Emergency extended for one more month, night curfew to remain
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
-
5
-
-
Latest posts...
-
0
Report Misunderstood Incident: Alleged Child Abduction Turns Out to Be Playful Banter
Picture courtesy of fm91bkk What initially appeared to be a sinister case of attempted child abduction in Saraburi has been clarified as a simple misunderstanding, following CCTV footage that captured the event. The individuals involved, along with a local shop owner, have corroborated that what transpired was mere playful interaction rather than malicious intent. The incident was brought to attention when a Facebook user posted footage depicting three men in a white box truck approaching two boys on bicycles. The scene appeared suspicious as the men quickly retreated when another vehicle passed by. This raised alarms, prompting Saraburi's investigative police to examine the footage closely. Upon review, the police identified the vehicle, bearing the licence plate ผข 4054 from Suphanburi, which was seen in the footage leaving the Kasemrat community at 3:18 pm. Further analysis of municipal CCTV is ongoing to better understand the sequence of events. In a twist of events, one of the boys involved recounted that as they cycled, one of the men humorously asked if they had any children’s heads for sale, to which the boy jestingly replied that they only had dog heads. The men then exited the truck in a clear act of playful chasing, not with intent to harm or abduct. Following up, police traced the truck to Oranicha Homtuanlom and made contact with her husband, Suchon Kusukcharoen. The couple confirmed that their team was conducting deliveries for their toy and snack business. Identified from the footage, driver Natthawut Lumlerd and assistants Phaechomphu Chaonaedee and Sapol Saeteng were merely engaging in light-hearted banter. During enquiries at Aunt Noi’s shop, owner Angrakkhana Kaewbupha confirmed their playful demeanor, reinforcing that the interaction was innocent. The trio plans to meet with Mueang Saraburi police to officially clarify the situation and rectify the misunderstanding. The incident highlights the importance of thorough investigations to differentiate between genuine threats and innocent behaviour, ensuring community safety without undue alarm. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Thaiger 2025-04-28 -
151
Immigration Thailand Digital Arrival Card. TDAC
Makes me glad I'll be arriving on 30 April...maybe I'll fill one out anyway, just for peace of mind 🤔 -
82
Crime Jealous New Foreign Boyfriend Stabs Russian in Pattaya
Going to prison over a woman in Thailand? Or any country is insane. -
75
America has emerged....as an international laughingstock
not one deal has been made, NOT one Trump Caught Red-Handed Lying in Crazy ’200 Deals’ Interview https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-caught-red-handed-lying-163719509.html -
321
ALL VACCINES WILL KILL YOU - The evidence is overwhelming
Ah ok - got it now... I was picturing a mechanical car wash or something similar when you mentioned 'car wash'.. I see both sides of the bias - although my analogy illustrates an improbable temporal causality, yours attempts something different: using circumstantial evidence to justify suspicion, but ultimately sidestepping the underlying problem of flawed causal assumptions. In my analogy - just because symptoms appear after a vaccination doesn't mean the vaccination caused them, any more than rain the day after washing a car means the car wash caused the storm - I highlight the fundamental danger of mistaking correlation for causation, especially when emotions run high. Your analogy - the police responding to screaming and finding a man covered in blood holding a knife - may seem superficially compelling, but it fundamentally differs. In that situation, the police are acting on immediate, tangible evidence of a potential crime - physical indicators that something likely did occur. However, post-vaccination symptoms are neither direct evidence of causality nor necessarily evidence of harm. They are expected in a biological process that is inherently complex. Thus, your analogy overstates the case: you're comparing obvious forensic clues pointing toward a specific incident with ambiguous, non-specific symptoms that, without clear evidence, cannot be presumed to indicate causation. Investigating is reasonable in both cases - but presuming or implying guilt based on circumstantial timing alone is precisely the logical trap my analogy warns against. -
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now