Neighbours ask Admin Court to stop Chaiyaphum power plant

[webfact]

Neighbours ask Admin Court to stop Chaiyaphum power plant

By The Nation

 

A lawsuit has been filed at the Administrative Court to stop construction of a coal-fired power plant and a biomass power plant in Chaiyaphum’s Bamnet Narong district.

 

Over 500 people from Bamnet Narong district gathered at Nakhon Ratchasima Provincial Administrative Court on Monday requesting the court cancel the approval process for a coal-fired or biomass power plant to be located in a potash mine in their area.

 

The residents made a public statement that multiple flaws in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the project has led them to take legal action. They cited an inadequate public participation process, an unlawful approval process permitting use of the local water supply, and failure of the EIA report to meet the standards of the Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning.

 

Protestor Mung Meechamnan said that more than 3,000 people in three tambon of Bamnet Narong district would suffer direct impacts from the power plant. Local community efforts to seek intervention by relevant agencies to stop the project have all failed, he said, and so their last hope is the Administrative Court.

 

“We would like the Administrative Court to order the revocation of all EIA reports of the power plant project and the permission [granted] to use the local water supply, and stop the consideration of this project,” Mung said.

 

“Nobody wants the coal-fired power plant, and biomass power plant, in our neighbourhood, because we have seen that every place with such a project suffers from pollution.”

 

The power plant projects are proposed for a potash and rock-salt mining location owned by ASEAN Potash Chaiyaphum Co. The EIA report was done by Team Consultant Engineering and Management Ltd.

 

Coal was originally proposed to fuel the 50-megawatt power plant. The proposal later changed the planned fuel to palm kernel shells due to protests anti-coal protests from the local community. Electricity from the plant is intended for use in the company’s mining operation.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30327623

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-09-25

[plachon]

TEAM, the consultants who did the EIA are infamous for producing substandard studies that support such projects developers and missing the majority of social, environmental and health impacts that result. They have been shown to get it wrong time and again, yet still they get hired.....

 

I really wonder where they would get a sufficient quantity of palm kernel shells to fire a 50 MW plant in Chaiyaphum? Crazy place for a coal-fired plant too, as so far from ports. Then there is the potash mining impacts to worry about...

[Srikcir]

TEAM as a contractor for the developers was faulted for its EIA report, along with the Social Impact Assessment (SIA) for a hydroelectric dam at Xayaburi in northern Laos.

https://www.earthrights.org/sites/default/files/documents/andritz-oecd-complaint-re-xayaburi-4.9.2014.pdf

The government needs independent assessment of TEAM reports to assure completeness and accuracy of reports for the Chaiyaphum power plant. Not to do so would be a dereliction of duty.