Or better asked: what would be the similar behaviour of, let's say the USA, when adressing Chinese ownership "issues" at the Panama canal -- which is well outside of American waters. Like I said, at least Americans have no valid part in this discussion and should shut up. As scottiejohn did not understand my argument and put a question mark on it. The definition of a Traffic Separation System (TSS) is part of UNCLOS. An international agreement, true, but Iran has never signed it and are therefore not bound by it. Oman did, so they are in their own pickle. Who else did not ratify it: the USA. Hence it is pure hyprocrisy by the USA to try to hold Iran to the same "international law" the USA itself is not wantign to be part of, because immediately, they themselves would be in breach of it. This does not mean that Iran blocking the strait is not a problem -- it is just not a problem the USA should be involved in to solve, until they have fixed their own shortcomings following international law. I think a consortium of European countries, well known for their upolding of democracy, freedom and internaitonal law -- so the polar opposite of the USA -- are maybe the only countries able to have a moral voice in this that cold influence Iran positively.
Create an account or sign in to comment