MPs seek to block no-deal Brexit by stopping government funds

[Loiner]

I take it you have evidence to support your proclamation that No Deal exit is the best for UK. Seems to contradict parliament who has rejected it already. Just one reference from a reliable source would be sufficient. 
 
In the event of a proposed no deal, enough Tories will block it, hence a GE comes next.

Go find your own sources.
You don’t know what the Remainer Tories will do, now that they will be lead by a Brexit supporter. Another GE? Yeah, you tried that in January and it didn’t work. They all go back to support the party lines.

[Bluespunk]

10 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Go find your own sources.
You don’t know what the Remainer Tories will do, now that they will be lead by a Brexit supporter. Another GE? Yeah, you tried that in January and it didn’t work. They all go back to support the party lines.

“Go find your own sources”

 

Grand advice indeed...

Edited June 30, 2019 by Bluespunk

[stephenterry]

15 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Go find your own sources.
You don’t know what the Remainer Tories will do, now that they will be lead by a Brexit supporter. Another GE? Yeah, you tried that in January and it didn’t work. They all go back to support the party lines.

There aren't any sources that proclaim a no deal is best for Britain. Maybe you could point me to one. Just one. The outcome for Johnson will result in a GE, which is best for Britain. Best of luck with that.

[Loiner]

“Go find your own sources”
 
Grand advice indeed...

If you are interested, then you go find them too. I’m not doing your homework for you.

Well that’s even grander now.

[Loiner]

There aren't any sources that proclaim a no deal is best for Britain. Maybe you could point me to one. Just one. The outcome for Johnson will result in a GE, which is best for Britain. Best of luck with that.

Masses of them. But you have to look.
The tail is not wagging this dog.

[stephenterry]

1 minute ago, Loiner said:

Masses of them. But you have to look.
The tail is not wagging this dog.

????????????

[Bluespunk]

42 minutes ago, Loiner said:

If you are interested, then you go find them too. I’m not doing your homework for you.

Well that’s even grander now.

You cant even present one link. 

 

Have to wonder why...

 

Ah, the irony considering your past posts. 

[billd766]

4 hours ago, stephenterry said:

Common sense. There would be no feasible time frame to fiddle about with an amended agreement. Hence Boris would  - so he said - table a no deal and it would be rejected. He won't prorogue parliament (end the current session) as that would be political suicide.

So you actually have NO idea other than common sense.

 

If common sense was applied for Brexit from day 1 it would have been Brexiteers in the government running it and it would have been wrapped up long ago and the UK wouldn't be in the mess it is now.

[billd766]

2 hours ago, stephenterry said:

There aren't any sources that proclaim a no deal is best for Britain. Maybe you could point me to one. Just one. The outcome for Johnson will result in a GE, which is best for Britain. Best of luck with that.

It took me 2 minutes to Google it.

 

Try this one.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/17/brexit-theresa-may-tells-eu-no-deal-better-bad-deal-britain/

 

or this one.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/29/course-no-deal-better-bad-deal-hope-theresa-may-has-not-abandoned/

 

or this one.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/24/no-deal-remain-theresa-may-brexit-party-compromise-brexit

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, Loiner said:

Go find your own sources.
You don’t know what the Remainer Tories will do, now that they will be lead by a Brexit supporter. Another GE? Yeah, you tried that in January and it didn’t work. They all go back to support the party lines.

You make a claim so should be able to support that. Asking others to do your homework for you is not done.

 

Johnson a brexit supporter? Are you sure, he had proved to be more of a wind vane than a full on supporter of anything.

[stevenl]

2 minutes ago, billd766 said:

It took me 2 minutes to Google it.

 

Try this one.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/17/brexit-theresa-may-tells-eu-no-deal-better-bad-deal-britain/

 

or this one.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/29/course-no-deal-better-bad-deal-hope-theresa-may-has-not-abandoned/

 

or this one.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/24/no-deal-remain-theresa-may-brexit-party-compromise-brexit

Neither of those links are claiming a no deal is best for Britain.

[Loiner]

You cant even present one link. 
 
Have to wonder why...
 
Ah, the irony considering your past posts. 

You consistently couldn’t present anything relating to your imaginary ad hoc arrangement.
Then you think I should jump through Remainers hoops for something that is easy to find? Dream on.

[Loiner]

You make a claim so should be able to support that. Asking others to do your homework for you is not done.
 
Johnson a brexit supporter? Are you sure, he had proved to be more of a wind vane than a full on supporter of anything.

Already told you - I’m not jumping through any hoops for you and you don’t allocate my homework.
Boris will be a proper Tory leader. The MPs will do as directed and there won’t be another GE for a few years.

[Bluespunk]

47 minutes ago, Loiner said:

You consistently couldn’t present anything relating to your imaginary ad hoc arrangement.
Then you think I should jump through Remainers hoops for something that is easy to find? Dream on.

The links I posted supported my point. 

 

Now where are your links?

[Loiner]

The links I posted supported my point. 
 
Now where are your links?

No they didn’t.
Don’t think I will fall for your game.

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, Loiner said:

No they didn’t.
Don’t think I will fall for your game.

You can’t can you, because you made it all up.