On 4/18/2021 at 2:38 PM, shdmn said:

Cost effective and efficient. Putting the limited money where it is most needed.

What's cost effective about having someone confined to home because they need new knees and can't walk? If that was me, they'd also have to put me in a rest home at taxpayer expense as don't have anyone to look after me and not rich.

On 4/19/2021 at 2:07 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

What's cost effective about having someone confined to home because they need new knees and can't walk? If that was me, they'd also have to put me in a rest home at taxpayer expense as don't have anyone to look after me and not rich.

This has happened much more than once.

A BC women even went to court - she waited over 2 years, could not leave the house without help.

Of course she lost - Gov't spent her out of a chance of winning