5 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

In my opinion Krazy Kav is more than likely guilty as charged. He just has that guilty white man smirk on his face. I truly hope he does not get confirmed. He is not supreme court caliber. 

so based on the facts that the people she swore said were there say under penalty of perjury it did not happen, you can still say it did.....nice one, and remarkably biased

Unacceptable comments from the president and unacceptable behaviour from the candidate in the meeting with the senators.

 

But very doubtful the senators will show them they don't agree with their behaviour and vote against the candidate, they just don't have the guts and lack moral decency.

3 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

so based on the facts that the people she swore said were there say under penalty of perjury it did not happen, you can still say it did.....nice one, and remarkably biased

Oh...if that is the game we are playing: how about a bunch of Republicans, voting for a guy who was obviously lying under oath?

Who presented an unstable personality and not even shied away from lunatic conspiracy- theories?

And a guy who still MIGHT be a sexual predator?

 

We are (maybe) biased on a #$%^&*! forum on the internet!

They are biased on the subject of a guy, who might shape 'Muricans lives and politics for decades!

Whine about that, for a change!

9 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

so based on the facts that the people she swore said were there say under penalty of perjury it did not happen, you can still say it did.....nice one, and remarkably biased

Except they don’t swear these things under oath.

 

The only people giving statements under oath are Dr Ford and Judge Kavanaugh.

 

Judge Kavanaugh has already demonstrably perjured himself on multiple occasions.

 

Kavanaugh’s ‘wing man’ Mark Judge (Ford’s witness) feigned no recollection in public but has since been interviewed by the FBI twice over two days.

 

Either the FBI don’t mind sitting for hours listening to Judge day he can’t remember or Mark Judge had a great deal to tell the FBI.

 

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Except they don’t swear these things under oath.

 

The only people giving statements under oath are Dr Ford and Judge Kavanaugh.

 

Judge Kavanaugh has already demonstrably perjured himself on multiple occasions.

 

Kavanaugh’s ‘wing man’ Mark Judge (Ford’s witness) feigned no recollection in public but has since been interviewed by the FBI twice over two days.

 

Either the FBI don’t mind sitting for hours listening to Judge day he can’t remember or Mark Judge had a great deal to tell the FBI.

 

What part of a written testimony under penalty of perjury do you not understand? 

 

There is zero corroborated evidence. 

 

The entire thing is an orchestrated lie. 

 

You can choose to ignore it 

7 minutes ago, DM07 said:

Oh...if that is the game we are playing: how about a bunch of Republicans, voting for a guy who was obviously lying under oath?

Who presented an unstable personality and not even shied away from lunatic conspiracy- theories?

And a guy who still MIGHT be a sexual predator?

 

We are (maybe) biased on a #$%^&*! forum on the internet!

They are biased on the subject of a guy, who might shape 'Muricans lives and politics for decades!

Whine about that, for a change!

Please tell us what you think he lied about 

2 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

Please tell us what you think he lied about 

Okay: The Devil's Triangle is a drinking game with 3 shot- glasses in a triangle!

Do you have a daughter?

If you believe the bull- pucky he told, how about driving her over to a male- college dormitory and letting her walk in and shout "Anyone up for a Devil's Triangle?"

Just a drinking game, ey?!

 

1 minute ago, DM07 said:

Okay: The Devil's Triangle is a drinking game with 3 shot- glasses in a triangle!

Do you have a daughter?

If you believe the bull- pucky he told, how about driving her over to a male- college dormitory and letting her walk in and shout "Anyone up for a Devil's Triangle?"

Just a drinking game, ey?!

 

Again, do you actually have any real evidence or just an emotional irrational reaction? 

Just now, mcambl61 said:

Again, do you actually have any real evidence or just an emotional irrational reaction? 

What about what I said, don't you understand?

He was asked, what a Devil's Triangle refers to (same as he was with barfing and boofing...)

and he made up some BS eg. he lied!

Okay...here is one more: he said, he learned about the New York Post -article, just on the day it was published!

Well...turns out, he sent some text messages about it to a friend, days BEFORE the article came out!

So...IMHO, making up false claims about stuff...that is lying in my book!

But you might have a different opinion about that!

What was that called in your world?
Oh yeah..."alternative facts"!

3 hours ago, newatthis said:

because everyone knows he's a snake-oil salesman.

 

Sorry bud, only in your mind. There are more people who like and support Trump than you would like to believe in your bubble world. 

6 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

Again, do you actually have any real evidence or just an emotional irrational reaction? 

 

You’ve got your illiberal denial glasses on, you’ll deny evidence when presented or you’l claim the source, the Police and the FBI are all biased.

 

 

33 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

You’ve got your illiberal denial glasses on, you’ll deny evidence when presented or you’l claim the source, the Police and the FBI are all biased.

 

 

again, where is the real actual evidence. stop pretending accusations are evidence

38 minutes ago, DM07 said:

What about what I said, don't you understand?

He was asked, what a Devil's Triangle refers to (same as he was with barfing and boofing...)

and he made up some BS eg. he lied!

Okay...here is one more: he said, he learned about the New York Post -article, just on the day it was published!

Well...turns out, he sent some text messages about it to a friend, days BEFORE the article came out!

So...IMHO, making up false claims about stuff...that is lying in my book!

But you might have a different opinion about that!

What was that called in your world?
Oh yeah..."alternative facts"!

so the looney left thinks writing in a yearbook is evidence and amounts to lying.

 

very weak nonsense you are peddling, but not surprising

52 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

so the looney left thinks writing in a yearbook is evidence and amounts to lying.

 

very weak nonsense you are peddling, but not surprising

 

Kavanaugh’s testimony before the Senate judiciary Committee amounts to lying, though it’s legally referred to as perjury.

57 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

again, where is the real actual evidence. stop pretending accusations are evidence

What, where is the real evidence Kavanaugh committed Perjury before the Senate Judiciary committee.

 

It’s on video.

 

Get your illeberal denial glasses on because now Kavanaugh’s room mate is also on video:

 

Go wriggle:

 

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/10/03/james-roche-anderson-cooper-kavanaugh-lied-ac360-sot-vpx.cnn

 

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

Kavanaugh’s testimony before the Senate judiciary Committee amounts to lying, though it’s legally referred to as perjury.

again, you have zero evidence, just a biased opinion

27 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

again, you have zero evidence, just a biased opinion

What is the point of any discussion with you when you ignore proven facts as 'just an opinion' and claim 'zero evidence' when it has been watched by millions.

2 hours ago, mcambl61 said:

so based on the facts that the people she swore said were there say under penalty of perjury it did not happen, you can still say it did.....nice one, and remarkably biased

Due process only applies when someone shares your political views. If they have different views, then a smirk is enough to convict. 

1 hour ago, brucec64 said:

Due process only applies when someone shares your political views. If they have different views, then a smirk is enough to convict. 

 

(Illiberal) Due process = hiding 96% of the documentation, limiting the scope of the FBI inquiry to omit material witnesses.

10 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I must admit I was utterly shocked when Tiny Don said Ford was a credible witness. It felt like the first tine in his presidency that he actually listened to advice, and showed some respect. Now, he quickly returns to his old form. He cannot help himself. His hatred, misogyny, lack of respect, lack of empathy and utter lack of kindness are so profound, so intense, that he cannot help but shoot himself in the foot, nearly every time he opens his foul mouth. He is a hater. What else can one say?

 

In my opinion Krazy Kav is more than likely guilty as charged. He just has that guilty white man smirk on his face. I truly hope he does not get confirmed. He is not supreme court caliber. 

Amazing. Words fail me.

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Kavanaugh makes laughable denials of his behaviour under oath, multiple people who have direct knowledge of his behaviour come forward to say he’s lying and explain why he’s lying.

 

Illiberal trolls say they want evidence.

 

 

Again not one single actual piece of evidence, just an opinion 

 

will you get mad and stomp your feet once he is voted in?

I didn't believe anything Ms Ford said. Totally unconvincing.

Troll posts and the replies have been removed. 

 

An inflammatory post and the replies have been removed. 

2 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

I didn't believe anything Ms Ford said. Totally unconvincing.

Up to you. Trump followers have great difficulty recognizing truth, especially when it comes to appointing a very biased Supreme Court judge by their supreme leader.

2 hours ago, mcambl61 said:

Again not one single actual piece of evidence, just an opinion 

 

will you get mad and stomp your feet once he is voted in?

You can repeat your mantra until you expire but there is ample, solid, evidence of Kavanaugh's perjury.

 

No one is required to spoon feed you. Please stop asking.

7 hours ago, vinegarbase said:

 

Sorry bud, only in your mind. There are more people who like and support Trump than you would like to believe in your bubble world. 

 

More people support Trump than some would imagine, fair enough. Surely more people than some of us like. That said, still nowhere near a majority, or even most of the votes cast.

14 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Trump would be criticized if he came up with a cure for Cancer because that would put doctors out of work. 

Mocking an out and out fabricator such as Blasy Ford is very appropriate. 

Trump isn't PC. He and the honorable Sen. L .Graham  are taken the heat for the team.How dare anybody  criticize the lair ,Ms. consistently inconsistent, ford. The far left have also been consistent in bringing their street antics into the Congress halls showing their sick disgusting ANTIFA tatics ,while confronting senators who are only concerned  about corroberating evidence, that substantiates  the  accusations of sexual conduct while JK was in HS and College .Looks good for Americans  and the constitution 

5 hours ago, riclag said:

Trump isn't PC. He and the honorable Sen. L .Graham  are taken the heat for the team.How dare anybody  criticize the lair ,Ms. consistently inconsistent, ford. The far left have also been consistent in bringing their street antics into the Congress halls showing their sick disgusting ANTIFA tatics ,while confronting senators who are only concerned  about corroberating evidence, that substantiates  the  accusations of sexual conduct while JK was in HS and College .Looks good for Americans  and the constitution 

I'm a bit surprised at Graham and McConnell standing up the way they have, at one time, I would not have been sorry to see them go. Hopefully they'll push this all the way through.

 

Latest reports are, that the Senators are going in to read the FBI Report, and the Democrats are coming out looking rather sad.

1 hour ago, beechguy said:

Latest reports are, that the Senators are going in to read the FBI Report, and the Democrats are coming out looking rather sad.

Yep, because Trump severely constrained the FBI probe, the process was farcical; including Trump with his lying smears embraced by his Base. That some voters continue to welcome Trump's behaviour is staggering.

 

Trump is unfit to represent the Office of the President of the USA

 He's had 3 years of nothing but criticism and derision so I'm sure he is not losing sleep over senate moderate virtue signalers.

After this sc nonsense wraps up, then declassification of fisa docs, wrap up Mueller Russia conspiracy (Baker flipped), Trump will go on the offensive.