Seripisut upbraided for fingering government

By THE NATION

 

Thanakorn Wangbunkhongchana, deputy spokesman of coalition leader Palang Pracharath Party

 

Thanakorn Wangbunkhongchana, deputy spokesman of coalition leader Palang Pracharath Party, on Sunday slammed Seri Ruam Thai Party leader Seripisuth Temiyavej for accusing the government of being behind the bomb attacks in Bangkok.

 

Thanakorn said he was disappointed with the former national police chief, insisting it was inconceivable that a government whose principals had run the country for the past five years would deliberately resort to such violence.

 

He also chastised Pheu Thai Party members for “ridiculing” the victims and concerned citizens on social media, a stance he called inhumane and immature.

 

Seripisuth alleged on Saturday that the government was behind the bombings, seeking to distract the news media and public from a row over an opposition MP’s accusation that the prime minister deliberately omitted a required phrase during his swearing-in last month.

 

Skipping the phrase violated the Constitution, Seripisuth charged, and thus invalidated both Prayut’s prime ministerial post and the entire Cabinet’s status.

 

Seripisut alleged on Saturday that the government was behind the bombings, seeking to distract the news media and public from a row over an opposition MP’s accusation that the prime minister deliberately omitted a required phrase during his swearing-in last month.

 

Skipping the phrase violated the Constitution, Seripisute charged, and thus invalidated both Prayut’s prime ministerial post and the entire Cabinet’s status.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30374186

 

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-08-05

Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info

"Principals who had run the country for the last 5 years.."

What principals?

They violated almost every civil right to obtain power and this numpty wants to promote this junta appointed government by preaching about morals.

One thing we do know is that Prayuth has surrounded himself with likewise delusional puppets.

It's funny, because what he thinks crossed my mind just before I read the article. Though maybe not for the same reasons.

'upbraided'..'fingered'? On what linguistic planet are these writers from?

Awfully convenient to keep the high defence spending going

fingering can be problematic . . . 

2 hours ago, webfact said:

He also chastised Pheu Thai Party members for “ridiculing” the victims and concerned citizens on social media, a stance he called inhumane and immature.

What did pt say?

2 hours ago, sunnyboy2018 said:

'upbraided'..'fingered'? On what linguistic planet are these writers from?

+ one whole paragraph was repeated verbatim.

3 hours ago, webfact said:

Seripisut upbraided for fingering government

Did he wash his hands beforehand?

2 hours ago, sunnyboy2018 said:

'upbraided'..'fingered'? On what linguistic planet are these writers from?

Planet Thailand of course!

16 minutes ago, PatOngo said:

Did he wash his hands beforehand?

Wash hands AFTER fingering, please

33 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

What did pt say?

The only thing I have read is PT strongly condemning the violence.

4 minutes ago, edwinchester said:

The only thing I have read is PT strongly condemning the violence.

So what is the guy in the op rambling on about?

1 hour ago, bluebluewater said:

fingering can be problematic . . . 

with these clowns in power, so does jerking off. 

3 hours ago, webfact said:

, Thanakorn Wangbunkhongchana spokesman of coalition leader Palang Pracharath Party, on Sunday slammed Seri Ruam Thai Party leader Seripisuth Temiyavej

Thanakorn Wangbunkhongchana fingered Seripisuth Temiyavej or was it Seripisuth Temiyavej who fingered Thanakorn Wangbunkhongchana? I'm confused. The end result was a finger bang either way.

4 hours ago, sunnyboy2018 said:

'upbraided'..'fingered'? On what linguistic planet are these writers from?

 

First it was army boss apirat who said, that the usual suspects (as in 2006) were responsible. Those in 2006 were never named or charged, but for the army it’s always an opposition party. 

Now, since several muslim insurgents were arrested and confested, apirat should withdraw his statement. However, he did not, it well might mean that he is preparing for an army crackdown, another military coup. 

This government, with 19 coalition parties, is very unstable, with a very small majority. In case it collapses, the army is already working on plan b. 

5 hours ago, webfact said:

Seripisuth alleged on Saturday that the government was behind the bombings, seeking to distract the news media and public from a row over an opposition MP’s accusation that the prime minister deliberately omitted a required phrase during his swearing-in last month.

Very much spot on. Had the same thought right from the beginning that this was a distraction from so many problems that started with the election being staged for the junta return to the attacks on activists and the constitution crisis regarding the swearing-in. Probably also to divert the attention of the external activists like Pavin being attacked and Faiyen granted refuge status in France. The small explosions were meant to provide the props for distraction and to conveniently put the blame on one side. If the instigators want to bring attention to the ASEAN meeting, a few placards will be more effective than bombs.  

5 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Awfully convenient to keep the high defence spending going

 

Awfully convenient to make people think it's a government false flag whilst stirring the <deleted>!

10 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Very much spot on. Had the same thought right from the beginning that this was a distraction from so many problems that started with the election being staged for the junta return to the attacks on activists and the constitution crisis regarding the swearing-in. Probably also to divert the attention of the external activists like Pavin being attacked and Faiyen granted refuge status in France. The small explosions were meant to provide the props for distraction and to conveniently put the blame on one side. If the instigators want to bring attention to the ASEAN meeting, a few placards will be more effective than bombs.  

 

Yes yes, must be the government.

 

No evidence whatsoever but as it suits your political agenda you assume it must be and try and present that as a fact. 

 

How unsurprising.

6 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Yes yes, must be the government.

 

No evidence whatsoever but as it suits your political agenda you assume it must be and try and present that as a fact. 

 

How unsurprising.

I am more convinced after you came out strongly and blindly defending the junta government.

6 hours ago, webfact said:

Seripisuth alleged on Saturday that the government was behind the bombings, seeking to distract the news media and public from a row over an opposition MP’s accusation that the prime minister deliberately omitted a required phrase during his swearing-in last month

There is possibly some truth to this. Every Thai I have spoken to regarding the missing text in his swearing in.. Were clueless about all of it.