One million signatures claimed in support of Amnesty International ousting

[The Hammer2021]

7 minutes ago, hansnl said:

And, for example, the Thaksin governments were shining examples of ethical behaviour?

Name me the differences, please?

He had the support of people, 25 million who voted for him. He got major infrastructure works done including the airport, he introduced a health system. Unlike the regime he took part in elections. No he was not perfect  but a 100 times better than the current clowns.

[MyFriend You]

7 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

How can we get rid of this man???? He is doing more damage to the country than anything else. He is against everything and want to keep the 19th century rules

'We'  I'm confused, maybe I missed something - what do 'We' have to do with it, unless you are a Thai National 'We' have nothing to say - their country, their rules.    Peace

[spidermike007]

3 hours ago, sscc said:

 

International tourists pick travel location mostly based on fun, cost, value, exoticness, convenience and safety.   Having NGO or not in a particular countries may be priority No. 9 or even No. 99 in the criteria. 

 

This idea is an example of selling for fear.  

Likely true. And the reality is that Thailand has killed the tourism industry  already, and the so called leadership's lack of vision, combined with an astonishing degree of arrogance, makes them rather blind to how the world perceives them, why that is even important, and their follies and mistakes. 

[ikke1959]

15 minutes ago, TunnelRat69 said:

'We'  I'm confused, maybe I missed something - what do 'We' have to do with it, unless you are a Thai National 'We' have nothing to say - their country, their rules.    Peace

That I am not a Thai national, does not mean that I am not worried for the country and its people... I have the best in mind for Thailand, and I feel sorry that a lot of Thais are not aware what kind of people do more harm than good for them.. I live here a long time already and it feels as my country and so I feel free to say "we"

[baboon]

20 minutes ago, TunnelRat69 said:

'We'  I'm confused, maybe I missed something - what do 'We' have to do with it, unless you are a Thai National 'We' have nothing to say - their country, their rules.    Peace

But it isn't their country and their rules, is it?

Thailand is not a country with an army, it is an army with a country. 

[GarryP]

1 hour ago, hansnl said:

And, for example, the Thaksin governments were shining examples of ethical behaviour?

Name me the differences, please?

You've got to be joking. I am no Thaksin supporter, in fact I seriously dislike the man, however, he did far more for the country than this lot did. The generals taking over and claiming they'd clear up the corruption. Look where that got the country. Thailand's corruption levels have gone through the roof. Make Thaksin and his cohorts look like saints in comparison. Even a military appointed senator came out the other day to pan the ridiculous levels of corruption so it must be bad. 

[zoltannyc]

Still remember a late night sketch about collecting signatures to eliminate "women's suffrage" and yes they received lot's of signatures. 

[herfiehandbag]

7 hours ago, hansnl said:

And, for example, the Thaksin governments were shining examples of ethical behaviour?

Name me the differences, please?

As ever, you (amongst many) miss or ignore the absolutely fundamental point. Thaksin was, time after time, the choice of the Thai electorate. In all probability he still would be.

 

To return to the proposals we are discussing; it has taken two good old fashioned military coups, plus any amount of judicial and electoral (commission) manipulation for the present regime to be able to (unconvincingly) claim they are the choice of the people. Few believe it internally or internationally. The view of their own population doesn't worry them (yet) - they think that, like their "besties"up the road in Myanmar they can control that. I don't think so, the dynamics in Thailand are different, the military is different (rank and file conscripts rather than a homogeneous ruling tribe) and the society is more open. International opinion, they think, will "drop off the radar" if they hamstring the NGOs like Amnesty. Again, unlike Myanmar which has been effectively closed as a society for over a generation, Thailand is more open and has more contacts with the outside world. In particular "those that matter" have a lot of wealth, property and business interests in that outside world. 

 

 

Edited January 19, 2022 by herfiehandbag

[sscc]

7 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Likely true. And the reality is that Thailand has killed the tourism industry  already, and the so called leadership's lack of vision, combined with an astonishing degree of arrogance, makes them rather blind to how the world perceives them, why that is even important, and their follies and mistakes. 

Tourist arrival data : 

24 M /2014 ;   29 M /2015 ;    32 M/2016 ;   35 M/2017 ;   38 M /2018  ;   39 M / 2019  then of course dropped very very sharply in 2020.   

 

" the reality is that Thailand has killed the tourism industry  already ,"

Your comment is based on ??? 

Or  spreading rumours ? 

 

 

 

 

[sscc]

1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

As ever, you (amongst many) miss or ignore the absolutely fundamental point. Thaksin was, time after time, the choice of the Thai electorate. In all probability he still would be.

 

To return to the proposals we are discussing; it has taken two good old fashioned military coups, plus any amount of judicial and electoral (commission) manipulation for the present regime to be able to (unconvincingly) claim they are the choice of the people. Few believe it internally or internationally. The view of their own population doesn't worry them (yet) - they think that, like their "besties"up the road in Myanmar they can control that. I don't think so, the dynamics in Thailand are different, the military is different (rank and file conscripts rather than a homogeneous ruling tribe) and the society is more open. International opinion, they think, will "drop off the radar" if they hamstring the NGOs like Amnesty. Again, unlike Myanmar which has been effectively closed as a society for over a generation, Thailand is more open and has more contacts with the outside world. In particular "those that matter" have a lot of wealth, property and business interests in that outside world. 

 

 

There was protest leading to riot in Hong Kong 2019,  then there was protest and coup attempt in Kazakhstan 2022.   So NGO is stereotyped in very different way nowadays.  

Add on the event of USA did the "Mother of all Retreats" -- quote from the words of a former USA Vice President --  in Afghanistan 2021.  ( Kazakhstan and  Afghanistan are both Central Asia countries. )

 

All government as well as general public in South East Asia are of course more cautious about NGO presence in their countries.    

 

 

Well are not you up to speed to understand the mood change of the Thai locals ?

And still glorify NGO blah blah blah ?   

[sscc]

9 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

Mind you, this same bunch who seem to want to chuck out Amnesty International are also hell bent on stamping out fun, forcing up the cost, reducing the value, are content to homogenise the exoticness and don't seem to give two hoots about safety, so...

Whatever bad-mouthing you put up.   

Tourist arrival data in past few years  as follows. 

24 M /2014 ;   29 M /2015 ;    32 M/2016 ;   35 M/2017 ;   38 M /2018  ;   39 M / 2019  then of course dropped very very sharply in 2020.   

 

[dinsdale]

Must have taken a long time. 1 million signatures. Complete nonsense from a junta lap dog doing some rubbish misinformation for his junta boss. DO NOT FORGET this is not a democratic country. This is a military government that took power through a coup d'etat. Their only purpose is to retain that power.

[The Hammer2021]

22 minutes ago, sscc said:

There was protest leading to riot in Hong Kong 2019,  then there was protest and coup attempt in Kazakhstan 2022.   So NGO is stereotyped in very different way nowadays.  

Add on the event of USA did the "Mother of all Retreats" -- quote from the words of a former USA Vice President --  in Afghanistan 2021.  ( Kazakhstan and  Afghanistan are both Central Asia countries. )

 

All government as well as general public in South East Asia are of course more cautious about NGO presence in their countries.    

 

 

Well are not you up to speed to understand the mood change of the Thai locals ?

And still glorify NGO blah blah blah ?   

I am no fan if NGOs. And Amnesty made a big mistake supporting militant Islam BUT bit Amnesty and other International worthy groups are sadly needed still and are a thorn in the side of authoritarian bully boys. With the help of NGOs a Syrian torture officer was brought to justice as was an ISIS torturer of children. Some NGOs do good work. But some are left wing political activists on good salaries having an adventure.

[Saanim]

23 minutes ago, sscc said:

Whatever bad-mouthing you put up.   

Tourist arrival data in past few years  as follows. 

24 M /2014 ;   29 M /2015 ;    32 M/2016 ;   35 M/2017 ;   38 M /2018  ;   39 M / 2019  then of course dropped very very sharply in 2020.   

 

So, didn't the tourist arrival drop very sharply? So, who else to blame? Or should we blame the Covid only? (That would be too easy, won't be?) (and no fun ...) (and no clicks...)

Edited January 19, 2022 by Saanim

[spidermike007]

1 hour ago, sscc said:

Tourist arrival data : 

24 M /2014 ;   29 M /2015 ;    32 M/2016 ;   35 M/2017 ;   38 M /2018  ;   39 M / 2019  then of course dropped very very sharply in 2020.   

 

" the reality is that Thailand has killed the tourism industry  already ,"

Your comment is based on ??? 

Or  spreading rumours ? 

 

 

 

 

Quantity over quality only works if you are selling one dollar items, at a swap meet. Rumours are the last of Thailand's worries. Nobody needs to damage their reputation. They have done it entirely on their own. These saboteurs are their own worst enemies. 

[bronzedude]

At 20 baht per signature, he only had to spend 200,000 baht. I wonder how much the powers that be paid him to try and get rid of Amnesty International?

[MyFriend You]

12 hours ago, baboon said:

But it isn't their country and their rules, is it?

Thailand is not a country with an army, it is an army with a country. 

I don't wish for a tit for tat with anyone, but I think we can all trace our countries roots back to King's, Dictators, Czars, Presidents, Prime Ministers and yes, Military Dictators, my point was 'we' can't do anything about it, as we can't vote in this 'quasi democracy/dictatorship'. We all have our reasons for calling Thailand home, it has been mine on and off since 1972.  and if you have been associated with Thailand as long as I have, you have seen it all.     Peace

[soalbundy]

On 1/18/2022 at 6:35 PM, tomacht8 said:

If the expel become a reality, then there will be negative consequences for Thailand in terms of international investment decisions.

I doubt that, it may an incentive to some big investors, they didn't grow rich drinking the milk of human kindness.

[Sharron Merrilees]

On 1/18/2022 at 10:08 PM, The Hammer2021 said:

Yet you live in Australia..good luck..

I have a brother living in London, And I live in Australia ( only because I have family matters here ) but the land dower under is stuffed . I would gladly get out. Be the first Female Robin Hood take from the rich and give to the poor.  

[simple1]

8 hours ago, The Hammer2021 said:

Amnesty made a big mistake supporting militant Islam

AI have condemned IS and Islamist terror a number of times. Accordingly care to clarify your claim with credible link/s?

[Highend Expat]

Thailand increasingly seems to think it is China. It is in for a big surprise. 

[sscc]

9 hours ago, Saanim said:

So, didn't the tourist arrival drop very sharply? So, who else to blame? Or should we blame the Covid only? (That would be too easy, won't be?) (and no fun ...) (and no clicks...)

Not knowing what happened to tourism everywhere in the world in 2020 ?

Do You need explanation ?  Really ? 

[Saanim]

2 hours ago, sscc said:

Not knowing what happened to tourism everywhere in the world in 2020 ?

Do You need explanation ?  Really ? 

Sorry, I did not attached a ???? to make it clear as an irony...

[spidermike007]

11 hours ago, bronzedude said:

At 20 baht per signature, he only had to spend 200,000 baht. I wonder how much the powers that be paid him to try and get rid of Amnesty International?

Very poor math. More like 20 million baht. 

[Mr Meeseeks]

23 hours ago, simple1 said:

It may be of interest to members to read the latest AI report on Thailand; URL below...

 

https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-east-asia-and-the-pacific/thailand/report-thailand/

All the reasons they want Amnesty gone are in that article right there. Damning. 

[rudi49jr]

1 hour ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

All the reasons they want Amnesty gone are in that article right there. Damning. 

Quite right: kill the messenger, and just keep doing what you’re doing without all those pesky comments and damning articles and reports.

[In Full Agreement]

On 1/18/2022 at 5:43 PM, baboon said:

Leave us alone, fix up your own backyard first. 

 

Who do you  mean when you say US?      Are  you a Thai Citizen?

 

 

[baboon]

2 minutes ago, In Full Agreement said:

 

Who do you  mean when you say US?      Are  you a Thai Citizen?

 

 

You are quoting the wrong poster, my old mate...

[Gottfrid]

On 1/19/2022 at 1:15 PM, baboon said:

I'll just go ahead and assume any laws they may break are laws enacted to repress. There's nothing morally wrong in breaking them in which case.

There is always something morally wrong in breaking a law, with the purpose to stop other law breakers. That, as it makes the organization trying to stop the criminal at the same level as another criminal.

[baboon]

24 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

There is always something morally wrong in breaking a law, with the purpose to stop other law breakers. That, as it makes the organization trying to stop the criminal at the same level as another criminal.

So the folks who gave shelter to Anne Frank and her family were nothing but common criminals, were they? Bloody hell, man, think...