Jump to content

New Zealand city takes down statue of British navy commander


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

It seems we have a Pandemic on our hands.

 

A Pandemic of "isms"!

 

Racism, Nationalism, Sectarianism, Socialism, Communism, Commercialism, Feminism, Fatism, Elitism, Fascism......the list is endless. Add in the phobias, homophobia, xenophobia, etc.

 

Be honest, each and every one of us has some of these. I've said it before and I'll say it again, the World has too many people.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess they can now move forward with the next logical step.

Council name change: How Hamilton got its name

"Hamilton was named after an English ship captain, John Charles Fane Hamilton, who was killed during the Battle of Gate Pa in Tauranga in 1864.

 

Kirikiriroa means "long stretch of gravel" in Maori. It's in reference to an area on the west bank of the Waikato River."

 

Welcome to the Land of the Long White Latte...

 

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12011599

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

Abhorring racism in all it connotations, I wonder if now we have removal of statues, and movies as well as tv shows from being broadcast, will books from libraries be next?

This move scares me, as did the removal of statues of terrible dictators. 

Theses terrible acts of massacres and slavery are part of history, in many countries and slavery continues in some countries.

Surely with the statues a well placed plaque could be affixed to explain the racism, slavery etc, and give an honest history of the person concerned. The plaque could be in a prominent place and easily seen.

Movies and TV shows could have a warning and explanation added at the beginning. 

 

"Movies and TV shows could have a warning and explanation added at the beginning."

 

That is the plan. The removal is temporary while they add appropriate information at the beginning and get the new version in place.

 

With regard to banning books, I haven't heard any mention of this so far. But book banning is nothing new, governments have been banning books for a very long time, usually because they challenge religious beliefs and/or existing government propaganda or are too sexually explicit for some. Some of the best books ever written have been banned at some point in time. And, of course, at least in the US, schools are not above white washing more problematic aspects of our history. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Benmart said:

Take down every statue, every flag, every building, every object however remotely associated with some misdeed, atrocity or word. Bulldoze the ground upon which walked the wicked.

 

Burn the books, the photos and obliterate history that contains even the most minute particle of discomfort. Then recreate a new history, designed by those who would put shackles on the minds of those who supported such folly.

 

It may be too late to turn the tide on this latest of all witch-hunts. Which is next? Social media?

I say ban social media. Its IMO created a mob of <deleted> that desire only to be offended by everything.

The similarity to Mao's Red guards running amok during 1966/67 and destroying things is astounding. Of course the present lot will be too ignorant to even know about Mao's red guards.

Edited by thaibeachlovers
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

The British didn't go to New Zealand to make the Maoris "civilized", but to grab land for settlers, at a huge cost to both sides:

 

The New Zealand wars:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_Wars

 

At the peak of hostilities in the 1860s, 18,000 British troops, supported by artillery, cavalry and local militia, battled about 4,000 Māori warriors[8] in what became a gross imbalance of manpower and weaponry.[9] Although outnumbered, the Māori were able to withstand their enemy with techniques that included anti-artillery bunkers and the use of carefully placed , or fortified villages, that allowed them to block their enemy's advance and often inflict heavy losses, yet quickly abandon their positions without significant loss. Guerrilla-style tactics were used by both sides in later campaigns, often fought in dense bush. Over the course of the Taranaki and Waikato campaigns, the lives of about 1,800 Māori and 800 Europeans were lost,[5] and total Māori losses over the course of all the wars may have exceeded 2,100.

 

It is not the job of colonial powers to interfere with the way of life of indigenous populations or force their moralities upon them. If they chose to eat their enemies after they were conquered in battle, it's their way of life and their business.

 

But at the end of the day, the British didn't go to New Zealand to help Maoris. They were there to grab land and do whatever it took to achieve that purpose. The Maoris were collateral damage. There was absolutely nothing altruistic about colonization.

 

The introduction of the British musket was responsible for the slaughter of many tribes that didn't have them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now tell us about the  beginning of the USA, or even Australia.....

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...