Trump says lead impeachment Democrat Schiff has not paid 'price, yet'

[blazes]

2 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Funny. I dont biden being investigated for anything.

What a comedian you are!!!

 

Biden's time will come...

[Sujo]

2 minutes ago, blazes said:

What a comedian you are!!!

 

Biden's time will come...

Yeah,so funny im correct. 

[metisdead]

Some inflammatory troll posts and the replies have been removed.

 

A post using a trolling representation of Trump's name has been removed. 

[spidermike007]

1 hour ago, blazes said:

 

Sorry, but you misunderstand me.  You say that Trump is the bigger gangster. My question  therefore logically follows: bigger than who????

 or even bigger than whom?

But still, you have to name who you think will be the Democratic candidate before we can take your assertion re Trump seriously.

Cos if you were to name Biden, for example, I'd have to say that Creepy Joe would give Trump a good run for his money in the gangster department.

Mike Bloomberg may very well be our next president. He has an very clever plan, and in polling he has climbed to 10%. From nowhere. He would make a great president. Very skilled. He has many of the qualities Trump lacks. Including the ability to negotiate a deal and command the respect of our allies. Plus, he is not a gangster.

[Thingamabob]

Creepy Adam Schiff will pay the price come November. Dems have just gifted Trump another 4 years.

[bristolboy]

Just now, Thingamabob said:

Creepy Adam Schiff will pay the price come November. Dems have just gifted Trump another 4 years.

You are clearly a scholar of American politics. Adam Schiff, from the red state of California, barely held on to his seat in the last election. He only got 78.4% of the votes.

https://ballotpedia.org/California's_28th_Congressional_District_election,_2018

MAGA!

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, blazes said:

 

Sorry, but you misunderstand me.  You say that Trump is the bigger gangster. My question  therefore logically follows: bigger than who????

 or even bigger than whom?

But still, you have to name who you think will be the Democratic candidate before we can take your assertion re Trump seriously.

Cos if you were to name Biden, for example, I'd have to say that Creepy Joe would give Trump a good run for his money in the gangster department.

 

38 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Creepy Adam Schiff will pay the price come November. Dems have just gifted Trump another 4 years.

Creepy and juvenile that namecalling, only to follow the example set by Trump.

[rabas]

2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Mike Bloomberg may very well be our next president. He has an very clever plan, and in polling he has climbed to 10%. From nowhere. He would make a great president. Very skilled. He has many of the qualities Trump lacks. Including the ability to negotiate a deal and command the respect of our allies. Plus, he is not a gangster.

I could consider him if he fully guaranteed 2 uncompromisable points:

 

1. The US takes full control of its borders and who enters the country, like all civilized nations.

2. The US  guarantees, alone or with allies, that Iran is never able to acquire nuclear weapons. None of this silly "OK, today we promise not to refine too much." political nonsense.

 

Do you think he can do that? Or is he just another politician willing to sell out the nation for votes?

 

[nobodysfriend]

6 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Trump is more unhinged, and less stable than he has ever been. Impeachment has driven him positively crazy, if he was not already insane, which many of us suspect.

 

Quite the opposite will happen. The senate will make a whitewash out of this trial, and will refuse to call any witnesses or hear any new evidence. And the GOP will pay the price come November, with a historic trouncing. I expect Trump to be defeated, and I expect both the house to pick up more seats, and the majority in the senate to be handed over to the dems. And guess what? The GOP, and Trump's loyal and lockstep devotees will have only themselves to blame. 

Good comment .

I an worried about the candidates of the Dems ... they are all old , too old .

If they could find somebody younger and charismatic who has a ' vision ' about how to make things better , they would have a real chance ...

The century is still young and needs somebody who is not so close to the ' final curtain ' as a leader ...

Edited January 27, 2020 by nobodysfriend

[hugocnx]

1 hour ago, rabas said:

I could consider him if he fully guaranteed 2 uncompromisable points:

 

1. The US takes full control of its borders and who enters the country, like all civilized nations.

2. The US  guarantees, alone or with allies, that Iran is never able to acquire nuclear weapons. None of this silly "OK, today we promise not to refine too much." political nonsense.

 

Do you think he can do that? Or is he just another politician willing to sell out the nation for votes?

 

If I am not mistaken Bloomberg himself said that he will do everything in his power ($) to prevent Trump from winning 2020. What a strategy; I do not trust this man therefor.

[earlinclaifornia]

Rudy is taken out by FOX right wingers:

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-host-jeanine-pirro-confronts-giuliani-reveal-evidence-bidens-alleged-corruption-1484066

[candide]

7 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Rudy is taken out by FOX right wingers:

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-host-jeanine-pirro-confronts-giuliani-reveal-evidence-bidens-alleged-corruption-1484066

Of course, he has zero evidence! 

[earlinclaifornia]

9 hours ago, Curt1591 said:

For over 3 years, Trump has been hit with constant "vitriol" from the democrat leadership, others. Seems they can dish it out but not take it!

Now his own staff is taking his re=election OUT:

https://news.yahoo.com/report-bolton-book-says-trump-074357582.html

[earlinclaifornia]

12 hours ago, Chrysaora said:

This one is so funny, it's worth a screen shot so I can put it here again after November.

Add this is your screen captures:

https://news.yahoo.com/report-bolton-book-says-trump-074357582.html

[earlinclaifornia]

6 hours ago, Sujo said:

Funny. I dont biden being investigated for anything.

Failed by Rudy again:

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-host-jeanine-pirro-confronts-giuliani-reveal-evidence-bidens-alleged-corruption-1484066

[earlinclaifornia]

1 hour ago, nobodysfriend said:

Good comment .

I an worried about the candidates of the Dems ... they are all old , too old .

If they could find somebody younger and charismatic who has a ' vision ' about how to make things better , they would have a real chance ...

The century is still young and needs somebody who is not so close to the ' final curtain ' as a leader ...

 Independent myself who will vote Vote ham sandwich over trump.

[hugocnx]

20 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Rudy is taken out by FOX right wingers:

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-host-jeanine-pirro-confronts-giuliani-reveal-evidence-bidens-alleged-corruption-1484066

Rudy is off topic, but I feel the need to answer. Have you seen the Judge Jeanine interview? First of all Rudy didn't pull a face like (fake) Newsweek showed. Wait till after Rudy relays his blog on Tuesday and following days and see if he has the real proof as he claims. He's probably 'keeping the best for last' (?)

Edited January 27, 2020 by hugocnx

[wwest5829]

7 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Trump is more unhinged, and less stable than he has ever been. Impeachment has driven him positively crazy, if he was not already insane, which many of us suspect.

 

Quite the opposite will happen. The senate will make a whitewash out of this trial, and will refuse to call any witnesses or hear any new evidence. And the GOP will pay the price come November, with a historic trouncing. I expect Trump to be defeated, and I expect both the house to pick up more seats, and the majority in the senate to be handed over to the dems. And guess what? The GOP, and Trump's loyal and lockstep devotees will have only themselves to blame. 

One can hope ...

[OneMoreFarang]

I just read this wonderful article.

 

Trump’s most baleful legacy? The end of trust in democracy and the rule of law

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jan/25/trump-legacy-end-of-trust-in-democracy-simon-tisdall

 

For a watching world where democracy is widely under attack from autocrats and populists and where the US claims to set an example, this is a chilling spectacle.

Of all the many wrong things Trump has done, his most terrible legacy may be the destruction of trust in the workings of democracy, the US constitution, and the rule of law. His weird, slightly unreal trial in absentia symbolises that dread prospect.

[Scott]

Off-topic post reported and removed.  

 

[bristolboy]

3 hours ago, hugocnx said:

Rudy is off topic, but I feel the need to answer. Have you seen the Judge Jeanine interview? First of all Rudy didn't pull a face like (fake) Newsweek showed. Wait till after Rudy relays his blog on Tuesday and following days and see if he has the real proof as he claims. He's probably 'keeping the best for last' (?)

But he claimed that he already has revealed it. So is he lying or just confused?

[hugocnx]

1 hour ago, bristolboy said:

But he claimed that he already has revealed it. So is he lying or just confused?

He revealed already bits and pieces like on Fox & Friends. On Janine Pirro's show he said to wait till Tuesday. He's probably doing it in his own sort of stage.

He said he had the proof, so if he comes out with nothing he fails terribly and I don't think he's about to fail. 

Edited January 27, 2020 by hugocnx

[Skeptic7]

This Joke-in-Chief is such a child and embarrassing punk. ????

[Tulak]

On 1/27/2020 at 9:50 AM, sirineou said:

Does that mean he is putting a contract out on him?

I think it means that all this may badly backfire when it is over

[Tulak]

On 1/27/2020 at 12:17 PM, justin case said:

part of the problem is that there are only 2 political parties

 

better to have 3 or more

 

but whomever you vote, they are OWNED by big corporations anyway

 

lobby groups throw money to both, to get what THEY want

 

it is just a farce

it's been said that no matter who you vote for, some politician will get in

[Tulak]

19 hours ago, stevenl said:

 

Creepy and juvenile that namecalling, only to follow the example set by Trump.

remember that all this only above politics

poly = many

ticks = those bloodsucking creatures

Ps. the above PUN intentional 

Edited January 28, 2020 by Tulak

[Eric Loh]

34 minutes ago, Tulak said:

I think it means that all this may badly backfire when it is over

Agree as it does backfire badly on Trump and made him look like a crime boss. 

[Tulak]

10 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Agree as it does backfire badly on Trump and made him look like a crime boss. 

possible - unlikely, but possible

[mercman24]

love him or hate him, Trump has done more in 3 years than the democrats, they done absolutely nothing in their 8 years in office, now just look at the american economy, its there for all to see. still i suppose haters will still hate, as said before this guy is a businessman not a serial politician, who do nothing except get paid every month,

[Eric Loh]

19 minutes ago, mercman24 said:

love him or hate him, Trump has done more in 3 years than the democrats, they done absolutely nothing in their 8 years in office, now just look at the american economy, its there for all to see. still i suppose haters will still hate, as said before this guy is a businessman not a serial politician, who do nothing except get paid every month,

He is judged on his overall job performance not economy alone and his job performance approval never exceed the 50% mark.