8 minutes ago, lamyai3 said:

To expand on your earlier question, if your friends did get sick under the previous arrangements, for nine months of the year at least they'd have had 800,000 that they could have liquidated immediately for a medical emergency without in any way invalidating their extension. 

 

The tightening noose of immigration could very easily extend to compulsory health insurance, and this in turn could lead to the rise of agents being willing to facilitate these arrangements for the less than insurable. Would you be so willing to take such a pro immigration stance then? 

Not if they're using the monthly income method they wouldn't. 

It seems this topic has now run its course since it has been evolved into a lot of bickering and baiting posts. I see no reason to keep it open.

Topic now