Jump to content

Thai junta says no need for foreign observers at next year's election


webfact

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, canuckamuck said:

Logically the only government that would resist foreign observers would be one that intends to cheat.

Nobody expects this election to be fair, but if they opened it to foreign observers people would give the government the legitimacy they seek. 

 

Do the US, UK, Germany, France, Australia, NZ, Italy, Poland etc etc etc all allow foreign obvservers>

 

But of course, as they would never ever cheat, now would they!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, HiSoLowSoNoSo said:

He must have slept during the election in Cambodia this year!  

He must also have gotten that Laos and Vietnam are Communist - they have a one party political system. Election monitors would be irrelevant - there is no political opposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, webfact said:

"To have others observing means the country is having a problem,"

Really.

Was there an irregularity with the General Election that voted in Prayut as the Prime Minister as well as the all ministers of the National Legislative Assembly?

Was there a problem with the February 2014 General Election that saw the Constitutional Court invalidate the election results, the third election that had been voided by the Constitutional Court since its creation?

Since at least back to 2010 there have been national election "problems" in Thailand that merits foreign monitoring. I hope the EU makes an issue of election monitoring as it has with Cambodia.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Do the US, UK, Germany, France, Australia, NZ, Italy, Poland etc etc etc all allow foreign obvservers>

 

When was the last time any of those countries had military coups?

 

Thailand has had about 30. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Thai junta does not understand the difference between 'do not need' and 'do not want for reasons they'd rather not talk about'. At least they say one when they mean another but fear it may not be accepted. So why take the risk by telling the truth when you can tell a lie - right? This is Thailand after all, and these are Thais.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, heybruce said:

Do the US, UK, Germany, France, Australia, NZ, Italy, Poland etc etc etc censor the press and internet, ban free speech, ban assembly for political purposes, and have a military government that seized power in a coup against an elected government?

 

And are they tin-pot 3rd world countries with a reputation for braggadoccio, dishonesty and propagandising and pillaging their populations?

 

Must compare apples with apples and not apples with oranges. Comparing Thailand with Cambodia and Laos is probably more sensible than comparing it with Germany and France.

Edited by HalfLight
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, HappyAndRich said:

No, not at all. It means that Thailand is showing the world they have nothing to hide. That is positive. Not negative.

u r correct, they said """"have nothing to hide, elections will be democratic.....""" if that's the case, nothing to hide, let the inspectors in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...