Jump to content

Vietnam puts the kibosh on foreigners


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Accidental Tourist said:

So there goes Vietnam. Cambodia is also tighten the rules, maybe no choice there in the future as well.

I still have a place in Egypt where I been working years before. Every 3 months now need to apply for a new resident card (same as in Malaysia). Good thing there is no hassle, no need to leave the country and everything is halve the price compare to Thailand.

NICE!  Congrats to you. Easy life.  The expats especially older are going to suffer even more as the immigration loops close and become far more restrictive/expensive.  Definitely, I have seen Asian governments as echoed here, becoming more and more difficult. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

On that point, if there was a sudden lockdown on all international travel, I suspect that most old world and former commonwealth countries would see a net boost in tourist $$$, with the loss in foreign tourists more than offset by the gain in domestic tourism since their citizens would no longer be allowed to spend their holiday money in SEA. 

 

I'm pretty sure tourism, as a source of GDP, creates a trade imbalance favoring SEA, and not the developed countries.  And the harder each SEA nation makes things for tourists, the smaller their trade surplus becomes.

 

I beg to differ. Domestic tourism within Europe will in no way offset the loss from Asian tourism. Hotels, restaurants, tourist attractions, factory and shopping outlets, luxury shops such as LV, Hermes, souvenir shops, coach companies, cruise companies, tour guides, hotel porters and a whole host of supporting industries depend heavily on tourism from Asia. The main non Asian market for European tourism is from Russia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Accidental Tourist said:

So there goes Vietnam. Cambodia is also tighten the rules, maybe no choice there in the future as well.

I still have a place in Egypt where I been working years before. Every 3 months now need to apply for a new resident card (same as in Malaysia). Good thing there is no hassle, no need to leave the country and everything is halve the price compare to Thailand.

I believe you are mistaken about the resident card with regards to Malaysia. I know quite a few expats on the MM2H scheme and no one has ever mentioned this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Accidental Tourist said:

So there goes Vietnam. Cambodia is also tighten the rules, maybe no choice there in the future as well.

I still have a place in Egypt where I been working years before. Every 3 months now need to apply for a new resident card (same as in Malaysia). Good thing there is no hassle, no need to leave the country and everything is halve the price compare to Thailand.

Has anything major changed with the retirement visa for Cambodia? If so what? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, HuskerDo said:

They are already doing that but you've probably already noticed.

 

Time for folks in the West to stop looking for a cheaper alternative and find a way to stay in their homeland because eventually that's the only place they'll be welcomed.

There are still options but sure home countries can be a Plan D. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Gweiloman said:

Quite right. Not a good country for sexpats and alcoholics. However, quite good for those that like to explore nature, keen golfers and other outdoor activities and street food lovers. Also, excellent food in restaurants. 

fabulous symphony as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, GeorgeCross said:

 

Thailand clamps down on visa requirements

 

foreigners flee to nearby countries

 

nearby countries clamp down on visas

 

foreigners ______ ??

 

 

"Thailand clamps down on visa requirements"

Which visa requirements are you thinking of? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

I beg to differ. Domestic tourism within Europe will in no way offset the loss from Asian tourism. Hotels, restaurants, tourist attractions, factory and shopping outlets, luxury shops such as LV, Hermes, souvenir shops, coach companies, cruise companies, tour guides, hotel porters and a whole host of supporting industries depend heavily on tourism from Asia. The main non Asian market for European tourism is from Russia. 

They won't even let them off the cruise ship in Italy

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/6000-passengers-stuck-on-cruise-ship-in-italy-over-coronavirus-fears/ar-BBZtsi8?li=BBnb7Kz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gweiloman said:

I beg to differ. Domestic tourism within Europe will in no way offset the loss from Asian tourism. Hotels, restaurants, tourist attractions, factory and shopping outlets, luxury shops such as LV, Hermes, souvenir shops, coach companies, cruise companies, tour guides, hotel porters and a whole host of supporting industries depend heavily on tourism from Asia. The main non Asian market for European tourism is from Russia. 

 

I honestly don't know.  Who spends more, Brits on holiday in SEA, or SEA tourists in the UK?  Then, what percentage is that of GDP?  My suspicion is that the old world and former commonwealth countries would lose a tiny percentage of GDP if SEA tourists stayed away.  While the SEA countries would lose a significant percentage of their GDP if it went the other way.

 

Of course, I'm always open to being swayed by numbers.  More open when those numbers come from credible sources.  Which rules out TAT statistics...

 

To be clear, some segments would be devastated, as you mentioned.  But the overall economy?  I think SEA is a lot more vulnerable.

 

Edited by impulse
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CNXexpat said:

I found the people very friendly. Ok, less fake smile than in Thailand.

 

No difference in life quality compared with the ("elected") military government in Thailand. 

Did you always find the Thai smile fake, or did you initially find it genuine and believe

Thais to be friendly?

 

Perhaps if you spent a lot in Vietnam, the allure would diminish over time.

 

As for the government, the current generals running things have documented failings,

but the last few "fairly elected" governments weren't much better.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

I honestly don't know.  Who spends more, Brits on holiday in SEA, or SEA tourists in the UK?  Then, what percentage is that of GDP?  My suspicion is that the old world and former commonwealth countries would lose a tiny percentage of GDP if SEA tourists stayed away.  While the SEA countries would lose a significant percentage of their GDP if it went the other way.

 

Of course, I'm always open to being swayed by numbers.  More open when those numbers come from credible sources.  Which rules out TAT statistics...

 

To be clear, some segments would be devastated, as you mentioned.  But the overall economy?  I think SEA is a lot more vulnerable.

 

As to who spends more, this varies greatly on a number of factors. Western tourists to Asia tends to be FIT’s so the individual spending is fairly high. A lot of Asians still travel in groups (there are many reasons for that). Within any group, a large percentage does not spend that much as a lot of the services are already paid for and enjoy group discounts (accommodation, meals, entrances). But then, there are usually a few individuals who spend a lot on shopping. Bags, watches, diamonds etc. 
 

I think if you take Europe and Uk as a whole and compare this to Asia (even excluding Japan which is a large market), Asian tourists will spend more, in absolute terms, over a year. By spend, I am excluding flights but including meals and accommodation. And in this group, the Chinese are the biggest segment. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, shy coconut said:

Did you always find the Thai smile fake, or did you initially find it genuine and believe

Thais to be friendly?

Here in the north the smile comes from the heart, in Phuket and Bangkok not so much. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

As to who spends more, this varies greatly on a number of factors. Western tourists to Asia tends to be FIT’s so the individual spending is fairly high. A lot of Asians still travel in groups (there are many reasons for that). Within any group, a large percentage does not spend that much as a lot of the services are already paid for and enjoy group discounts (accommodation, meals, entrances). But then, there are usually a few individuals who spend a lot on shopping. Bags, watches, diamonds etc. 
 

I think if you take Europe and Uk as a whole and compare this to Asia (even excluding Japan which is a large market), Asian tourists will spend more, in absolute terms, over a year. By spend, I am excluding flights but including meals and accommodation. And in this group, the Chinese are the biggest segment. 

https://www.themds.com/companies/chasing-the-tourist-in-europe-where-do-they-come-from-and-how-much-do-they-spend.html

 

Quote

Overall, the European Union received 1,048 million tourists in 2017, taking into account also domestic tourism, which represents about 86% of overnight stays. European visitors spend, on average, 73 euros per night on the continent and sleep an average of 4.6 nights in the country.

 

86% of european tourists are domestic aka from the EU. 

 

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Tourism_statistics_-_expenditure#German_tourists_accounted_for_26.25_of_EU_tourism_expenditure

 

Quote

German tourists accounted for 26% of EU tourism expenditure

 

 

So nearly 90% of tourism in the EU is domestic, and germans are 26% of all money spent.

 

Who would have thought? Seems we aren't so broke after all even tho some here might suggest that.

 

Other big spenders are France and the UK - makes sense.

 

Quote

After locals, most tourist in the Union come from American, that represent 2.5% of the total, and from Asian countries, except China, Japan and South Korea, which account for 2.3% of arrivals. Switzerland takes the bronze, representing 1.4% of tourists in the Union, with an average of 107 euros of spending per night and 6.5 overnight stays per trip.

 

 

The non domestic biggest part is from America, so thanks for that fellow fallangs.

 

Quote

The United Kingdom is the only large market in the Union that receives more non-EU tourists than European tourists. Specifically, 6.9% come from Asian countries (except China, Japan and South Korea) and 5.4% from the United States. Another 4.6% comes from France, with an average expenditure of 131 euros per night. Spain is also the country preferred by the British, accounting for 11.5% of overnight stays. Followed by France and the United States. In addition, only 36.2% of UK residents choose to stay in their country.

 

The only country who will suffer a bit is the UK it seems.

 

 

Seems this whole EU one market thing kinda does work - who would have thought?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend has been living in VN for some years.  I recall him telling me after the 9/11 attacks the VN gov't pretty much got rid of all Islami immigrants, stance was "there is no reason for you to be here."  It seems they can be pretty efficient when it comes to rounding up foreigners and giving them the bum's rush. 

While visiting the country I witnessed an incident with the police and an old woman street vendor: along with a few other things I saw there I have a pretty sour view of the place.

 

I was interested in setting up (somewhat) permanently in Malaysia around 2006, when the retirement visa was called "silver hair."  100,000RM (app US$3,000 at the time) was way more than my budget. 

I really liked Penang, stayed in the old Chinese area near the quays.  When the town was declared a World Heritage site it completely changed, and not for the better IMO.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Laos has no formal program but there are apparently workarounds. So I'd say for the more adventurous that want to live in Laos (I've been and don't). 

Singapore is not a retirement destination. It's for working expats.

Indonesia, haven't kept up. It used to be difficult though. 

Brunei, off my radar.

 

If people get bored in Cambodia they'll be bored in Laos. Nightlife virtually non existent.

 

The pace is just too slow and I would die of boredom, Isaarn is difficult enough but I have big house and all the creature comforts.

 

I believe reports on Vietnam are a bit knee jerk, I am sure there are workarounds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, AAArdvark said:

I don't doubt you but do you have any background on those reports about the Philippines, like where can I see them?  I ask because I am heading there in a month.

I'm not sure but there may be some confusion around the difference between a "Visa on Arrival" (Which guys from China & India etc... get & is what I understand the 9a Visa to be) & "Visa Exempt" (The "Stamp" us guys from UK, US, EU etc... get for turning up) 

 

The only thing I've heard/read (granted I've not been keeping an eye on things as much since splitting up with my Filipina) is they're cracking down on extending Visa on Arrival haven't seen or heard anything about them cracking down on extending Visa Exempt.

 

Not saying I'm right & even if I am, they may well move on to cracking down on Visa Exempt next, but I don't believe you need to worry just yet...

 

Having said that, If I wanted to live in the Philippines I'd just go for the SRRV.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...