Jump to content

UK's worst-case no-deal Brexit plan warns of food shortages, public disorder


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, dunroaming said:

2016 to 2019.  Let's see how the percentages change when the people too young (and couldn't be bothered to) vote last time get the chance now.  Not to mention all those old fogies who have fallen off of their perch. ???? 

I can think of at least one old fogey who is still alive and kicking and there are quite a few more of us as well.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Forethat said:

There are plenty of recorded hearings available for those interested in ascertaining the Brexit readiness. Including monetary and financial systems. You'd be amazed if you knew the amount of work spent on Brexit preparations. I guess in you mind, the people involved are all "pathetic" and "liars".

 

One thing for sure,I am not coming up against you in any form ,discussion or otherwise

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Forethat said:

There are plenty of recorded hearings available for those interested in ascertaining the Brexit readiness. Including monetary and financial systems. You'd be amazed if you knew the amount of work spent on Brexit preparations. I guess in you mind, the people involved are all "pathetic" and "liars".

 

Since you are involved with Brexit preparation. 

Can you clarify why the Scottish government received a different copy of the Yellowhamer report to the Uk issued .

Scottish states Base scenario

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, cleopatra2 said:

Since you are involved with Brexit preparation. 

Can you clarify why the Scottish government received a different copy of the Yellowhamer report to the Uk issued .

Scottish states Base scenario

No.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Just remember all your internet activity is being logged and you could be subject to disciplinary action if true. And if true for your own sake log off and stop boasting about what you supposedly do.  

Oh, dear me. "you could be subject to disciplinary action if true. And if true for your own sake log off and stop boasting about what you supposedly do". :cheesy:

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Just remember all your internet activity is being logged and you could be subject to disciplinary action if true. And if true for your own sake log off and stop boasting about what you supposedly do.  

He once said in a thread that he'd bet his last dime. Invoked a pointless analogy about shipping pork to Virginia. He repeatedly introduces irrelevant Hillary Clinton references into threads. What are the odds that he is what he represents himself to be?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

the usual remainer scare tactics to thwart a leave .it will pass like the year 2000 bug which turned out to be a small fart ..planes didnt fall from the sky as they claimed

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, kingdong said:

They need us more thanks need them,let's get out and let the uncontrolled econo.if migration become the eu,a problem,good luck .

They need us more how ? 

 

Again UK GDP $2.9t - EU GDP $17.2t 

 

Looking forward to your explanation 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Forethat said:

There are plenty of recorded hearings available for those interested in ascertaining the Brexit readiness. Including monetary and financial systems. You'd be amazed if you knew the amount of work spent on Brexit preparations. I guess in your mind, the people involved are all "pathetic" and "liars", and YOU are the one providing REAL expertise.

 

Hmmm the leavers claim the pounds rout is due to ‘uncertainty’ and EVERY industry is crying out for clarification so given I would be amazed how much had been spent on Brexit preparations, would it have been a good idea to let the economy in on them ? 

 

Which ‘financial systems’ have been readied for an event no one knows how will pan out ? 

 

In other words stop talking drivel. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Bruntoid said:

Hmmm the leavers claim the pounds rout is due to ‘uncertainty’ and EVERY industry is crying out for clarification so given I would be amazed how much had been spent on Brexit preparations, would it have been a good idea to let the economy in on them ? 

 

Which ‘financial systems’ have been readied for an event no one knows how will pan out ? 

 

In other words stop talking drivel. 

Excellent point.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, billd766 said:

I can think of at least one old fogey who is still alive and kicking and there are quite a few more of us as well.

But many many dead ones who voted leave to be replaced by younger ones that won’t - thus the leavers panic to avoid a second referendum.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
41 minutes ago, 3NUMBAS said:

the usual remainer scare tactics to thwart a leave .it will pass like the year 2000 bug which turned out to be a small fart ..planes didnt fall from the sky as they claimed

As the remainers claimed?  Mate. You need to get professional help.  Not sure if linguistic or pyschological. Perhaps both.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

You need to provide an actual refutation. You know, engage with the points raised, rather than indulge in idle insults. To recapitulate what Bruntoid said, why leave the business community in a state of uncertainty, if plans are in place? 

 

 

LOL...and you consider “excellent point” to be a valuable contribution to the debate, do you.

 

Physician - heal thyself.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, zorrow424 said:

..and just how do you yourself know of anything different?  Go on tell?

Your argument being that as it hasn't happened yet, it isn't going to? 

This seems to flt in the face of cause and effect. 

I've already cjted my extensive experience of logistics at Dover but you are saying this wont happen...this is based on what?

  • Haha 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Loiner said:


Hello, have you got a new tag team partner? Or is it one of the old ones in one of his various guises?

Rather than attacking the messenger(s), wouldn't it be better to attack the message?

  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...