Jump to content

U.S. swoops down on Portland protesters after Trump order to protect monuments


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/22/2020 at 7:19 AM, checkered flag said:

They'll be asked and detained if necessary. The federal officers are very professional but not sissies. The police are told to stand down, which only make things worse. 

 

That's hardly what my post was about, though.

Posted
8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Deflection?

It's about destruction of property, not a "national threat".

 

Maybe stop pretending not to be aware of how Trump supporters on these topic hype the protests. following Trump's own example. There were posters on here claiming these protests will bring about the fall of the US, never mind civilization.

 

Kinda doubt "destruction of property" would do that.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
9 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Deflection?

It's about destruction of property, not a "national threat".

Federal agents are there to protect the property, not arrest protesters away from that property.

Posted
23 hours ago, Morch said:

 

Maybe stop pretending not to be aware of how Trump supporters on these topic hype the protests. following Trump's own example. There were posters on here claiming these protests will bring about the fall of the US, never mind civilization.

 

Kinda doubt "destruction of property" would do that.

Kinda depends on whether they get away with this. If they do they'll be ramping it up, IMO. Revolutions usually start small and get bigger.

Hopefully Trump can stop it now.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
23 hours ago, Morch said:

 

When it suits, the "goons" are a national threat about to bring the country to its knees. Couple of posts later, and they're "panty waist mama boys". Which is it, then?

Well, IMO they certainly are goons and one on one I doubt they'd be much of a threat.

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Kinda depends on whether they get away with this. If they do they'll be ramping it up, IMO. Revolutions usually start small and get bigger.

Hopefully Trump can stop it now.

 

What does "getting away with it" got to do with the language and terms used to described the protests and those partaking? As for the "revolution" nonsense, another poster on here alleged that there are no and that there were no underlying issues. You've agreed. How does a "revolution" get going, never mind succeed, if no issues are involved? More scaremongering talking points from Trump supporters.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
Posted
On 7/22/2020 at 8:53 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

I agree that they are just a mob looking for a rumble, but someone is paying the expenses as it's doubtful they have well paying jobs.

 

Such as who? What do you and others have to say about the Moms & Vets providing a protective 'wall' against the actions of federal law enforcement - one presumes people will not call them out a commies / Antifa, lefties whatever, but members of the public who disagree with the tactics supported by the trump administration. Local authorities are saying the tactics used by Fed law enforcement only increases the level of antagonism, one questions why they do not use the tactics of de-escalation.

  • Haha 2
Posted

More and more cities reporting riots and looting by black clad anarchists and almost 30 murders to date as a result of Antifa/BLM riots and demonstrations on top of billions in property damage. 
 

And the same ole usual suspects in this thread keep on denying it exists, covering for it, applauding it... Even as the violence escalates and even as the pandemic rages. 
 

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Mama Noodle said:

More and more cities reporting riots and looting by black clad anarchists and almost 30 murders to date as a result of Antifa/BLM riots and demonstrations on top of billions in property damage. 
 

And the same ole usual suspects in this thread keep on denying it exists, covering for it, applauding it... Even as the violence escalates and even as the pandemic rages. 
 

 

 

How many of these "almost 30 murders" are directly attributed to ANTIFA/BLM? As for the "murders" label, were all of these cases subject to investigations, courts and all of that legal stuff associated with "law and order" which Trump supporters go on about? To head off expected nonsense deflections, I am not denying people died. Rather questioning the lumping together of deaths, and the wholesale label attached.

 

I don't think many people on these topics, even the one opposing Trump, deny that there is violence, or "applaud" it. Not sure how the Covid-19 situation relates to your "argument".

  • Confused 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

How many of these "almost 30 murders" are directly attributed to ANTIFA/BLM? As for the "murders" label, were all of these cases subject to investigations, courts and all of that legal stuff associated with "law and order" which Trump supporters go on about? To head off expected nonsense deflections, I am not denying people died. Rather questioning the lumping together of deaths, and the wholesale label attached.

 

I don't think many people on these topics, even the one opposing Trump, deny that there is violence, or "applaud" it. Not sure how the Covid-19 situation relates to your "argument".

Probably 100%. If no Antifa/Blm circus these people, many black, would still be alive. Other deaths and/or crimes happen because police are taken away to protect city assets and the poor communities suffer.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 7/23/2020 at 1:44 PM, Morch said:

 

When it suits, the "goons" are a national threat about to bring the country to its knees. Couple of posts later, and they're "panty waist mama boys". Which is it, then?

OK goony panty waist mama boys then. That make you happy. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, simple1 said:

Such as who? What do you and others have to say about the Moms & Vets providing a protective 'wall' against the actions of federal law enforcement - one presumes people will not call them out a commies / Antifa, lefties whatever, but members of the public who disagree with the tactics supported by the trump administration. Local authorities are saying the tactics used by Fed law enforcement only increases the level of antagonism, one questions why they do not use the tactics of de-escalation.

Do you really think de-escalation would be effective? Look what happened to the Portland police chief. The agenda of the mob is not to find a solution, it's to tear everything down. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

Probably 100%. If no Antifa/Blm circus these people, many black, would still be alive. Other deaths and/or crimes happen because police are taken away to protect city assets and the poor communities suffer.

 

In other words, you can't even back your own claims.

Posted
9 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

OK goony panty waist mama boys then. That make you happy. 

 

It just shows you can't make a coherent argument. Can't have it both ways.

  • Sad 1
Posted

The problem with American "democracy" has never been the government. The problem is the people's reaction to the government, which is usually very weak to non existent. Look at the public's reaction to the extreme Patriot Act as a prime example. 

 

Now, the people are reacting a little bit. Compare what is going on now to things you have seen in France for example. 

 

This is nothing, hopefully the people keep pushing. It is the only way to get what you want. Push push push the government until they absolutely must give you what you want. There is still a long way to go, but this is a start. Maybe it is a clumsy start, but it is something, that is for sure. A lot better than doing nothing. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

Do you really think de-escalation would be effective? Look what happened to the Portland police chief. The agenda of the mob is not to find a solution, it's to tear everything down. 

 

Remind me, what happened to the Portland Police chief? it has been referenced a number of times by local authorities Fed involvement is not contributing to reduction in violence and not wanted, Yes, de-escalation is a method that if used effectively will reduce tension / violence, though so far, a tactic appears to be not utilised by militarised Fed enforcement in Portland.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
4 hours ago, checkered flag said:

You can't calculate the total damages done, being so ubiquitousness. 

 

Keep deflecting. My post was more to do with the death alluded to in your previous comments. As for not being able to calculate the total damages? There are actually quite a few estimates doing the rounds, and even posted here. So that's would be another bogus statement.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

A post with a link to an unapproved social media site has been removed as well as the replies:

 

18) Social Media content is not to be used as  source material unless it is from a recognized or approved news media source,  the source of any such material (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube  etc.) should always be shown.

 

 

An offensive post has been removed. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...