Jump to content

Climate change: As Po River dries up, Italy's food and energy supplies are at risk


onthedarkside

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

But you don't seem to understand is that it's statistically invalid the cherry pick a starting point and move on from there. It should be obvious that one year does not get to define a trend. Apparently not for some.

Current data is last 4 to 6 years. 1976 to 2016 shows warming no doubt. Thats old data though.

 

1942 to 1976 shows cooling. Old data.

 

What data do you want to use?

 

You cant just pick a warming period that ended in 2016 and ignore the rest.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bluespunk said:

Yeah, those pesky facts eh...

Facts are hand-picked and misrepresented data that they are feeding us.  Consider, the biggest fact providers on this in the US.    Gore with a home that uses more power than small towns, Leo DiCaprio with his private jets, Obama and Biden acquiring significant ocean-front property (and jetting everywhere).    Huge transfer of wealth from us to them.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sparktrader said:

What facts? We know warming happened from 1976 to 2016. No warmer years since 2016.

 

6 years no warming....

 

Why not?

Oh noes!    Must be global cooling!    Tax heating to prevent more!!!!

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Climate change means that climates are changing because of man made actions...there is no incongruity in the changes in Australia.

 

The very fact that the Australians chose parties that are in favour of actions to halt climate change is proof of this. 

What the  heck are you on about?   Show that the Australian people specifically picked parties to halt climate change versus a million other reasons.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

What facts? We know warming happened from 1976 to 2016. No warmer years since 2016.

 

6 years no warming....

 

Why not?

I think you should try out on a scientist or statistician your notion

 

7 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

What facts? We know warming happened from 1976 to 2016. No warmer years since 2016.

 

6 years no warming....

 

Why not?

that establishing a baseline derived from one anomalous datum is a valid way to determine a trend. If nothing else, you'll give them a good laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

I think you should try out on a scientist or statistician your notion

 

that establishing a baseline derived from one anomalous datum is a valid way to determine a trend. If nothing else, you'll give them a good laugh.

I am a statistician. I built and maintained spreadsheets for a living.

 

The data over 142 years shows warming and cooling trends. You can see that. 1880 to 1909. 1909 to 1942. 1942 to 1976. 1976 to 2016. 2016 to 2022...

 

The most relevant data is recent data though. Same like with a share or economy.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

What facts? We know warming happened from 1976 to 2016. No warmer years since 2016.

 

6 years no warming....

 

Why not?

This same class objection was used by years for denialists in regards to global warming because 1998 was an anomalously warm year. And for a few years afterwards the global temperature was lower. That was because of the phenomenon called el nino. It was almost as nonsensical and objection as yours. I say almost because the data you are citing is only about africa. And Africa does not cover the entire globe. So what's your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

This same class objection was used by years for denialists in regards to global warming because 1998 was an anomalously warm year. And for a few years afterwards the global temperature was lower. That was because of the phenomenon called el nino. It was almost as nonsensical and objection as yours. I say almost because the data you are citing is only about africa. And Africa does not cover the entire globe. So what's your point?

There's a few points.

 

1 explain 1909 to 1942 warming

2 explain why chinese co2 is up a lot in 6 years yet temps not up.

I will post the links.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, tjintx said:

Facts are hand-picked and misrepresented data that they are feeding us.  Consider, the biggest fact providers on this in the US.    Gore with a home that uses more power than small towns, Leo DiCaprio with his private jets, Obama and Biden acquiring significant ocean-front property (and jetting everywhere).    Huge transfer of wealth from us to them.

The facts are there.

 

They are real.

 

As is the danger of man made climate change.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, tjintx said:

What the  heck are you on about?   Show that the Australian people specifically picked parties to halt climate change versus a million other reasons.

Look to the new commitments made last week.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Climate change means that climates are changing because of man made actions...there is no incongruity in the changes in Australia.

 

The very fact that the Australians chose parties that are in favour of actions to halt climate change is proof of this. 

Yet we have cold temps and snow records. Power failures.

 

People voting is proof of nothing really.

 

Chinese co2 33% and going up

Aus 1.15%

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...