Popular Post snoop1130 Posted April 8, 2022 Popular Post Posted April 8, 2022 Former Palang Pracharath MP Pareena Kraikupt has described the Supreme Court decision, to strip her of her MP status and to ban her from running for or holding political office for life, as a “political death sentence”, echoing Progressive Movement’s Piyabutr Saengkanokkul’s remark that such a move is a gross violation of her basic rights. The Supreme Court Criminal Division for Political Office Holders ruled yesterday (Thursday) that Pareena, formerly an MP for Ratchaburi province, is guilty of gross ethical misconduct for encroachment on national forest reserves and land reserved for a land reform project. The court stripped her of the parliamentary status and banned her from voting for ten years. The court also barred her from contesting an election or holding a political office for life. Keep up to date with all things Thailand - Join our daily ASEAN NOW Thailand Newsletter - Click to subscribe In her Facebook post last night, Pareena said that she had never concealed the fact that she had occupied the land in question. She said that she had told the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) that she had utilised the land, without being aware that the land in question is land intended for land reform, because there was no indication that it is land reform land. Additionally, there were no protests from local administration officials over the years until, one day, someone complained to the NACC, she claimed. Full Story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/pprps-pareena-equates-supreme-court-verdict-to-political-death-sentence/ -- © Copyright Thai PBS 2022-04-08 - Aetna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here. - Follow ASEAN NOW on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates 1 4
Popular Post ThailandRyan Posted April 8, 2022 Popular Post Posted April 8, 2022 Oh my heart just aches for her poor decisions...not. 2 1
Bluespunk Posted April 8, 2022 Posted April 8, 2022 43 minutes ago, snoop1130 said: In her Facebook post last night, Pareena said that she had never concealed the fact that she had occupied the land in question. She said that she had told the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) that she had utilised the land, without being aware that the land in question is land intended for land reform Yeah right, sure you didn’t. 1
overt2016 Posted April 8, 2022 Posted April 8, 2022 She got what she deserved. With a bit of luck others will get the same treatment. 2
Popular Post Callmeishmael Posted April 8, 2022 Popular Post Posted April 8, 2022 I have never liked her and I do think that being kicked out of parliament and given a 10 year ban is a just sentence. However, the lifetime ban from politics is a dangerous precedent. Who will be given this sort of ban next? This sentence is all too convenient for TPTB to use to eliminate the opposition. 3
ikke1959 Posted April 8, 2022 Posted April 8, 2022 She lost and now is not happy... Good decision of the court and now she can go find a real job..End of politics for her .... just accept it. 2
Popular Post The Hammer2021 Posted April 8, 2022 Popular Post Posted April 8, 2022 The ultimate corruptionist is in power and remains unpunished for occupying a whole country 5
MrJ2U Posted April 9, 2022 Posted April 9, 2022 She's an absolute witch. Good riddance! She should be facing jail time.
Popular Post poskat Posted April 9, 2022 Popular Post Posted April 9, 2022 If she had only been running a gambling den or a drug ring, driven over a cop and killed him, or made millions over extravagant lampposts, all would be well 3 1 1
Popular Post Will B Good Posted April 9, 2022 Popular Post Posted April 9, 2022 14 hours ago, Callmeishmael said: I have never liked her and I do think that being kicked out of parliament and given a 10 year ban is a just sentence. However, the lifetime ban from politics is a dangerous precedent. Who will be given this sort of ban next? This sentence is all too convenient for TPTB to use to eliminate the opposition. Good point......if she had any sense she should have focussed on drug smuggling and not chicken farming......could be in the cabinet now. 1 3
SomchaiCNX Posted April 9, 2022 Posted April 9, 2022 So what kind of sentences did those government officials get at the department responsible for these landowner papers?
candide Posted April 9, 2022 Posted April 9, 2022 17 hours ago, snoop1130 said: Additionally, there were no protests from local administration officials over the years until, one day, someone complained to the NACC, she claimed. And we know why! ????
Trvlr55 Posted April 9, 2022 Posted April 9, 2022 at least what she says now is correct. Being banned from politics is a political death sentence; but that was the point!
internationalism Posted April 10, 2022 Posted April 10, 2022 Now there is a green light to sentence tens of future forward MPs for lese majeste, which carries much more danger to the establishment than some illegal use of land. thanarhorn has already lese majeste charge for his exposure of astra zeneca and the whole vax program. charges would be rolling pre and post election time, to decimate this party at the most sensitive time. Already a week ago the whole party was accused of disrespecting the king for questioning royal budget at censure debate the last year. Those MPs wont be able to form a new party, as they did the last time, when their original party was disbanded on trump up charges. They would even go jail for tens of years 1
billd766 Posted April 10, 2022 Posted April 10, 2022 I have 3 responses to this. 1. People in glass houses should not throw stones. 2 Let she who is without sin, cast the first stone. 3
Excel Posted April 10, 2022 Posted April 10, 2022 (edited) Mores the pity that more of the current crop of MP's can not similarly get the same treatment . Edited April 10, 2022 by Excel
zzaa09 Posted April 10, 2022 Posted April 10, 2022 3 hours ago, internationalism said: Now there is a green light to sentence tens of future forward MPs for lese majeste, which carries much more danger to the establishment than some illegal use of land. thanarhorn has already lese majeste charge for his exposure of astra zeneca and the whole vax program. charges would be rolling pre and post election time, to decimate this party at the most sensitive time. Already a week ago the whole party was accused of disrespecting the king for questioning royal budget at censure debate the last year. Those MPs wont be able to form a new party, as they did the last time, when their original party was disbanded on trump up charges. They would even go jail for tens of years There are those who have already suggested [certainly of the last couple decades] that the base lese majeste law would be exaggerated and unethically tweaked as a broad blanket ruling, straying way away from it's original intent. And will continue to see this particular and prestigious law overvalued and used discriminantly and willy-nilly by the preference of the select ruling classes. And yet, over all these years and decades, we still haven't figured out the true crux of all issues and problems.
candide Posted April 10, 2022 Posted April 10, 2022 3 hours ago, internationalism said: Now there is a green light to sentence tens of future forward MPs for lese majeste, which carries much more danger to the establishment than some illegal use of land. thanarhorn has already lese majeste charge for his exposure of astra zeneca and the whole vax program. charges would be rolling pre and post election time, to decimate this party at the most sensitive time. Already a week ago the whole party was accused of disrespecting the king for questioning royal budget at censure debate the last year. Those MPs wont be able to form a new party, as they did the last time, when their original party was disbanded on trump up charges. They would even go jail for tens of years It has been a regular pattern over time. When the yellow/green network sentenced one of its own people (or was lenient in a case involving an opponent), it was a way to pretend being balanced and fair, before hitting hard opponents. You may be right.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now