Jump to content

Trump threatens to shutter social media companies after Twitter warning


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Tie Dye Samurai said:

Taxes....what taxes....you mean somebody has seen Trump's taxes....

No one at the tax office has 

Posted
7 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

You are not paranoid, they really are watching you

Dude, I'm Australian and definitely not paranoid about what goes on in US politics.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, simple1 said:

You're making the allegations, the onus is on you to back up your accusation with factual info from credible sources. if you decline to do so one can only come to one conclusion; you've got nothing.

Done. The evidence you wanted to see that you could have easily found on your own but were too lazy to search for - in a post just above... choosing instead to believe the BS Twitter "fact-checking".

 

What is your onus? To believe everything you read?

Edited by tropo
  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
4 hours ago, utalkin2me said:

This is something every human should support. We cannot have Twitter or anyone else deciding what the truth is. 

True.  But with global media inundating people with news, there must be some way to have reliable, skeptical fact checkers calling BS on leaders and false prophets when they present BS.

 

If only there were some kind of "Fourth Estate" dedicated to unbiased reporting and reasonable analysis of events, and fact checking those who use a position of power to promote self-serving falsehoods. 

 

Wouldn't it be great if there were such institutions, ideally businesses in competition with each other, not only fact checking the leaders but each other?  Businesses that survived for many decades because they earned a reputation for factual reporting and analysis.

 

Of course such a business couldn't last if the public relied on "infotainment" in a vain attempt to stay informed; it would never last on television or the internet, which are driven by ratings and likes.  It would probably have to exist only in print, willing to present its reporting in a permanent, check-able form. 

 

Yeah, this is a business that would only survive if people were willing to read the news, instead of channel and link surfing in order to be entertained and confirm beliefs.  That won't happen.

 

Seriously, what are the chances of a literate public trying to stay informed by reading?

  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Phil McCaverty said:

How do you know its a "he"?

 

Admit it, you have no idea who the fact checker is or their political leanings.

How do I know it's a "he"?

 

I already stated his name in a previous post that you were too lazy to read.

 

Yoel Roth looks like a he. What do you think?

 

 

1388319170_YoelRoth.jpg.99241af7c1f8bd8ce4781dec9beea8c2.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, BobBKK said:

Social Media companies should not get involved with censorship. On this one Zuckerberg is right. Slippery slope.

Right, and Goebbels should not be held responsible for promoting Hitler's message.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Youlike said:

 

That says a lot.  When MSNBC incorrectly reported the location of some Christmas parties it then corrected the error.

 

What was you point?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, DoctorG said:

Not going to open the link again but the first I remember was the "nasty woman" comment. The Star acknowledges that he didn't actually call her a nasty women, as reported by many in the media, but they included it anyway in their list.

At the same time that Trump was denying calling her a "nasty women", recordings of him saying "I didn't know she was nasty" were being played.

 

"Speaking on "The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore" in 2016, Markle called Trump misogynistic and said his politics are divisive, saying she would move to Canada if he won the presidency.

Trump responded, "I didn't know that she was nasty. I hope she is OK. ...""   https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/31/politics/donald-trump-meghan-markle-nasty-boris-johnson-good-prime-minister/index.html
Posted
1 minute ago, simple1 said:

Fair enough, but really a defection as we are talking to national Presidential elections. trump's claim of extensive mail-in voter fraud is total rubbish including his other ridiculous claims e.g.

 

As MIT elections scholar Charles Stewart and National Vote At Home Institute CEO Amber McReynolds, two leading experts on voting by mail, said in an April op-ed, those figures come out to 7.1 cases per year nationwide and an average of three convictions per state in the past 20 years, accounting for just 0.00006% of all votes cast in that time.

 

Some hair splitting, but a good investigation into factual info.

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/twitters-first-fact-check-on-trumps-voting-tweets-was-misleading-2020-5?r=US&IR=T

 

 

I showed cases where people were caught and convicted. This is probably the tip of the iceberg... and with the level of hatred for Trump and desperation to remove him, it could be done at a very high level and change the balance in some close states.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

 

2 hours ago, Logosone said:

It's a little known policy of MENSA to send it's best and brightest to post on TVF for at least 8 hours a day. Don't tell anyone.

I'm curious, how long have you belonged to MENSA?

 

Are you a member of Intertel?

 

Posted
27 minutes ago, tropo said:

One lie.

 

Twitter fact checker: "Trump falsely claimed that mail-in ballots would lead to a 'Rigged Election'... Fact-checkers say there is no evidence that mail-in ballots are linked to voter fraud."

 

This is the lie, as there is lots of evidence of absentee voter fraud for anyone that cares to look for it, and it's surprisingly easy to find.

 

The following site lists 1071 proven instances of voter fraud.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/docs/pacei-voterfraudcases.pdf

 

The one we are looking for is: FRAUDULENT USE OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS.

 

If you scroll down, you will find many cases of this particular type of voter fraud. They are listed by state. I scrolled down to G: Georgia and counted 47 cases of absentee ballot fraud. Some people were charged and sent to prison. In some cases they won an election as a result of this fraud.

 

Here are some examples:

=====================================================================================================

Olivia Lee Reynolds

OUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTION

Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots Olivia Lee Reynolds was convicted of 24 counts of voter fraud. While working on the 2013 campaign for her boyfriend, Dothan City Commissioner Amos Newsome, Reynolds filled out voters’ ballots for them and told others for whom to vote. Her fraud had definite consequences: Commissioner Newsome won reelection by a mere 14 votes, losing the in-person vote by a wide margin but winning an incredible 96 percent of the absentee vote. Newsome himself faced pressure to resign as a consequence. Reynolds was sentenced to serve six months in a community corrections facility. She is appealing the conviction.

 

Karen Tipton Berry

OUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTION

Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots Ms. Berry pleaded guilty and received a two-year suspended sentence. The former Pike County Commissioner narrowly won--and then lost--her 2008 reelection bid when 10 absentee ballots were found to have been fraudulently cast in the election. Ms. Berry was charged with mailing an illegal absentee ballot.

 

Connie Tyree, Frank “Pinto” Smith, Booker Cooke, Jr., Flephus Hardy, Garria Spencer, Althenia Spencer, Racing Commissioner Lester “Bop” Brown, and Spiver Gordon

OUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTION

Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots The Birmingham Office of the U.S. Attorney and the Alabama Attorney General conducted an extensive joint investigation of absentee ballot fraud allegations in Greene County in the November 1994 election. By the end of the investigation, nine defendants pleaded guilty to voter fraud and two others were found guilty by a jury. The defendants included Greene County commissioners, officials, and employees; a racing commissioner; a member of the board of education; a Eutaw city councilman; and other community leaders. The conspiracy included using an assembly line to mass produce forged absentee ballots meant to swing elections in favor of preferred candidates

==================================================================================================

 

Examples of absentee ballot fraud, in cooperation with local officials. Here we're talking about national elections.

Are in the US mail in ballots and absentee ballots the same btw?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, KhunFred said:

Astounding lack of knowledge of constitutional limits on the power of the presidency. Media outlets can't be closed by a President. Trump saw what they do in North Korea and got excited. This is just one reason why a failed casino operator is unqualified for the office of Chief Executive.

Not just North Korea, but China and Russia as well.

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, stevenl said:

 

Are in the US mail in ballots and absentee ballots the same btw?

How would you suggest absentee ballots should be sent? Carrier pigeons?

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, tropo said:

I showed cases where people were caught and convicted. This is probably the tip of the iceberg... and with the level of hatred for Trump and desperation to remove him, it could be done at a very high level and change the balance in some close states.

If you dig deeply you might be able to show cases of small, local elections being influenced by voter fraud.  However you can't show examples of large election results being changed.

 

"probably the tip of the iceberg".  On what do you base this assumption?  How would one orchestrate large scale voter fraud undetected?

 

Let's see; affluent people, mostly well-off retirees, with summer and winter residences could easily vote in more than one state, but these are typically conservative sorts.  Let's not look to closely at this possibility.

 

I know; let's assume than illegal immigrants, those who strive to avoid attention and have much to lose by unnecessary involvement with government affairs, will commit a federal felony in a long-shot attempt to influence a national election. 

 

To make this credible, let's assume that there is some sinister and well hidden organization that can make this worthwhile for these low key individuals to risk everything in a foolish attempt to vote, and do so without being caught.

 

Yeah, that's what Trump supporters want to believe.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, KhunFred said:

Astounding lack of knowledge of constitutional limits on the power of the presidency. Media outlets can't be closed by a President. Trump saw what they do in North Korea and got excited. This is just one reason why a failed casino operator is unqualified for the office of Chief Executive.

 

It sounds, prior to any formal order from Trump, like they're mainly talking about trying to revoke a current liability shield that exists in federal law for social media companies... Something that presumably would require action by both houses of Congress.

 

However, if I recall, I read an article a while back that actually, the president under a state of emergency (in this case coronavirus) could have pretty sweeping authority over the internet, should a president decide to try to invoke that.

 

Quote

If Trump decides to build a great firewall, he may not need Congress. Section 606 of the Communications Act of 1934 provides emergency powers to seize control of communications facilities if the president declares there is a "war or threat of war" or "a state of public peril." In 2010, a Senate report concluded that section 606 "gives the President the authority to take over wire communications in the United States and, if the President so chooses, shut a network down." With a stroke of a pen, Trump could invoke it.

 

Quote

Section 606 has never been applied to the internet, but there is nothing in the law that explicitly says it cannot be.  The question is whether the government’s statutory authority over traditional telecommunications under 606 extends to the internet. 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/seanlawson/2016/12/02/the-law-that-could-allow-trump-to-shut-down-the-u-s-internet/#7e759a994dac

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, tropo said:

How would you suggest absentee ballots should be sent? Carrier pigeons?

Same as in other countries, by friends, neighbors, etc.

  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...