Jump to content

Germany designates BDS Israel boycott movement as anti-Semitic


Recommended Posts

Posted

There is another factor to this. Thousands of years of antisemitism that contributed to the development of the political movement of Zionism -- seeing the need for a land of self determination for the Jewish people. What was part of that history? Trying to restrict Jews to certain limited professions. Movements to not buy from Jews. From a Jewish POV for many Jews anyway, BDS is painfully close to a don't buy from Jews message. In other words, hateful. Protest Israeli government policies, that's well deserved. BDS is not the answer. 

  • Like 2
Posted
Stating (incorrectly) that Israel is a "racist supremacist apartheid regime" can be considered to be anti semetic , because the Israeli nation is made up people from various races and not one race rules the others and Israel doesnt have "apartheid" 
   
I agree the rhetoric you cited is extremely inflammatory. No chance for any rational dialogue with people spouting such toxic stuff.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Like 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, sanemax said:

Stating (incorrectly) that Israel is a "racist supremacist apartheid regime" can be considered to be anti semetic , because the Israeli nation is made up people from various races and not one race rules the others and Israel doesnt have "apartheid" 

   

I think  you had better run that past the Israeli Prime Minister who recently said

"Israel is not a state of all its citizens. According to the Nation-State Law that we passed, Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish People - and them alone. "

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-is-the-nation-state-of-jews-alone-netanyahu-responds-to-tv-star-who-said-arabs-are-equal-citizens-1.7003348

 

I wonder what the German parliament had a say about that. 
BDS is one of the few avenues the ordinary citizen world wide has to voice objection to the racist supremacist apartheid regime in a non violent way.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I agree the rhetoric you cited is extremely inflammatory. No chance for any rational dialogue with people spouting such toxic stuff.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Even if I were to agree, that does not make his statements anti-Semitic as claimed. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I agree the rhetoric you cited is extremely inflammatory. No chance for any rational dialogue with people spouting such toxic stuff.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

I think you regard toxic is any criticism of Israel.

 

So how toxic do you regard Netanyahu's statement or Israel's treatment of Palestinians inside Israel..could give you many instances of apartheid there, in the Occupied Territories overt apartheid, and Israel's refusal to allow any Palestinians from the diaspora to marry or be reunited with their families.

 

You call it maintaining the demographics balance in the Jewish State of Israel...I call it apartheid.

 

And BDS is one of the few peaceful ways that the global community can rectify that injustice.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

In the XXI century, anti-Semite is not the one who does not like Jews
but the one that the Jews do not like !


The Americans recently adopted the Law( HR 672 )to combat European

anti-Semitism. The law aims to shut the mouths of critics of Israeli

crimes and the Israeli neo-fascist state.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

I didn't post on that question either way but I agree that BDS is an antisemitic movement.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

..and yet still not a single shred of evidence in this thread about anything BDS has said or done that is anti-semitic.

 

Jump up and down often enough, yell "anti semitic" loudly enough, get German politicians to parrot your mantras and hope some of the mud sticks.

 

Pure McCarthyism.

 

Many on this forum suffer from PEP...Progressive Except Palestine.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
In the XXI century, anti-Semite is not the one who does not like Jews
but the one that the Jews do not like !

The Americans recently adopted the Law( HR 672 )to combat European
anti-Semitism. The law aims to shut the mouths of critics of Israeli
crimes and the Israeli neo-fascist state.
A good example of why Israel needed to exist.

The Jewish global conspiracy theories exist whether Jews have the power of a nation state or not.

Better to have the state.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Posted
32 minutes ago, laspalmas said:

In the XXI century, anti-Semite is not the one who does not like Jews
but the one that the Jews do not like !


The Americans recently adopted the Law( HR 672 )to combat European

anti-Semitism. The law aims to shut the mouths of critics of Israeli

crimes and the Israeli neo-fascist state.

I agree with the second part of your post. But don't like the use of the blanket anti semitic term "the Jews"

 

There are many younger American Jews and even Israeli Jews who clearly understand the  difference between the evil of anti-semitism and the legitimate criticism: anti Zionism.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Inflammatory posts and replies removed.  Continue and face a suspension.   Personal commentary needs to cease.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, dexterm said:

I think you regard toxic is any criticism of Israel.

 

So how toxic do you regard Netanyahu's statement or Israel's treatment of Palestinians inside Israel..could give you many instances of apartheid there, in the Occupied Territories overt apartheid, and Israel's refusal to allow any Palestinians from the diaspora to marry or be reunited with their families.

 

You call it maintaining the demographics balance in the Jewish State of Israel...I call it apartheid.

 

And BDS is one of the few peaceful ways that the global community can rectify that injustice.

 

No, that's a standard-issue deflection. I think it would be hard to call your rhetoric anything but, and that would still be a polite description. Not exactly sure why you'd want to compare the style of rhetoric you favor to Netanyahu's - but even so, he doesn't usually engage in such a manner. There's plenty of ways to say things, it is not mandatory to choose vehemence.

 

The BDS doesn't represent the "global community". The World is not fully aligned with your politics.

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, dexterm said:

..and yet still not a single shred of evidence in this thread about anything BDS has said or done that is anti-semitic.

 

Jump up and down often enough, yell "anti semitic" loudly enough, get German politicians to parrot your mantras and hope some of the mud sticks.

 

Pure McCarthyism.

 

Many on this forum suffer from PEP...Progressive Except Palestine.

 

Jump up and down often enough, yell "apartheid" loudly enough, parrot mantras and hope some of the mud sticks. Some posters seem to imagine that "progressive" necessarily equates with their own extreme views on a specific issue. It doesn't.

Posted
4 minutes ago, candide said:

Why do some people support Thibetans and not Palestinians? Why do some people support Uighurs and not Thibetans or Palestinians? Why do some people support .. and not ...? Etc....

I was talking about boycotting , actively trying to cause a Countries downfall , rather than just merely supporting or not  

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, candide said:

Why do some people support Thibetans and not Palestinians? Why do some people support Uighurs and not Thibetans or Palestinians? Why do some people support .. and not ...? Etc....

 

People can support whatever they feel like, fair enough. Then there's conducting a campaign trying to paint this as the worst human rights issue ever, regardless of facts and without applying perspective. We're told, on this topic, that those not embracing the BDS agenda are "fake" liberals/progressives. At the same time, those advocating BDS agenda aren't nearly as active applying similar standards to more heavy duty human right violators, and even welcome support from such parties. All this while going on about governments not acting according to their wishes as morally bankrupt, duplicitous and whatnot.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

The whole world didn't support the anti apartheid movement till it did, and then the white government was gone.

Movements take a while to gain momentum, but you know that.

Every time Israel bombs schools and hospitals in Gaza, kills children, more people start to wake up to what is happening there.

Israel has sown the wind, the whirlwind is coming.

 

Somehow doubt you could meaningfully demonstrate the effectiveness of either set of boycott, even if both cases were similar (which is basically just another talking point). There will always be people who choose, for one reason or another, to see only Israeli actions, while ignoring/justifying Palestinian actions or having little concept of context. As for posters' standing predictions....wouldn't hold my breath.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. I was replying to Sanemax who was using the "go back thousands of years" argument. 

Here's news from recently- Israelis bomb Gaza, again, killing more children.

450 rockets into southern Israel. aimed deliberately at schools even if they do miss. What are they supposed to do? War for their survival. Yes, missiles kill children a.lso.

  • Like 1
  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If Israel did the right thing and left the occupied territories for real ( not a pretend evacuation like in Gaza ) and the Palestinians had their own state, they might not feel the need to fire rockets at their tormenters. Making peace does work, as the British found when they started really talking to the IRA.

Sadly, the Israelis apparently don't want peace, as they keep building settlements on illegally occupied territory in violation of all international treaties.

 

More "what if". If the Palestinians accepted the partition plan, or chose negotiation over rejectionism and violence - they wouldn't be in the sorry state they are in. But in some posters' world, the Palestinians are never ever accountable or responsible for anything, not even their own choices and decisions.

 

How was Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip "pretend" isn't explained. Same goes for the connection between this bogus "argument" and rockets attacks.

 

Peace making takes both side. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, dexterm said:

BDS is protesting against the illegal occupation of Palestinian land. The injustice and racism lies in the fact that a person can arrive at Ben Gurion airport and claim instant citizenship and a house land subsidy based purely on his religion, however adulterated by millennia of inter marriage and conversion... Ivanka Trump could claim the package if she wanted to. Whereas the actual Palestinian owner of the land who still holds the title deeds is languishing in a refugee camp a couple of miles away. 

 

The Bible is not a real estate title deed. This has got to be the most ridiculous argument in the Zionist mythology playbook, ignoring the fact that countless other peoples before and after the brief period of Jewish history have lived in Palestine.

 

Strikes me as extremely unfair. That's why I support BDS.

 

BDS founder's notion of how things ought to be is pretty much the same, but in reverse. That is, Palestinian diaspora being afforded a right of return, while Jews abroad won't.

Not quite what you're trying to market.

 

Wholesale denial of the Jewish people's unique connection with the land is not a strong argument.

 

You support BDS because it suits your extreme anti-Israeli position, and the style of rhetoric employed.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

BDS founder's notion of how things ought to be is pretty much the same, but in reverse. That is, Palestinian diaspora being afforded a right of return, while Jews abroad won't.

Not quite what you're trying to market.

 

Wholesale denial of the Jewish people's unique connection with the land is not a strong argument.

 

You support BDS because it suits your extreme anti-Israeli position, and the style of rhetoric employed.

And Israel's refusal to allow Palestinians' right of return having once ethnically cleansed them is based on one thing only: pure racism.

 

A clause in a peace agreement could easily be negotiated: guaranteeing the right of any persecuted Jew world wide a safe haven in Israel, along with a whole host of family reunification, religious, marriage, retirement permanent residence visas. Plus a guaranteed 50:50 Jewish/non Jewish parliament.

 

It is the racism and desire to hold onto power however unjustly that I object to. That's why I support BDS.

  • Haha 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

More "what if". If the Palestinians accepted the partition plan, or chose negotiation over rejectionism and violence - they wouldn't be in the sorry state they are in. But in some posters' world, the Palestinians are never ever accountable or responsible for anything, not even their own choices and decisions.

 

How was Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip "pretend" isn't explained. Same goes for the connection between this bogus "argument" and rockets attacks.

 

Peace making takes both side. 

If we are playing the "What if" game, Zionists too have missed many very costly opportunities for peace by refusing partition (1937 Peel) and compromise. If the Palestinians do not have peace, nor do Israelis.

 

Let's deal with the present please. The only way Israel can have permanent peace (the only kind worth having) is to compromise with its neighbors.... the offer from the entire Arab world has been on the table for years.. end the illegal occupation and allow return/compensation/ recognition of the Palestinian refugees...which are the corner stones of the BDS movement too.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...