Jump to content

Nearly 80% of Americans say Biden won White House, ignoring Trump's refusal to concede: Reuters/Ipsos poll


Recommended Posts

Posted

durng/just after the prev. election (clinton - trump) there was a lot of talk about

to what extent are the electors bound bt the cvote in their lap

 

if I remember  correctly it turned out that in some states the electors were legally boun by the result in their lap,

in other states they were not, ie they electors were freeer to pick the candidate they thought would be best for the USofA

 

is that situation the same same or has there been some streamlinig of these parts of the relevant legislation in various member states?

 

 

Posted

on CNN and in newspapers is has been said severel times

that 48 out of  50 states enjoy winner take all or first past the pole (roughly same same)

 

which two states do not apply winner take all,

and how do these two states do it?

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

which two states do not apply winner take all,

and how do these two states do it?

 

Nebraska and Maine I believe. No idea how they split it but I would hope based on the split of the votes.

Edited by Salerno
  • Like 1
Posted

came across and studied some maps (of USA)

 

2016 US county by county basis all Trump counties red the rest white

2016, same for Clinton, blue and  white

2020, as above

2020, as above

 

those 4 maps made quite an impression

it might be time for a political discussion of some sort of balance mechansim should be introduced ,

ie giving impact to both peoples vote and electoal vote

 

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

it might be time for a political discussion of some sort of balance mechansim should be introduced ,

ie giving impact to both peoples vote and electoal vote

 

It's one of the strangest issues of the US process to me.

 

Why should the Republicans get all 29 electoral votes available from Florida given the chunk of Democrat counties? In the same vein, why should the Democrats get all 55 electoral votes available from California given the chunk of Republican counties?

2020-election-results-Interactive-Florida-county-map.png.4b9fb598b734935088a5b304aee63291.png  California-Election-Results-2020-Live-Map-Updates-Voting-by-County-District.png.4daaad31f4cbf95cc57ef2fd02c51405.png

 

Doesn't seem a fair process reflecting the wishes of the people to me.

Edited by Salerno
Posted
57 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

on CNN and in newspapers is has been said severel times

that 48 out of  50 states enjoy winner take all or first past the pole (roughly same same)

 

which two states do not apply winner take all,

and how do these two states do it?

The two states are Nebraska and Maine.   Here's a link to how they do it:

 

https://www.270towin.com/content/split-electoral-votes-maine-and-nebraska/

Posted
50 minutes ago, Salerno said:

 

It's one of the strangest issues of the US process to me.

 

Why should the Republicans get all 29 electoral votes available from Florida given the chunk of Democrat counties? In the same vein, why should the Democrats get all 55 electoral votes available from California given the chunk of Republican counties?

2020-election-results-Interactive-Florida-county-map.png.4b9fb598b734935088a5b304aee63291.png  California-Election-Results-2020-Live-Map-Updates-Voting-by-County-District.png.4daaad31f4cbf95cc57ef2fd02c51405.png

 

Doesn't seem a fair process reflecting the wishes of the people to me.

If you do it by county then you'll just be replicating the unfairness of the electoral college votes. In the USA the more  sparsely populated a county is, the more likely it is to lean Republican. The more heavily populated a county is, the more likely it is to lean Democratic.

Posted
20 hours ago, mtls2005 said:

 

Assume this is meant to be humorous?

 

I mean, trump did already declare that he won the 2020 election.

 

 

I WON THIS ELECTION, BY A LOT!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

BECAUSE HE DID WIN!!!

  • Sad 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

To make that an irrefutable assertion I suggest you put it in bold type and make it a lot larger.

I suggest you put in a sarcasm alert, the person you are responding to might take it seriously.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

*Deleted post edited out*

 

IMO we will see how many corrupt and criminal Republicans there are after Biden takes office, and the justice system can operate without Barr smothering it.

Communist? In Australia, the Democrats would be classed as a right-wing party.

I have news for you. Socialism works quite well in many democracies where people are not brainwashed from birth to regard it as akin to leprosy.

Check out how a socialist government in Victoria, Australia has eliminated coronavirus. Thirteen straight days without a death or new case, three active cases in the whole state.

Compare that with the 123,000 odd new cases, 1250 deaths, and 3.8 million active cases America had YESTERDAY.

Get back to me when you have stopped drinking the Trump Koolaid.

Edited by Scott
  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, placeholder said:

Gratuitous and cliched insults really don't help the cause.

but even his mother didn't like him, she referred to him once as a monster.

Posted
41 minutes ago, placeholder said:

If you do it by county then you'll just be replicating the unfairness of the electoral college votes.

 

Wasn't even touching on that strange set up - just the fact that it's winner take all in 48 States. Why not a percentage based on the wishes of the people as per the ballot box.

Posted

The last election was decided by approximately 70,000 votes. And they were real votes as real as the 150,000 now giving the advantage to the other side. With again 4 million more votes to the democratic candidate by the popular vote.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jcsmith said:

But since you will need republican votes to change it, and it is against their best interests, it's unlikely to ever change.

Not if the Democrats win the 2 senatorial run offs in Georgia. Senate tied, Harris takes the seat.

 

Democrats won the state, can they win the senate?

Posted
57 minutes ago, polpott said:

Not if the Democrats win the 2 senatorial run offs in Georgia. Senate tied, Harris takes the seat.

 

Democrats won the state, can they win the senate?

Possible, but seems unlikely.

Posted

Newsmax, the conservative "news" organization run by trump friend chris ruddy has published an op-ed piece calling for trump to retire now and let pence handle the remaining term.

 

ouch.

 

Let Mike Pence Handle the Transition

 

To avoid all this unpleasantness, President Trump should retire immediately and let Mike Pence concede the election, occupy the White House, and handle the transition.

 

https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/996319/456

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, mtls2005 said:

Newsmax, the conservative "news" organization run by trump friend chris ruddy has published an op-ed piece calling for trump to retire now and let pence handle the remaining term.

 

ouch.

 

Let Mike Pence Handle the Transition

 

To avoid all this unpleasantness, President Trump should retire immediately and let Mike Pence concede the election, occupy the White House, and handle the transition.

 

https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/996319/456

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, right, Dude. Like that's going to happen.  :stoner:

Posted
13 hours ago, Masterton said:

 

Continually having to respond to your bias nonsense is becoming tiresome. Pennsylvania has a long history of "voting issues" which goes back decades. The problem there is systemic. The fact that you automatically believe the word of the people who are being accused of fraud/interference/irregularities/illegality without taking into consideration any of the evidence/proof already (allegedly) collected by the Trump lawyers just highlights your confirmation bias. Please don't bother replying to this message because I will be ignoring you from here on.

"evidence/proof already (allegedly) collected by the Trump lawyers" 

That's just funny.  These lawyers are getting creamed in the courts because they do not in fact have any real evidence.  It's one thing to make allegations of voter fraud.  It's another thing to try and prove it in court.  That's why every single case so far has been thrown out.  

 

[By now, it’s well-established that most of the arguments put forward by President Trump’s reelection campaign in its challenge of the results of the 2020 election are baseless and highly speculative. Even Trump allies, as The Washington Post reported late Tuesday, acknowledge the apparent futility of the effort.]

[The common thread running through all of these (court cases) is that Trump’s lawyers are regularly offering a significantly more watered-down version of Trump’s claims about rampant voter fraud — because they, unlike Trump, have to substantiate their claims. And as these exchanges show, it’s a rather thankless task that can quickly land them on a judge’s bad side.]

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-lawyers-suffer-embarrassing-rebukes-from-judges-over-voter-fraud-claims/ar-BB1aUUWm

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Is DC one of those states/regions where you can shoot people for trespassing?

 

If yes it would be an elegant solution.

Edited by n00dle

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...