Jump to content

Public outrage over approval for CP Group's acquisition of Tesco Lotus


webfact

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, webfact said:

“It is not in line with the spirit of the competition law, which aims to prevent companies having market dominance to unfairly enjoy an advantage over other competitors,” said Nipon, a former member of the competition committee when it was under the supervision of the Commerce Ministry.

 

I hope this guy has a bodyguard.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scorecard said:

I don't buy that.

There are plenty who want the current outrageous gap in income strongly reduced. 

 

Currently Thailand has the biggest gap in the world regarding the gap in income. 

Could this be the great reason that 1000's of foreigners are clamouring to retire here? Are they missing the "income gap" back home?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Oldie said:

I wouldn't complain too much about this. If labor costs increase to western standards then Thailand will get very expensive. These low labor costs are the reason why Thailand is still somehow affordable. I wouldn't call Thailand cheap anymore. Many products here are more expensive than in my home country. 

Point taken. I'd prefer to think this in terms of the quality of life, welfare etc., of the Thai populace.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, reptile91602 said:

Sound like these guys  have studied american strategies and love it. Conglomerates owning everything in their business sectors. No competition, no problem.

 

Why not? The did it with the medical sector and health insurance. You can now enjoy the same efficiencies and cost cutting measures already common in America's food supply chain. Like in America, where it's buy at Wal-Mart or else, you now have a choice of CP and CP and CP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SomchaiCNX said:

But... but you can not blame Tesco for getting out of this mess. Plenty of foreign companies in the same branch sold their shares a long time ago. Doing something (set-up or business) in Thailand is not easy, I wonder why ????

 

 

Except for Jack Ma. But then Jack is from . . .

Edited by John Drake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, John Drake said:

 

Why not? The did it with the medical sector and health insurance. You can now enjoy the same efficiencies and cost cutting measures already common in America's food supply chain. Like in America, where it's buy at Wal-Mart or else, you now have a choice of CP and CP and CP.

What ever happened to image.png.3a459f1e33b181907b90e984e9df60b2.png  and   then? And for the select few, image.png.22b20baf972ffebe5926471609f71dca.png&   image.png.c76cb19f23603ebb50607d4e09390031.png

image.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ratcatcher said:

What ever happened to image.png.3a459f1e33b181907b90e984e9df60b2.png  and   then? And for the select few, image.png.22b20baf972ffebe5926471609f71dca.png&   image.png.c76cb19f23603ebb50607d4e09390031.png

image.png

 

You forgot Gourmet Market, owned by The Mall Group. I have one less than 1 km from my house. It's a shorter walk than the 3.5 km to my nearest Foodland. Too bad it has a lousy selection. CP will just erode these others' market share. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, fruitman said:

It's why Thai supermarkets are much more expensive than in Europe. Thailand needs Aldi or Lidl or both and everybody will be so happy to shop there. Because of the monoplies Thailand became too expensive for what it is...

 

They had Carrefour, Casino and now Tesco, that have left because they could not compete with the too expensive prices of the Thai run supermarkets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Katipo said:

There is no way in hell that this should be approved. That it has been, makes it clear that the Thailand has not moved forward with regards to eliminating corruption and unfair practices.

And I don't think anyone anywhere would believe this didn't happen without brown envelopes. So disappointing.

It was a Business Aquisition,to my knowledge there were no other Companies' nterest in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jimbo53 said:

It was a Business Aquisition,to my knowledge there were no other Companies' nterest in it.

But that shouldn't be a factor. If it's not in the public interest they should wait until an approved buyer bids, or split the company, etc. 

 

The public interest / civil society should dominate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...