Jump to content

Trump calls London mayor "stone cold loser" as he lands in the UK


webfact

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Thairealist said:

 

It all depends on how you quantify as an immigrant. From your own reference, only 44.9% of London’s population is white. However they in turn, if you go back generations,were also immigrants.

 The problem stems from the fact that, those that people think of as immigrants, have only consisted of a large % of the whole population over the last 50-60 years. And maybe that’s the problem, if there had been a trickle of immigration over the years, they may have integrated and therefore been accepted to a greater degree than is the case now.  As it is, over these last 50-60 there has been a deluge of immigrants, so that now London is not recognised by many as a British City. 

What's the criteria for a 'British City'. IMO London meets the criteria as the centre for Britishness, centre for HMG, Royal Family, cathedrals, internationally recognised centres of excellence for museums, galleries, music etc etc, all demonstrating the traditions of London.

Edited by simple1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Loiner said:

Not really, if it is because he thinks that islamic terrorism is something we should be prepared for as part and parcel of living in a major city. Didn't you get the impression he kinda condoned that?

He's not so hot on sorting out the acid attacks or knife crime in our capital either, both of which are have strong racial overtones that he ignores.

Sorting out knife attacks and acid attacks are the responsibility of police and other agencies.

He has often spoken out against radicals, and let us remember that these attacks are carried out by a minority of Muslims. Some also forget about the attacks carried out by white supremacists, equally as disgusting.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

Gosh I am astounded at the outright racism expressed against the Mr Khan, and as for the religious slurs, it is very scary in the 21st century.

 

I agree. But I have no sympathies remaining to offer you, as all my sympathies have gone to the long-suffering moderators who have to slog through—and remove—much worse than what we see here.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what name-calling accomplishes, other than to display one's own inadequacies?

 

"Stone-Cold" really only goes with Steve Austin, or killer. Loser doesn't really make sense.

 

But this seems to be the hallmark of the president and his staff.

 

He's said to denigrate jared by calling him a "girl", to others obviously.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

He's said to denigrate jared by calling him a "girl", to others obviously.

 

Jared is Trump’s love rival who stole away his beloved Ivanka, a girl he thinks is “hot” and “datable”

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorting out knife attacks and acid attacks are the responsibility of police and other agencies.
He has often spoken out against radicals, and let us remember that these attacks are carried out by a minority of Muslims. Some also forget about the attacks carried out by white supremacists, equally as disgusting.
 
Yes a "minority" of muslims,all over the world,as opposed to a few attacks by other idiots.

Sent from my SM-A720F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious about the potus use of the phrase stone cold. It occurred to me that must be dated, it isn't very widely used, and frankly I don't even know what it means. Is it mafia slang? Do Brits know what it means? So I had to look it up. So notice the Shakespeare reference. Now back to the meaning, bereft of any emotion / lack of concern. Forgetting the insult "loser" which is the favorite insult of the potus because it clearly is what he fears most for himself, do Londoners agree their mayor is bereft of emotion / has a lack of concern?

 

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/stone+cold

Edited by Jingthing
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/3/2019 at 3:27 PM, BTB1958 said:

Good for Trump.  Calling it like the rest of the world sees it.  . Unless your a socialist liberal. Than free food and free everything for all immigrants.  

Because Trump is so popular in the rest of the world?

"America’s global image plummeted following the election of President Donald Trump, amid widespread opposition to his administration’s policies and a widely shared lack of confidence in his leadership. Now, as the second anniversary of Trump’s election approaches, a new 25-nation Pew Research Center survey finds that Trump’s international image remains poor, while ratings for the United States are much lower than during Barack Obama’s presidency."

Chart showing Americaâs international image in 2018

https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/10/01/trumps-international-ratings-remain-low-especially-among-key-allies/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Thairealist said:

 

It all depends on how you quantify as an immigrant. From your own reference, only 44.9% of London’s population is white. However they in turn, if you go back generations,were also immigrants.

Using your definition of an immigrant; Trump is an immigrant. All his grandparents were immigrants to the USA, as was his mother. 

 

Taking your argument to it's logical conclusion, all Americans who cannot trace their ancestry back to pre-Columbian times are immigrants!

 

8 hours ago, Thairealist said:

The problem stems from the fact that, those that people think of as immigrants, have only consisted of a large % of the whole population over the last 50-60 years. And maybe that’s the problem, if there had been a trickle of immigration over the years, they may have integrated and therefore been accepted to a greater degree than is the case now.  As it is, over these last 50-60 there has been a deluge of immigrants, so that now London is not recognised by many as a British City.

As a UK resident, I can assure you that your conclusion and the assumptions upon which it is based are completely incorrect.

 

Unless you can prove me wrong by providing verifiable data showing the percentage of white British citizens who do not recognise London as a British citizen.

 

I've limited my request to white British because the alt right posters here wouldn't accept the views of black, Asian etc. British.

 

Edited by 7by7
Addendum
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sanemax said:
7 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

Sorting out knife attacks and acid attacks are the responsibility of police and other agencies.

He has often spoken out against radicals, and let us remember that these attacks are carried out by a minority of Muslims. Some also forget about the attacks carried out by white supremacists, equally as disgusting.

 

We dont forget attacks by "White supremacists" , its just that they dont often happen .

Theres nothing to forget or remember 

 

There's no evidence that Muslim immigrants are responsible for most of London's knife attacks

Quote

We could find no data showing that Muslim immigrants are responsible for most knife attacks in London. A spokesman for the city’s police service denied that the claim was true, and academics we reached out to concurred. The burden of proof is on the Facebook post, and discovering no evidence to corroborate its claim, we rate this statement False.

 

Muslims and other non-whites are often the victims of random attacks by whites; it just rarely get's reported outside the local news.

 

Just one example:'If this was a white person .. It'd be all over the news': Muslim acid attack victim speaks out.

 

In that case the perpetrator, John Tomin, was caught. Despite his Facebook page containing links to the far right and other such evidence, at his trial it was ruled that he was mentally unstable so this was not judged to be a racially motivated crime. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, ivor bigun said:

The guardian,that wonderful paper,just right for your bottom, oh and the dozen or so people who read it,are they still begging for cash to keep going?

Sent from my SM-A720F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

You may not like it's source, but The Guardian's quote of Khan's remark: "Part and parcel of living in a great global city is you’ve got to be prepared for these things, you’ve got to be vigilant, you’ve got to support the police doing an incredibly hard job. We must never accept terrorists being successful, we must never accept that terrorists can destroy our life or destroy the way we lead our lives.” is 100% accurate.

 

He was asked on the London Assembly's website at the time to clarify his remark: What did you mean by your recent statement that terror attacks are "part and parcel of living in a big city" and how did you come to this conclusion?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

 

There's no evidence that Muslim immigrants are responsible for most of London's knife attacks

 

Muslims and other non-whites are often the victims of random attacks by whites; it just rarely get's reported outside the local news.

 

Just one example:'If this was a white person .. It'd be all over the news': Muslim acid attack victim speaks out.

 

In that case the perpetrator, John Tomin, was caught. Despite his Facebook page containing links to the far right and other such evidence, at his trial it was ruled that he was mentally unstable so this was not judged to be a racially motivated crime. 

I agree to a certain extent.

 

A poster (can't be bothered to go back and look for the actual post, for which I apologise) said that white crimes against blacks aren't remembered.  I certainly remember the murder of Stephen Lawrence by a group of white thugs, albeit possibly because I was burgled a few days later and the police that attended made their racism extremely clear..... ☹️

 

A few years later, my white next door neighbour was beaten up by a gang of white thugs 'cos he had long hair and didn't fit into their definition of 'acceptable people'. ☹️

Edited by dick dasterdly
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/3/2019 at 3:18 PM, keith101 said:

I am 100% with Sadiq Khan on this , I just cant imagine why they would give a state visit to Trump when pretty much all he does is give them s##t on twitter and from that tiny little lying mouth of his .

 

On 6/3/2019 at 3:27 PM, BTB1958 said:

Good for Trump.  Calling it like the rest of the world sees it.  . Unless your a socialist liberal. Than free food and free everything for all immigrants.  

 

 

You two sure see things differently.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Loiner said:

 

 

So it's not worth complaining when describing the US President, but it is when describing the Nazim of Londonistan? Take the weight off your feet, cos that white man's burden is getting to you too much.

Who are you calling "white"

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...