Jump to content

China air force video appears to show simulated attack on U.S. base on Guam


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, warcy said:

Preach world peace and not war. USA should not poke their nose at other countries affairs where it has done for decades.

 

 

So what to do with Chinese territorial aggression? What to do if they attack Taiwan, an independent democratic country? USA should just sit back, relax and mind its own business or rather....."preach world peace"?

You don't see China as a threat to the free world? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those islands the  China is  developing  are likely on a big oil find as well.

  Do people think  that China does not need oil as much as the next guy.

Well maybe the greenies,  but  then  they are pro electric  and anti oil.

China  has not invaded anyone, yet.  Yet  being a catch word.

Geezer

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/22/2020 at 11:58 AM, Eric Loh said:

Tad naive on your part. The CCP leadership has been successful in guiding China to prosper economically, lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty, creating a substantial and comfortable middle class with expanded personal (if not political) freedom. China leadership has managed to ensure a relatively long period of political stability with orderly leadership transitions. In fact the Chinese people see democracy not fairing too well and have flaws in poor leadership choices and transition filled with anxieties and often turbulent. 

What's the poverty line in China again? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

I'm asking you. Can you just type how much you need to earn in China to be considered to be above the poverty line. 

 

You are the expert in all things China, after all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rkidlad said:

I'm asking you. Can you just type how much you need to earn in China to be considered to be above the poverty line. 

 

You are the expert in all things China, after all.

 

 

So you didn't read. Here to help. 

 

Item 3. What is the poverty line (included poverty line adjusted with inflation). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Eric Loh said:

So you didn't read. Here to help. 

 

Item 3. What is the poverty line (included poverty line adjusted with inflation). 

I don't read too good, Eric.

 

Can you just tell me how much you need to earn in China to be considered to be above the poverty line?

 

$7,000 a year, for example. You can quote it in yuan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2020 at 7:58 AM, YetAnother said:

not a worry in the world, usa simulations of destroying beijing, shanghai and most of the other big chinese cities is quite old

Really? Can you share these productoions where the USA government  has simulated the  destruction of a Chinese civilian population center?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎9‎/‎22‎/‎2020 at 7:46 AM, steven100 said:

US should send their aircraft carries to the south china sea and blast tomahawk missiles at china and some appache helicopters and F-15 fighter jets to bomb and destroy. 

Sure, start another war, are there not enough countries you bomb at the moment or requires the "defense" industry more money?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChipButty said:

Right now China doesn't have any friends if a war was to start I wonder which side of the fence Thailand will be?

 

Pretending to look studiously at the Andaman Sea, and hoping it will all be over before someone presses the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cjinchiangrai said:

And why do they need to be punished? 

 

Well, I do agree that the PRC should be held accountable - at the very least for the initial cover up. Doubt this could amount to anything more serious than the diplomatic level, and even that is unlikely. All the talk about war, attacks and the like is nonsense.

 

The funny thing is this - if the PRC is to be blamed for some nefarious plane, what does it imply with regard to other countries' intelligence services and leaders? 

 

IMO, Trump is just playing for the home crowd, trying to deflect and minimize his failures. It doesn't mean the PRC does not carry any responsibility, though, or that it's practices are to be condoned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Stargrazer9889 said:

China has not invaded anyone, yet. 

Don't know your definition of 'invasion' but PRC military direct aggression against a foreign country includes Russia, India, Tibet, Vietnam and Korea, plus proxy wars.

Edited by simple1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Morch said:

It doesn't mean the PRC does not carry any responsibility, though, or that it's practices are to be condoned.

and carrying all responsibility for allowing unhygienic slaughter practices to be carried out at markets everywhere doesn't do a damn thing for the millions upon millions of folks who lost their jobs, houses, assets, cars and meager savings and put many into poverty world wide.

 

 

Edited by steven100
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, simple1 said:

Don't know your definition of 'invasion' but PRC military direct aggression against a foreign country includes Russia, India, Tibet, Vietnam and Korea, plus proxy wars.

Didn’t fit the description of invasion. Russia and India were territorial disputes, Vietnam was a border war because of Vietnam invasion of Cambodia, Korea was to thwart US aggression near the Chinese border and Tibet was to quell a rebellion. China withdrew and didn’t occupied.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, steven100 said:

and carrying all responsibility for allowing unhygienic slaughter practices to be carried out at markets everywhere doesn't do a damn thing for the millions upon millions of folks who lost their jobs, houses, assets, cars and meager savings and put many into poverty world wide.

 

 

 

Please don't quote bits of my post out of context in order to push your nonsense agenda.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, steven100 said:

We means the rest of the world, or those who suffered because the Chinese government allowed unhygienic slaughter practices to be carried at markets everywhere. 

But I guess your fine ....

 

You do not speak for any "we". The World is not unified in support of your views. The World is not known for being able to effectively act in a coordinated manner.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Didn’t fit the description of invasion. Russia and India were territorial disputes, Vietnam was a border war because of Vietnam invasion of Cambodia, Korea was to thwart US aggression near the Chinese border and Tibet was to quell a rebellion. China withdrew and didn’t occupied.  

 

Spin which way you want, it broadcasts that the PRC is not a good neighbor, to put it mildly. The whole China-can-do-no-wrong defense is not very convincing to anyone following news and history.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Didn’t fit the description of invasion. Russia and India were territorial disputes, Vietnam was a border war because of Vietnam invasion of Cambodia, Korea was to thwart US aggression near the Chinese border and Tibet was to quell a rebellion. China withdrew and didn’t occupied.  

I was asking the poster. However, got to say you're you come across as a PRC propaganda outlet, true colours and all that. As an example, China supported Pol Pot and annoyed when Vietnam stepped in, launching an attempted punishment war, but PRC did not achieve it's objective to have Viet Nam withdraw from Cambodia, Pol Pot was defeated. PRC invaded and did not withdraw from Tibet; Tibet has been occupied ever since the PRC invasion.

Edited by simple1
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

Please don't quote bits of my post out of context in order to push your nonsense agenda.

so it appears by your comments and responses that you are ok with the Chinese government not administering regulation to ensure H&S are implemented at slaughter markets where a virus was permitted to infect other around and thereby cause suffering to billions globally. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...