Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.
Negotiations over a proposed agreement between the United States and Iran remain clouded by uncertainty, despite US President Donald Trump saying the framework has already been signed electronically and describing it as a fair arrangement.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking three days before the expected signing of a memorandum of understanding in Switzerland, Trump said the central aim of the deal was to ensure Iran could never obtain a nuclear weapon. He warned Tehran would face severe consequences if it attempted to develop, buy or otherwise acquire one.
Nuclear Restrictions at Centre of Agreement
Trump said he personally pushed for changes to the wording of the agreement, arguing that it should prohibit Iran not only from developing nuclear weapons but also from obtaining them by any means.
According to Trump, the revised language required additional negotiations before the framework could be finalised. He said Iran would be barred from developing, purchasing or acquiring a nuclear weapon and insisted Tehran would not violate those terms.
The US president also dismissed reports that Washington would commit funds to rebuilding Iran under the agreement. Iranian media have reported that a reconstruction package worth $300 billion forms part of the framework, but Trump rejected that claim, saying the United States had no obligation to invest in Iran.
On Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, Trump said Washington intended to recover the material. He argued that doing so carried symbolic importance, even if the uranium itself was not especially valuable.
Trump also defended his decision to withdraw from the 2015 nuclear agreement negotiated during the administration of former president Barack Obama, describing that accord as deeply flawed.
Trump Criticises Israel Over Lebanon
While discussing the broader regional situation, Trump said he did not support regime change in Iran, arguing that such efforts had historically failed. However, he noted that the deaths of several Iranian leaders had already altered the country's leadership landscape.
The US president also delivered unusually direct criticism of Israel’s military actions in Lebanon. He said the conflict with Hezbollah had dragged on for too long and warned that excessive civilian casualties were being caused.
Trump suggested that Syria could play a greater role in dealing with Hezbollah and questioned the need for strikes that destroy residential buildings while targeting militants.
He also criticised Israeli military action shortly before the expected signing of the US-Iran agreement and said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu needed to act more responsibly regarding Lebanon.
Despite reports of tensions between the two leaders, Trump said his relationship with Netanyahu remained strong and described cooperation between the United States and Israel as highly effective.
Iran Links Deal to Lebanon Ceasefire
Iranian officials have continued to argue that the framework extends beyond Iran itself and includes provisions affecting Lebanon.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said implementation of the memorandum would begin on Friday and described the end of hostilities across multiple fronts as a key achievement of the first stage of negotiations.
Araghchi said discussions had been divided into two phases. The first focused on ending the war, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, releasing frozen Iranian assets and reconstruction efforts. A second 60-day negotiating period is expected to address sanctions relief and the nuclear issue in greater detail.
He also warned that any future Israeli military action against Lebanon would violate the understanding reached with the United States.
Missiles and Drones Remain Unresolved
Although Trump has presented the agreement as a major diplomatic success, significant questions remain unanswered.
Israeli and European officials have expressed concern that Iran’s ballistic missile programme does not appear to be covered by the current framework. European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, have urged that missile capabilities be included in any final settlement.
Iran has long refused to negotiate over its missile programme, describing it as a matter of national defence. Israeli officials fear that large-scale missile attacks could inflict damage comparable to that caused by a small nuclear weapon.
Questions also remain over Iran’s drone capabilities and the future of its regional proxy groups. Analysts in Israel believe there is no guarantee that negotiations will produce a final agreement, leaving key security concerns unresolved.
For now, Trump continues to frame the emerging accord around a single objective: preventing Iran from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon. Yet disputes over missiles, Lebanon, Hezbollah and broader regional security issues are already testing the framework before it is formally signed.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Leaders of the G7 nations gathered in France on Tuesday with the United States-Iran agreement and the war in Ukraine dominating the agenda, as European allies seek progress on both crises.

Get today's headlines by email

French President Emmanuel Macron, hosting the summit in Evian-les-Bains near the Swiss border, said leaders would focus on ensuring that the agreement between Washington and Tehran is turned into a “solid, serious” final settlement.
Focus on Strait of Hormuz
Macron said a working lunch on Tuesday would centre on reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route for global energy supplies. Discussions are expected to include a possible French-British maritime security mission and alternative energy transport routes that avoid the waterway.
US President Donald Trump has said the strait would be fully reopened on Friday, when a formal agreement is expected to be signed in Geneva.
The preliminary deal, digitally signed on Monday, is set to open a 60-day negotiating period covering issues including Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium and the lifting of international sanctions.
The G7 brings together the United States, France, the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan and the European Union.
Leaders from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Egypt are also attending the talks, although diplomats say they are not expected to play a major role in discussions on Iran’s nuclear programme.
Arriving in France on Monday evening, Trump welcomed the agreement, describing it as a deal that would bring significant benefits.
European Backing for Agreement
Before the summit opened, the leaders of France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom issued a joint statement, also signed by Canada, congratulating the United States, Iran and mediators on what they described as a diplomatic breakthrough.
They stressed the importance of detailed negotiations and rapid implementation of the agreement to allow tanker traffic to resume through the Strait of Hormuz.
Macron later said France and its partners stood ready to move quickly to support the reopening of the waterway. Paris and London have promoted plans for a maritime mission aimed at restoring security in the area when conditions permit.
Ukraine Remains High on Agenda
The war in Ukraine is expected to be the second major focus of the summit, with European leaders hoping to persuade Trump that previous US proposals for ending the conflict have favoured Moscow too heavily.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is participating in Tuesday’s opening session, which is devoted to efforts to build peace in Ukraine, and could also hold separate talks with Trump.
On Monday, Zelenskyy renewed an offer to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin at the summit. Putin previously rejected a similar proposal, saying there was little value in a meeting without a draft agreement.
Europe Seeks Pressure on Russia
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Ukraine was continuing to resist Russian advances and had regained some territory while developing the ability to strike targets deep inside Russia.
She also argued that sanctions were placing increasing strain on Russia’s economy.
Negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv have stalled as both sides continue to intensify military attacks.
European governments are seeking to demonstrate that they remain open to talks with Russia while also increasing sanctions pressure and military support for Ukraine, arguing that Moscow is responsible for the lack of progress toward a settlement.
Trump said he held positive conversations on Sunday with both Zelenskyy and Putin and believed both leaders were willing to explore steps toward ending the war.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Dozens of Ukrainian drones targeted Moscow overnight, damaging a major oil refinery and disrupting air traffic across the Russian capital, according to city officials.

Get today's headlines by email

Moscow Mayor Sergey Sobyanin said one drone struck a facility at the Moscow Refinery in the southeastern Kapotnya district. He said there were no casualties and emergency crews were working at the site.
Videos circulating on social media appeared to show flames and thick black smoke rising from the Gazprom-owned refinery, one of the largest fuel-processing facilities serving the Russian capital.
Drone Campaign Intensifies
The attack marked the ninth consecutive day of Ukrainian drone strikes on Moscow, according to statements issued by Sobyanin.
Ukraine has increasingly expanded its long-range drone campaign against targets deep inside Russia, a strategy Kyiv has described as "long-range sanctions." The number of drones reportedly intercepted around Moscow on Tuesday was the highest recorded by the mayor since mid-May.
Sobyanin said Russian forces have shot down 1,134 Ukrainian drones heading toward Moscow so far this year, surpassing the 734 interceptions he reported for all of 2025.
Kyiv Says Strikes Are a Response to Russian Attacks
The latest strike followed a major Russian attack on Kyiv a day earlier that killed at least five people and damaged a historic cathedral.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shared footage that he said showed the burning Moscow refinery, describing the attack as part of Ukraine's long-range strike campaign.
"Russia must be compelled to end the war against our people," Zelenskyy said, calling the operation a response to continuing Russian attacks and the prolongation of the conflict.
Andriy Kovalenko, head of Ukraine's Counter-Disinformation Center, said the refinery processes around 11 million tonnes of oil annually and supplies roughly 40% of Moscow's gasoline demand. He argued the strike demonstrated the limits of Russia's air-defence network despite extensive protection around the capital.
Airports Face Restrictions
Russia's Defence Ministry said its forces destroyed at least 172 Ukrainian drones overnight across the country, with the Moscow attack forming part of a broader wave of strikes.
Russia's aviation authority imposed temporary flight restrictions at more than a dozen airports, including all four of Moscow's international hubs: Sheremetyevo International Airport, Domodedovo International Airport, Vnukovo International Airport and Zhukovsky International Airport.
Other affected airports stretched from Sochi on the Black Sea coast to Nizhnekamsk in the republic of Tatarstan.
Russia and Ukraine Continue Long-Range Strikes
Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 132 drones and two missiles overnight. It said 114 drones were intercepted or suppressed, while both missiles and 16 drones struck targets at nine locations.
The latest exchanges came as Zelenskyy met Western leaders, including US President Donald Trump, at the G7 summit in France.
Ahead of the gathering, Zelenskyy said he would again urge Ukraine's allies to increase pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin to end Moscow's invasion.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 June 2026

webfact
webfact
US President Donald Trump has said a preliminary agreement aimed at ending the war with Iran has already been signed, with further details expected to be released in the coming days.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking alongside Emmanuel Macron during the G7 summit on Monday, Trump said the deal had been completed and would soon be made public.
Agreement Signed, Details Due Soon
"I am very happy to say it's signed, the deal is all signed," he said.
Senior US officials later disclosed some elements of the framework, saying the Strait of Hormuz is expected to reopen on Friday, the same day the agreement is due to be formally signed in Geneva. Trump said the document was a "very powerful" one and indicated it would be released publicly shortly after the ceremony.
Ceasefire Extended as Nuclear Talks Begin
According to US officials, the agreement was electronically signed by Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.
The framework extends the current ceasefire by 60 days while negotiations continue on a comprehensive settlement. Technical discussions on Iran's nuclear programme are expected to begin this week.
Officials said any easing of sanctions or release of frozen Iranian assets would depend on Tehran meeting commitments under the agreement. Vance said Iran's commitment never to acquire a nuclear weapon was built into the framework and would be subject to verification.
Regional Tensions Persist
The breakthrough was first announced on Sunday by Shehbaz Sharif, whose government helped mediate the talks. He said the agreement included the immediate cessation of military operations across all fronts, including Lebanon.
However, US officials clarified that while Lebanon falls under the ceasefire framework, the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanese territory is not a condition of the deal. They added that Israel would retain the right to defend itself.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday that Israeli forces would remain in security zones in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza for as long as necessary. He also reiterated that Iran would not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons regardless of any agreement.
His comments came after reports of a deadly Israeli strike in southern Lebanon, the first reported since the deal was announced. Hezbollah said it responded by launching missiles and drones at Israeli forces.
Mixed Reactions to Framework Deal
Trump said he had ordered the lifting of a US naval blockade of Iranian ports and claimed ships carrying oil had already begun moving through the Strait of Hormuz.
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi confirmed the halt in military operations and said Qatari mediators spent up to 15 hours in talks in Tehran to secure the agreement.
Iranian state media portrayed the deal as a victory, while the country's military command said the US and Israel had been forced to accept defeat. However, Iran's foreign ministry struck a more cautious tone, saying Tehran still harboured deep mistrust of Washington and viewed the framework only as a first step towards reducing tensions.
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun welcomed the announcement, expressing hope that it would lead to lasting measures to end regional violence.
European leaders, including those of the UK, France, Germany and Italy, welcomed the development and reiterated that Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the agreement as a significant step towards ending the conflict, improving regional stability and reopening the Strait of Hormuz.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 June 2026
webfact
webfact
The ceasefire agreement brokered by US President Donald Trump with Iran has created a major political challenge for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, undermining key pillars of the security and foreign policy credentials that have defined his career.

Get today's headlines by email

For years, Netanyahu portrayed himself as a leader with significant influence in Washington and positioned confronting Iran as the centrepiece of Israel’s national security strategy. The new agreement, however, has raised questions about both claims, with Israel appearing sidelined during negotiations and Iran emerging from the conflict without the outcome Netanyahu had sought.
Alliance Strains After Ceasefire Agreement
The deal has also intensified concerns over Israel’s ability to continue military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, after Tehran insisted that the ceasefire should apply to military activity across multiple fronts, including Lebanon.
Growing Political Pressure at Home
The agreement has drawn criticism from across Israel’s political spectrum. Opposition leader Yair Lapid told parliament that Netanyahu faced a choice between a damaging confrontation with Israel’s closest ally or accepting an arrangement that could compromise Israeli interests.
Trump’s public criticism of Netanyahu following an Israeli strike on Beirut has further fuelled debate ahead of an election that must be held before the end of October. Political rivals and commentators have seized on the remarks as evidence of deteriorating relations between Washington and Jerusalem.
Pressure is also emerging from within Netanyahu’s governing coalition. Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir argued that Israel was not bound by an agreement that failed to guarantee its security.
Likud lawmaker Ariel Kallner said Israel would continue to defend itself, while declining to specify whether military operations would continue under the new arrangement.
Former Mossad official and Iran specialist Sima Shine questioned why the United States had accepted terms that could allow Iran to maintain influence through Hezbollah in Lebanon, describing the deal as deeply unpopular among both Israel’s political leadership and security establishment.
Security Strategy Under Scrutiny
Netanyahu has so far remained largely silent, an unusual stance for a leader who has often been quick to declare success after military operations. His reluctance to comment has been interpreted by some observers as a sign of the difficult choices now facing his government.
Since the Hamas-led attacks of 7 October 2023, Netanyahu has pursued a more aggressive security doctrine aimed at eliminating threats before they fully emerge. That approach has led to extended Israeli military operations in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria.
Despite Israel’s campaign in Gaza, Hamas continues to retain control over significant parts of the territory, while international efforts to establish a post-war political framework remain stalled. At the same time, Israel’s military commitments across several fronts have increased pressure on armed forces and reservists.
Limited Room for Manoeuvre
Critics argue that repeated confrontations with Hezbollah and Iran have failed to eliminate Israel’s principal adversaries. Instead, some analysts say Iran’s leadership has become more hardline and continues to wield influence across the region.
Security analyst Danny Citrinowicz said Israel must reassess its strategy towards Tehran and adopt more realistic objectives. He warned that any Israeli action viewed in Washington as an attempt to undermine the agreement could provoke a strong response from the United States.
Unlike previous disputes with US administrations, analysts note that Netanyahu has fewer opportunities to bypass the White House by appealing directly to Congress or public opinion in the United States.
As Israel heads towards a general election, Netanyahu’s long-standing argument that he offers the strongest protection against regional threats is facing renewed scrutiny. Rather than securing a decisive victory over Iran, the ceasefire has left him confronting a difficult choice between challenging a key ally or adapting to an agreement he did not shape.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 June 2026
webfact
webfact
A US Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber crashed shortly after taking off from Edwards Air Force Base in southern California on Tuesday, prompting an emergency response and the closure of the airfield.

Get today's headlines by email

The incident occurred at about 11:20 local time (19:20 GMT), according to a statement from the base. Officials did not immediately confirm whether anyone was injured in the crash.
Emergency crews were dispatched to the scene, where a large plume of black smoke rose into the sky and was visible from miles away.
“Emergency crews immediately responded to the scene and the situation is ongoing. More information will be provided as it becomes available,” the base said.
A spokesperson for Edwards Air Force Base declined to provide further details when contacted by the BBC.
Airfield Closed After Crash
Television footage from the area showed a scorched and smoking crash site in the Mojave Desert.
In a later update posted on X, the base said the airfield had been closed and all inbound aircraft were being diverted. Officials also suspended all non-commercial visitor passes to allow the installation to focus on emergency operations.
Authorities have not yet released details on what caused the crash.


video screenshot
Long-Serving Strategic Bomber
The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress has been a key part of the US Air Force since the 1950s. The long-range strategic bomber is capable of carrying a payload of up to 70,000 pounds, including conventional munitions and nuclear cruise missiles.
Designed for extended missions, the aircraft can refuel in flight, giving it a potentially global reach. It typically operates with a crew of five: an aircraft commander, pilot, radar navigator, navigator and electronic warfare officer.
The B-52 has recently been involved in operations linked to the latest US-Israeli conflict with Iran.
Lawmakers Offer Support
Edwards Air Force Base is located about 100 miles (160km) north of Los Angeles.
Congressman Jay Obernolte, whose district includes the base, said on Facebook that he and his wife were praying for those involved in the crash, particularly the crew, their families and emergency responders.
Meanwhile, Lisa McClain wrote on X that her thoughts were with everyone affected by the incident. She thanked emergency personnel responding to the scene and expressed support for US service members.
The emergency response remained ongoing as officials continued to assess the situation.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 June 2026
webfact
webfact
A memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran has brought an end to months of conflict, reopening the Strait of Hormuz and extending a ceasefire that has eased pressure on global markets and regional security.

Get today's headlines by email

The agreement, announced after intensive negotiations, is expected to restore shipping through one of the world's most important waterways and remove restrictions on Iranian ports. However, key issues, including Iran’s nuclear programme and the future of sanctions, have been postponed for further talks.
War's Lasting Consequences
The conflict has left deep scars across the Middle East. Thousands of people were killed, while homes, businesses and infrastructure suffered extensive damage.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupted the movement of oil, natural gas and industrial products, including fertilisers and materials used in manufacturing. Concerns remain that the disruption could have longer-term effects on food supplies in poorer regions, particularly parts of sub-Saharan Africa.
Officials in Gulf Arab states are also reassessing their security strategies following the war. Some have privately discussed reducing reliance on Washington and pursuing more balanced relations with regional powers, including Iran.
Return to Negotiations
The agreement effectively restores conditions that existed before the outbreak of hostilities on 28 February.
Before the conflict began, American and Iranian officials had been engaged in negotiations in Geneva aimed at addressing concerns over Tehran’s nuclear activities. According to sources familiar with the talks, Iranian representatives believed serious progress was being made and had presented both proposals and concessions during discussions.
The new memorandum creates an opportunity for those negotiations to resume while allowing commercial shipping to return to the Strait of Hormuz.
Miscalculations and Political Fallout
The war began with a series of surprise attacks by the United States and Israel, whose leaders predicted a swift campaign that would weaken Iran’s leadership and potentially bring about political change in Tehran.
Instead, Iran’s ruling establishment survived and quickly reorganised following the deaths of senior figures, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Leadership positions were rapidly filled by a new generation of officials and commanders linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.
Rather than collapsing, the Iranian government emerged from the conflict intact, strengthening the position of hardline figures who viewed the war as an existential threat to the Islamic Republic.
Iran responded by pursuing a strategy that included pressure on regional shipping routes and attacks against targets linked to the United States, Israel and several Arab neighbours.
Israel Faces Difficult Choices
Israel, a key partner in the conflict, was not included in negotiations over the memorandum and has reacted with concern to the outcome.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had long argued that Iran represented Israel’s greatest security threat, now faces criticism from political opponents who accuse him of harming Israel’s strategic position.
Attention is also focused on Israel’s military presence in parts of Lebanon, Syria and Gaza. Israeli officials have indicated that some occupied areas could remain under military control for an extended period, a stance that continues to generate political debate.
An Israeli air strike on Beirut’s southern suburbs shortly before the agreement was reached appeared to increase pressure on negotiators as diplomatic efforts entered a critical phase.
Uncertain Path Forward
While the memorandum has halted active fighting, it falls short of a comprehensive peace settlement. The most contentious issues have been deferred, and significant distrust remains between Washington and Tehran.
For now, the agreement has brought an end to a costly conflict and reopened channels for diplomacy. Whether it can evolve into a broader settlement capable of reshaping relations between the United States and Iran remains uncertain.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 June 2026
webfact
webfact
The White House hosted its first professional sporting event on Sunday night as President Donald Trump celebrated his 80th birthday and the approaching 250th anniversary of American independence with a UFC card staged on the South Lawn.

Get today's headlines by email

The event transformed a space traditionally used for state functions, diplomatic ceremonies and national celebrations into an outdoor arena beneath a massive steel structure known as the Claw. Military aircraft flyovers accompanied Trump's arrival alongside UFC president Dana White, while thousands of spectators gathered on the South Lawn and the nearby Ellipse.
White House hosts first professional UFC event
Organizers had delayed the start by an hour because of forecasts of thunderstorms, but the weather held throughout the night.
The evening featured a strong display of patriotic symbolism. A joint flyover involving the Blue Angels and Thunderbirds took place during the event, while a B-1 bomber later passed overhead. Chants of "U-S-A" echoed around the venue throughout the night.
Guests included technology executives, political allies, cabinet officials and foreign dignitaries, reflecting the unusual blend of politics, business and combat sports surrounding the event.
Gaethje stuns unbeaten Topuria for lightweight title
The main event produced one of the biggest upsets in recent UFC history. American fighter Justin Gaethje defeated previously unbeaten Ilia Topuria to capture the undisputed lightweight title after Topuria's corner stopped the contest before the fifth round.
Gaethje survived several difficult moments early in the fight as Topuria appeared to be in control. However, the American rallied as the bout progressed, leaving the champion badly swollen and bloodied by the later rounds.
The seven-fight card proved highly entertaining from a sporting perspective. Every contest ended by knockout or technical knockout, marking the first time in the UFC's history that an entire event card had finished without a single fight going to the judges' scorecards.
Other notable winners included Ciryl Gane, who secured the interim heavyweight title, along with Josh Hokit, Sean O'Malley and Bo Nickal.
Michelle Obama smear overshadows celebratory night
Despite the festive atmosphere, controversy emerged during the fight card. Following his second-round victory over Derrick Lewis, heavyweight prospect Josh Hokit left the cage to present Trump with a necklace before delivering a post-fight speech.
During his remarks, Hokit repeated a false conspiracy theory about former First Lady Michelle Obama. The claim, which has circulated for years despite being repeatedly debunked, drew mixed reactions from spectators and quickly became one of the night's most controversial moments.
The incident overshadowed parts of an event that had been intended as a showcase of American achievement and national pride.
Politics, patriotism and sport collide at White House
Politics surfaced elsewhere during the event. During O'Malley's bout against Canadian fighter Aiemann Zahabi, some spectators chanted slogans referencing Trump's past remarks about Canada. O'Malley later defeated Zahabi by second-round technical knockout.
The evening concluded shortly after 1am on Monday. Fireworks lit up the sky above the White House as Trump entered the cage to congratulate Gaethje and celebrate the American fighter's championship victory.
What began as a showcase of American patriotism and sporting spectacle ultimately combined elite competition, political theatre and controversy, leaving the historic event remembered for more than just the action inside the cage.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Marius Borg Høiby, the son of Norway’s Crown Princess Mette-Marit, has been sentenced to four years in prison after being found guilty of two counts of rape by Oslo District Court.

Get today's headlines by email

The 29-year-old was cleared of two other rape charges but convicted of several additional offences, including violence and abuse against former partners. Høiby denied all four rape allegations.
The verdict was delivered on Monday by a panel of three judges. Høiby did not attend court in person because of unspecified health reasons and instead joined proceedings by video link.
Court Delivers Mixed Verdict
Prosecutors had sought a prison sentence of seven years and seven months, while defence lawyers argued for a term of 18 months. The defence team said it would consider an appeal.
Judge Jon Sverdrup Efjestad opened the hearing with a summary of the court’s findings before presenting a detailed 128-page ruling.
The court found Høiby guilty of raping two women. One case related to an incident on the Crown Prince’s Skaugum estate in 2018, while the second involved a woman in Oslo in 2024.
However, judges acquitted him of two other rape charges connected to separate incidents involving women he met in Oslo and in the Lofoten Islands.
Evidence and Victims
The case involved six women in total. One of the victims attended court to hear the verdict and was seen crying after the guilty finding.
Prosecutors argued that she had been asleep or otherwise unable to resist when the assault occurred following a party in Oslo in March 2024. The woman testified that she had been asleep and would never have consented to the act.
The court accepted that she had been incapable of resisting what took place. All four rape allegations in the case involved women who were either asleep or incapacitated.
Høiby was also convicted of abusing former girlfriend and influencer Nora Haukland, as well as causing serious bodily harm to another former partner. He was further found guilty of offences involving a sixth woman, known publicly as the “Frogner woman” after the Oslo district where she lived.
Compensation and Possible Appeal
The court ordered Høiby to pay a total of 640,000 Norwegian kroner in compensation to four women, including Haukland, the only complainant judges ruled could be identified publicly.
The sentence exceeded the punishment proposed by the defence, despite Høiby having admitted to other offences, including transporting 3.5kg of marijuana and committing traffic violations.
His lawyer, Petar Sekulic, said the defence had not yet spoken with Høiby following the ruling but indicated that an appeal remained a possibility. Defence lawyer Ellen Holager Andenæs said the team welcomed the acquittals while expressing concerns about other parts of the judgment.
Royal Family Under Scrutiny
Although Høiby is not a member of the royal family, the case has drawn significant public attention because he was raised alongside Crown Prince Haakon and Crown Princess Mette-Marit after her marriage into the royal household.
The palace said it would not comment on the verdict. Attention has also focused on Mette-Marit’s health after she was placed on a lung transplant list due to pulmonary fibrosis.
Commentators said the case had damaged public perceptions of Norway’s royal family, although concern over the crown princess’s health has increasingly dominated public discussion.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 June 2026
webfact
webfact
At least nine people were killed in a large-scale Russian missile and drone assault on Ukraine that damaged a historic cathedral in Kyiv, according to Ukrainian officials.

Get today's headlines by email
Cathedral Hit During Nationwide Attack
Four people died in attacks on the capital, while five rescue workers were killed while tackling a fire caused by a strike in the north-eastern city of Kharkiv. Authorities said a further 23 people were injured in Kyiv and five were wounded in Kharkiv.
The overnight bombardment left much of the country under air raid alerts on Monday morning.
Historic Religious Site Damaged
Among the sites affected was the 11th-century Dormition Cathedral, part of the UNESCO-listed Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra.
Images from the scene showed a large hole in one side of the cathedral and fire damage to part of its roof. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described the strike as “one of the biggest Russian crimes against Christian culture today”.
The fire at the cathedral was later extinguished.
Russia denied striking the religious landmark, claiming instead that a US-made Patriot air defence missile had hit the site after apparently malfunctioning. Moscow did not provide evidence to support the allegation.
The cathedral has suffered damage before during Russia’s full-scale invasion, which began in 2022. In January, Ukrainian officials reported damage to several buildings within the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra complex. The cathedral had also been largely destroyed during World War Two before being rebuilt.
Widespread Damage Across Kyiv
Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said drone and missile attacks set buildings and vehicles ablaze and cut electricity supplies to more than 140,000 residents.
Zelensky said Russia launched 70 missiles and 611 drones during the overnight assault. Russia’s military said its “massive strike” targeted Ukrainian military facilities.
French President Emmanuel Macron condemned the damage to the cathedral, writing on X that “nothing justifies this attack on our universal heritage”.
G7 Meeting Looms
The attacks came ahead of a G7 summit in France, where the war in Ukraine is expected to feature prominently on the agenda.
Zelensky said the gathering should deliver a “decisive and meaningful” response, including greater pressure on Russia and additional air defence support for Ukraine, particularly anti-ballistic missile systems.
The Ukrainian leader also said he had spoken with US President Donald Trump about efforts to bring an end to the conflict.
Meanwhile, Russian officials reported that a Ukrainian drone strike on the city of Tula killed three people and injured three others, including a one-year-old child.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced plans to ban social media access for children under 16 across the UK, saying the move is needed to protect young people from harmful online content, bullying and potential mental health risks.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking at Downing Street, Starmer said the measure would deliver “real change for our children and our future”, arguing that the benefits of social media no longer outweighed the risks faced by many young users.
Wider Restrictions Planned
Under the proposals, children under 16 would be barred from using major social media platforms. The government also intends to introduce restrictions on other online products, including gaming applications, with measures such as removing the ability for young users to communicate with strangers.
Starmer acknowledged that social media offers benefits for young people but said the government had concluded that a complete ban was the best option.
“This is not something I do lightly,” he said, adding that government decisions often involve difficult choices and that protecting children had become the priority.
Legislation Expected This Year
The prime minister said the government aims to pass legislation before the end of the year, with the restrictions expected to take effect next spring.
The announcement comes as concerns grow over the impact of online platforms on children’s wellbeing and safety. Starmer presented the policy as part of a broader effort to give children a fairer and safer environment in which to grow up.
Addressing concerns that teenagers may find ways around the restrictions, as some have reportedly done in Australia following similar measures, Starmer said the possibility of circumvention should not prevent action.
He compared the proposal to existing age restrictions on alcohol sales, arguing that laws serve not only as rules but also as statements of societal values. He said the ban would help shape expectations among parents and children and contribute to a safer online environment.
Support From Campaigners and Parents
The announcement was made before an audience that included campaigners advocating stronger protections for children online, including parents who had lost children. Starmer thanked those campaigners for their efforts and said he would not compromise on children's safety and happiness.
He acknowledged that implementing and enforcing the ban would be challenging but said the government had consulted widely, reviewed available evidence and examined approaches taken by countries such as Australia.
Tech Industry Concerns
Asked whether the policy could provoke opposition from major US technology companies, Starmer rejected suggestions that the move was anti-technology.
He said supporting technological innovation and artificial intelligence could coexist with stronger protections for children, arguing that the development of new technologies should not come at the expense of young people's safety.
The government also said that responses to its “growing up in the online world” consultation showed strong public backing for tougher measures, with nine in 10 parents supporting a minimum age of 16 for access to social media platforms.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said a ceasefire agreement between the United States and Iran is now in place, with a formal signing ceremony scheduled for June 19 in Switzerland.

Get today's headlines by email
Sharif says ceasefire now in effect
Sharif said both sides had agreed to the "immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon."
Israel renews attacks on Beirut suburbs
The announcement came as Israel renewed air strikes on the southern suburbs of Beirut despite the reported ceasefire, raising questions about the agreement's implementation.
Trump declares deal complete
In a post on Truth Social, President Donald Trump declared that the deal with Iran was "now complete."
"Congratulations to all!" Trump wrote.
Trump also said he had authorized the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and ordered the immediate removal of the US naval blockade.
"Ships of the World, start your engines. Let the oil flow!" he said.
Talks to continue before signing ceremony
Sharif thanked the US and Iran for their commitment to the agreement, as well as Qatar for supporting efforts to secure the deal.
He also praised the leadership of Saudi Arabia and Turkiye for what he described as their significant contributions to the negotiations.
According to Sharif, a series of meetings will take place this week to prepare for technical discussions ahead of the official signing ceremony in Switzerland on June 19.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 June 2026
webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump on Sunday urged Israel and Iran not to jeopardize an emerging peace agreement, warning that renewed violence in Lebanon could undermine efforts to finalize a deal aimed at easing tensions across the region.

Get today's headlines by email

Writing on Truth Social, Trump said negotiators were close to reaching an agreement that could bring stability not only to Iran and the United States but also to neighboring Lebanon.
“We are very close to a Deal that will bring peace to the region, including to Lebanon, and all sides should stand down,” Trump said. He called for an end to attacks by both Israel and Hezbollah, adding: “This could be the beginning of a long and beautiful peace — Let’s not blow it!”
Beirut strike raises concerns
Trump’s comments came after Israeli forces struck Beirut on Sunday in response to three projectiles launched from Lebanon into northern Israel.
The Israeli military said no injuries were reported from the projectile fire and that the incident was being investigated. Trump described the initial attack on Israel as “small and meaningless,” noting that nobody had been killed or wounded.
He also criticized Israel’s retaliatory strike, saying the attack on Beirut should not have taken place at a time when negotiations were nearing a breakthrough.
Deal faces regional complications
According to a source cited by NewsNation, Israel’s military action in Lebanon has complicated efforts to complete the proposed agreement between Washington and Tehran. Israel is not a direct participant in the talks, although Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said earlier this week that he supports Trump’s commitment to securing a deal.
Trump had suggested on Saturday that a ceasefire agreement could be signed on Sunday. However, Iranian officials and state media have pushed back against that timeline.
Iran remains cautious
Efforts to advance negotiations continued on Sunday, with Qatari mediators traveling to Tehran for meetings with Iranian officials, according to a source familiar with the talks cited by Reuters.
A key element of the proposed agreement would involve reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route through which roughly one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies pass.
Iranian state media indicated that while a formal agreement was unlikely to be signed on Sunday, negotiations could produce a final deal within days. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Tehran remained cautious about commenting on the process because of what he described as inconsistency from the other side.
Democrats criticize terms
The reported outlines of the agreement have drawn criticism from some Democratic lawmakers.
Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts argued that the deal amounted to a concession, questioning whether reopening the Strait of Hormuz justified the costs of the conflict. He cited the financial burden of the war and the loss of American lives while criticizing the reported terms.
Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island also criticized the initiative, suggesting Trump was seeking a political achievement on his 80th birthday. Reed said the agreement came after what he described as significant financial costs associated with the conflict.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 June 2026

webfact
webfact
Swiss voters have rejected a proposal to limit the country's population to 10 million people, delivering a setback to the right-wing Swiss People's Party (SVP), which had argued that immigration was placing excessive strain on public services and infrastructure.

Get today's headlines by email
Referendum Defeats Immigration-Linked Plan
Official results showed that almost 55% voted against the measure, while about 45% supported it. Turnout reached 60%.
The referendum carried significant implications for Switzerland's relationship with the European Union. The proposal was opposed by the Swiss government, business groups and all other major political parties, which warned that approval could threaten the country's agreement on the free movement of people with the EU.
Swiss Justice Minister Beat Jans welcomed the outcome, describing it as a vote for “stability, openness and reliability”.
Concerns Over Economy and EU Ties
Switzerland's population has increased from 7.3 million in 2002 to around 9.1 million today. About 27% of residents are not Swiss citizens.
Supporters of the proposal argued that limiting population growth would help ease pressure on housing, transport networks and the environment. However, these arguments failed to attract enough support nationwide.
Business leaders and many voters expressed concern that stricter limits could reduce access to workers needed in sectors including tourism, healthcare and elderly care. Others feared economic consequences if Switzerland's ties with the EU were weakened.
More than half of Swiss exports are sold within the European Union. Continued access to the bloc's markets is linked to Switzerland's commitment to the free movement agreement. Had the proposal passed, Switzerland would have been required to end that arrangement.
Following the vote, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the result, saying Switzerland and the EU share strong links and a close partnership.
Debate Over Immigration and Public Services
The referendum highlighted a long-running political debate over immigration and its impact on Swiss society.
Marcel Dettling, president of the Swiss People's Party, said the result did not remove underlying concerns, arguing that voters still wanted solutions to problems such as housing shortages and rising costs.
The party has frequently linked immigration to challenges including crowded schools, pressure on healthcare services and increased demand for housing.
Critics rejected that argument. Helin Genis, a Social Democrat serving on Bern city council, said migrants were being unfairly blamed for issues that stem from political and economic decisions rather than immigration itself.
Before the vote, SVP politician Nils Fiechter argued that immigration was contributing directly to shortages in housing and public services. Opponents countered that focusing on migration risked deepening divisions without addressing the root causes of those problems.
Urban-Rural Divide Emerges
Voting patterns revealed a clear contrast between urban and rural areas. Swiss citizens are the only people eligible to vote in national referendums.
Cities with larger immigrant populations overwhelmingly rejected the proposal. In Bern, nearly 84% of voters opposed the population cap.
Tourism-dependent regions also voted against the measure. Cantons including Graubünden, home to St. Moritz, and Valais, which includes Zermatt and the Matterhorn area, rejected the plan amid concerns over labour shortages.
Employers warned that sectors such as hospitality, healthcare and care homes rely heavily on foreign workers. Opponents also noted that around one-fifth of Switzerland's population is now over the age of 65, increasing demand for younger workers and taxpayers.
The outcome suggests that while concerns over housing costs, public services and infrastructure remain significant, a majority of Swiss voters were unconvinced that restricting immigration was the best way to address them.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Russia's long-standing advantage in manpower over Ukraine is showing signs of weakening, despite increasingly generous financial incentives aimed at attracting recruits for the war.

Get today's headlines by email

Military advertisements across Russia are offering signing bonuses worth millions of rubles, debt relief packages and promises of social status to encourage men to enlist. Some incentives are equivalent to several years of average earnings, while recent measures include writing off debts of up to $140,000 for those who join the armed forces.
Even so, recruitment appears to be slowing. According to Russian economy expert Janis Kluge, military enlistment fell by around 20% in the first quarter of 2026 compared with the previous year, suggesting that financial incentives may be losing their effectiveness.
Recruitment Challenges Grow
Since launching its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Kremlin has relied heavily on Russia's larger population and defence industry to sustain a prolonged war of attrition. Higher oil prices linked to tensions involving Iran have provided additional revenue for Moscow, but analysts argue that money alone cannot solve mounting manpower problems.
Nigel Gould-Davies, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), said Russia is facing a situation in which troop losses may be exceeding the number of new recruits.
He noted that modern Russia has largely relied on financial incentives rather than compulsory service to fill its ranks, creating growing economic pressure. According to Gould-Davies, there are indications that the current recruitment model is becoming less effective.
Russia has already drawn heavily on alternative sources of manpower, including former prisoners, foreign recruits and several deployments of North Korean troops. The government has also sought to attract immigrants and expand recruitment efforts beyond traditional pools of volunteers.
Labour Shortages Hit the Economy
The war's impact extends beyond the battlefield. Analysts say Russia is experiencing a severe labour shortage as military recruitment and emigration have reduced the number of working-age men available to the civilian economy.
Defence factories are reportedly operating around the clock, leaving little room to expand production further. At the same time, competition for workers is pushing wages higher and contributing to inflationary pressures.
Some Western intelligence assessments estimate that nearly 500,000 Russian soldiers have been killed since the war began, while hundreds of thousands of people have left the country to avoid military service.
Analysts suggest the Kremlin may increasingly rely on foreign labour from countries such as India, North Korea and several African nations to offset shortages. More controversial options could include another large-scale mobilization campaign or tighter restrictions on men leaving the country, although such measures would likely be unpopular.
Economic Pressure Mounts
Maria Snegovaya of the Center for Strategic and International Studies argues that Russia may still be able to maintain recruitment by increasing pressure on poorer regions, students and foreign nationals. However, she says the economic burden of the war is becoming more visible.
Military personnel and recruitment spending account for a significant share of Russia's federal budget and economic output. Meanwhile, the country is facing sluggish growth, business closures and weak consumer confidence.
Although official inflation has moderated, households continue to face rising food and utility costs, while infrastructure disruptions linked to Ukrainian attacks have affected fuel supplies and transportation in some areas.
Ukraine Gains Through Innovation
At the same time, Ukraine is increasingly relying on technology to offset Russia's numerical advantages.
According to analysts, Ukrainian forces have made significant advances in drone warfare and unmanned systems. President Volodymyr Zelensky has said Ukrainian troops have successfully conducted operations using only drones and robotic systems, while thousands of unmanned ground missions were carried out during the first months of 2026.
Ukrainian military officials also claim Russia suffered net territorial losses for a second consecutive month in May, while drone operations inflicted casualties at a rate exceeding Russia's recruitment capacity.
Analysts say Russia's growing dependence on former prisoners and poorly trained recruits may further reduce battlefield effectiveness, even as Ukraine continues to develop new military technologies.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 June 2026

webfact
webfact
British armed forces intercepted and boarded a Russian-linked oil tanker in the English Channel early on Sunday in a six-hour operation targeting Moscow's so-called shadow fleet, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said.

Get today's headlines by email

The vessel, Smyrtos, was boarded by Royal Marine Commandos and specially trained officers from the National Crime Agency, with support from the Royal Air Force and Royal Navy.
Vessel Held Off English Coast
The Ministry of Defence said the tanker is being held and monitored off England's south coast while investigations continue.
The operation involved aircraft from the Maritime Air Group, an RAF P-8 maritime patrol aircraft, as well as the Royal Navy warships HMS Sutherland and HMS Ledbury.
Officials described the action as part of wider efforts to disrupt Russia's ability to finance its war in Ukraine.
Starmer: Operation Targets Kremlin Funding
Starmer said the interception represented another setback for Russia and those helping to sustain President Vladimir Putin's military campaign.
"This successful operation delivers yet another blow to Russia and reminds those fueling Putin's war in Ukraine that we will not let them hide," the prime minister said.
Defence Secretary Dan Jarvis said Russia depends on its shadow fleet to generate revenue from oil exports despite international sanctions.
"Russia relies on its shadow fleet to fund their conflict in Ukraine and our interdiction delivers a blow to Putin's illegal war," Jarvis said.
Focus on Russia's Shadow Fleet
Western governments have accused Russia of using a large network of tankers with complex and often opaque ownership arrangements to evade sanctions imposed on its oil exports following the invasion of Ukraine.
According to the Ministry of Defence, the shadow fleet consists of more than 700 vessels and is responsible for transporting around 75% of Russia's sanctioned oil exports, providing a significant source of income for the Kremlin.
The UK government said it has already imposed sanctions on more than 500 vessels linked to the network.
The interception marks the latest effort by Britain and its allies to tighten enforcement measures against Russia's oil trade and limit funding for its military operations in Ukraine.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Elon Musk, recently named the world's first trillionaire, has come under renewed criticism following anti-immigrant riots in Belfast after researchers said posts he amplified on X generated tens of millions of views.

Get today's headlines by email

Violence erupted in the Northern Irish capital after a knife attack on Monday. Police have charged a Sudanese national, Hadi Alodid, with attempted murder in connection with the incident.
Calls for Protest Amplified
Musk used X to promote calls for protests across Britain from anti-immigration activist Tommy Robinson. In a post to his roughly 240 million followers, Musk wrote: "Only by protesting REPEATEDLY and LOUDLY will there be any change."
He also shared anti-immigration content and posts from Rupert Lowe, leader of the fringe hard-right party Restore Britain, significantly increasing their visibility on the platform.
Researchers Highlight Reach
According to researchers at the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), posts by Musk, Robinson and Lowe relating to the Belfast unrest attracted more than 115 million views combined. The group said Musk's account was responsible for 55% of that total.
In a report, CCDH said Musk's amplification generated around 64 million views and played a key role in spreading the content.
Watchdog Criticises Platform Owner
"As the owner of X and its most followed user, Musk has unparalleled power to shape what people see online," said CCDH founder and chief executive Imran Ahmed.
Ahmed said the research showed Musk had used the Belfast attack to amplify anti-migrant narratives to millions of users, while communities were dealing with the aftermath of violence and disorder.
He added that no individual had done more to spread such content on X during the crisis than Musk.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 June 2026
webfact
webfact
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore signs and exhibits removed or altered at national parks under a directive aimed at reshaping how American history is presented.

Get today's headlines by email

In a 63-page ruling issued on Friday, Judge Angel Kelley said the administration had sought to promote a selective version of history by removing displays that did not fit its preferred narrative.
“Under the guise of promoting American dignity, this Administration seeks to share a limited history,” Kelley wrote, arguing that the changes resulted in incomplete accounts of historical events.
Restoration Deadline Set
Kelley ordered the government to reinstate all affected signs and exhibits by July 3, ahead of celebrations marking the United States' 250th anniversary. She also barred the administration from making further changes to national park exhibits while the case proceeds.
The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed in February by conservation and advocacy groups against the Interior Department and the National Park Service. The groups alleged the administration was attempting to erase aspects of American history and weaken science-based interpretation at park sites.
Executive Order Challenged
The dispute centres on a March 2025 executive order signed by President Donald Trump titled Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History. The order directed federal agencies to address public content that it said “inappropriately disparage Americans past or living.”
According to advocacy group Save Our Signs, at least 45 displays covering subjects such as climate change and Native American history were modified or removed following the directive.
Among the examples highlighted in court was the removal of a marker at Grand Teton National Park that referenced explorer Gustavus Cheyney Doane’s role in the 1870 massacre of at least 173 Piegan Blackfeet people.
At Fort Sumter National Monument, an exhibit discussing the potential impact of rising sea levels on the historic site was removed entirely.
Administration Weighs Appeal
An Interior Department spokesperson criticised Kelley’s decision, describing her as a “liberal activist judge” and indicating that the department was considering an appeal.
The spokesperson said officials were reviewing their legal options while participating in anniversary celebrations at the White House.
Advocates Welcome Decision
Alan Spears of the National Parks Conservation Association, one of the groups behind the lawsuit, welcomed the ruling.
He said the decision temporarily halted what he described as the “sanitization” and censorship of historical interpretation within the national park system.
Spears argued that visitors should have access to the full scope of American history and said national parks play a crucial role in preserving and explaining the country's past.
In her ruling, Kelley echoed that view, describing national parks as “a cornerstone of public learning” and “America’s largest classroom.”
She said the government has a responsibility to present history in its entirety rather than through selective accounts, adding that federal officials had failed to uphold that principle.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 June 2026
webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump has said a deal aimed at ending hostilities between the United States and Iran is due to be signed on Sunday, although Iranian officials have questioned whether the agreement will be finalised that quickly.

Get today's headlines by email

In a social media post on Saturday, Trump said the agreement was scheduled to be signed the following day and claimed the Strait of Hormuz would reopen to international shipping immediately afterward.
“The Deal is scheduled to get signed tomorrow, and immediately after it is signed, the Hormuz Strait is OPEN TO ALL,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Iran Questions Timeline
Despite the optimism from Washington, Iran indicated that the timing remains uncertain.
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said a memorandum of understanding was expected, but cautioned against assuming an immediate signing.
“We will have to wait and see about the exact date of the signing of the memorandum of understanding, although it will not be tomorrow,” Baghaei said.
Trump also referred to Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium, stating that once conditions stabilise, the United States would retrieve what he described as “Nuclear Dust” and later destroy it.
He further warned that if the process did not proceed “quickly, easily and smoothly”, the US had “the ultimate alternative”, which he said he hoped would never be required.
Pakistan Signals Progress
Pakistan, which has played a mediating role in the talks, also suggested an agreement was close.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said preparations were under way for an electronic signing of the deal, with finalisation expected within 24 hours.
“With finalisation likely expected in the next 24 hours, Pakistan is preparing for the electronic signing of the peace deal immediately after, followed by technical level talks next week,” Sharif wrote on X.
On Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said an agreement with the US had “never been closer”.
Deal Details Emerge
According to Araghchi, the proposed deal would end the conflict involving Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and lift a US blockade on Iranian ports.
He said negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme would be addressed at a later stage.
US officials have confirmed some aspects of the proposed agreement, while stressing that economic benefits for Iran would depend on Tehran fulfilling its commitments.
Previous reports from the United States suggested Lebanon might not be included in the arrangement, while Iran had reportedly pushed for its inclusion.
Several earlier attempts to finalise a similar agreement have failed during the final stages of negotiations.
Conflict Continues Despite Ceasefire
The current conflict began on 28 February when US and Israeli forces launched strikes across Iran. Tehran responded with attacks against Israel and US-aligned Gulf states, while effectively shutting the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments.
Although the two sides agreed to a ceasefire in April, intermittent exchanges of fire have continued. This week alone saw two rounds of retaliatory strikes between the US and Iran.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Israel carried out air strikes in southern Lebanon on Saturday after warning residents to evacuate around 20 locations, according to Lebanese state media.

Get today's headlines by email

The Lebanese National News Agency reported that at least one person was killed in a strike on the town of Marrakeh in the Tyre district. The attacks came after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that Israel would target Hezbollah if the group continued attacks on northern Israel.
Peace Deal Moves Closer
The strikes coincided with growing optimism over negotiations aimed at ending hostilities between Iran and the United States.
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, whose government is helping mediate the talks, said on X that the parties were closer than ever to reaching a peace agreement. He said finalisation of the deal could come within 24 hours and later added that preparations were under way for an electronic signing of the accord.
Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi also said an agreement was near. According to Araghchi, the proposed deal would not only end fighting between Iran and the US but could also help bring an end to the conflict involving Hezbollah in Lebanon.
He said the agreement would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and include the lifting of a US blockade on Iran. Discussions on Iran's nuclear programme, however, would take place during a later phase of negotiations.
Details of the Proposed Agreement
US officials have confirmed elements of the framework, while stressing that economic benefits for Iran would depend on Tehran meeting its commitments.
Under the proposal, the Strait of Hormuz would reopen and restrictions on Iranian shipping would be eased. A subsequent 60-day negotiation period would focus on Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium, which US officials say would ultimately be destroyed and removed from the country, although the exact process remains under discussion.
Washington also rejected reports suggesting Iran would receive immediate access to frozen assets. Instead, sanctions relief and broader economic reintegration would occur gradually as Iran fulfilled verified obligations.
The agreement would also require Iran to end support for regional proxy groups, including Hezbollah and other allied organisations across the Middle East.
US officials said the arrangement was based on verifiable actions rather than trust, with economic incentives linked to confirmed compliance.
Cautious Optimism Remains
The current conflict began on 28 February when US and Israeli forces launched strikes across Iran. Tehran responded with attacks against Israel and US-aligned Gulf states and effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments.
Although Iran and the US agreed to a ceasefire in April, both sides have continued exchanging intermittent strikes, including two rounds of retaliatory attacks this week.
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he had cancelled planned attacks on Iran because negotiators had reached what he described as a major settlement.
Despite the positive signals from Washington, Tehran, Islamabad and mediator Qatar, officials acknowledge that the agreement has not yet been formally approved. Araghchi said Iran's Supreme National Security Council still contains both supporters and opponents of the latest terms.
"If approved, the agreement will be signed remotely," he said, adding that he remained hopeful a final accord could be announced within days.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Workers started removing President Donald Trump’s name from the exterior of the Kennedy Center early on Saturday after the venue missed a court-ordered deadline and sought extra time to complete the work.

Get today's headlines by email

The move followed a federal judge’s order requiring the historic performing arts institution to remove Trump’s name from its building and related materials. The center had been required to certify compliance by 11:59 p.m. on Friday but later informed the court that severe weather had delayed the process.
Deadline Missed After Storm Delays
Attorneys from the Justice Department, representing the Kennedy Center, said late Friday that thunderstorms in the Washington area had slowed progress. They told the court that crews expected to finish removing the signage during the early hours of Saturday.
US District Judge Casey Cooper had set the Friday night deadline. As of early Saturday, the judge had not publicly responded to the center’s request for additional time.
Workers spent Friday assembling scaffolding beneath the building’s exterior signage. Shortly before 2 a.m. on Saturday, crews appeared to enclose the structure with protective covering, limiting public visibility of the work. Video recorded through a gap in the covering later appeared to show workers taking down letters from the sign.
A crowd gathered nearby during the overnight operation, with some people chanting “Shame!” as work continued.
Appeals Court Rejects Last-Minute Request
Earlier on Friday, a federal appeals court declined to halt Cooper’s ruling, rejecting a last-minute effort by the Kennedy Center to delay compliance while the broader legal dispute continues.
The brief, unsigned decision did not provide a detailed explanation. The three-judge panel included Judge Gregory Katsas, appointed by Trump, along with Judges Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins, both appointed by former President Barack Obama.
While refusing to pause the ruling, the appeals court requested additional legal submissions later this month regarding the center’s effort to suspend the lower court’s order. Until then, the Kennedy Center must continue complying with the judge’s directive.
The ruling requires Trump’s name to be removed not only from the building but also from the center’s website, promotional materials and other affiliated locations.
Donation Concerns Raised
In court filings, Justice Department lawyers argued that restoring the center’s previous name could create confusion if the government ultimately succeeds in overturning the ruling.
They also warned that compliance could affect fundraising. According to the filing, Kennedy Center bylaws require donations to be returned if Trump’s name is removed from the organization’s branding, marketing materials, façade or other affiliated locations.
Government lawyers told the appeals court that hundreds of millions of dollars in donations could be affected if those provisions are triggered.
Protesters and Political Supporters Gather
Protesters remained outside the center throughout Friday, chanting “Take it down” and praising workers involved in the removal effort.
Representative Joyce Beatty, an Ohio Democrat who has led the legal challenge, visited the site and expressed support for the court ruling. She said the campaign would continue regardless of further legal action and described the effort as a fight on behalf of the Kennedy family.
Trump’s name was added to the center in December after the board of trustees voted to honour the president. The decision followed major changes to the institution’s leadership and programming and drew criticism from members of the Kennedy family.
At a meeting on Thursday, the board approved a resolution praising Trump’s support for the arts center and created the Trump Kennedy Center Fund to attract additional private donations. Those funds would supplement the $257 million allocated by Congress through Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill.” It remains unclear whether Trump will personally contribute to the fund.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Swiss voters will head to the polls on Sunday to decide whether the country should impose a population cap of 10 million people, in a closely contested referendum that has exposed deep divisions over immigration, housing and Switzerland’s future relationship with Europe.

Get today's headlines by email

The proposal, backed by the right-wing Swiss People's Party, is presented as a “sustainability initiative” designed to reduce pressure on housing, public services and the environment.
Population Growth at Centre of Referendum
Opponents, including the Swiss government, major political parties, business groups and trade unions, argue the measure would create economic disruption, worsen labour shortages and damage ties with the European Union.
Immigration Debate Divides Voters
Switzerland’s population has risen from 7.3 million in 2002 to 9.1 million today, with foreign residents accounting for around 27% of the population.
Supporters of the initiative say rapid population growth has contributed to housing shortages, crowded transport networks, rising healthcare costs and pressure on schools and social services.
Among them is local politician Nils Fiechter, who argues that immigration has become excessive and that Switzerland has lost control over population growth.
Critics reject that view. Helin Genis, a Social Democrat councillor in Bern, says migrants are being blamed for problems caused by broader policy decisions on housing, infrastructure and public investment.
Recent opinion polls suggest the result could be extremely close. Surveys indicate a narrow lead for the “No” campaign, with around 52% opposed and 45% in favour, while a significant share of voters remain undecided.
How the Population Cap Would Work
The proposal would require Switzerland’s population to remain below 10 million until 2050. The government would be instructed to take action once the population reaches 9.5 million.
Potential measures could include reducing asylum admissions and ending family reunification rights for foreign workers.
The initiative also states that if the population reaches 10 million, Switzerland would have to withdraw from international agreements that prevent enforcement of the cap. This could include ending participation in the EU’s free movement of people framework.
Economic and Diplomatic Concerns
Business groups warn that restricting immigration could create serious labour shortages.
Foreign workers play a major role in sectors including hospitality, healthcare and elder care. Employers argue that access to skilled workers from across Europe is vital for the Swiss economy, particularly as the country’s population ages.
Rudolf Minsch of Economiesuisse has warned that approving the initiative could complicate relations with the European Union, Switzerland’s largest trading partner.
Opponents also argue that Switzerland needs younger workers and taxpayers to help support a growing elderly population, with around one-fifth of residents now aged over 65.
Fears of Isolation
The referendum comes amid broader concerns about Switzerland’s international position. Despite its longstanding neutrality, the country has been moving towards closer defence cooperation with neighbouring states while facing economic pressures linked to global conflicts and trade disputes.
Social Democrat parliamentarian Jon Pult has warned that the initiative risks leaving Switzerland isolated at a time of growing international uncertainty.
Supporters dismiss such concerns, arguing that both Switzerland and the EU have strong incentives to maintain their existing economic relationship regardless of the vote’s outcome.
As campaigning enters its final hours, voters appear split between concerns over population growth and fears that tighter limits could weaken Switzerland’s economic and diplomatic standing.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Sweden has abandoned plans to allow serious offenders as young as 13 to be imprisoned after failing to secure sufficient parliamentary backing.

Get today's headlines by email

Instead, the centre-right government will introduce legislation to lower the age of criminal responsibility from 15 to 14 ahead of legislative elections scheduled for September.
Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer said the change would enable authorities to impose sanctions that are more proportionate to serious crimes while improving opportunities for rehabilitation.
“By lowering the age of criminal responsibility... fairer and proportionate sanctions can be imposed, and we will be able to create better conditions for rehabilitation than today,” Strömmer said.
Concern Over Youth Gang Violence
The move comes as Sweden continues to face growing problems with children being recruited by violent criminal gangs.
According to Strömmer, more than 50 children under the age of 15 appeared in court last year on charges of murder or attempted murder.
Under current law, children younger than 15 cannot be imprisoned and are instead placed in youth detention facilities known as SiS homes. The government argues that the existing system has failed to prevent reoffending and, in some cases, has contributed to further criminal involvement.
Although plans to imprison 13-year-olds have been dropped, authorities have instructed eight prisons to prepare dedicated sections for younger offenders, separated from adult inmates.
Strömmer said the proposed reforms were aimed at protecting society from serious violent crime and safeguarding victims, many of whom are also children.
Critics Question Effectiveness
Children’s rights advocates have criticised the proposal, arguing that strengthening existing youth facilities would be more effective than lowering the age of criminal responsibility.
Maria Frisk, secretary general of Swedish children's rights organisation Bris, said there was no evidence that reducing the age threshold to 14 would reverse current trends.
At the same time, concerns have grown over reports that some SiS homes have become recruitment grounds for criminal networks.
Gang Conflict Fuels Security Concerns
Sweden has experienced a rise in deadly violence over the past decade. The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention reported 121 homicides in 2023, compared with 87 ten years earlier, although the figure fell to 92 in 2024.
One of the country's most notorious criminal groups, the Foxtrot gang, has frequently used teenagers to carry out crimes ranging from shootings and bomb attacks to contract killings.
Violence surged in 2023 during a feud between Foxtrot leader Rawa Majid and rival gang leader Ismail Abdo. Abdo was arrested in Turkey in 2025, while Majid is believed to be in the Middle East.
Several attacks involving suspects aged 13 and 14 have also targeted sites linked to Israel, including facilities belonging to Elbit Systems in Gothenburg and the Israeli embassy in Stockholm.
Sweden's security service, Säpo, has alleged that Iran recruited Swedish gang members to carry out attacks on Israeli and Jewish targets. Iran has denied the accusations, describing them as unfounded and based on misinformation.
In 2025, both the United States and the United Kingdom imposed sanctions on Foxtrot and Majid, citing their alleged involvement in attacks on Jewish and Israeli targets in Europe on behalf of the Iranian government.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said he has a duty to remain in office despite growing political pressure, defending his government's defence spending plans after the resignation of two senior ministers.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to the BBC a day after Defence Secretary John Healey and Armed Forces Minister Al Carns stepped down, Starmer said difficult choices were necessary to fund defence commitments.
He argued that all government departments had been required to make savings in order to prioritise military spending and insisted that defence remained at the centre of his government's agenda.
"Whoever is prime minister is going to face the same prevailing winds as I am facing," Starmer said, suggesting that any successor would encounter the same financial and political constraints.
Asked whether he intended to lead Labour into the next general election, the prime minister said he wanted to do so but acknowledged that he needed to improve his political standing.
He said he had no desire to trigger a leadership contest, describing such a move as potentially destabilising, but added that he would contest any challenge that emerged.
Defence Funding Dispute
The resignations followed an escalating disagreement over funding for the government's Defence Investment Plan (DIP), a long-delayed strategy outlining spending on military equipment and infrastructure over the coming decade.
In his resignation letter, Healey accused Starmer of failing to commit the resources needed to guarantee national security. The former defence secretary argued that planned spending increases were insufficient and called for faster growth in military expenditure.
Starmer rejected that criticism, saying defence was his government's "number one priority" and would continue to receive preferential treatment during future spending reviews.
He pointed to reductions in overseas aid spending as evidence that ministers had already taken difficult decisions to free up resources for defence.
The government has pledged to raise defence spending to 3.5% of gross domestic product by 2035. Healey argued that the UK should reach 3% by 2030, claiming the current investment plan would increase spending only to 2.68% of national income by that date.
Starmer said significant new funding had already been committed and that the investment plan contained further spending beyond existing allocations.
Leadership Pressure Grows
The dispute has intensified scrutiny of Starmer's leadership following Labour's poor performance in local elections earlier this year.
Although no formal leadership contest has been launched, speculation has increased about possible challengers. Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham is expected to consider a leadership bid if he secures victory in the upcoming Makerfield by-election.
Without naming any potential rivals, Starmer said governing required difficult trade-offs and warned against simplistic solutions to spending challenges.
"For every answer that is being suggested, the question has to be what you would not do instead," he said.
Critics Demand Clearer Priorities
Former Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who has previously indicated he would enter a leadership contest, said disagreements over defence spending reflected broader indecision within the government.
Writing on X, he questioned whether defence or economic growth was the government's main priority and criticised spending commitments elsewhere while defence budgets remained under pressure.
Meanwhile, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the government should cut welfare spending to fund defence properly.
The Liberal Democrats' defence spokesperson, James MacCleary, said both major parties had failed to provide the armed forces with adequate support. He reiterated his party's proposal to introduce war bonds, which it says could raise £20 billion for defence.
Starmer said the Defence Investment Plan would still be published before a NATO summit scheduled for early July, despite the recent ministerial departures.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 June 2026
webfact
webfact
Iran has said an agreement with the United States to end months of hostilities is closer than ever, with both Tehran and Pakistani mediators expressing optimism that a final deal could soon be completed.

Get today's headlines by email

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said a deal to end the fighting had “never been closer”. The assessment was echoed by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, whose government has been mediating talks between the two sides.
Sharif said negotiators had reached a final agreed text and were working with both parties on the next steps. However, neither side has officially released details of any proposed agreement.
Dispute Over Reported Terms
US President Donald Trump reposted Araghchi’s comments while urging media outlets not to speculate about the contents of the negotiations.
The remarks came after Iranian media published what they claimed were details of the proposed agreement. Trump rejected the reports, saying they had “nothing to do with the terms that were agreed to” and bore “no relation to the truth”.
He accused Tehran of leaking inaccurate information and described Iranian negotiators as “very dishonorable people to deal with”.
On Thursday, Trump said he had cancelled planned US attacks against Iran because negotiators had reached what he called a “great settlement” that could be signed soon.
Conflict and Ceasefire Efforts
The current crisis began on 28 February, when US and Israeli forces carried out extensive strikes across Iran. Tehran responded with attacks on Israel and US-aligned states in the Gulf and effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments.
Although a ceasefire was agreed in April, the US and Iran have continued to exchange sporadic fire, including two rounds of retaliatory strikes earlier this week.
Israel is not participating in the current negotiations, which are largely being mediated by Pakistan. The talks are intended to extend the ceasefire and launch broader negotiations on issues including Iran’s nuclear programme.
Western governments have long accused Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons, an allegation Tehran denies, insisting its nuclear activities are intended for civilian energy production and research.
Conflicting Expectations
Iran’s Mehr news agency reported that Tehran was seeking measures including the lifting of a US naval blockade, compensation of at least $300 billion for damage caused by US and Israeli strikes, and endorsement of any final agreement through a UN Security Council resolution.
The reported terms also suggested Iran wanted sanctions relief, access to frozen assets and the suspension of restrictions on oil exports before final negotiations begin.
US officials have strongly disputed those claims.
A senior US administration official said the proposed agreement would require Iran’s nuclear material to be removed or destroyed and its nuclear programme dismantled. The official added that no Iranian funds would be released until Tehran met US conditions, reopened the Strait of Hormuz and ceased support for militant groups including Hezbollah.
US Vice-President JD Vance also rejected reports that Iran would receive immediate financial benefits, saying any rewards would depend on compliance with the agreement.
Deal Remains Unfinished
According to US officials, the proposed arrangement would be performance-based, with economic incentives tied to specific Iranian actions.
Officials estimated the chances of a deal being signed at between 80% and 85%, while acknowledging delays caused by the complexity of the negotiations and divisions within Iran’s government.
The US administration also expressed confidence that regional partners, including Israel and members of the Gulf Cooperation Council, would ultimately support the agreement while retaining the right to self-defence.
Pakistan, meanwhile, warned against what it described as misinformation aimed at undermining the negotiations, insisting that a peace deal is closer than at any previous stage of the talks.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.