Jump to content

Johnson under fire over handling of coronavirus crisis


Recommended Posts

Posted
44 minutes ago, nauseus said:

No it doesn't. This collective effort only emerged after the EU was embarrassed by Italy's call for help earlier this month:

 

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEX_20_631

 

https://www.france24.com/en/20200403-european-commission-italy-ursula-van-der-leyen-apology-coronavirus-covid19-giuseppe-conte

Ok, so you mean the post you reacted to was not correct since the collective effort mentioned in that post started too late, after shortages emerged.

Correct?

  • Like 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, David in the north said:

No need to say anymore!
This is exact.
Pathetic response from opposition leaders. Just out to cause trouble.

There job is to examine and challenge the government.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I went on AliExpress and bought a consignment of PPE. I don't know why the government is blaming global shortages. There's plenty out there.

 

Untimately this crisis will cost the global economy every penny ever saved by outsourcing to China. Ironic, huh?

Posted
2 hours ago, Forethat said:

In my opinion, one great benefit of wearing a mask is that it acts as a physical barrier between peoples hands and their face. That alone is reason enough for wearing one. In that respect it also stops you from 'getting it'.

It also makes some women look really sex.

  • Sad 3
Posted
1 hour ago, yardrunner said:

yes they are private companies but they are regulated/overseen by the quality care commission who have the power to inspect any care home without prior warning and to close any that do not meet certain standards or give an improvement notice. yes i know because i worked in care for the last four years before i retired

Yes they are regulated but that does not remove their responsibility for their employees - residents - procurement and standards, that is all them - not the government - not the NHS, they are responsible

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, stevenl said:

Ok, so you mean the post you reacted to was not correct since the collective effort mentioned in that post started too late, after shortages emerged.

Correct?

Incorrect.

Posted
2 minutes ago, rhyddid said:

He shall be immaterially removed from any government or politic post , locked in the same jail where they detain Julian Assange and condemned to spend his life in prison for all the death caused by his incompetence!

Immaterially removed?

 

Presumably, you mean immediately?

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MRToMRT said:

Hindsight is a wonderful thing but IMHO should be used to develop new standards for epidemic preparedness and operations. The press' badgering of the gov' just for headlines and sales takes away from the time they have to be doing something about the pandemic.

 

Let the gov get on with it now and we can have a lessons learned inquiry later as we should.

 

This is not the time in the UK to having a blame game.

 

The ‘press badgering the Government’ is what made Johnson ditch his failed here immunity experiment.

 

The ‘press badgering the Government’ is what caused the Government to revise it’s reporting of deaths to include deaths in the community.

 

The ‘press badgering the Government’ is what has made the public aware of the Government’s failings.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, evadgib said:

Why are MSM not showing the full picture, including online complaints from NHS workers who say that their (Cancer etc) fully staffed wards are lying empty because normal hospital activity has ceased (yet people still have cancer!) & some NHS workers are able to produce 'synchronized-dance-routine' videos on youtube featuring themselves in scrubs using a very expensive mobile xray machine as a sledge?

 

All they're interested in is hanging johnson in the hope of toppling his govt....& we all know the reason why...????

 

On a lighter note; Happy St Georges day ???? ????????????????????????????

Where did you get this from?

  • Like 2
Posted
33 minutes ago, Forethat said:

To be perfectly honest, I don't think the current crew is doing that bad. Obviously, some things could have been managed better, but in an international comparison based on size of population and population density, the numbers speak for themselves. Unsurprisingly, a number of political shipwrecks suffering from BJ-tourettes will want to believe that BJ is making arbitrary decisions in a dictator-like fashion (or that it's Cummings who plan the strategy for him) and that he should be held responsible for...doing a pretty good job?

 

720373798_Screenshot2020-04-23at09_54_28.thumb.png.f084b2752626e345ebca5cef37aa196b.png

Putting aside your snide attacks  on those who think differently to yourself, how old is that image, does it include the recently revealed 41% error in UK Government reporting?

 

And where is the link to the image you have posted?

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Forethat said:

To be perfectly honest, I don't think the current crew is doing that bad. Obviously, some things could have been managed better, but in an international comparison based on size of population and population density, the numbers speak for themselves. Unsurprisingly, a number of political shipwrecks suffering from BJ-tourettes will want to believe that BJ is making arbitrary decisions in a dictator-like fashion (or that it's Cummings who plan the strategy for him) and that he should be held responsible for...doing a pretty good job?

 

720373798_Screenshot2020-04-23at09_54_28.thumb.png.f084b2752626e345ebca5cef37aa196b.png

Not doing that bad?

Did you read the FT article I linked to?

It calculates that over 41000 people have died because of corona in the UK.

That puts us just behind the United States for total number of deaths with the US having a far larger population.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Putting aside your snide attacks  on those who think differently to yourself, how old is that image, does it include the recently revealed 41% error in UK Government reporting?

 

And where is the link to the image you have posted?

 

 

Here's the COVID-19 death data:

https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19/blob/master/csse_covid_19_data/csse_covid_19_time_series/time_series_covid19_deaths_global.csv

 

Here's the population data:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.POP.DNST

Posted
21 minutes ago, nauseus said:

If the EU is not embarrassed in the slightest then why the apology???

Because Von der Leyen was very annoyed that countries did not come to her and beg her in her magnificence to co-ordinate their national responses with her. She's using Italy to increment her authority, which countries have shown up to be close to zero. Probably because she's a miserable plagiarist who should never be in that job.

 

Of course the fact that 88% of Italians somehow believe that the EU should have prevented the coronavirus for them, and the fact that communist and far right extremists alike are instrumentalising Italian anger and trying to direct it at the EU (because they both want out) no doubt has Von der Leyen worried that Italy could be an exit candidate (thank you Britain). And guess what Miss Plagiarist doesn't want most of all? That the EU falls apart under her stewardship.

 

So the plagiarist genius decides the best thing she can do is plant a grovelling apology in an Italian newspaper. And so Miss von der Lying makes her problems even wore.

 

Again, under EU law health care policy is the responsibility of each member state and the EU merely serves to ease collaboration. Possibly an emergency fund was not working correctly, however, it was Italy's responsibility to protect its population from the virus. As in every war, Italy failed miserably. And now is trying to weasel the blame onto Germany, who is paying hundreds of millions to help Italy, like with Greece.

 

It's a disgrace, really, but we can't afford to have Italy leave the EU, so VdL figured best to apologise, even if they're talking nonsense.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Forethat said:

Here. Point out where they're doing badly. Please. Just point.

2014191333_Screenshot2020-04-23at09_54_28.thumb.png.4cae3c2f83d7f54ad3267414976b6e84.png

Okay, well, if you take the numbers and restrict them to infected people who have the surname O'Malley obviously Ireland would be the worst affected.

 

Obviously the rather clear issue with your statistics is that you have skewed the numbers with population and population density on top. Very obviously that way the UK will always have an advantage over countries with lower populations and lower pop density.

 

Shall we compare the numbers in a more meaningful way and see how they look like when you don't divide by per capita and density?

 

https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus

total-deaths-covid-19 GBP.png

Edited by Logosone
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Forethat said:

Neither of those links direct to the image you have posted and are using as the basis of arguments you are making.

 

Please provide a link to the image you have posted and are using as the basis of your arguments.

 

Links to websites in which the image might or might not be buried are not links to the image.

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Okay, well, if you take the numbers and restrict them to infected people who have the surname O'Malley obviously Ireland would be the worst affected.

 

Obviously the rather clear issue with your statistics is that you have skewed the numbers with population and population density on top. Very obviously that way the UK will always have an advantage over countries with lower populations and lower pop density.

 

Shall we compare the numbers in a more meaningful way and see how they look like when you don't divide by per capita and density?

 

 

total-deaths-covid-19 GBP.png

Likewise please provide a link to the image you have posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...