webfact Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 Picture: Naew Na A public referendum was held at Wat Mai Samran on Koh Larn on Sunday in which 845 locals were given their chance to vote on keeping the island open or closing it due to the third wave of Covid-19. They decided to close the island down from Wednesday 5th to 20th May. 306 people voted for a complete closure for 15 days. 420 called for a 15 day closure to tourists. 94 wanted to stay open. The rest were abstensions. All tourists must vacate the island by tomorrow, May 4th. Locals will be able to come and go using a strict sticker system. Vendors from the mainland like lottery sellers are prohibited and no one who is unauthorized will be able to travel on supply vessels. Two trips daily at 7am and 6pm each way will be allowed to and from the island and Pattaya, reported Naew Na. -- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2021-05-03 - Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you - Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates 1 2
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 Thai people seem to select lockdown over infection risk. But Farang knows better. 2 2 2
Surelynot Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 Can tourist stay there.........thought this was just a day visit island?
gunderhill Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: Thai people seem to select lockdown over infection risk. But Farang knows better. Same with driving then eh. Not to mention 50% of survey respondents think eating pad krapao can help protect against COVID-19 Edited May 3, 2021 by gunderhill 1 1
Danderman123 Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 3 minutes ago, Surelynot said: Can tourist stay there.........thought this was just a day visit island? There are hotels. 1 1
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, gunderhill said: Same with driving then eh. Not to mention 50% of survey respondents think eating pad krapao can help protect against COVID-19 The issue is whether Thai people will accept an economic penalty in order to reduce risk of infection. 3
Popular Post gunderhill Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 1 minute ago, Danderman123 said: The issue is whether Thai people will accept an economic penalty in order to reduce risk of infection. Death is quite a high economic penalty, on a bike with no helmet, could always eat more pad krapao I suppose, I mean if it repels covid sure it can repel 2 tons of pick up ploughing into you. 1 2
Popular Post smedly Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 how many on koh larn have been tested - likely none a fine example of locking themselves in without knowing the community spread of covid 3 1 1 1
Popular Post Amdesign Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 This is second time already when they lock down themselves, and immediately kick out the 'tourists' (non-residents)... I mean if people already there, how they can force them to leave?? This is completely illegal and lawless. I suggest this island should be ignored in the future. The inhabitants are greedy grabbers with no respect of the visitors. 6 1 1
Popular Post jacko45k Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Danderman123 said: Thai people seem to select lockdown over infection risk. But Farang knows better. Yes you make a good point..... so many here on TV are going on about how the lockdown measures are wrong and are making the locals suffer terrible hardships. Yet here we have a small sample of them voting for a lockdown. Maybe the posters are self serving! Edited May 3, 2021 by jacko45k 3
Popular Post kaneko86 Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 If they lockdown than they also shouldn't allow the koh larn locals to come to Pattaya. Otherwise they could bring their diseases to here. 1 1 1
hotchilli Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 4 hours ago, Amdesign said: This is second time already when they lock down themselves, and immediately kick out the 'tourists' (non-residents)... I mean if people already there, how they can force them to leave?? This is completely illegal and lawless. I suggest this island should be ignored in the future. The inhabitants are greedy grabbers with no respect of the visitors. But a healthy respect for not getting Covid it seems.
Sametboy2019 Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 So your already there and could possibly have covid but now need to leave and the locals are still allowed to leave the island and return possibly catching covid. Ok I get it. Makes perfect sense. Thankfully they have a strict sticker system. 1
Swimfan Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 So they had a mass gathering ? or a referendum in the middle of a pandemic ? sound like a superspreader event 2
bluedoc Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 6 hours ago, webfact said: Locals will be able to come and go using a strict sticker system. We’ll that makes no sense at all 1
Excel Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, bluedoc said: We’ll that makes no sense at all It will to a Thai ???? 1
gunderhill Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 4 hours ago, jacko45k said: Maybe the posters are self serving! its the new normal dont you know, this way we can only infect ourselves
Harveyboy Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 8 hours ago, Surelynot said: Can tourist stay there.........thought this was just a day visit island? dozens of hotels there many people stay here 1
Joe Farang Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 8 hours ago, gunderhill said: Death is quite a high economic penalty, on a bike with no helmet, could always eat more pad krapao I suppose, I mean if it repels covid sure it can repel 2 tons of pick up ploughing into you. Pad krapao can repel a 2 ton pick up truck to the same extent a helmet can.
Popular Post Yknot Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 OK, but the islanders should not be allowed to come to Pattaya. Of course, for their own safety. 3
Caldera Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 If they don't want to allow anyone new to get IN, fine. What I don't get is why they want to kick OUT those tourists who are already there. Either they have Covid and the damage has already been done, or they don't have Covid so there's no risk. Island mentality? 2
Popular Post connda Posted May 3, 2021 Popular Post Posted May 3, 2021 10 hours ago, Danderman123 said: Thai people seem to select lockdown over infection risk. But Farang knows better. I've lived in Thailand for 14 years and in my village for 10. If the villagers all vote tomorrow to close the village to tourists, then they are in their rights to kick me out, right, even as a long-stay expat. How about a referendum to kick all foreigners out of Thailand? What they have done is set a precedence. If other places follow this lead, Thailand can kiss retirees, investors, and new foreign business goodbye, because there becomes too much risk involved in setting up a business, investing in Thailand, or buying a condo. How do you think the world would react if you own country decided to just kick establish foreigners out? Not unheard of, but it would kill foreign trade and finish off the economy. And my new recommendation to any friends of mine considering traveling here or retiring here or investing here? You're not wanted. Weigh that carefully and consider the risks to rewards ratio before coming. 4
connda Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 2 hours ago, Harveyboy said: dozens of hotels there many people stay here Not anymore.
Nojohndoe Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 12 minutes ago, Caldera said: If they don't want to allow anyone new to get IN, fine. What I don't get is why they want to kick OUT those tourists who are already there. Either they have Covid and the damage has already been done, or they don't have Covid so there's no risk. Island mentality? Perhaps because those tourists are effectively of no economic advantage except for a relative minority and the exercise of a democratic vote has demonstrated the outcome. Island mentality? If so then not so dis-similar to "national" mandate being arbitrarily made by Governments globally in contradiction of such democratic expectations. For the poor self preservation retains a greater sense of priority than it does for the selfishness of the wealthy. I personally predict the ructions and ramifications of this pandemic will impact on politics and society in the longer term in ways as yet unappreciated in effect.
Amdesign Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 In fact, regular speedboat traffic to Koh Larn causes massive pollution of Pattaya bay. Once Koh Larn is closed, one can see turtles, fish, dolphins in Pattaya bay again. So my proposal is: Pattaya gets dirty beaches due to Koh Larn, and Koh Larn benefits from this by having those tourists. Turn it into the benefit of Pattaya: ban traffic to Koh Larn forever, stay clean, keep tourists for clean Pattaya? ???? Let the islanders enjoy Covid-free self-isolation forever - those greedy mongers deserve it.
jacko45k Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 (edited) 9 hours ago, Yknot said: OK, but the islanders should not be allowed to come to Pattaya. Of course, for their own safety. Is this some tit for tat pandemic response? If the infection level on the island became high I expect City Hall would react and prevent Islanders leaving, or proper testing of them as they did. Edited May 3, 2021 by jacko45k
Excel Posted May 3, 2021 Posted May 3, 2021 As most of what Thai administrations plan never reach fruition, perhaps this is local edict number 007 - "Tomorrow never Comes" ???? 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now