penetrate the defences.
Ukraine also relies heavily on foreign-supplied air defence systems. In March, Zelensky warned that supplies could become strained because of military demands linked to the US and Israel’s conflict with Iran.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Israel launched a new wave of air strikes across Lebanon on Monday after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the country would intensify its military campaign against Hezbollah.

Get today's headlines by email

The Israeli military said it had targeted Hezbollah sites in the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon, as well as additional locations elsewhere in the country. The strikes followed a video statement from Netanyahu, who said Israel was “at war with Hezbollah” and had instructed the military to “deal them a crushing blow”.
The escalation comes despite a 45-day ceasefire extension agreed earlier this month between Israel and Lebanon. Although the truce reduced large-scale fighting, clashes and air strikes have continued, particularly in southern Lebanon.
Fears of Wider Conflict
The latest attacks have raised concerns in Beirut that Israel’s military campaign could expand further and potentially include the Lebanese capital.
Netanyahu said Israeli operations against Hezbollah had already “eliminated over 600 terrorists” and argued that the military now needed to increase both the number and intensity of its strikes.
Since the ceasefire agreement signed on 16 April, most Israeli attacks have been concentrated in southern Lebanon, where Israeli troops remain deployed. Israel says rockets and drones have continued to be launched from the area.
The Bekaa Valley, targeted on Monday evening, is a strategic region in eastern Lebanon near the Syrian border and has long been considered a stronghold for Hezbollah.
Regional Tensions Persist
The expansion of Israel’s offensive came as Iran said any emerging peace agreement with the United States must include a complete ceasefire across all fronts in the regional conflict.
Israel’s government has resisted calls to end operations against Hezbollah. Ten Israeli soldiers have been killed since the original ceasefire was agreed, according to Israeli officials.
Lebanese authorities say more than 400 people have been killed in Israeli bombardments during the same period, including paramedics and emergency workers.
Israeli forces have also issued near-daily evacuation warnings for residents in newly targeted areas of southern Lebanon, contributing to the displacement of more than one million people.
Background to the Conflict
Lebanon became involved in the current conflict after the United States and Israel launched military action against Iran on 28 February. Hezbollah, which is backed by Iran, responded after an Israeli strike killed Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The group fired rockets into Israel, prompting an Israeli air campaign across Lebanon and a subsequent ground invasion.
According to Lebanon’s health ministry, more than 3,000 people have been killed in Israeli attacks since the conflict began.
The Lebanese government has said it is attempting to disarm Hezbollah but argues that maintaining a ceasefire is essential to completing what it describes as a highly complex process.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 May 2026

webfact
webfact
Iran has said progress has been made in negotiations with the United States but warned that an agreement between the two sides is still not close.

Get today's headlines by email.

Speaking in Tehran on Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baqai said talks had advanced on many issues but cautioned against expectations of an imminent breakthrough.
“It is correct to say that we have reached a conclusion on a large portion of the issues under discussion,” Baqai said. “But to say that this means the signing of an agreement is imminent — no one can make such a claim.”
His comments came after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested a deal could be announced as early as Monday.
Speaking to reporters in Delhi, Rubio said negotiators had hoped for developments overnight. “Maybe today,” he added, while warning against reading too much into the timing because communication with Tehran was taking time.
Talks and ceasefire proposal
According to reports, the proposed memorandum of understanding would include a 60-day extension of the ceasefire, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and further negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme.
At the weekend, US President Donald Trump said the two sides were moving closer to a deal, although he later said he had instructed negotiators not to rush.
CBS News reported that US intelligence believes Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is in hiding after being injured during an Israeli strike at the start of the conflict that killed his father and predecessor. The report said difficulties communicating with his envoys had slowed the pace of negotiations.
US media reports said the current proposal is not intended as a final settlement and would leave several major issues unresolved for future talks. These include sanctions relief, access to frozen Iranian assets and Washington’s demands for limits on Iran’s nuclear activities.
Hormuz and market reaction
Rubio said the agreement would help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the key shipping route through which around one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas supplies pass.
Iran has effectively blocked the waterway since the conflict began, disrupting global trade and pushing up energy prices.
Markets reacted positively to signs of progress in the negotiations. Oil prices fell sharply on Monday, while Asian stock markets rose.
However, shipping executives warned that any recovery in global supply chains would take time even if an agreement is reached.
Lars Jensen, chief executive of Vespucci Maritime and former director at shipping company Maersk, told BBC Radio 4 that the industry would remain cautious for months before making significant operational changes.
Republican divisions emerge
The proposed deal has triggered criticism from several senior Republicans in Washington, exposing divisions within Trump’s political allies.
Senator Ted Cruz called the reported terms “a disastrous mistake”, while Senator Roger Wicker said a temporary ceasefire would undermine the results of “Operation Epic Fury”.
Senator Lindsey Graham also criticised any arrangement that could leave Iran appearing dominant in the region.
Trump dismissed the criticism, describing opponents as “losers” and insisting any agreement with Iran would either be “great and meaningful” or there would be no deal at all.
The conflict began after wide-ranging US and Israeli strikes on Iran on 28 February. Iran retaliated with attacks on Israel and Gulf states allied with Washington and moved to close the Strait of Hormuz.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran remained willing to reassure the international community that it was not seeking nuclear weapons.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source: 26 May 2026
webfact
webfact
China has launched the Shenzhou 23 spacecraft carrying three astronauts to its Tiangong space station, with one crew member expected to remain in orbit for up to a year in one of the country's longest planned human spaceflight missions on Sunday according to state media reports.

Get today's headlines by email

Commander Zhu Yangzhu leads the mission alongside Zhang Zhiyuan and Lai Ka-ying, also identified by authorities as Li Jiaying. Lai, born and raised in Hong Kong, holds a doctorate in computer forensics and becomes the first astronaut from the city to participate in a space mission. She is also described by state media as China's fourth female astronaut to go into space in space.
Crew and extended mission
The crew is expected to carry out dozens of science and application projects while in orbit. They will also take part in an in-orbit rotation with the crew of Shenzhou 21, who have been aboard the Tiangong space station for more than 200 days.
Station operations and rotation
The Shenzhou 21 mission included China's youngest astronaut and carried four mice, marking the first live mammals sent on a Chinese space mission since the programme began during their time in orbit at Tiangong station state media said according to state media reports.
Space programme context
China is expanding its space programme as it prepares for a first crewed lunar landing by 2030. The United States is seen as its main rival in space, with NASA targeting a lunar landing in 2028. China was effectively excluded from the International Space Station on US national security concerns, prompting development of its own Tiangong station, which first hosted a crew in 2021. In previous missions, an emergency Shenzhou flight returned astronauts who had been stranded after a spacecraft was damaged. A separate incident saw astronauts delayed for nine days when the window of their return spacecraft was damaged. They ultimately returned on Shenzhou 21 after its crew arrived at the station, while Shenzhou 20 was later deemed unsafe to carry astronauts as the programme continues to develop in the future according to official reports.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Israeli air strikes hit areas across southern and eastern Lebanon on Sunday, according to Lebanese state media, with reports of casualties as attacks continued despite a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah that began on 17 April and has since been extended.

Get today's headlines by email

The latest bombardment followed a deadly strike a day earlier in Sir al-Gharbiyeh, in southern Lebanon, where the health ministry said 11 people were killed, including a child and six women. Nine others were injured, among them four children and a woman, the ministry added.
Israel’s military has maintained that its operations are aimed at Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, even after the ceasefire came into effect. The Iran-backed group has also continued cross-border activity, including rocket fire on Sunday targeting Israeli forces operating inside Lebanese territory.
Warnings before fresh raids
Lebanon’s National News Agency reported multiple strikes on Sunday across southern and eastern regions, some of which resulted in casualties. Several of the attacks reportedly came shortly before the Israeli military issued evacuation warnings covering more than a dozen villages in southern Lebanon and the eastern Bekaa Valley.
An AFP correspondent described large plumes of smoke rising after strikes on the southern towns of Nabatieh and Zawtar al-Sharqiyah. Lebanon’s civil defence agency said its regional facility in Nabatieh had been destroyed in an overnight strike, with images showing personnel recovering equipment and removing oxygen cylinders from rubble.
The ceasefire, brokered with US involvement, has faced repeated strain as both sides continue to accuse each other of violations. Under the terms published by Washington, Israel retains the right to respond to what it describes as “planned, imminent or ongoing attacks”.
Diplomatic signals and regional talks
Amid the continued violence, political figures in Lebanon and abroad have pointed to possible diplomatic movement between Washington and Tehran. Hassan Fadlallah, a Hezbollah lawmaker recently sanctioned by the United States, said “major transformations are taking place in the region” and suggested a potential US-Iran understanding could include Lebanon in any broader settlement.
He said Iran had made any agreement with the United States conditional on halting the war in Lebanon. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem also said he had received a message from Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, delivered via Pakistani mediators, outlining a proposal that included Lebanon in wider ceasefire efforts.
Qassem expressed cautious hope that a deal between Iran and the United States could soon be completed, saying there were “signs of its completion” and that Lebanon could be included in a full cessation of hostilities.
US criticism and political tensions
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Hezbollah of attempting to push Lebanon “back into chaos”, criticising what he described as the group’s “reckless call to overthrow Lebanon’s democratically elected government”. He said Hezbollah was actively contributing to instability in the country.
Separately, Lebanese authorities have begun direct talks with Israel under US mediation, while insisting those discussions remain separate from Iran-US negotiations.
Hezbollah entered the broader regional conflict on 2 March, launching rockets at Israel in response to the killing of Iran’s supreme leader, according to the group’s position outlined in the source material. Israeli forces are also reported to be operating within an area described as a “yellow line”, extending about 10km inside Lebanon’s southern border.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 May 2026
webfact
webfact
A spearfisher has died after being attacked by a shark on the Great Barrier Reef, marking Australia’s second fatal shark attack in just over a week, police have said in recent days in Australian waters.

Get today's headlines by email

The 39-year-old man was diving with three friends from a boat at Kennedy Shoal off the Queensland coast south of Cairns on Sunday when the incident occurred during a diving trip at sea, according to police.
Police Inspector Elaine Burns said the man was spearfishing when he was attacked and suffered a fatal head injury in Queensland waters.
Attack off Queensland reef
Kennedy Shoal is a shallow coral reef popular with recreational fishers and divers. It is also known for the nearby Lady Bowen shipwreck, a 19th-century wreck that attracts visitors, according to local authorities.
Police said fishers in the area had previously reported sightings of bull sharks before the attack.
Emergency response and victim details
The victim, a resident of Cairns, was brought by boat to the tourist town of Hull Heads around midday, shortly after the attack, where paramedics were waiting.
An ambulance service statement said he had “sustained injuries not compatible with life”, according to the ambulance service.
Inspector Burns said the man died from a critical head injury.
Recent fatal attacks and national toll
The incident follows another fatal shark attack on 16 May at a coral reef off Rottnest Island near the southwest coast of Western Australia in another incident.
In that case, spearfisher Steve Mattabonni, a 38-year-old Perth resident, was fatally injured. He was taken by boat to the holiday island, where paramedics were unable to resuscitate him, in that case.
A five-metre white shark was suspected by authorities.
Australia has recorded an average of more than three fatal shark attacks a year in recent decades over time. The latest death is Australia’s third shark fatality of 2026 so far.
Earlier this year, 12-year-old Nico Antic died in hospital days after being attacked by a suspected bull shark off a Sydney beach on 18 January this year.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 May 2026
webfact
webfact
The White House has sharply criticised former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo after he attacked an emerging US proposal aimed at ending the conflict with Iran, with a senior communications official telling him to “shut his stupid mouth”.

Get today's headlines by email

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung accused Pompeo of commenting without proper knowledge of ongoing negotiations, escalating a public dispute over the direction of US policy on Iran.
Cheung said Pompeo “has no idea what the f— he’s talking about” and urged him to stop commenting on the talks, arguing that he was not briefed on current developments and therefore could not accurately assess the situation.
Pompeo, who served as Secretary of State during the first Trump administration, had earlier criticised the reported outline of a deal in a post on X, saying it did not align with an “America First” approach.
Criticism of emerging Iran framework
In his remarks, Pompeo compared the reported negotiations to earlier diplomatic efforts linked to Obama-era officials, referencing figures involved in previous Iran nuclear talks, including Wendy Sherman, Robert Malley and Ben Rhodes.
He argued that the approach being discussed would strengthen Iran’s military-linked institutions and warned against financial concessions, urging a far tougher strategy toward Tehran. His comments formed part of a wider wave of criticism from Republican figures.
Several Republican lawmakers, including Senators Roger Wicker, Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, also raised concerns about the emerging framework, reflecting divisions within conservative ranks over how to handle Iran.
Limited details of proposed agreement
Details of the proposed deal remain limited, but reports suggest it may include reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global shipping route through which around a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes. Any disruption or reopening of the passage has significant implications for global energy markets.
The reported framework also appears to include lifting a blockade on Iranian ports and establishing a temporary 60-day ceasefire intended to allow further negotiations on longer-term issues.
However, the proposal does not appear to include immediate restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme, a point that has drawn criticism from conservatives and former officials who argue the omission is a major weakness.
US President Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social that final details of the agreement were still being discussed and would be announced soon. He also indicated that reopening the Strait of Hormuz would be part of any deal.
Tensions over past policy and alliances
Pompeo served in Trump’s first administration but later became politically distanced from parts of the former president’s circle. Relations between the two have remained strained since Trump returned to office in 2025.
The exchange also reflects wider disagreements over US strategy toward Iran, particularly the legacy of the Obama-era nuclear agreement, which the Trump administration previously withdrew from and has repeatedly criticised.
Trump has also previously revoked security protection for Pompeo and other former officials with whom he fell out, despite ongoing threats reportedly linked to Iran.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Iran’s football federation says Fifa has approved a request to move the country’s World Cup training base from the United States to Mexico ahead of next month’s tournament.

Get today's headlines by email

The president of the Iranian Football Federation, Mehdi Taj, said the team would now be based in the Mexican border city of Tijuana instead of Tucson.
Fifa has not yet publicly confirmed the change.
Iran had originally been assigned a base camp in Arizona for the tournament, which is being jointly hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. However, uncertainty linked to the conflict in the Middle East and related security concerns prompted discussions over relocating the team’s preparations.
Tournament schedule
Iran are due to begin their campaign against New Zealand in Los Angeles on 15 June before facing Belgium in the same city six days later. Their final group match is scheduled against Egypt in Seattle on 26 June.
Speaking about the move, Taj said the federation had held talks with Fifa and World Cup officials in Istanbul and also took part in an online meeting from Tehran with Fifa secretary general Mattias Grafstrom.
He said the request to relocate the camp to Mexico had been accepted and added that Tijuana’s location offered shorter travel times to match venues.
According to Taj, flights from Tijuana to Los Angeles would take less than an hour, making logistics easier compared with the original Arizona base.
Iran’s squad are currently training in Antalya ahead of the tournament, which begins on 11 June.
Visa concerns remain
The preparations have also been affected by visa issues involving Iranian players and officials.
Earlier this month, Taj said members of the national team were still waiting to receive visas to enter the United States for the competition.
The Iranian federation has reportedly submitted a list of conditions to Fifa regarding participation in the tournament. These include requests for visas to be granted to players, coaches and officials who previously completed military service with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Iranian players would be welcomed at the World Cup, although individuals linked to the IRGC could face restrictions on entry.
In April, Taj and several other Iranian football officials were denied entry into Canada ahead of Fifa’s annual congress in Vancouver. Canada’s immigration minister later said Taj’s visa had been cancelled because of alleged links to the IRGC.
Some members of Iran’s squad travelled to the US embassy in Ankara on Thursday to submit visa applications for the tournament.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 May 2026
webfact
webfact
Russia launched a large-scale overnight assault on Ukraine, firing hundreds of drones and dozens of missiles in attacks that killed at least four people and injured around 100, according to Ukrainian officials.

Get today's headlines by email

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Kyiv was the primary target of the strikes, though several other regions were also hit. Loud explosions were reported across the capital through the night, while residential buildings, a school, an opera house and a museum suffered damage.
Ukraine’s air force said Russia launched 90 missiles and 600 drones from Saturday evening onwards. Preliminary data indicated that 55 ballistic and cruise missiles and 549 drones were intercepted or destroyed, while 19 missiles may have failed to reach their targets. Officials also reported 16 direct missile strikes and 51 drone impacts across 54 locations.
Kyiv Under Heavy Fire
Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said two people were killed inside the city and 36 others, including two children, were taken to hospital.
One fatality occurred after a nine-storey apartment building in Kyiv’s Shevchenko district was struck, sparking a fire on the upper floors. In the same district, debris from another strike blocked the entrance to an air raid shelter at a school, trapping several people inside.
Emergency crews were deployed across the capital to extinguish fires, clear rubble and treat the wounded.
In the surrounding Kyiv region, regional governor Mykola Kalashnyk said two additional people had been killed. He described the strikes as “deliberate terror against peaceful people”.
Ukraine’s Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko said the Chornobyl Museum in Kyiv had been heavily damaged. He called it “a deliberate attack on history, memory, and truth”.
Other regions including Cherkasy, Kharkiv, Odesa, Poltava, Sumy and Zhytomyr were also targeted, according to Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha.
Dispute Over Oreshnik Missile
Russia’s defence ministry said the attacks were carried out in response to what it described as Ukrainian strikes on civilian infrastructure. Ukraine’s military denies targeting civilians.
Moscow also claimed it used the Oreshnik hypersonic missile during the assault. The weapon is believed to travel at more than 10 times the speed of sound and is capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads.
President Zelensky said the missile had been launched at Bila Tserkva in the Kyiv region, though Ukraine’s presidential office later said investigations were continuing to confirm exactly which weapons had been used.
If verified, it would mark the third known use of the Oreshnik missile since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022 under President Vladimir Putin.
International Reaction
European leaders condemned the strikes and the reported use of the hypersonic missile.
French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz criticised the attack, while EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas described the missile’s use as “reckless nuclear-brinkmanship”.
UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said the scenes in Kyiv were “awful” and pledged continued pressure on Russia.
The assault came days after Russian officials accused Ukraine of attacking a student dormitory in the occupied town of Starobilsk, where Moscow said 21 people were killed. Ukraine acknowledged carrying out a strike in the area but said it targeted an elite Russian drone unit.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 May 2026

webfact
webfact
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has described as “appalling” a case in which three teenage boys convicted of raping two girls avoided custodial sentences.

Get today's headlines by email

The boys, aged 13 and 14 at the time of the offences, were sentenced at Southampton Crown Court on Thursday after attacks on two girls in Fordingbridge in November 2024 and January 2025.
Two of the boys, both now aged 15, and another now aged 14, were instead given Youth Rehabilitation Orders (YROs), community-based sentences for children that can include curfews, supervision and treatment requirements.
Review of sentences
Speaking after one of the victims criticised the ruling in an interview with the BBC, Starmer said the case was being urgently reviewed by the attorney general.
In a post on X, the prime minister said the girls had shown “extraordinary bravery and strength in heinous circumstances”.
“This is an appalling case and it is right that law officers are urgently reviewing the sentences,” he said.
The attorney general now has 28 days to decide whether to refer the sentences to the Court of Appeal under the unduly lenient sentence scheme.
Cabinet Office minister Darren Jones said ministers expected the review to move more quickly because of the seriousness of the case.
Victim criticises ruling
One of the victims, now aged 16, told the BBC the decision felt like “a rock straight in my face”.
She said the outcome made it appear that what had happened to the girls was “not OK, but it was OK in the eyes of the law because they were still children”.
The teenager questioned why she had gone through the court process and relived the attacks during the trial if the punishment amounted to what she described as “a slap on the wrist”.
She had been 15 when she was raped in an underpass near the River Avon after travelling to meet one of the boys, who had contacted her through Snapchat. The second victim, aged 14 at the time, was raped in a field.
The assaults were filmed on mobile phones, with some footage later shared online.
Judge cited age of offenders
At sentencing, Judge Nicholas Rowland said he wanted to avoid “criminalising these children unnecessarily”, despite acknowledging the seriousness of the offences.
He said the filming of the attacks made the crimes “even more serious”, but also praised the boys for their behaviour during the trial.
One 15-year-old received a three-year YRO with 180 days of intensive supervision for raping both girls and for indecent image offences.
The second 15-year-old received the same sentence for multiple rape charges and indecent image offences. The 14-year-old was given an 18-month YRO after being convicted of encouraging one of the rapes.
Under UK law, offenders under 18 serve custodial sentences in secure youth facilities rather than adult prisons.
Political reaction
Senior politicians from across parties criticised the sentences.
Robert Jenrick said justice had not been done and questioned whether judges should face greater accountability for sentencing decisions.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said she was “sickened” by the case, while Liberal Democrat justice spokesperson Ben Maguire called the crimes “utterly horrific”.
Rachel de Souza said she was “deeply concerned” and that her office would contact the families to offer support.
A government spokesperson said ministers shared the public’s “shock” at the details of the case and confirmed that law officers were reviewing the sentences “with the utmost care and attention”.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 May 2026

webfact
webfact
US President Donald Trump has told American negotiators not to rush efforts to secure a deal with Iran, despite reports suggesting an agreement may be close.

Get today's headlines by email

Media reports in the United States said discussions have focused on a possible 60-day extension of the current ceasefire, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and continued negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme.
In a post on Truth Social on Sunday, Trump described the talks as “constructive” but stressed that both sides should proceed carefully.
“Negotiations are proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner, and I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal in that time is on our side,” Trump wrote.
He added: “Both sides must take their time and get it right. There can be no mistakes!”
Talks Continue Despite Remaining Disputes
Trump had said on Saturday that an agreement had been “largely negotiated”, fuelling speculation that a breakthrough announcement could be imminent.
However, Iranian media later reported that disagreements remain over “one or two” unresolved issues.
Iranian officials have also indicated that progress has been made, though foreign ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei cautioned that key matters had not yet been settled.
Baghaei said negotiations were moving forward but warned that this did not guarantee final agreements on the most sensitive issues.
Conflict and Ceasefire
The latest diplomatic efforts follow months of conflict between Iran, Israel and the United States.
On 28 February, Israel and the US launched major air strikes on Iran. Tehran responded with drones and missile attacks targeting Israel and US-linked sites across Gulf countries.
A ceasefire reached in April was intended to create space for negotiations and has mostly held, although occasional exchanges of fire have continued.
Nuclear Programme and Hormuz
Trump repeated Washington’s long-standing position that Iran must not develop a nuclear weapon.
The United States and its allies accuse Tehran of seeking nuclear weapons capability through uranium enrichment. Iran has consistently denied the allegation, insisting its nuclear activities are for peaceful civilian purposes.
Trump also said the US blockade on Iranian ports, introduced in early April, would remain in place until any agreement is fully finalised and signed.
At the same time, Iran has maintained control over the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically important shipping route through which roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas supplies pass. Restrictions around the strait have contributed to rising global energy prices.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said earlier that negotiations had produced “significant” but “not final” progress.
Rubio suggested there could soon be positive developments regarding the strait, saying recent discussions could potentially lead to a “completely open strait... without tolls”.
Mediation Efforts
Baghaei told Iranian state television on Saturday that Tehran was preparing a “memorandum of understanding” aimed at extending discussions and eventually securing a final agreement.
Trump also referred to a possible memorandum in a separate Truth Social post.
Meanwhile, Ishaq Dar, whose government has been helping mediate the talks, said recent negotiations offered “grounds for optimism” and suggested a positive outcome could be “within reach”.
Despite the upbeat signals, several US media outlets reported that officials did not expect a formal agreement to be signed on Sunday.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 May 2026

webfact
webfact
A growing number of climate and pro-Palestinian activists in England and Wales are being jailed for acts of protest and civil disobedience, according to new research that argues Britain has created a “new breed” of political prisoner.

Get today's headlines by email

The report, produced by researchers at Queen Mary University of London and campaign group Defend Our Juries, says custodial sentences for direct action protests were once uncommon but are now becoming longer and more frequent.
Researchers examined 286 cases involving climate activists and Palestine solidarity protesters who received prison sentences, amounting to a combined total of 136 years in jail. The findings are due to be published on Tuesday.
Rising use of prison sentences
The report links the increase in imprisonments to tougher anti-protest legislation, expanded police powers and the growing use of civil injunctions by companies and public authorities. It also highlights concerns about judges limiting legal defences available to protesters and imposing what it describes as unusually severe punishments.
Of the 256 cases where sentencing data was available, the average period spent in detention was 28 weeks. One-third of protesters received sentences of at least six months, while one in five was jailed for more than a year.
David Whyte, professor of climate justice at QMUL and co-author of the report, said the sentences reflected a political response to protest movements.
He said the use of long prison terms and extended periods on remand showed authorities were treating political protesters differently from other defendants involved in civil disobedience cases.
Concerns over pre-trial detention
The report describes pre-trial detention as “the first line of attack” against protesters, arguing that lengthy remand periods discourage future demonstrations.
Researchers found that in 60% of the cases studied, protesters ultimately received sentences shorter than the time they had already spent in custody awaiting trial.
Among the cases highlighted are the “Filton 24”, a group charged over a protest linked to Palestine Action at a factory near Bristol operated by Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit Systems.
Some defendants spent up to 18 months in custody before trial, despite the standard pre-trial detention limit being six months. Most were later granted bail after the first six defendants were cleared of aggravated burglary charges. Two of those six were also acquitted of criminal damage offences. Eighteen other defendants are still awaiting trial on separate charges connected to the protest.
Civil injunctions and contempt cases
The report found that contempt of court offences accounted for 40% of imprisonment cases examined. These included breaches of courtroom orders as well as violations of civil injunctions obtained by companies or public authorities to prevent protests.
Whyte said the growing use of injunctions was concerning because actions that begin as civil matters can ultimately result in criminal penalties and prison sentences.
Researchers pointed to the case of 69 people jailed following a high court injunction secured by Warwickshire borough council during a Just Stop Oil campaign at the Kingsbury oil terminal in 2022. Some of those imprisoned had been holding placards, according to the report.
A spokesperson for the judiciary defended the independence of the courts, saying judges make decisions based on evidence, legal arguments and sentencing guidelines established under the law.
The spokesperson added that judges and magistrates sentence offenders according to legislation set by parliament and guidance issued by the independent Sentencing Council, while taking account of aggravating and mitigating factors in each case.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 May 2026
webfact
webfact
SpaceX launched the largest and most powerful version of its Starship rocket on Friday, carrying out the 12th test flight of the spacecraft that the company hopes will eventually take humans to Mars and the moon.

Get today's headlines by email

The upgraded rocket, known as Starship V3, lifted off from the company’s Starbase facility in southern Texas near the Mexican border. The launch came two days after SpaceX chief executive Elon Musk announced plans to take the company public.
The mission carried 20 mock Starlink satellites, which were due to be released later in the flight. The launch followed a scrubbed attempt on Thursday evening caused by last-minute problems at the launch pad.
New Design and More Power
The latest Starship model stands 407 feet (124 metres) tall, making it slightly larger than earlier versions while delivering greater engine thrust. The redesigned booster includes fewer but larger grid fins to help guide it back toward Earth after separation, along with a bigger fuel transfer system supplying its 33 engines.
The stainless steel spacecraft also features upgraded navigation systems, increased computing capability and additional cameras. Engineers have added docking cones intended for future rendezvous operations and lunar missions.
SpaceX has faced several setbacks during previous test flights. Back-to-back launches last year ended in midair explosions that scattered debris over the Atlantic Ocean, while other missions also failed before completing their objectives. Friday’s launch was intended to demonstrate improvements to the upgraded design.
Although Starship is designed to be fully reusable, SpaceX did not attempt to recover any parts during this mission. The first-stage booster was expected to fall into the Gulf of Mexico, while the spacecraft and its satellite payloads were planned to end their journey in the Indian Ocean.
Moon Race Intensifies
NASA is relying on Starship as part of its Artemis programme, which aims to return astronauts to the moon for the first time since the Apollo era. NASA has awarded billions of dollars in contracts to both SpaceX and Blue Origin, the company founded by Jeff Bezos, to develop lunar landing systems.
The companies are competing to provide the spacecraft that will carry astronauts from lunar orbit to the moon’s surface.
While Starship has already completed several brief spaceflights lasting around an hour, Blue Origin’s Blue Moon lander has yet to launch. A prototype mission is expected later this year.
NASA plans to follow April’s crewed lunar flyby mission with an orbital docking test next year under Artemis III. During that mission, astronauts aboard the Orion capsule are expected to practise docking with Starship, Blue Moon or both systems.
A crewed lunar landing under Artemis IV could take place as early as 2028 using whichever lander is ready first. NASA aims to establish a long-term base near the moon’s south pole, supported by astronauts and robotic systems.
Private Missions Planned
SpaceX has also begun taking reservations for private journeys aboard Starship.
Businessman Dennis Tito, recognised as the world’s first space tourist, and his wife signed up several years ago for a planned flight around the moon, although no timetable has been confirmed.
This week, cryptocurrency investor Chun Wang announced plans to join Starship’s first interplanetary mission to Mars. Wang previously funded a privately chartered SpaceX Dragon flight that became the first human mission to orbit above both the north and south poles.
Neither the cost nor a launch date for the proposed Mars mission has been disclosed.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 May 2026
webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.