webfact Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Pannika faces dismissal from House panel By The Nation Pannika Wanich Palang Pracharath Party’s Sira Jenjaka is planning to dismiss Pannika Wanich, a leading figure in the Progressive Movement and former Future Forward Party spokeswoman, from the House committee on law, justice and human rights for "inappropriate" behaviour and being “impolite”. As committee chairman, Sira said Pannika had acted inappropriately after she requested the police to clarify an incident in which two political activists were arrested in Rayong for holding signs criticising the government. Sira said she referred herself to the police as a commissioner while, in fact, she was an adviser to the committee, and she did not ask permission to do so at a committee meeting. Her action might be interpreted as a claim for political benefit and is, therefore, deemed to be inappropriate and impolite, which was not in keeping with the high standards of the committee, he said. Sira has already informed Pannika about the matter and has requested her to resign. If she does not do so, the committee will call for a vote at a meeting depending on the agenda, he added. Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30391737 -- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-07-22 - Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you - Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thaiwrath Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 5 minutes ago, webfact said: Sira has already informed Pannika about the matter and has requested her to resign. If she does not do so, the committee will call for a vote 8 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bluesofa Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 25 minutes ago, webfact said: Palang Pracharath Party’s Sira Jenjaka is planning to dismiss Pannika Wanich, a leading figure in the Progressive Movement and former Future Forward Party spokeswoman, from the House committee on law, justice and human rights for "inappropriate" behaviour and being “impolite”. Surprised she hasn't been charged with 'eating a sandwich with political intent'. That was a popular made up charge back in June 2014, if you were caught reading Orwell's 1984. Or maybe we could have 'sitting with an offensive friend', or 'walking on the cracks in the pavement'. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post edwinchester Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 If only she was guilty of drug trafficking they'd have done nothing. 10 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mavideol Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 39 minutes ago, webfact said: Her action might be interpreted as a claim for political benefit and is, therefore, deemed to be inappropriate and impolite, which was not in keeping with the high standards of the committee, he said. this must be a joke, no person in a normal state of mind would say some stupid shxx like that.... the last statement makes it even more laughable """...was not in keeping with the high standards of the committee, he said""" since when does the committee has high standards or any kind of standards, all a bunch of no good or good for nothing 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post jonclark Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 So let me get this straight. An MP on a House committee, the purpose of which is to examine and scrutinise Law, Justice and Human rights. Is being asked to resign or face dismissal for asking the police to clarify details surrounding the arrest of a Thai citizen. What is the purpose of the House committee again? 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post worgeordie Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 54 minutes ago, webfact said: a leading figure in the Progressive Movement and former Future Forward Party Thats the real reason they want her out....been "impolite" , that's the best they can do. regards worgeordie 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post colinneil Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 This pathetic so-called government are getting worse, even more pathetic by the day. Pannika is facing dismissal for being in polite, what a load of c++p. 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Paiman Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 It is a pity to see the ruling members coming up with anything they want to have it their way. Seems impossible even to voice criticism. Very poor state of affairs. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newatthis Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 2 hours ago, webfact said: which was not in keeping with the high standards of the committee, ???????????????????????????? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JusticeGB Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 21 minutes ago, newatthis said: which was not in keeping with the high standards of the committee, A committee designed to look into reforms of Justice and Law. She was making enquiries about an arrest which seems well within her remit. She was dismissed because she used to be a Future Forward MP! 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sead Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 2 hours ago, jonclark said: So let me get this straight. An MP on a House committee, the purpose of which is to examine and scrutinise Law, Justice and Human rights. Is being asked to resign or face dismissal for asking the police to clarify details surrounding the arrest of a Thai citizen. What is the purpose of the House committee again? I guess she tried to do some good and she would get the reward, not the comittee. Perhaps the comittee took bribes to shut things up and she went past it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post DaveE13 Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 Anyone really surprised? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post overt2016 Posted July 22, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2020 You can try as hard as you like, you can't make this <deleted> up. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutz Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 4 hours ago, jonclark said: So let me get this straight. An MP on a House committee, the purpose of which is to examine and scrutinise Law, Justice and Human rights. Is being asked to resign or face dismissal for asking the police to clarify details surrounding the arrest of a Thai citizen. What is the purpose of the House committee again? If you ask any (pro) military person they say commissions, boards etc. are places to show up a few times and collect cash rewards or to network a bit. Commissions aren't really supposed to do anything, they are window dressing and only silly democratic minded people would think that they are their for reasons such as transparency or accountability. ???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 18 hours ago, webfact said: As committee chairman, Sira said Pannika had acted inappropriately after she requested the police to clarify an incident in which two political activists were arrested in Rayong for holding signs criticising the government. Asking impertinent questions is not allowed.. you will be removed. Democratic state... my ar*e ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 Is this Sira the same on who throw a hissy fit in Phuket for not getting a police escort and just last week was found that he did not act inappropriately despite it being on video of him acting very inappropriately? The hypocrisy of this little snake, and of course the timing of this is almost to much for my little brain to comprehend. Its as if he was let of his misdemeanor and in return he has been requested to do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post brianthainess Posted July 23, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2020 20 hours ago, webfact said: Her action might be interpreted as a claim for political benefit and is, therefore, deemed to be inappropriate and impolite, What about A Nut In government, he has said many things inappropriate and impolite. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesofa Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 21 hours ago, webfact said: Pannika faces dismissal from House panel My mistake, I take it she's not an electrician? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now